|
Post by bianca42 on Nov 10, 2015 18:29:23 GMT
I'm not an HR pea, but the last time I looked into it, I was told by the insurance rep at my work that you need to be in a high deductible plan to be eligible to open an HSA. But, that once it's open you can keep it forever even if I change away from the high deductible plan or leave my current employer.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 4:51:43 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2015 18:31:29 GMT
To have an HSA, you must be covered with an qualified high deductible health plan (HDHP). For 2015 and 2016, the deductible has to be at least $1300 for an individual or $2600 for a family.
You can have an HSA that's not through your employer, but you will have to prove you are in a qualified plan.
If the employer is not offering an HSA option with the PPO plan, it is probably not a qualified plan. It may be, but would be unusual for the employer not to offer the HSA with it if it is.
|
|
|
Post by bratkar on Nov 10, 2015 18:41:43 GMT
correct to have the HSA you need to be in a high deductible plan.
Now she can be in a high deductible plan and open her own HSA away from her employer one, but she probably wont receive any employer supplied benefits of it. (Our will put money into ours if its the one that they 'recommend', if I opened one on my own at another place, I don't received the money from my employer.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 4:51:43 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2015 18:41:56 GMT
If she is young and healthy, I would strongly encourage her to reconsider. HSAs are an awesome secondary savings route. We aren't that young (40s), but are healthy. We have had an HSA for (I think) 7 years now. We have maxed out it each year and as a result, we now have a healthy balance that is invested and growing and essentially will be additional retirement assets for us. It is before tax income and grows tax free, and qualified distributions are tax-free. If there is one thing I've learned from my parents' retirement, it's that there are plenty of healthcare expenses in retirement - and our HSA will be there to help fund those.
Starting to build an HSA when young will have the same time-value of money benefits that beginning to save for retirement when young has.
ETA: Make sure she really calculates out how much the low deductible plan actually costs vs the HDHP. It's not at all uncommon for the premiums on low deductible health plans to be so much higher that they make up the difference between the low and high deductibles.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Nov 10, 2015 18:55:34 GMT
I second @busypea advice. We're going to switch to an HSA with a high deductible plan. There was a huge increase in the premiums for the regularly PPO, and his company is offering the option for the first time. Coupled with the fact that we know more changes are in store for the regularly PPO as it's considered a Cadillac plan, we decided to look hard at the HSA option. For us, if you actually price out the difference in premiums, employer contribution to HSA etc - the high deductible plan is much, much less expensive - even under a worse case scenario of maxing out the deductible and out of pocket costs. Now obviously, for a young person, the biggest risk is not having enough cash on hand to pay out the deductible. But if she does have the resources for an unexpected emergency, she could probably just bank the difference in premiums for the year and come out way ahead.
|
|
|
Post by whopea on Nov 10, 2015 18:58:00 GMT
I would urge her to look at the high deductible plan as well. In our case, if you look at total monthly expenses for both plans, the high deductible plan is cheaper by about the same amount the deductible differs, if that makes sense. By going that route, our employer contributes $500 to an HSA. In the years in which we've had high medical expenses, our deductible has been met in the 1st quarter and virtually all medical care was free after that.
|
|
|
Post by utmr on Nov 10, 2015 19:15:21 GMT
Another one saying to check out the HDHP. The difference in price between the two options may be enough to cover the deductible.
If she were to put the difference in cost between the two into her HSA, that amount, plus any company contributions might cover her deductible. If she does not use the entire amount it rolls forward and could build up a nice little nest egg.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 4:51:43 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2015 19:18:32 GMT
She can contribute as long as she stays on the HDHP. And she can use the benefits as long as they are there, even is she switches back to a lower deductible with a different employer or in the next years. We had an HSA from previous employer and went onto a lower deductible PPO and had to stop contributing but could still use the money in the account.
