|
|
Post by ahiller on Jul 14, 2014 17:01:41 GMT
I would like to get a new lens for my birthday. I have the 7d, the 50mm 1.4 and the 28-200.
I'd like to get rid of the 28-200 and upgrade to something better. As much as I love the Canon 24-70 L (I've rented it twice), it's just not in my budget to buy.
I'd like a good everyday "walking around" lens. I've read positive reviews about this lens from Tamron but am wondering if anyone has it and what they think?
Or any other suggestions for what I am looking for?
|
|
|
|
Post by Basket1lady on Jul 15, 2014 2:59:57 GMT
I forgot to look today. I have two Tamron lenses and love them both, but I use them for very different reasons.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 22, 2024 0:22:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2014 3:11:39 GMT
I would have thought your 28-200 would be a better walking around lens than a 28-75 simply due to the greater range of focal lengths. What shots are you currently not able to get that you feel like you are missing?
I don't have any experience with that particular lens. But when I know what you aren't able to shoot I might can help you find the lens that gets what you want.
|
|
|
|
Post by ahiller on Jul 15, 2014 4:34:24 GMT
I was hoping you would pop in here, Volt! My 28-200 is a f/3.5-5.6. I like that the Tamron is a 2.8. I do use my 50mm primarily now, mostly because of the f/1.4. I find in my house (read: grey, overcast Michigan winters that stretch forever) that I really end up having to crank up the ISO with the 28-200 and I tend to not care for those pictures as much. But I like having something that goes beyond just 50mm for those times that it's not possible to use it. I also read that the Tamron lens is a nice macro lens as well, which is something I don't have. I don't use the 200 end of my zoom a ton now. When I do need a zoom lens for kid's sports, etc., I will likely invest in the 70-200 f/2.8 - it's just not in the birthday budget right now.  I don't know - I rented the Canon 24-70 and LOVED it - it's just not going to happen. I don't necessarily *have* to replace my 28-200 - I'm just not certain that I would get use out of 2 zooms. I'm open to other suggestions as well (macro, wide angle, etc.). |
|
|
|
Post by ahiller on Jul 15, 2014 5:27:01 GMT
And thank you for challenging me with that question because I really made me stop and think about how I use my lenses and what's important to me. It got me to think beyond the "I-just-really-want-a-new-lens-for-the-hell-of-it" syndrome.  |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 22, 2024 0:22:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2014 5:31:35 GMT
I don't like a lot of overlap in my lens focal lengths. You have a 28-200 which the 24-70 is pretty much an overlap. Since you are wanting something mainly for indoor use have you looked at Tamron's 17-55 2.8? It gives you a considerably wider angle for indoor shots or outdoor landscapes. Less overlap with your 28-200. You can read a review here www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-Lens-Review.aspx It runs right around $500. I have the tamron 90mm macro. It is a very sharp lens. Love it but there is one big "con" to it. The lens movement is external so the barrel extends/contracts. It nearly doubles in length which makes it difficult to get as close as possible (I sometimes bump my object while trying to get focused) and the movement can scare off small critters while trying to get focused. It is also not a good choice for portraits. Macro lenses flatten images (otherwise they'd get a bubble look when shooting close up) You know how you get a bobble head look if you use a wide angle up close? The macro is engineered to flatten out the bobblehead but it can easily go way to flat when doing portrait work. When people say "walk around" I assume more of a vacation type walking around, mainly outdoors, as a tour group. Your 28-200 is about perfect for a walk around lens. Have you considered a flash unit and to learn some flash skills (not the pop up flash) instead of a new lens? |
|
|
|
Post by ahiller on Jul 15, 2014 12:42:06 GMT
Thanks for the recommendations! I do have a an external flash and that funny looking Tupperware-bowl looking diffuser (the brand is escaping me right now). I am off to check out the Tamron you recommend. |
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on Jul 15, 2014 12:49:45 GMT
I have a 28-75 and love it for my walking around lens. I like that it is 2.8 and has a bit of reach, but isn't too big. I don't have the 200 you have, but my 200 is big and heavy and used for completely different purposes. How big is you 28-200? I get not wanting a lot of overlap, but if the 28-75 is smaller and more convenient and has a lower aperture I would think it is different enough to justify it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ahiller on Jul 15, 2014 14:21:17 GMT
I have a 28-75 and love it for my walking around lens. I like that it is 2.8 and has a bit of reach, but isn't too big. I don't have the 200 you have, but my 200 is big and heavy and used for completely different purposes. How big is you 28-200? I get not wanting a lot of overlap, but if the 28-75 is smaller and more convenient and has a lower aperture I would think it is different enough to justify it. It's pretty small. Nothing like the big L-series type. It was a $350-ish lens so nothing fancy. I think I will head to my local camera shop to see what they have and what might make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Basket1lady on Jul 15, 2014 19:47:03 GMT
I have the Tamron 18-270 mm F/3.5-? I love it and use it most of the time. I'm on vacation right now and it's the only lens I brought. I took pics at a family wedding (not the official ones!), pics of the dog and kids in the water, pics of a hummingbird feeding, iron ore boats off shore in Lake Superior... It's a workhorse!
