Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 2:02:00 GMT
Fun question. Has the OP ever started a thread that wasn't anti-conservative in nature? I'll go with a big fat NO on this one. I may subscribe. Haven't decided yet. I have been a Glenn beck subscriber for almost a decade. I think what he has done with The Blaze is revolutionary. I'm more than happy to be able to contribute $9.95 a month to a news organization that represents me, that gives me real facts and not liberal talking points disguised as facts. And if Glenn gets filthy rich in the process, I say GOOD. god bless America, that's what it is all about. So the not so subtle digs at him and Sarah for "doing It for the money" are assinine at best, totally ignorant at worst. Why the hell would anyone take such a huge risk, if not to make money as one of the benefits. Seriously, why are you all so mysoginistic anyway?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 2:02:29 GMT
I just read where Meghan McCain won't be tuning into Sarah's TV station. I wonder if John McCain will.
Actually I wonder what he will say when someone from the media asks him about it. And they will.
|
|
julia
Junior Member
Posts: 58
Jun 26, 2014 0:39:50 GMT
|
Post by julia on Jul 30, 2014 2:02:38 GMT
Ummm....nope. I don't think I would pay to watch any politician on TV.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 2:05:22 GMT
lynlam said: It's misogynistic. And not wanting to pay 9.95 a month to watch Sarah Palin is hardly misogynistic.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 2:13:42 GMT
Fun question. Has the OP ever started a thread that wasn't anti-conservative in nature? I'll go with a big fat NO on this one. I may subscribe. Haven't decided yet. I have been a Glenn beck subscriber for almost a decade. I think what he has done with The Blaze is revolutionary. I'm more than happy to be able to contribute $9.95 a month to a news organization that represents me, that gives me real facts and not liberal talking points disguised as facts. And if Glenn gets filthy rich in the process, I say GOOD. god bless America, that's what it is all about. So the not so subtle digs at him and Sarah for "doing It for the money" are assinine at best, totally ignorant at worst. Why the hell would anyone take such a huge risk, if not to make money as one of the benefits. Seriously, why are you all so mysoginistic anyway? Why am I not surprised you are considering subscribing. But I would do it for a full year you get a better deal. Of course you could be the only one or one of few. I wonder how long she'll run this station before she quits On second thought you had better do it month to month.
|
|
|
Post by doxielady on Jul 30, 2014 2:19:29 GMT
I would have to say - No. No. and No.
As others have said, I would not pay to watch ANY politician, whether I agreed with their politics or not. Just not happening.
|
|
Anita
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,703
Location: Kansas City -ish
Jun 27, 2014 2:38:58 GMT
|
Post by Anita on Jul 30, 2014 2:25:37 GMT
I wouldn't watch if it were the only channel left on earth.
|
|
|
Post by 2peafaithful on Jul 30, 2014 2:34:12 GMT
No way!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 2:34:50 GMT
No kidding!
|
|
|
Post by 4evercrafty on Jul 30, 2014 2:37:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by fruitysuet on Jul 30, 2014 7:01:40 GMT
Erm nope, but I'm in the UK so it wouldn't even be on my radar.
And add me to another 'cheapie' we refuse to pay for any extra channels on our normal tv.
|
|
|
Post by jmurray on Jul 30, 2014 11:29:18 GMT
There is no sum high enough that you could pay me to watch that woman, even if it came with 24x7 foot rubs and neverending chocolate bars.
|
|
peppermintpatty
Pearl Clutcher
Refupea #1345
Posts: 3,947
Jun 26, 2014 17:47:08 GMT
|
Post by peppermintpatty on Jul 30, 2014 12:23:24 GMT
AAAHHHH! Just the thought of that makes my eyes and ears bleed!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by zoeybug on Jul 30, 2014 12:27:38 GMT
I wouldn't even watch it if Sarah Palin paid me $9.95 a month to watch it. Oh how I wish I had said this! I wouldn't pay $9.95 to watch anyone in particular. Is sh really doing this? One thing you can say for sure about Sarah Palin, she certainly has no problems woth self-esteem.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 15:28:17 GMT
"A basic lesson for politicos in the digital age: Own your domain.
Sarah Palin, who just launched her own online television channel, has become the latest politician to lose her eponymous website to another bidder -- and in this case the bidder was Stephen Colbert.
Palin got SarahPalinChannel.com, but she failed to get "TheSarahPalinChannel.com." That address is now in the hands of Colbert and his staff, as he announced on his show on Tuesday night. The site currently boasts a photo of Palin with the line "The only Sarah Palin Channel on the internet with a definite article in the address!"
The page then links to a segment from Colbert's show about Palin and Paul Revere. "
Now this is funny!
|
|
|
Post by CarefreeSadie on Jul 30, 2014 15:42:42 GMT
So how is this "show" delivered? Is there one hour a day that you can watch over and over for your $9.99 a month? Or do they strap a GoPro on her head and follow her around for 24/7? I understand paying for HBO online $9.99 a month for streaming of all their past and present shows but a channel with just one person on it I don't understand how they come up with enough content to justify the cost.
