|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 31, 2014 13:24:59 GMT
"A basic lesson for politicos in the digital age: Own your domain.
Sarah Palin, who just launched her own online television channel, has become the latest politician to lose her eponymous website to another bidder -- and in this case the bidder was Stephen Colbert.
Palin got SarahPalinChannel.com, but she failed to get "TheSarahPalinChannel.com." That address is now in the hands of Colbert and his staff, as he announced on his show on Tuesday night. The site currently boasts a photo of Palin with the line "The only Sarah Palin Channel on the internet with a definite article in the address!"
The page then links to a segment from Colbert's show about Palin and Paul Revere. "
Now this is funny!
Indeed! :-D
|
|
Sarah*H
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,015
Jun 25, 2014 20:07:06 GMT
|
Post by Sarah*H on Jul 31, 2014 13:33:48 GMT
And we're misogynistic to boot? I find it very, very amusing that you can't think of any other reason people might think she's incompetent - like say maybe because she can't even spew her simplistic soundbites without making word salad out of her native language. She's so rogue!
|
|
back to *pea*ality
Pearl Clutcher
Not my circus, not my monkeys ~refugee pea #59
Posts: 3,149
Jun 25, 2014 19:51:11 GMT
|
Post by back to *pea*ality on Jul 31, 2014 13:41:03 GMT
Fun question. Has the OP ever started a thread that wasn't anti-conservative in nature? It's one thing to argue political ideology in a political thread based on a current event but I have to wonder why it was necessary to call out certain conservative refugeepeas that's where it becomes mean spirited.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 31, 2014 13:55:53 GMT
And we're misogynistic to boot? I find it very, very amusing that you can't think of any other reason people might think she's incompetent - like say maybe because she can't even spew her simplistic soundbites without making word salad out of her native language. She's so rogue! Dagnabbit! I wish that I could "like" this post more than once. :-D
|
|
ChrisinCT
Shy Member
Posts: 30
Jun 26, 2014 0:17:32 GMT
|
Post by ChrisinCT on Jul 31, 2014 13:57:38 GMT
No
|
|
|
Post by mzza111 on Jul 31, 2014 14:28:57 GMT
Oh, please do and pay for the year. Hopefully it will be non-refundable. That way she can give you the finger, just like she did to the people of the great state of Alaska, when she quits half way through her commitment. Because I'm sure she could have continued to be an effective governor when a few asshole Alaskans were suing her every single day out of pure hatred and spite, costing the state and her personally millions of dollars in legal fees, and tying up staff who should have been doing the business of the state. Not to mention the female-hating press that was dogging her like they had never dogged a politician before, disrupting the lives of the citizens and her family. You just hate her so much that you can't let yourself see that she made a good choice by resigning. And face it, if she hadnt resigned, you'd be bitching about that too, accusing her of wasting the states precious resources to defend her when she should have just stepped down. Interesting. So are you OK with what the "asshole" Boner is doing to Obama? My bet is your still a hypocrite and are absolutely fine with it. I'm sure your out doing something to your horses so you won't answer?
|
|
|
Post by SabrinaM on Jul 31, 2014 14:57:42 GMT
Question: Is it possible to put posters on ignore in this forum? I had 3 Peas on ignore before and I need to figure out if there is a way to do that here. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by doxielady on Jul 31, 2014 15:00:23 GMT
Question: Is it possible to put posters on ignore in this forum? I had 3 Peas on ignore before and I need to figure out if there is a way to do that here. Thanks! Yes, there is.
click on the members name. In the profile, click on the little gear on the right. One of the drop down options is to "Block member"
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 22:45:04 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 15:22:01 GMT
Question: Is it possible to put posters on ignore in this forum? I had 3 Peas on ignore before and I need to figure out if there is a way to do that here. Thanks! I have a question. Actually I have 2.