For 2016, we are moving back to a HDHP and HSA contributions. The employer is putting a large amount in and we are funding the difference in premiums. Not the max by any means but enough to cover current and some future medical expenditures.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Nov 10, 2015 19:33:35 GMT
If she is young and healthy, I would strongly encourage her to reconsider. HSAs are an awesome secondary savings route. We aren't that young (40s), but are healthy. We have had an HSA for (I think) 7 years now. We have maxed out it each year and as a result, we now have a healthy balance that is invested and growing and essentially will be additional retirement assets for us. It is before tax income and grows tax free, and qualified distributions are tax-free. If there is one thing I've learned from my parents' retirement, it's that there are plenty of healthcare expenses in retirement - and our HSA will be there to help fund those. Starting to build an HSA when young will have the same time-value of money benefits that beginning to save for retirement when young has. ETA: Make sure she really calculates out how much the low deductible plan actually costs vs the HDHP. It's not at all uncommon for the premiums on low deductible health plans to be so much higher that they make up the difference between the low and high deductibles. Now obviously, for a young person, the biggest risk is not having enough cash on hand to pay out the deductible. But if she does have the resources for an unexpected emergency, she could probably just bank the difference in premiums for the year and come out way ahead. This is the problem she is facing this year. She's only been with this company for 3 months, after spending most of the year unemployed from a layoff. Her savings are pretty well depleted from Cobra and other expenses while unemployed. From the explanation you both provide on the savings vs costs benefits, it does look like something she needs to consider though. Perhaps not this year while she rebuilds her savings, but next year. Before she decides have her double check that the employer doesn't contribute an amount to start the HSA. My husband's company contributes $1,500 in January to start the year. That's a pretty nice cushion for an unexpected expense. The monthly savings on the premium is $300. Only contributing that difference to the HSA in contribution with the employer portion, would mean having the full annual deductible in the HSA in 5 months. Now obviously there is a risk that she could have an accident in month 2 and need to come up with the additional $1,000. These are obviously OUR numbers for OUR plan. Hers could be completely different with a much, less advantageous HSA. Clearly my husband's company is making it very financially advantageous - I'm guessing to help transition people before 2018 when the PPO will be hit with the penalty tax.
|
|
|
Post by SnowWhite on Nov 10, 2015 19:45:53 GMT
Before she decides have her double check that the employer doesn't contribute an amount to start the HSA. My husband's company contributes $1,500 in January to start the year. That's a pretty nice cushion for an unexpected expense. My company did the same thing the first year they offered the high deductible plan, although I think it was $1000. I only stayed on that for one year, but I kept my HSA and used the money for medical expenses for the next year or so. Oddly enough, my company has dropped the high deductible plan this year and now only offers three levels (Basic, Intermediate, Premium) of the PPO. I don't know why they dropped it, I thought that was the way every company was going.
|
|
|
Post by cmpeter on Nov 10, 2015 20:03:49 GMT
My company also contributes a huge chunk to my HSA on Jan 1 to offset the deductible. In addition all preventive visits are covered at 100%, so the deductible only applies to non-preventive. The monthly employee contributions are lower and I have no co-pays.
Like Busypea we have been contributing for about six years now. It's been a good thing for us.
|
|
|
Post by bianca42 on Nov 10, 2015 21:06:59 GMT
We were on a high deductible plan this year, but DH's company isn't offering it next year and is going back to a traditional plan.
|
|
|
Post by Ellie on Nov 10, 2015 21:08:47 GMT
My company also contributes a huge chunk to my HSA on Jan 1 to offset the deductible. In addition all preventive visits are covered at 100%, so the deductible only applies to non-preventive. The monthly employee contributions are lower and I have no co-pays. Like Busypea we have been contributing for about six years now. It's been a good thing for us. Yes, my employer contributes $1,200 for families, preventative care is 100% covered with no co-pay--that includes physicals, immunizations, mammograms, etc. I contribute a lower amount out of each paycheck--I've been pretty happy with the higher-deductible plan for sure!
|
|
|
Post by scrapperal on Nov 10, 2015 21:51:57 GMT
I second, third, at least look more closely at the HSA bandwagon. In the first few years that I had the HSA, I "made" money. That is, HSA plan premiums + what the company contributed - my expenses = less than what the other health plans from my company would have cost. I did max out my HSA contributions so I actually had less take home pay though. But my HSA money earns a small amount of interest and is available to me for the future. When I had an ambulance ride and emergency room visit, it gave me some peace of mind to know that I had that $ in my HSA savings account already.
BUT for my plan choices, if I were to have surgery or a hospital stay, I think it would have been more cost effective to go with the HMO plan, even with the higher premiums. Since I want to have my choice of doctors and don't want to have to get a referral to a specialist, I'm avoiding the HMO plan.
|
|
|
Post by peasapie on Nov 10, 2015 22:28:02 GMT
This is the question we are facing this year as well. My husband's company has offered the same option. We have a choice of 3 plans -- two aren't eligible for HSA and have different deductible amounts (with corresponding cost). The third has a high deductible and an FSA. We are close to retirement and don't need an additional retirement plan, and I wonder then if going with the lowest deductible is the better way for us.