|
|
|
|
Post by scrapcat on Jul 16, 2014 15:24:15 GMT
I would def recommend renting a lens before purchase. I use borrowlenses.com which I like, but there are other rental companies as well. I don't know how many times I thought I wanted to buy a specific lens, but then rented it for a few weeks and found I either didn't like it or just didn't use it enough. I also thought I wanted a macro lens, played with that a bit and found its not my cup of tea.
You can rent Tamron (and other off brand) lenses through them as well. You should try it before you buy it!
Out of all lenses I rent, I tend to like the wider angle's best bcz I have a crop sensor so I'm always looking for more coverage. The zooms are great for specific events, like sports, but I agree, a little too heavy, too much for a walkaround.
|
|
|
|
Post by ahiller on Jul 16, 2014 18:37:27 GMT
I've rented from Borrow Lenses in the past and liked them a lot - I just hate the cost of shipping. At the bare minimum, I will head to a local camera shop and play around with some before I buy.
|
|
|
|
Post by ametallichick on Jul 21, 2014 5:19:42 GMT
I have the Tamron AF 17-50mm f2.8. The only complaint I have is that the gears are somewhat loud if I am using it on Af and that the lens rotates the opposite direction that I am used to with my Canon lenses.
|
|
stampstace
Junior Member
Posts: 74 
|
Post by stampstace on Jul 23, 2014 3:49:24 GMT
I had the 28-75 and loved it. I gave it to my sister when I bought my canon 24-70 2.8 L I still me it sometimes but she loves it now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flibbertigibbet on Jul 23, 2014 23:51:43 GMT
I had it for about a month and sold it on Craig's list. It's a decent lens. It's only 2.8 wide open. It was not nearly as sharp as my nifty 50. I also have a canon 18-135 IS. I was hoping the Tamron would be sharper but it wasn't. At all.
|
|
luvscrappin
Shy Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by luvscrappin on Jul 27, 2014 16:39:16 GMT
Have you considered the canon 17-55 2.8? I know its a little more than the tamron but the price has dropped a little and it is a great lens. It isn't a "red ring glass" lens but its pretty darn close to one. It's my walk around lens on my t4i and I love it. Just something else to consider.
|
|
|
|
Post by karenl on Jul 28, 2014 3:00:31 GMT
I have the Tamron 28-75 and haven't had any problems with it. The 2.8 you will like, not as much as you 1.4 but you will have zoom/reach. For the $$ it's a very good lens. It's not nearly as big or heavy as 70-200mm 2.8 either. I use them for different reasons but the 2.8 on both Tamrons I have are good. Now if I can just get that new 150-600mm I'll be happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by karenl on Jul 28, 2014 3:03:00 GMT
Forgot to add that I also have the 7D & 5D, if that helps you. You can always sell it later if you find you don't like it as much. Lenses don't lose their value like cameras do.
|
|
|
|
Post by delilahtwo on Jul 28, 2014 4:15:20 GMT
I have it and don't like it. For everyday shooting it's fine...but I don't trust it. It doesn't focus as fast as I need it to for sports photography. I had hoped to be able to take hockey pics close to the boards thru the glass....my 70-200 2.8 won't focus that close. Well, it focuses close but not fast enough or sharp enough so all the pics are blurry. For around the house, fine. It won't do the challenging stuff. I'm glad it wasn't very expensive because I'm quite disappointed in it.
I'd like to get an 11-80 ish 2.8 lens if possible, get the real close up. I know that one's not available, I just want something that goes quite close to about 80ish. Need to save my pennies. Which may be tough here in Canada as they quit making them! LOL
|
|
