|
Post by txdancermom on May 14, 2015 23:03:31 GMT
I guess you would say that we are in a starter home - we have been here 28 years, and will be paid off in a few years (refi's lengthened the term), and while we a lot of equity, have no interest in selling, both our kids are out of school, living on their own, and the house is just enough for us. we need to do some work around the house, but I don't see us moving unless DH's job takes us to another location
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:33:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2015 23:06:24 GMT
personally I would stay at this point....college is much more expensive than you might be thinking. I wouldn't want a larger mortgage during those years!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:33:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2015 23:06:26 GMT
I would stay right where I was. Not being strapped for cash when it comes time to pay college tuition times two will be worth it.
|
|
|
Post by lesleyanne on May 14, 2015 23:07:37 GMT
We bought our first home that was just a little bit bigger and better than the neighbourhood "starter" home. Here 14 years too. I often think I'd like a bigger house. It just seems like so much hassle to move and buy up, when we have enough bedrooms and living space. Just more would be nice too.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:33:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2015 23:09:04 GMT
I hope to sell our starter home in a few years and move further south where housing is more expensive. So, we will probably end up with one the same size or smaller.
|
|
psiluvu
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,217
Location: Canada's Capital
Jun 25, 2014 22:52:26 GMT
|
Post by psiluvu on May 14, 2015 23:11:32 GMT
We are in our starter home. It's a 4 bedroom 2700 sq ft so more than enough room. We have been here 16 years and have no plans to move. Our mortgage will be paid off in 15 months, 11 months before DD starts University just like we planned. No way would I take on additional debt at this point in time
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on May 14, 2015 23:12:22 GMT
Me. When we (my ex and I) first got out of college, we decided to buy a house that the mortgage payment was equal to what we were paying in rent. We were told we could borrow more money than we needed for this house, but we wanted to be safe. It took us a while, but we found a small cottage (built in the 20's) in one of the better neighborhoods for this area.
When my ex and I divorced, I stayed in the house. At the time, it was about 800 square feet. I eventually refinanced my ex off the loan and did a small addition. It is still pretty small based on modern home standards, but the layout works really well in that everyone has their own, surprisingly, private space.
I have no desire to move-until I leave this town anyway. It is a great little house, in an amazing neighborhood (the smallest house on the block deal.)
|
|
|
Post by disneypal on May 14, 2015 23:12:48 GMT
When I bought my first house, I bought it with the intention of staying there - it is small 1,500 sq feet or so and I think most people would consider it a starter home but it has 3 bedrooms, was built in 1960 and is charming. So I guess my answer is yes - I have stayed in my "starter home"
To answer your question. Personally, I would remain in your current home so you could have more money in retirement.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:33:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2015 23:18:30 GMT
We thought we'd move by now. Our home is nice, but not fancy. It was a new build when we moved in 6 years ago, but smaller than we thought we'd be happy in long term (1800 sf). We bought well under what we could afford because we weren't sure what could happen with the economy and DH's industry is not particularly stable. We got a screamin' deal on it because we bought in 2009 when the market was tanking and the builder had a lot of completed inventory to unload. And our mortgage rate is lower than we could get now. And we don't *need* more space - we'd just get more stuff to put in it. And we're in a great location. And and and.
So yeah, we're staying for the foreseeable future. Not what we thought would happen, but we are totally at happy with it. Our mortgage is extremely affordable, even if only one of us worked. It gives us plenty of options to save more for retirement, travel, college, etc.. We've thought about keeping this as a rental and moving to a bigger, fancier house, but really, that would not bring us any more happiness in day to day life, so what's the point?
|
|
|
Post by padresfan619 on May 14, 2015 23:22:36 GMT
We bought small with the intention of staying for as long as possible. I'm sure it is considered a starter home by most, but the size is just fine for us. We bought an older home that needed work done, so we have been able to change it to our tastes - for the most part. I also like having less square footage to clean.
I would stay and pad the retirement/college fund.
|
|
suzastampin
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,587
Jun 28, 2014 14:32:59 GMT
|
Post by suzastampin on May 14, 2015 23:24:48 GMT
If size is what determines a "starter" home, I guess we've been living in one for 40 years. LOL. Our house is 1600 sq. ft., and I've never thought of it as small. Two adults and two kids and nobody seemed to be under anybody else's feet.
|
|
|
Post by iteach3rdgrade on May 14, 2015 23:27:14 GMT
We've been in our starter home for 16 years. We bought the lot next to us about 8 years ago and I'm sure we'll be here for a very long time. My plan it to add on one day.
|
|
|
Post by moveablefeast on May 14, 2015 23:32:48 GMT
Yep, we are still in our starter. We had intended to sell in 5 years and buy up, but the market tanked and we lost tons of equity, and now we are back above water and staying put. We are halfway done paying off our loan and I would love to be debt free in ten years, not buying up and starting the clock over again.
Our place is small and doesn't have everything we want. Except being half paid off.