And even if they did attach a GoPro to her head and have it activated 24/7 I would not pay that, it would be classified as just another reality show that I am not interested in watching.
|
|
River
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,575
Location: Alabama
Jun 26, 2014 15:26:04 GMT
|
Post by River on Jul 30, 2014 15:51:28 GMT
Nope, and I am a conservative, though more "middle wing" than right wing. I just don't like her. Ditto! I do admire her passion, but that's about it, we part ways quickly after that. LOL
|
|
|
Post by mommaho on Jul 30, 2014 15:54:44 GMT
NOPE!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2014 18:46:16 GMT
I'd watch her show/channel, but I pay enough for TV as it is and really don't want to pay more to add another season pass to my already overstuffed DVR lineup.
|
|
|
Post by mdoc on Jul 30, 2014 23:07:02 GMT
No. I wouldn't even watch her for free. Not that I don't like Sarah Palin - I actually do - I just don't like watching TV and I certainly don't need to see Sarah Palin there.
|
|
|
Post by mzza111 on Jul 30, 2014 23:41:38 GMT
FUCK NO!!!! You couldn't pay me to listen to that complete and utter moron!
|
|
|
Post by kimpossible on Jul 30, 2014 23:43:06 GMT
Nope - not even if she offered to pay me $9.95 a month to watch her!
|
|
|
Post by mzza111 on Jul 30, 2014 23:54:11 GMT
I may subscribe. Haven't decided yet. I have been a Glenn beck subscriber for almost a decade. I think what he has done with The Blaze is revolutionary. I'm more than happy to be able to contribute $9.95 a month to a news organization that represents me, that gives me real facts and not liberal talking points disguised as facts. And if Glenn gets filthy rich in the process, I say GOOD. god bless America, that's what it is all about. So the not so subtle digs at him and Sarah for "doing It for the money" are assinine at best, totally ignorant at worst. Why the hell would anyone take such a huge risk, if not to make money as one of the benefits. Seriously, why are you all so mysoginistic anyway? Oh, please do and pay for the year. Hopefully it will be non-refundable. That way she can give you the finger, just like she did to the people of the great state of Alaska, when she quits half way through her commitment.
|
|
|
Post by smokeynspike on Jul 31, 2014 0:41:01 GMT
No. Not for anyone.
Melissa
|
|
|
Post by mztfied on Jul 31, 2014 1:00:53 GMT
I certainly would not pay that to watch anyone! I have no problem with the lady but for me that would be a big deal. $10 is groceries for a few days or one of my meds for a 3 months prescription.
|
|
|
Post by *KatyCupcake* on Jul 31, 2014 1:30:33 GMT
Fun question. Has the OP ever started a thread that wasn't anti-conservative in nature? I'll go with a big fat NO on this one. Psssssst... I was being tongue in cheek when I posted. Hence the wink. I will admit when I read the thread title I wasn't expecting a politically charged thread.
|
|
scrapaddie
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,090
Jul 8, 2014 20:17:31 GMT
|
Post by scrapaddie on Jul 31, 2014 1:38:18 GMT
No. Just no
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 12:16:24 GMT
I'll go with a big fat NO on this one. Psssssst... I was being tongue in cheek when I posted. Hence the wink. I will admit when I read the thread title I wasn't expecting a politically charged thread. Oh I know you were.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 12:23:04 GMT
I may subscribe. Haven't decided yet. I have been a Glenn beck subscriber for almost a decade. I think what he has done with The Blaze is revolutionary. I'm more than happy to be able to contribute $9.95 a month to a news organization that represents me, that gives me real facts and not liberal talking points disguised as facts. And if Glenn gets filthy rich in the process, I say GOOD. god bless America, that's what it is all about. So the not so subtle digs at him and Sarah for "doing It for the money" are assinine at best, totally ignorant at worst. Why the hell would anyone take such a huge risk, if not to make money as one of the benefits. Seriously, why are you all so mysoginistic anyway? Oh, please do and pay for the year. Hopefully it will be non-refundable. That way she can give you the finger, just like she did to the people of the great state of Alaska, when she quits half way through her commitment. Because I'm sure she could have continued to be an effective governor when a few asshole Alaskans were suing her every single day out of pure hatred and spite, costing the state and her personally millions of dollars in legal fees, and tying up staff who should have been doing the business of the state. Not to mention the female-hating press that was dogging her like they had never dogged a politician before, disrupting the lives of the citizens and her family. You just hate her so much that you can't let yourself see that she made a good choice by resigning. And face it, if she hadnt resigned, you'd be bitching about that too, accusing her of wasting the states precious resources to defend her when she should have just stepped down.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 13:22:51 GMT
Oh, please do and pay for the year. Hopefully it will be non-refundable. That way she can give you the finger, just like she did to the people of the great state of Alaska, when she quits half way through her commitment. Because I'm sure she could have continued to be an effective governor when a few asshole Alaskans were suing her every single day out of pure hatred and spite, costing the state and her personally millions of dollars in legal fees, and tying up staff who should have been doing the business of the state. Not to mention the female-hating press that was dogging her like they had never dogged a politician before, disrupting the lives of the citizens and her family. You just hate her so much that you can't let yourself see that she made a good choice by resigning. And face it, if she hadnt resigned, you'd be bitching about that too, accusing her of wasting the states precious resources to defend her when she should have just stepped down. Suing her out of pure hatred and spite. Hmm isn't that is what John Boehner is doing to the President now. And I guess that is not ok with you.
|
|