|
Post by alittleintrepid on Apr 19, 2015 13:13:54 GMT
Can we talk about the line between what is okay to copy and what is not? I'm just interested in perspectives since I've seen this issue crop up a few times lately but don't seem to see consistency. For example, there is the Misti thread (over on the stamping board) with differing opinions about whether or not it is okay to copy the tool. (My opinion is that it's fine to DIY for your own use)
Meanwhile, Jennifer McGuire has very publicly posted info on how to use a laminator to foil....although says she is excited to get a Minc. I haven't seen any controversy about this (have I missed it?). Somehow, this seems worse to me since she is such a leader in the industry instead of Joe Blow scrapper. What do people think? Is it all good because it is generating interest and at least getting people to buy foil if not the machine?
|
|
|
Post by impearia on Apr 19, 2015 13:39:52 GMT
Well...in terms of the Jennifer McGuire thing, Heidi Swapp did not invent the MINC or the idea of it at all. I love Heidi, I think she is innovative and everything, but I am sure someone posted that this tool already existed made by another company and Heidi's company did their own version. It is really more of a marketing thing than a true invention. So, since it isn't a new idea, or a new tool at all I feel it is totally fine.
ETA: I found at least one earlier model...the Foil Master...which has been around since at least 2012 if not earlier.
|
|
christinec68
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,437
Location: New York, NY
Jun 26, 2014 18:02:19 GMT
|
Post by christinec68 on Apr 19, 2015 14:11:41 GMT
I feel like Jennifer McGuire did scrapbookers a favor. Heidi Swapp didn't invent laminators nor the foiling technique. She simply took something that existed, marketed it to the scrapbooking community, marked up her machine about 400% and is selling unfinished embellishments at a finished product price. I am sure this will be really successful for HS since the money for this product line will be made with repeat sales of the products. Customers are only going to buy one machine but will likely spend more than that on the dies cuts, tags, papers, foils, etc.
|
|
|
Post by alittleintrepid on Apr 19, 2015 14:56:16 GMT
Thanks for the replies ladies! Is it any different than the Misti thing though? There was the stampamagig and other tools before Misti.... Which I think has also been marked up about 400%.
|
|
|
Post by impearia on Apr 19, 2015 15:05:10 GMT
Here is my opinion overall...if you want to protect an innovative product apply for a patent, otherwise you take your chances. Copying is rife in the SB industry: someone starts a new trend and others bring out their own version. Everyone makes enamel dots now, for just one example. Fashion is the same way...unless it is outright copying (like copying someone's artistic work and calling it your own) it seems everything is fair game.
|
|
JustTricia
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,850
Location: Indianapolis
Jul 2, 2014 17:12:39 GMT
|
Post by JustTricia on Apr 19, 2015 15:14:02 GMT
I think the Misti and Stampamajig are similar concepts but different tools. It's more like comparing the Quikkutz handle to the Big Shot.
My problem with the other thread, and I said it on there, is that I thought the Misti creator asked politely and professionally for the link to be taken down and I don't feel she was treated in kind.
|
|
|
Post by gmcwife1 on Apr 19, 2015 15:46:34 GMT
Copying a tool for your own use does not bother me in the least. I don't do it because it's too much time and work. But I don't begrudge someone else doing it. Showing a picture of said tool also doesn't bother me.
There are many variations on the MISTI tool out there, from modifying a CD case to a French YouTuber that made a wood framed model.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 18:45:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2015 17:45:19 GMT
I think finding DIY ways to make your own tools is brilliant, and that's exactly why I like following innovative and creative people who share information like that on their blog. I think that anyone who is going to buy the tool will buy it, and those that can't/won't spend that money will DIY it instead.
|
|
oaksong
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,167
Location: LA Suburbia
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2014 6:24:29 GMT
|
Post by oaksong on Apr 19, 2015 17:59:59 GMT
The concept of a hinged device for repeated prints is one of the oldest ideas in the graphics industry. The MISTI creator has brought something to a hobby market for those who wouldn't or couldn't make something themselves. It's a nice little product, but it's not like she invented the zipper.