A few of my friends who are nearing retirement age have stayed in their starter homes their whole working lives. The wealth they've been able to amass by paying off and staying put, even on incomes below the area average, is remarkable. We are in a very pricey housing market and are of moderate income, so that influences our financial decisions as well.
|
|
|
Post by eebud on May 14, 2015 23:34:57 GMT
With kids about to start college in a few years, I would definitely stay put. With college expenses and saving for retirement, I would not want to add extra house payment when your kids will be away at college so not even using the extra space the majority of the year. After the kids are finished with school, then you can decide if you want to sell and move. You will have a better idea of where you are financially towards retirement. Maybe the right thing to do will be to continue to stay where you are. Just because you can afford a larger house doesn't necessarily mean you should spend your money on a larger house. Obviously, it is your money and you can decide what you want to do with it but I would take a hard look at all of my savings and if it wasn't significant, all of the extra money that could go towards a larger house payment would be going into one kind of savings or another. However, I am very focused on retirement and wanting to retire as soon as I can. Also, there are still constantly layoffs in my field/company. Story of my life for over 10 years. I am always wondering when my number will come up. So, for me, it is very important to be prepared to lose my job.
|
|
|
Post by kandie on May 14, 2015 23:42:52 GMT
We are still in our first house. 16 yrs, i dont forsee us moving. Only 1800 sq feet, but a lovely 5.2 acres:)
|
|
|
Post by Karene on May 14, 2015 23:51:13 GMT
Yup, still in our first home. It has been paid off for 12 years. We planned to only be here around 5 years, but it has been 26 years and we will probably stay put until my husband retires. We do eventually want to move because we are on a busy street; the main street out of town and sometimes we have trouble getting out of our driveway to go to work in the morning. We'd like to be on a quieter street.
It is a semi, built in 1860s, only 1100 sq ft. It has 3 bedrooms and one small bathroom. The other semi has only 2 bedrooms and a large bathroom so I like ours better. We also have an unfinished basement and they don't have any basement.
We had 2 sons and they each were able to have their own bedrooms. One is leaving away so the other one uses his brother's room as a den and that works well. Gives him some extra space since he ended up with the smallest bedroom.
|
|
akathy
What's For Dinner?
Still peaing from Podunk!
Posts: 4,546
Location: North Dakota
Jun 25, 2014 22:56:55 GMT
|
Post by akathy on May 14, 2015 23:51:23 GMT
I would stay right where I was. Not being strapped for cash when it comes time to pay college tuition times two will be worth it. I agree and that's exactly what we did.
|
|
|
Post by gmcwife1 on May 15, 2015 0:06:01 GMT
When I bought my first house, I bought it with the intention of staying there - it is small 1,500 sq feet or so and I think most people would consider it a starter home but it has 3 bedrooms, was built in 1960 and is charming. So I guess my answer is yes - I have stayed in my "starter home" To answer your question. Personally, I would remain in your current home so you could have more money in retirement. Same for us. We bought our first and last house 8 yrs ago intending on keeping it for retirement. It's 1400 sq feet, single level and perfect for dh and I. It's fine for the three of us now, but of course dd would love a larger bedroom and we would all like a second bathroom with a teen. But we don't need either so we are good with what we have. And we can afford to send our dd to college and have an RV because we bought under budget.
|
|
queenofkings
Full Member
 
Posts: 283
Jun 26, 2014 15:26:41 GMT
|
Post by queenofkings on May 15, 2015 0:06:30 GMT
We have lived in our starter home for 11 years. I don't see the point in moving "up", so to speak. I've got one kid that's already graduated from high school and may be moving out soon, and one kid half grown. Once they are grown and gone, this house will be plenty big for my dh and I (and dh isn't here most of the week.) We would just full a bigger house with more stuff and I'd have more to clean. So unless our neighborhood just goes south, I see us staying put.
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on May 15, 2015 0:15:44 GMT
Having moved states & countries, we have had multiple homes, but none have been bigger than 2400 sq ft. Given your situation, I wouldn't move this close to the kids leaving home unless you felt really squeezed for space. There is a big cost everytime you buy & sell a house (realtor commission, moving utilities, buying new window treatments, furniture to fit the new home, etc.) that also need to be added onto the additional mortgage and also the increased costs of running a bigger house (heating & cooling a bigger space).
