MizIndependent
Drama Llama

Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,927
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Oct 13, 2015 23:40:54 GMT
What kind of a person does this?? Geez. Witch. 
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Oct 13, 2015 23:44:27 GMT
Oh god.
|
|
|
Post by kernriver on Oct 13, 2015 23:44:59 GMT
|
|
perumbula
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,439
Location: Idaho
Jun 26, 2014 18:51:17 GMT
|
Post by perumbula on Oct 13, 2015 23:46:01 GMT
Well, I guess she cured her nephew of being excited to see her.
|
|
back to *pea*ality
Pearl Clutcher
Not my circus, not my monkeys ~refugee pea #59
Posts: 3,149
Jun 25, 2014 19:51:11 GMT
|
Post by back to *pea*ality on Oct 13, 2015 23:46:32 GMT
How sad. I hope that she has no expectations to further disrupt her nephew's life. Poor kid has endured the loss of his mother. What a piece of sh!t Jennifer Connell is.
|
|
Nicole in TX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,951
Jun 26, 2014 2:00:21 GMT
|
Post by Nicole in TX on Oct 13, 2015 23:49:28 GMT
I missed the part that his mother had died.
What an absolute bitch.
|
|
Anita
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,891
Location: Kansas City -ish
Jun 27, 2014 2:38:58 GMT
|
Post by Anita on Oct 13, 2015 23:49:42 GMT
I know an aunt who won't be invited over for the holidays this year. I suspect she won't need to worry about holding anymore hors d’oeuvres without company to serve them to.
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Oct 13, 2015 23:56:56 GMT
Good. What a bitch.
|
|
azredhead
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,755
Jun 25, 2014 22:49:18 GMT
|
Post by azredhead on Oct 13, 2015 23:58:34 GMT
I saw this on the news today and wasn't sure I heard it right. Or it was something else... what kind of person does that.She must have wanted something. The poor kid. The story I heard was that it ruined her social life .. really!! I wonder what the father thinks of all this.
|
|
LeaP
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,939
Location: Los Angeles, CA where 405 meets 101
Jun 26, 2014 23:17:22 GMT
|
Post by LeaP on Oct 14, 2015 0:06:54 GMT
One of the comments on Salon suggested that it might have been done to get the home owner policy to pay out or to transfer assets to the sister. If these scenarios are not the case, it is very sad.
|
|
|
Post by gale w on Oct 14, 2015 0:08:23 GMT
The first thing I noticed was "clammered". SMH at that and the whole story.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:03:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2015 0:17:05 GMT
There's a possibility that this is a result of her insurance policy requiring a recovery from a third party.
My in laws damaged their van pretty significantly when a dog ran out in front of them and they hit it. The problem is, it was their adult daughter's dog and in the road in front of her house. Their insurance company wouldn't pay for the repairs unless there was a 3rd party claim against their daughter and her husband so that they could recover their costs. In the end, my in laws refused and had to pay out of pocket.
Or maybe not but it does happen when medical and insurance companies are involved.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Oct 14, 2015 0:19:35 GMT
Holy hell. What kind of a lowlife attorney would even take the case?
And I'm annoyed by 'clammered," too. hmmph, even auto correct caught it just now and I had to fix it.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:03:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2015 0:19:35 GMT
I guess she's no longer invited to family birthday parties? Who would want to risk being sued?
|
|
peabay
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 9,975
Jun 25, 2014 19:50:41 GMT
|
Post by peabay on Oct 14, 2015 0:20:43 GMT
There's a possibility that this is a result of her insurance policy requiring a recovery from a third party. My in laws damaged their van pretty significantly when a dog ran out in front of them and they hit it. The problem is, it was their adult daughter's dog and in the road in front of her house. Their insurance company wouldn't pay for the repairs unless there was a 3rd party claim against their daughter and her husband so that they could recover their costs. In the end, my in laws refused and had to pay out of pocket. Or maybe not but it does happen when medical and insurance companies are involved. I thought the same - I know that has happened many times. But upon reading it - I don't see that claim anywhere. You'd think she (or her lawyers) would've tried to get ahead of the news cycle with that, but they haven't.