OP glad you brought this up. I forgot we have HR specialists on this board.
|
|
|
Post by kmcginn on Nov 10, 2015 22:54:52 GMT
I'm a little confused - please forgive me and enlighten me.
I contribute to an account (maybe it's an FSA)that I can use to offset medical expenses like co-pays or prescriptions. My employer does not match anything. It's all my contribution. Also, I have to use it by the end of the year or I lose it.
All this talk about people contributing for years has me confused. Is that the difference between an HSA and an FSA?
Thanks for the information.
|
|
|
Post by kimpossible on Nov 10, 2015 23:51:36 GMT
Be mindful of the IRS guidelines with regards of the max you can contribute each year and still have it be pre-tax.
I don't have the exact figures at my fingertip, but if you are participating in more than one HSA = yes, must be a HDHP and must not exceed IRS guidelines.
|
|
|
Post by cmpeter on Nov 11, 2015 0:03:40 GMT
If you have to use it by the end of the year, it's not an HSA. I have never had an FSA, so I can't comment on those.
when I renew the registration page tells me the max I can contribute to my HSA. For me that $6,750 which includes employer contributions.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 4:51:43 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2015 0:08:02 GMT
I'm a little confused - please forgive me and enlighten me. I contribute to an account (maybe it's an FSA)that I can use to offset medical expenses like co-pays or prescriptions. My employer does not match anything. It's all my contribution. Also, I have to use it by the end of the year or I lose it. All this talk about people contributing for years has me confused. Is that the difference between an HSA and an FSA? Thanks for the information. The primary difference between an HSA and an FSA is that the money in an HSA carries over year to year (and in many cases, you can opt to invest a portion of the funds and grow the balance), while an FSA is use it or lose it. There are other differences: HSA allows much higher annual contributions, FSA does not require a high deductible health plan, HSA allows some different things to be paid, FSA is tied to employer - HSA is not.
|
|
|
Post by momofkandn on Nov 11, 2015 0:18:51 GMT
I work in benefits and I always encourage people to seriously consider a high deductible plan with an HSA. Especially if you are a low utilizer of healthcare services. Preventative care is covered 100% even with a high deductible plan. So the only thing she will have to pay out of pocket is if goes to the doctor for other things or prescriptions. She should add up how much in premium she would pay for the PPO. And then think to herself if she would really spend that much if she paid for services out of pocket. In most cases the premium amount is much higher than actual healthcare costs unless you have a chronic disease or really expensive prescriptions.
With the HDHP you only pay for what you actually use. With the standard low deductible plan you are paying high premiums just in case you have high healthcare costs. If she is healthy now, she should save that premium and put it into an HSA instead of giving it to an insurance carrier. It only takes a year to really build up a good amount. The HSA limit for individual is around $3000.
Most people focus only on what the insurance plan covers at time of service while ignoring how much they have to pay in premium to get that discounted price. Most of time you spend less overall with the HDHP. I'm a single mom with three kids and I have an HDHP. I've had one for over 5 years and have a very nice sized HSA built up that more than covers the deductible.
|
|
|
Post by cbet on Nov 11, 2015 0:23:51 GMT
I'm a little confused - please forgive me and enlighten me. I contribute to an account (maybe it's an FSA)that I can use to offset medical expenses like co-pays or prescriptions. My employer does not match anything. It's all my contribution. Also, I have to use it by the end of the year or I lose it. All this talk about people contributing for years has me confused. Is that the difference between an HSA and an FSA? Thanks for the information. FSA - Flexible Spending Account - if you don't use it by the end of the year, you lose it. HSA - Health Spending Account. The employer might or might not contribute to it, but it's kind of like a special IRA. You don't lose it if you don't use it, and once you reach retirement age, it becomes like a regular IRA and doesn't have to be used for health expenses only.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 4:51:43 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2015 0:30:15 GMT
HSA - Health Spending Account. The employer might or might not contribute to it, but it's kind of like a special IRA. You don't lose it if you don't use it, and once you reach retirement age, it becomes like a regular IRA and doesn't have to be used for health expenses only. However, after retirement, while you *can* make withdrawals for purposes other than health expenses, those withdrawals will be regular income and subject to income tax. Withdrawals for qualified healthcare expenses - whether before or after retirement - are never taxable.
|
|
|
Post by scrapperal on Nov 11, 2015 2:12:40 GMT
Another difference between FSA and HSA is that the FSA reimbursement is administered by the company and the HSA is self administered (at least in my experience). By that, I mean for FSA reimbursement, you have to submit a form and the company can deny the reimbursement if that item isn't on their plan (for example, the company might say that certain medical equipment doesn't qualify, even though it is on the IRS list). For HSA reimbursement, you "self regulate" and need to keep receipts in case you are audited.
