|
Post by **Angie** on Oct 8, 2015 19:38:03 GMT
What if it is a commercial property?
I mean, if Trump were elected, how would that work? He, personally, would be making money off of, say, Azerbaijan. What if he owns property in a non-ally country?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 2:32:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2015 19:48:31 GMT
He could not have any kind of voting/controlling role in a company while president (god forbid). His holdings would to go into a trust to be administered by someone else. He cannot make decisions - personally or governmentally - that would affect his personal financial situation. Presidents are required to submit extensive financial disclosures that are reviewed by for any potential conflicts of interest.
|
|
|
Post by LavenderLayoutLady on Oct 8, 2015 20:06:05 GMT
I never even thought of that.
Thanks for giving me something to think about.
|
|
|
Post by **Angie** on Oct 8, 2015 20:26:17 GMT
I never even thought of that. Thanks for giving me something to think about. Sorry, I had to ask because, well, Trump.....
|
|
|
Post by rainangel on Oct 8, 2015 20:51:08 GMT
I seriously doubt this even crossed his mind when he decided to run for president. I can't take his campaign as anything else than attention seeking behaviour. He is getting the BEST publicity virtually for free.
I am sure there are a TON of things that he hasn't considered will be part of being president. Would he even move to the White House? Or just rename his tower to the White Tower? I would not be the least bit surprised if that is his gameplan....
|
|
|
Post by **Angie** on Oct 8, 2015 20:58:01 GMT
See, I think the guy is always thinking of what puts money in his pocket. I don't think he is above using presidential influence to make more money for himself. And if the past recent presidents have shown, they can get away with almost everything
|
|
Kerri W
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,768
Location: Kentucky
Jun 25, 2014 20:31:44 GMT
|
Post by Kerri W on Oct 8, 2015 21:35:38 GMT
I seriously doubt this even crossed his mind when he decided to run for president. I can't take his campaign as anything else than attention seeking behaviour. He is getting the BEST publicity virtually for free. I am sure there are a TON of things that he hasn't considered will be part of being president. Would he even move to the White House? Or just rename his tower to the White Tower? I would not be the least bit surprised if that is his gameplan.... I disagree. I don't care for him and wouldn't vote for him, but the man is FAR from stupid. I think it's absurd to think he (or his handlers) aren't aware of what would be required of him.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 2:32:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2015 21:40:30 GMT
I seriously doubt this even crossed his mind when he decided to run for president. I can't take his campaign as anything else than attention seeking behaviour. He is getting the BEST publicity virtually for free. I am sure there are a TON of things that he hasn't considered will be part of being president. Would he even move to the White House? Or just rename his tower to the White Tower? I would not be the least bit surprised if that is his gameplan.... I disagree. I don't care for him and wouldn't vote for him, but the man is FAR from stupid. i think it's absurd to think he (or his handlers) are aware of what would be required of him. But would living in the White House be required? I only ask because when I lived in Illinois, we had a Governor who refused to live in the Governor's residence in Springfield and lived in Chicago instead. Of course, he's in jail now . . . but they pretty much all are (would have served that little asshole right if the jail was located in Springfield)
|
|
|
Post by **Angie** on Oct 8, 2015 22:27:29 GMT
By law it isn't required, I think Truman didn't.
|
|
valleyview
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,816
Jun 27, 2014 18:41:26 GMT
|
Post by valleyview on Oct 8, 2015 22:44:02 GMT
It's pretty unlikely that the Secret Service would be able to best do their job if a president did not choose to live in the White House. Plus, a Republican who supposedly does not believe in excessive spending, would be costing the taxpayers a boatload of money to secure all of his residences.
Maybe that's a good question for the next debate?
|
|
|
Post by oliquig on Oct 8, 2015 23:07:56 GMT
Maybe that's a good question for the next debate? Another thing he would claim to be persecuted about.
|
|
|
Post by RiverIsis on Oct 8, 2015 23:13:25 GMT
Probably let Ivanka run the trust and give him the nod when something is going to negatively affect the empire that he inherited. Apparently his wealth isn't any better than if he had just done the normal investments, so his business acumen is questionable at best.
|
|
BarbaraUK
Drama Llama
Surrounded by my yarn stash on the NE coast of England...............!! Refupea 1702
Posts: 5,961
Location: England UK
Jun 27, 2014 12:47:11 GMT
|
Post by BarbaraUK on Oct 8, 2015 23:13:41 GMT
He could not have any kind of voting/controlling role in a company while president (god forbid). His holdings would to go into a trust to be administered by someone else. He cannot make decisions - personally or governmentally - that would affect his personal financial situation. Presidents are required to submit extensive financial disclosures that are reviewed by for any potential conflicts of interest. Thank you, that answers a thought I had earlier today regarding what would happen if he became President, when I was reading about Trump and his golf course in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, and his additional resort development plans in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. It's in the news at the moment here as he is now taking a legal challenge to the UK Supreme Court about a decision concerning the area in Scotland his resort is in, after being unsuccessful in the Scottish courts. He has been so personally involved and identified with this for some years now that I just wondered if he would be able to continue like that if he was successful in the Presidential election.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 2:32:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2015 0:03:02 GMT
Probably let Ivanka run the trust and give him the nod when something is going to negatively affect the empire that he inherited. Apparently his wealth isn't any better than if he had just done the normal investments, so his business acumen is questionable at best. I'm not 100% sure, but I think it has to be a professional, third party trustee. I really really doubt having his daughter be the trustee would pass muster with ethics review.