First why would one put someone on "ignore"? I mean if you don't like what the person has to say or how they are saying it just don't read it. Or don't you have enough self-control to pass it by. I have often wondered why people feel they need the ignore button. Don't like something don't read it. This is not meant to be a snarky remark but I have often wondered why one feels the need for an ignore button.
Second question is you didn't answer the question of the thread. Would you pay $9.95 a month or $99.95 a year to subscribe to Sarah Palin's site?
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Jul 31, 2014 15:33:08 GMT
And we're misogynistic to boot? I find it very, very amusing that you can't think of any other reason people might think she's incompetent - like say maybe because she can't even spew her simplistic soundbites without making word salad out of her native language. She's so rogue! And here I thought it was misogyny on the part of the men who thought she was the candidate that the women in this country could/should rally behind.
|
|
|
Post by lovetodigi on Jul 31, 2014 15:54:07 GMT
Because I'm sure she could have continued to be an effective governor when a few asshole Alaskans were suing her every single day out of pure hatred and spite, costing the state and her personally millions of dollars in legal fees, and tying up staff who should have been doing the business of the state. Not to mention the female-hating press that was dogging her like they had never dogged a politician before, disrupting the lives of the citizens and her family. You just hate her so much that you can't let yourself see that she made a good choice by resigning. And face it, if she hadnt resigned, you'd be bitching about that too, accusing her of wasting the states precious resources to defend her when she should have just stepped down. Interesting. So are you OK with what the "asshole" Boner is doing to Obama? My bet is your still a hypocrite and are absolutely fine with it. I'm sure your out doing something to your horses so you won't answer? Yes, exactly like what we see going on in Washington with the Republicans going after Obama out of pure hatred and spite. That foolish lawsuit they just filed will cost the tax payers plenty. You just hate Obama so much that you can't let yourself see the good things that he has done and how much better the economy is...in spite of the Republicans in Congress. Maybe they will be voted out, some long timers already have been, (Cantor, Kingston, etc.) and then all that money that is being wasted on the "do nothings" that just want to block, impede and sue, can be put to better use. Then you have the Democrat hating Fox News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, etc. dogging President Obama like they never have any other President before, criticizing every little thing he does or doesn't do, even if it is something that was the Republicans idea to begin with. They spoon feed their viewers, with whatever twisted version they choose to give and many eat it up as fact. They like to keep the anger level up. No matter what Obama does, you will b***h about it. See how that works The thing about Sarah Palin, is that many Republicans agree with the Democrats view of her. There are many women in Politics that are admired, both Republican and Democrat, Palin just is not one of them and will never be. Even John McCains daughter said that she has had enough Palin to last her a life time. She is a Republican and was far closer to Palin that most people. That is telling.
|
|
The Birdhouse Lady
Drama Llama
Moose. It's what's for dinner.
Posts: 7,347
Location: Alaska -The Last Frontier
Jun 30, 2014 17:15:19 GMT
|
Post by The Birdhouse Lady on Jul 31, 2014 18:12:07 GMT
Straight up NO!
|
|
KateMarie
Full Member
Refupea #31
Posts: 109
Jun 25, 2014 19:33:47 GMT
|
Post by KateMarie on Jul 31, 2014 18:24:29 GMT
No way in hell!
|
|
|
Post by chlerbie on Jul 31, 2014 18:52:10 GMT
Absolutely, without a doubt in my mind, I can say NO.
|
|
|
Post by meeko77 on Jul 31, 2014 19:16:10 GMT
This may have already been said, as I haven't read the whole thread, just skimmed the first page, but...she would have to pay me 9.95 a MINUTE just to watch her. I am not sure I could last longer than a few minutes.
|
|
scrappammie
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Jun 25, 2014 21:31:40 GMT
|
Post by scrappammie on Jul 31, 2014 19:21:08 GMT
I could possibly see Russia blowing ten bucks for the entertainment value. (Definitely not a full year subscription - I mean how many times do you need to watch a train wreck?)
|
|