Another thing regarding the HSA, if your daughter decides to go with that and she can afford it, I suggest putting in at least the deductible and if possible, more. I did not feel secure about my HSA account until I contributed the out-of-pocket maximum for out-of-network services. It took a couple of years to contribute that much. That way, if anything catastrophic happened, I knew I had the $ to cover it.
|
|
|
Post by kmcginn on Nov 11, 2015 15:16:50 GMT
Thanks, busypea and cbet for the explanation. I sort of gathered that from the conversation but your explanation made it very clear!
|
|
basketdiva
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,615
Jun 26, 2014 11:45:09 GMT
|
Post by basketdiva on Nov 12, 2015 16:59:40 GMT
I'm trying to decide between the HSA and FSA but my problem is paying $2500 for a 90 supply of a drug at the beginning of the year. Yes I know I can repay myself at the end of the year, still it's a big chunk to pay. Another drug is $1800 per 90 supply. The 1 st drug will meet my deductible and the other drugs will towards the balance of out of pocket but still it "hurts" to pay that much up front.
I can get a small reimbursement from the 2 drug companies which helps a little.
It's all so confusing and giving me a headache!!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 2, 2024 4:51:43 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2015 17:05:34 GMT
I'm trying to decide between the HSA and FSA but my problem is paying $2500 for a 90 supply of a drug at the beginning of the year. Yes I know I can repay myself at the end of the year, still it's a big chunk to pay. Another drug is $1800 per 90 supply. The 1 st drug will meet my deductible and the other drugs will towards the balance of out of pocket but still it "hurts" to pay that much up front. I can get a small reimbursement from the 2 drug companies which helps a little. It's all so confusing and giving me a headache!! I haven't had an FSA for several years, but when I had one, you could access your full annual contribution on January 1, so if you elected to contribute $2500 to your FSA for the year, you could pay that full bill at the beginning of the year without any extra cash out of your pocket. ETA: I think the FSA max contribution is $2500, so you couldn't cover both prescriptions with an FSA. My HSA does not allow that and I *think* (but am not sure) it is against the rules for HSAs.
|
|
smartypants71
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,701
Location: Houston, TX
Jun 25, 2014 22:47:49 GMT
|
Post by smartypants71 on Nov 12, 2015 17:11:02 GMT
It is not always true that the Use It or Lose It rule applies to FSAs. Many employers (mine included) allow you to carry over $500.
|
|
|
Post by scrapperal on Nov 12, 2015 17:11:52 GMT
basketdiva For my high deductible health plan, if you have an HSA, then the FSA is a limited FSA that can be used only for vision and dental expenses. You might want to confirm what you can use your FSA monies for if you have a HDHP.
|
|
basketdiva
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,615
Jun 26, 2014 11:45:09 GMT
|
Post by basketdiva on Nov 12, 2015 17:20:44 GMT
I'm trying to decide between the HSA and FSA but my problem is paying $2500 for a 90 supply of a drug at the beginning of the year. Yes I know I can repay myself at the end of the year, still it's a big chunk to pay. Another drug is $1800 per 90 supply. The 1 st drug will meet my deductible and the other drugs will towards the balance of out of pocket but still it "hurts" to pay that much up front. I can get a small reimbursement from the 2 drug companies which helps a little. It's all so confusing and giving me a headache!! I haven't had an FSA for several years, but when I had one, you could access your full annual contribution on January 1, so if you elected to contribute $2500 to your FSA for the year, you could pay that full bill at the beginning of the year without any extra cash out of your pocket. ETA: I think the FSA max contribution is $2500, so you couldn't cover both prescriptions with an FSA. My HSA does not allow that and I *think* (but am not sure) it is against the rules for HSAs. If I have an FSA, my cost for the drug is $70 for a 90 day supply. With the HSA, I would have to wait until mid year to recoup the money.
|
|
basketdiva
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,615
Jun 26, 2014 11:45:09 GMT
|
Post by basketdiva on Nov 12, 2015 17:40:57 GMT
basketdiva For my high deductible health plan, if you have an HSA, then the FSA is a limited FSA that can be used only for vision and dental expenses. You might want to confirm what you can use your FSA monies for if you have a HDHP. I have a separate vision and dental policy. I realize I can't have both accounts. Just trying to decide which plan to go with.
|
|