With our kids probably both out in 3 years we are already thinking about a smaller, one level house or condo for down the road.
|
|
|
Post by scrappyoutlaw on May 15, 2015 0:21:20 GMT
We bought our first home that was just a little bit bigger and better than the neighbourhood "starter" home. DH and I did this a year and a half ago, do you have any regrets? DH and I stretched ourselves just a tad to make it work, but we got into a house I love, it's a GREAT town with top notch schools and services that we wouldn't be able to afford even today. Sometimes I wish I would have bought a cute little starter house so I had some vacation money! I'm hoping to have a job by this time next year, so once that happens it will be smooth sailing!
|
|
|
Post by brina on May 15, 2015 0:31:25 GMT
We are in the 'intermediate' home. Our first house was a 3-flat. We lived in one apartment and rented the other two and the two rents covered our mortgage. We moved in here when my boys were 2 and later adopted my daughter. The house has three bedrooms and is about 2000 square feet. Our plan was to stay here until the boys were about 10 or 12 and move to a house with 4 bedrooms. In this town that kind of move up would mean 50-100% more than the value of our current house. We looked. We saw a few things that we liked, but never pulled the trigger. The boys are now 15 and we just renovated our kitchen and dining room. One of my sons has moved into the basement. We are happy here. It is a great house (better now with the new kitchen  ) on a great block, in a great neighborhood. We aren't going anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on May 15, 2015 0:38:10 GMT
FWIW, I think part of the point of calling a segment of the market "starter homes" is to entice people to buy homes when otherwise they might not think they are ready (it's a starter home, so obviously you are ready to buy a house) and then to persuade them once they are stable and a little older that obviously this home can't be enough for them (it's just a starter home).
I didn't buy a house until I was 30, and it was actually bigger than the second house we bought (we moved from a moderate-COL area to a high-COL area). That second house is a pretty modest arts and crafts bungalow, and had we not gone from two to 5 2/3 kids, we would never have looked for another house.
|
|
scrapaddie
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,090
Jul 8, 2014 20:17:31 GMT
|
Post by scrapaddie on May 15, 2015 0:41:39 GMT
I can only say that is wonderful not having to worry about a house payment in retirement!
|
|
|
Post by jenb72 on May 15, 2015 0:44:40 GMT
I guess I have a vastly different idea of what a starter home is. I guess it depends on where and how you grew up.  I grew up in a 1545 square foot ranch home - there were four people living in that house in three bedrooms. And I never felt like it was too small. I consider that a family-size home rather than a starter home. Our home when I was first married in 1993 was a 900 square foot, two-bedroom home that actually originally belonged to my now ex FIL's family - he and ex-DH renovated it for us. It was us and our toddler daughter living there. We lived there for four years and then sold it and moved for our jobs. My SO and I bought the house we're in now two years ago. It's 1850 square feet, has three bedrooms and has a full, unfinished basement. We got a great price on it and bought it specifically because it's not too big. When my younger two kids have flown the coop in four years to go off to college, it will be the perfect size for just the two of us - large enough to get space when we need it, but easy enough to keep clean and maintain. We have the option of finishing the basement as an additional living space or in-law suite and we have room to put in a workshop if SO decides to tinker with cars in his retirement. As for your situation, unless I was really unhappy living there, I'd stay there and save the money. No point in making yourself house-poor when you really don't need to. Jen
|
|
|
Post by ~Sherri~ on May 15, 2015 1:03:22 GMT
We bought our home almost 28 years ago. It is small by today's standard, 1600 sq. ft. but it is just DH and me now. A bigger home would mean more to clean and that is not what I want. I always wanted a two story home but not anymore. Aging joints make stairs difficult to go up and down, making me grateful for my one story, small but happy home.
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on May 15, 2015 1:07:43 GMT
we have been in the first and only home for 30 yrs. it was as much as we could afford at the time...1600 square feet. we have invested more than the purchase price in repairs/remodeled. our three kids grew up and 2 are gone. it is fine..except for the 34 stairs up to bedrooms. but we can't afford to move ..property tax based on what we bought the home for...and it is worth about 10 times as much these days.
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on May 15, 2015 1:30:29 GMT
It's interesting seeing what everyone considers a "starter home". To me, a starter home is not just a first home, it is a very small first home purchased with the intention of moving within a few years- maybe 1000-1100 sq feet or less. 1500, 1800, & 2700 sq feet are not starter homes to me.
|
|
QueenoftheSloths
Drama Llama

Member Since January 2004, 2,698 forum posts PeaNut Number: 122614 PeaBoard Title: StuckOnPeas
Posts: 5,955
Jun 26, 2014 0:29:24 GMT
|
Post by QueenoftheSloths on May 15, 2015 1:38:40 GMT
We are currently living in the home I bought when I was single and 23. The location no longer suits us, and various other factors have led to the "five year plan", in five years we want to buy a new house an move. We haven't had a mortgage in years, so it will be tough to give that up, but it's pay or stay, and we know we aren't happy staying.
|
|
|
Post by salem on May 15, 2015 1:45:32 GMT
We are 15 years and 2 kids into our "starter" home. It's small. Only 2 bedrooms. We do have half of the basement finished and we are planning on adding a second bath down there. My older DD has her room downstairs. We make it work. There's room for all. We did have thoughts of moving to something bigger and them we hit were hit with multiple layoffs between us for several years. We decided a bigger mortgage and utility bills were not something we want to deal with. We are planning on staying put. The kids don't seem to mind that our house is smaller than most of their friends. We're the ones with the pool. It all evens out. Lol
|
|