peppermintpatty
Pearl Clutcher
Refupea #1345
Posts: 3,947
Jun 26, 2014 17:47:08 GMT
|
Post by peppermintpatty on Apr 5, 2016 12:14:19 GMT
In the comic it isn't Carl. It's Glenn
|
|
|
Post by Miss Ang on Apr 5, 2016 12:22:02 GMT
That was interesting. TFS. However, I totally disagree with one thing that the author said. I thought that was classic! We laughed out loud. It brought humor to an incredibly dark situation when we were all sitting on the edge of our seats. Maybe I'm just weird and we're the only people that thought it fit in the story perfectly. haha I think I must now pause it in that exact moment (unlike others, I don't delete episodes until I feel I have gotten everything I want out of them). Ahem, I may still have the entire season on the DVR. Ya know, just in case we need to look back at something. #TWDNerd And in the comic, where it is (spoiler alert!!!) ........................Glen, he is actually wearing a hat. I just don't think it would make sense for it to be Carl when you consider the comment about cutting out Carl's other eye if someone makes a sound. But that pic Jackie posted sure does make it look that way! But I think that it just can not be. Time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by PenandInk on Apr 5, 2016 13:45:08 GMT
I think this photo is like the dress photo that some saw brown and some saw blue. I clearly see Carl's hat. My DH clearly sees Abraham's head, and an arm that's "too big to be Carl's." I can't figure out what he is looking at, and he can't figure out how I see a hat. Obviously, the producers are having a fine time throwing us off!
|
|
scrappinspidey2
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,511
Location: In the Parlor with the Fly
Mar 18, 2015 19:19:37 GMT
|
Post by scrappinspidey2 on Apr 5, 2016 13:51:59 GMT
So my theory? If even the actors themselves do not know who is chosen, could it be they shot that scene from multiple angles? If the actors don't know, then odds are the actors aren't there in that moment when this shot was taken, otherwise they would know who he is aiming to hit. So they took shots from different angles, which would have different shadows and then just used the best one? Just a thought from someone who is not an actor, producer or director.
|
|
|
Post by scrapsotime on Apr 5, 2016 13:54:48 GMT
I think this photo is like the dress photo that some saw brown and some saw blue. I clearly see Carl's hat. My DH clearly sees Abraham's head, and an arm that's "too big to be Carl's." I can't figure out what he is looking at, and he can't figure out how I see a hat. Obviously, the producers are having a fine time throwing us off! That picture to me is just strange. Why is his jacket so light colored and the shadow way more pronounced than what I saw on my screen, which I thought was caused by the movement of his jacket?
|
|
|
Post by canadianscrappergirl on Apr 5, 2016 15:38:17 GMT
I think I must now pause it in that exact moment (unlike others, I don't delete episodes until I feel I have gotten everything I want out of them). Haha I save all episodes until the dvd is released for that reason I am such a nerd lol.
|
|
|
Post by gale w on Apr 5, 2016 15:44:17 GMT
We rewatch before the new season so I have them too. As for the others knowing, since he obviously didn't actually hit one of them, even if they were right there they still could be in the dark.
|
|
|
Post by threegirls on Apr 5, 2016 15:51:56 GMT
I'm beginning to think that the writers and producers of the show don't even know who dies!
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Apr 7, 2016 4:48:36 GMT
I didn't read your post But damn Your is a huge spoiler and that pisses me off. Now anyone who hasn't watched the finale yet knows Negan killed someone with Lucille but we don't know who. Thanks a lot. I have avoided all the thread here, FB, Yahoo, and other sites all day so I could wait to watch it with my husband. And now you spoiled it. In a title, It's being talked about everywhere so not sure how you are able to avoid it. Honestly, if I'm afraid of spoilers I don't get online till I've seen the show. Hell we talked about it with patients today. I didn't get on FB. I didn't get on yahoo. I only came here. Where shit like this is supposed to be contained IN a thread. Not in a title.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Apr 7, 2016 4:50:58 GMT
We were talking about it at dinner at a restaurant. My students came in today talking about it. I do understand being upset that something was spoiled. We do forget that we didn't know a little over 24 hours ago whether we would get to see who died or not. However, I do wonder what the time limit is. Are we supposed to wait 24, 48, 72 hours? A week or more? Good question. Honestly with Twitter, FB, IG...it's hard to avoid spoilers. I purposely didn't get on FB, IG, Twitter. I don't listen to the radio and I don't watch any news shows. I literally did not hear about it anywhere except this thread title.
|
|
|
Post by jackie on Apr 7, 2016 5:19:05 GMT
Okay, I get it. I messed up by putting too much information in my title. The show was on a full day after I posted and people had been discussing Lucille making an appearance for so long everywhere, I honestly thought all the fans knew that the finale involved Lucille and a victim by that point. When you pointed it out I immediately realized my error and that I shouldnt have made that assumption. I apologized and changed the title. That's really all I can do. Can we agree it was an honest mistake and just move on?
|
|
jenkate77
Full Member
Posts: 427
Jun 26, 2014 1:33:16 GMT
|
Post by jenkate77 on Apr 7, 2016 14:05:06 GMT
I think, with a show like TWD, it's hard to avoid spoilers. Jackie didn't mean to spoil anything - and honestly - didn't we all know what was going to happen? For weeks the internet has been abuzz with the assumption that Negan and Lucille were going to take out one of our people.