|
|
|
Post by padresfan619 on Oct 14, 2015 0:21:22 GMT
I have a bitchy relative who I would expect this kind of behavior from. We don't get together often.
|
|
eastcoastpea
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 9,252
Jun 27, 2014 13:05:28 GMT
|
Post by eastcoastpea on Oct 14, 2015 0:26:46 GMT
ugh
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 14, 2015 0:31:49 GMT
Here's my take on it. Sister dies and has substantial life insurance policy. Aunt is pissed, wants part of it and thinks back to the wrist incident and decides to go for it. or, she is vying for America's Most Hated Miserable Bitch. I thought that it likely hinged on something regarding the death of the boys mom. I hope she had to pay a bunch of lawyers and court costs! What lawyer would ever take on a case like this? 
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Oct 14, 2015 0:34:55 GMT
DH was reading a few articles, and one said that the case had originally filed 2 years ago, before the boy's mother even died.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Oct 14, 2015 0:38:14 GMT
There's a possibility that this is a result of her insurance policy requiring a recovery from a third party. My in laws damaged their van pretty significantly when a dog ran out in front of them and they hit it. The problem is, it was their adult daughter's dog and in the road in front of her house. Their insurance company wouldn't pay for the repairs unless there was a 3rd party claim against their daughter and her husband so that they could recover their costs. In the end, my in laws refused and had to pay out of pocket. Or maybe not but it does happen when medical and insurance companies are involved. I thought the same - I know that has happened many times. But upon reading it - I don't see that claim anywhere. You'd think she (or her lawyers) would've tried to get ahead of the news cycle with that, but they haven't. I would have thought so, too. In any case, this might be a good reminder for people to see if their insurance company requires this or if they will pay & chase themselves if the situation allows for it. Poor kid. No matter what the reason behind all of this, it must be at least a little confusing/upsetting/disconcerting to him. Especially if it started when he was 10.
|
|
NoWomanNoCry
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,856
Jun 25, 2014 21:53:42 GMT
|
Post by NoWomanNoCry on Oct 14, 2015 1:41:30 GMT
Here's my take on it. Sister dies and has substantial life insurance policy. Aunt is pissed, wants part of it and thinks back to the wrist incident and decides to go for it. or, she is vying for America's Most Hated Miserable Bitch. I thought that it likely hinged on something regarding the death of the boys mom. I hope she had to pay a bunch of lawyers and court costs! What lawyer would ever take on a case like this?  I agree. First thought that came to my mind.
|
|
|
Post by brina on Oct 14, 2015 1:47:52 GMT
she is vying for America's Most Hated Miserable Bitch. whether she threw her hat into the ring intentionally or not, I think the crown is hers. First of all, ignoring the fact that her nephew was 8, I don't care where you live, a broken wrist is not a $127,000 injury. Not sure how living in a third floor walk-up even plays into the question - wrist, not leg or back. Second, she's a cow.
|
|
basketdiva
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,699
Jun 26, 2014 11:45:09 GMT
|
Post by basketdiva on Oct 14, 2015 1:53:45 GMT
I think the 3rd floor walk up plays into it because people hold onto stair railing and it dies put pressure on the wrist. I don't understand how the fact that Manhattan is crowded fits into the story.
|
|
GiantsFan
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 8,704
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2014 14:44:56 GMT
|
Post by GiantsFan on Oct 14, 2015 2:00:16 GMT
Wow!
|
|
|
Post by sues on Oct 14, 2015 2:00:19 GMT
One of the first things they ask you at the hospital, at registration is how and where the accident happened. From there it seems to be a free-for-all, in terms of who is going to pay. The insurance companies will do everything they can to push it off on someone else. I'd be surprised if that wasn't the root of this whole thing. Though- she sure hasn't done anything to change the information out there, demonizing her- so who knows.