I can understand her frustration with someone showing how they built something similar, but it's not like everyone was going to rush out to Home Depot to get supplies and build it. It sounds like the whole situation took a bad turn, and she's probably wishing she had kept her thoughts to herself.
|
|
|
Post by gmcwife1 on Apr 19, 2015 23:40:37 GMT
The concept of a hinged device for repeated prints is one of the oldest ideas in the graphics industry. The MISTI creator has brought something to a hobby market for those who wouldn't or couldn't make something themselves. It's a nice little product, but it's not like she invented the zipper. I can understand her frustration with someone showing how they built something similar, but it's not like everyone was going to rush out to Home Depot to get supplies and build it. It sounds like the whole situation took a bad turn, and she's probably wishing she had kept her thoughts to herself. She gives the impression that she does think she is the only one to come up with this idea and anything similar. She is becoming her own worst advertising.
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Apr 20, 2015 0:02:24 GMT
isn't JMG's more a technique than a knock off tool. when i think knock off tool, i think the recollections brand punches and tools like that. in that case, nothing compares to the original punches like EK Success, Martha Stewart, and Fiskars that are much better quality. I'm glad JMG came out with her technique because it shows people that there isn't one set way to do things and you can work with what you already have. in that sense, i support thinking outside of the box.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Apr 20, 2015 3:16:30 GMT
The foiling process with toner isn't anything new, it's been around for a long time. By showing you can use the foils with a laminator just saves people who already have one big bulky tool that probably rarely gets used from buying another big bulky tool that will rarely get used.
I think that's different from intentionally buying someone's tool to take it apart to figure it out and running to China to bootleg it and repackage/ resell it for profit (which unfortunately happens all the time in the crafting industry). If a person truly comes up with something new and innovative, it's in their best interests to talk to a patent attorney and jump through the hoops to protect their intellectual property before ever putting it out there in front of the world.
The person rigging up a one-off tool for their own personal use isn't going to financially ruin anyone because they were never going to be a paying customer buying that product anyway. Look at all of the people who check out the unique things on Etsy for inspiration and will never buy because they are creative and can make it themselves. Unless the person is setting up their own shop and directly infringing on someone's work and reselling it or profiting from it in some way, there's not much anyone can do. It's the risk you take by putting your stuff out there.
|
|
|
Post by alittleintrepid on Apr 20, 2015 4:15:45 GMT
I still think JMG was cheeky because of her following in the crafting community. If *i* posted a Youtube video telling everyone how to use a laminator to foil, it wouldn't have the same impact. JMG has potentially messed up tons of sales for HS even if she hasn't violated any copyrights or disclosed any secrets.
|
|
|
Post by impearia on Apr 20, 2015 12:44:55 GMT
I still think JMG was cheeky because of her following in the crafting community. If *i* posted a Youtube video telling everyone how to use a laminator to foil, it wouldn't have the same impact. JMG has potentially messed up tons of sales for HS even if she hasn't violated any copyrights or disclosed any secrets. But again the information was already out there, HS didn't invent or even improve upon anything. All she is doing is marketing something that at least one other company (and probably others) have already done. So if she "looses" sales is that really an issue? Maybe the people at Foil Master are now loosing sales because Heidi Swapp has a better marketing team.
|
|
doglover
Full Member
Posts: 237
Jun 27, 2014 14:50:33 GMT
|
Post by doglover on Apr 20, 2015 13:06:26 GMT
If Heidi Swapp's Minc was priced just slightly above a regular laminator, people wouldn't have been looking for an alternative. It's the differential in price that is making people so excited about Jennifer McGuire's option.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Apr 20, 2015 16:05:38 GMT
Not to mention that if you already OWN a laminator that is taking up space in your life and it will do the job, why spend the money and dedicate more space for a Minc? Just saying. People will still buy the foils to try, and I'd be willing to bet that there is a much better profit margin on the consumables anyway.
I have a heavy duty commercial laminator that I bought years ago when I worked at an office supply place. The thing is big, bulky and was expensive (although I did get a crazy good deal on it back in the day). I've used the heck out of that thing over the years and it owes me nothing. I keep it around because it comes in handy from time to time. If I can also use it for something else too, so much the better. I'm pretty sure if I bought a Minc today I wouldn't be able to say the same about it in another 20 years!
|
|
ashwyness
Full Member
Posts: 186
Jul 22, 2014 17:33:23 GMT
|
Post by ashwyness on Apr 20, 2015 17:15:33 GMT
I think making a knock off is one thing...if it is for your own use. If you are making it and selling it, then that is unethical.