|
|
tincin
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,368
Jul 25, 2014 4:55:32 GMT
|
Post by tincin on Oct 9, 2015 0:09:22 GMT
Well one thing's for certain if he wins, it will no longer be called the White House, he will replace that with the TRUMP HOUSE in big gold tacky lettering.
|
|
|
Post by RiverIsis on Oct 9, 2015 1:57:10 GMT
Probably let Ivanka run the trust and give him the nod when something is going to negatively affect the empire that he inherited. Apparently his wealth isn't any better than if he had just done the normal investments, so his business acumen is questionable at best. I'm not 100% sure, but I think it has to be a professional, third party trustee. I really really doubt having his daughter be the trustee would pass muster with ethics review. It might not, but when has that stopped Trump?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 2:32:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2015 2:30:02 GMT
I'm not 100% sure, but I think it has to be a professional, third party trustee. I really really doubt having his daughter be the trustee would pass muster with ethics review. It might not, but when has that stopped Trump? Here is some info about blind trusts.
|
|
|
Post by RiverIsis on Oct 9, 2015 2:33:37 GMT
Thank you. I am quite aware how a blind trust operates. I am also aware that many past presidents from political and wealthy families still ended up making very advantageous decisions with regard to their blind trusts. Maybe a new thread but I think Congress should be on blind trusts as well. They really are the ones laughing all the way to the bank.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 9, 2015 3:34:54 GMT
Thank you. I am quite aware how a blind trust operates. I am also aware that many past presidents from political and wealthy families still ended up making very advantageous decisions with regard to their blind trusts. Maybe a new thread but I think Congress should be on blind trusts as well. They really are the ones laughing all the way to the bank. Thanks busy pea for the blind trust info--despite the somewhat bitchy response you got for doing so! I have heard of blind trusts but did not know all what it entailed--thanks again for posting--not all of us are superior know-it-alls!!! Lol
|
|
|
Post by RiverIsis on Oct 9, 2015 3:40:36 GMT
Thank you. I am quite aware how a blind trust operates. I am also aware that many past presidents from political and wealthy families still ended up making very advantageous decisions with regard to their blind trusts. Maybe a new thread but I think Congress should be on blind trusts as well. They really are the ones laughing all the way to the bank. Thanks busy pea for the blind trust info--despite the somewhat bitchy response you got for doing so! I have heard of blind trusts but did not know all what it entailed--thanks again for posting--not all of us are superior know-it-alls!!! Lol I wasn't being bitchy. I do know. Maybe it was bitchy to imply I didn't, so I was just clarifying I did as I didn't take it that way. Don't you think part of the problem is Congress is worried about lining their pockets. And don't you think it is naive to think that there aren't people that work around things like blind trusts. For example,Dick Cheney knew exactly what he was negotiating. Presidents and VP's may not have access, but they are well informed as to their personal economic interests.
|
|
|
Post by AussieMeg on Oct 9, 2015 3:53:55 GMT
Interesting thread, I hadn't thought about any of these points. I guess because I refuse to believe that there is any real chance of him becoming President. It's pretty unlikely that the Secret Service would be able to best do their job if a president did not choose to live in the White House. Plus, a Republican who supposedly does not believe in excessive spending, would be costing the taxpayers a boatload of money to secure all of his residences. Our current Prime Minister had decided that he will continue to live in his $60 million waterfront mansion in Sydney rather than "The Lodge" or Kirribilli House where our Prime Ministers usually reside. I hadn't thought about how much extra it might cost (although our PM doesn't need the same level of protection as POTUS of course).
|
|
|
Post by Kelpea on Oct 9, 2015 13:13:02 GMT
Sorry but that made me laugh out loud.
|
|
|
Post by rainangel on Oct 9, 2015 20:04:47 GMT
I seriously doubt this even crossed his mind when he decided to run for president. I can't take his campaign as anything else than attention seeking behaviour. He is getting the BEST publicity virtually for free. I am sure there are a TON of things that he hasn't considered will be part of being president. Would he even move to the White House? Or just rename his tower to the White Tower? I would not be the least bit surprised if that is his gameplan.... I disagree. I don't care for him and wouldn't vote for him, but the man is FAR from stupid. I think it's absurd to think he (or his handlers) aren't aware of what would be required of him. Oh, you don't get to be the Trump by being stupid! I just think he really has no intention of actually serving as president, and therefore doesn't really care what would happen if he (God forbid) wins. Now that a few people actually seem to back him up, he needs to figure out all of the things a president is required to do. I truly believe he is running for president PURELY to gain attention around himself and his brand. You just can't buy that kind of publicity.
|
|