When my son was little, he was mauled by a dog at my SIL's house. At the hospital, we were met by police officers who emphatically told us the dog would NOT be put down, no matter what we expected. (We hadn't said anything one way or the other. Our son was bruised and bleeding, and possibly going to lose an eye. We were not thinking about the dog.) SIL's home insurance company wasted no time assigning blame to my toddler and told us they were only willing to pay a small percentage of the bills. They also advised us, if we were looking for a big payout, they wouldn't pay a dime over $15,ooo. This was all in the horrible days following the mauling, when we were running from one specialist to another. Nice going, insurance scum!
In the end, what were our choices? Pay thousands and thousands in medical bills and maybe plastic surgery down the road... or take them to court? We tried very hard to avoid it- we waited almost a year for the insurance company to be reasonable before we had to file suit. In the end, we had no choice. The drama in our family sounded a lot like this story. "OMG- I can't believe you're suing your sister/SIL!!!" Divided the family for many years.
The real story was more like SIL gave us the insurance info and told us 'You have to do what you have to do. We have insurance for a reason. They should pay the bills" We weren't thinking about suing, until the insurance company made it impossible to avoid.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 9,890
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Oct 14, 2015 2:09:21 GMT
I am so happy to see your title and know the aunt lost. Heard preview on the news and missed the verdict after the commercial. I was afraid to look it up because, crazier things have happened and I couldn't stand the thought of her "winning". WTH is wrong with people?
|
|
likescarrots
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,879
Aug 16, 2014 17:52:53 GMT
|
Post by likescarrots on Oct 14, 2015 2:29:28 GMT
First of all, ignoring the fact that her nephew was 8, I don't care where you live, a broken wrist is not a $127,000 injury. Not that I'm trying to defend her and I don't know the situation at all, but if there was surgery involved it could have easily racked up the bills. My husband (when we were dating) broke his finger playing softball and had to have surgery on his finger and then months of physical therapy. He got a good amount of mobility back but it still can't do what it used to do, and it still causes him pain. I'm sure the bill for all of that wasn't cheap, even after insurance. I also wondered if her insurance company required that she sue, but I would think it would have been against the parent and their homeowner's insurance and not the nephew?
|
|
|
Post by scrapsotime on Oct 14, 2015 2:30:30 GMT
If she was going after insurance money why did she just name the boy in the suit? Wouldn't you sue the policy holder?
|
|
SuPeaNatural
Full Member
 
AUSTRALIA
Posts: 424
Jun 27, 2014 8:49:11 GMT
|
Post by SuPeaNatural on Oct 14, 2015 3:16:18 GMT
If it is a case of the insurance company insisting, then Aunty Jen probably had no choice but to sue. But if it was that, surely the jury would take that into account. The fact that it was tossed it out so quickly implies to me that it wasn't the IC that did it. That, and because she didn't mention the IC, and she waited for 4 years - even an insurance company wouldn't drag it out that long would they?
But based on what was reported in the story, it smacks of dear Aunty Jen seeing the chance to make a quick buck. If that's the case, she would never have to worry about my child hurting her in the future - she'd never see any of us again. And it's even more suss is that she didn't say anything at the time it happened. If she still can't walk up the stairs or hold a plate of snacks 4 years later, it must have been a hell of a break - so she just sat through the party and didn't say a word about it - yeah right! She'd have been in agony and would have had to go to the ER or a doctor right then.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Oct 14, 2015 5:01:46 GMT
I agree with everyone who talked about the insurance company forcing the suit ... it does happen sometimes. When I was a teenager, we got into a car accident (my dad was driving) with a car full of kids and my brother's friend had the worst injuries. My dad, who was a lawyer, told his dad absolutely to sue us if our insurance company caused any trouble about paying the bills. I guess it didn't, because they never sued us and the kid got all the medical treatment needed.
But I sure don't see any sign of something similar happening in this case. She sued the child. That right there is bizarre. Not the parents, not the homeowner's insurance. And I don't see any evidence that anyone involved in the case is blaming an insurance company for this fallout. You couldn't keep it quiet.
So yeah, I'd say she is one rat bastard who deserved what she got, which is nothing.
|
|