However, look at the fashion industry. You can have virtually the same article of clothing copied, with minor differences, and sell it for far less.
|
|
christinec68
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,437
Location: New York, NY
Jun 26, 2014 18:02:19 GMT
|
Post by christinec68 on Apr 20, 2015 17:34:36 GMT
I still think JMG was cheeky because of her following in the crafting community. If *i* posted a Youtube video telling everyone how to use a laminator to foil, it wouldn't have the same impact. JMG has potentially messed up tons of sales for HS even if she hasn't violated any copyrights or disclosed any secrets. I believe the opposite happened. I think, if anything, JMG videos inspired people to want to foil even more. Scrapbookers may or may not buy her machine but I am sure their interest in her embellishments and foils escalated, I know mind did. That's where she'll make the most money since they are consumable, can be personalized based on color and she can roll out new products for as long as the trend lasts. I was one of those people who didn't know much about foiling before the videos. I had zero interest in buying another machine for $120-150. Now that I know a simple $20 laminator from Amazon will do the exact same thing (except 12x12), I am all over it. I bought some of her foil and a pack of die cuts to test it out and LOVE it. I was not even a potential customer before the video and now she has a new one. I am sure I am not the only one.
|
|
NoWomanNoCry
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,856
Jun 25, 2014 21:53:42 GMT
|
Post by NoWomanNoCry on Apr 20, 2015 18:13:54 GMT
Copying a tool for your own use does not bother me in the least. I don't do it because it's too much time and work. But I don't begrudge someone else doing it. Showing a picture of said tool also doesn't bother me. There are many variations on the MISTI tool out there, from modifying a CD case to a French YouTuber that made a wood framed model. This is pretty much how I feel. I feel like that tool is waaaay overpriced but some people don't and can afford the tool and that's great! The ones who can make their own version for their own personal use (NOT to make money off of) I feel there is nothing wrong with that. I'm too lazy to try and recreate something like this anyways plus I'm not a big stamper but I can see why others would want to make their own. I can also see why others who are lazy to make their own would want to just go out and buy this.
|
|
ashwyness
Full Member
Posts: 186
Jul 22, 2014 17:33:23 GMT
|
Post by ashwyness on Apr 20, 2015 18:34:46 GMT
I'm not sure it is overpriced to make one the same quality that she makes. I used to make clear, acrylic albums (back when they were popular) and sold them on ebay. Unless you have the specialty tools needed to finish the edges, and the correct blades, it is a crapshoot. There was a lot of scrap involved in making those. She also put the laser edge/screen printing grid on these. I think more than just a few bucks went in to making them.
|
|
ashwyness
Full Member
Posts: 186
Jul 22, 2014 17:33:23 GMT
|
Post by ashwyness on Apr 20, 2015 18:39:52 GMT
I also wanted to say (but the board locked up on me) that there are now many stamp sets are priced $20-$30. If you are willing to spend that much on one set of stamps, then a MISTI is really not that expensive, especially to get the really nice results you get when using those layered/builder type sets.
|
|
FurryP
Drama Llama
To pea or not to pea...
Posts: 7,290
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2014 19:58:26 GMT
|
Post by FurryP on Apr 20, 2015 23:18:22 GMT
Ok, I have not read all the responses, but I am just throwing in my 2 cents.
From my understanding the person in question did not tell people how to make it, nor was he making anything for his financial benefit. I am sure everyone of us is guilty of DIY'ing something that we wanted, but did not want (or could not) pay full price for. That whole fiasco was handled inappropriately by the inventor.
However, I will add that she is a new overwhelmed business owner, and probably has many mistakes to make before she gets it right.
|
|
|
Post by alittleintrepid on Apr 21, 2015 3:23:36 GMT
I also wanted to say (but the board locked up on me) that there are now many stamp sets are priced $20-$30. If you are willing to spend that much on one set of stamps, then a MISTI is really not that expensive, especially to get the really nice results you get when using those layered/builder type sets. Good point. I don't think I've ever spent more than $15 on a stamp set but maybe f I had a Mistii might get better results and want to buy more expensive stamps. Win, win!
|
|