I watched without my husband. I told him I couldn't avoid the internet for three days until he came home!
|
|
|
Post by pealikecrazy on Apr 7, 2016 14:23:28 GMT
Okay, I get it. I messed up by putting too much information in my title. The show was on a full day after I posted and people had been discussing Lucille making an appearance for so long everywhere, I honestly thought all the fans knew that the finale involved Lucille and a victim by that point. When you pointed it out I immediately realized my error and that I shouldnt have made that assumption. I apologized and changed the title. That's really all I can do. Can we agree it was an honest mistake and just move on? Jackie, dahhhhling....don't worry. You apologized. Most of us realize you didn't mean any harm! Good grief! It's a television show. Don't give it another thought.
|
|
|
Post by Chips on Apr 7, 2016 14:37:39 GMT
Okay, I get it. I messed up by putting too much information in my title. The show was on a full day after I posted and people had been discussing Lucille making an appearance for so long everywhere, I honestly thought all the fans knew that the finale involved Lucille and a victim by that point. When you pointed it out I immediately realized my error and that I shouldnt have made that assumption. I apologized and changed the title. That's really all I can do. Can we agree it was an honest mistake and just move on? Jackie, dahhhhling....don't worry. You apologized. Most of us realize you didn't mean any harm! Good grief! It's a television show. Don't give it another thought. Totally agree! Do not worry one bit.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Apr 7, 2016 14:39:07 GMT
I think, with a show like TWD, it's hard to avoid spoilers. Jackie didn't mean to spoil anything - and honestly - didn't we all know what was going to happen? For weeks the internet has been abuzz with the assumption that Negan and Lucille were going to take out one of our people. I watched without my husband. I told him I couldn't avoid the internet for three days until he came home! That wasn't the spoiler The spoiler posted here was that we don't find out who was killed in the finale. No one expected that.
|
|
|
Post by pealikecrazy on Apr 7, 2016 14:42:09 GMT
I think, with a show like TWD, it's hard to avoid spoilers. Jackie didn't mean to spoil anything - and honestly - didn't we all know what was going to happen? For weeks the internet has been abuzz with the assumption that Negan and Lucille were going to take out one of our people. I watched without my husband. I told him I couldn't avoid the internet for three days until he came home! That wasn't the spoiler The spoiler posted here was that we don't find out who was killed in the finale. No one expected that. oh well...again...she apologized.
|
|
|
Post by jackie on Apr 7, 2016 15:04:52 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point.
|
|
|
Post by shaniam on Apr 7, 2016 15:23:29 GMT
I am hoping its Aaron since I am the least emotionally invested in him but feel like it will be one of our favorites. This will drive me mad until October.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Apr 7, 2016 16:37:55 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves.
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,517
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Apr 7, 2016 16:48:44 GMT
Jackie, you're fine. You apologized. We're talking about a pop culture television show that happens to be highly rated and unless someone is living in a bunker, spoilers would be almost impossible to avoid come Monday morning. It's a TV show. Not a code for weapons of mass destruction. Shake it off.
|
|
|
Post by fkawitchypea on Apr 7, 2016 17:04:11 GMT
That's a bit of a stretch for spoiling a tv show so immensely popular that if you went out into the light of day on Monday would have been spoiled for you. If you are so intensely afraid of spoilers, then how about watching the show when it airs?
|
|
|
Post by Fairlyoddparent on Apr 7, 2016 17:45:26 GMT
Geez! Give the OP a break.
|
|
|
Post by PolarGreen12 on Apr 7, 2016 17:49:43 GMT
Whoa. That's totally uncalled for. She was asked to post the pic by several of us. We wanted to see it and discuss it.
|
|
|
Post by Chips on Apr 7, 2016 18:29:18 GMT
Whoa. That's totally uncalled for. She was asked to post the pic by several of us. We wanted to see it and discuss it. That ^ ^ ^ and please get over yourself. If you're so afraid of spoilers stay off the internet, do not watch tv, listen to the radio and wear ear plugs when walking in public.
|
|
loco coco
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,662
Jun 26, 2014 16:15:45 GMT
|
Post by loco coco on Apr 7, 2016 18:31:44 GMT
a lot of people thought it would be a cliffhanger for weeks now. I see no problem with the title
|
|
|
Post by jassy on Apr 7, 2016 19:06:26 GMT
I'm just chiming in with a "Don't sweat it, Jackie! You cool!"
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,670
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Apr 7, 2016 19:10:37 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. Well you don't even know who Lucille is so not much of a spoiler. Time to let it go.
|
|
|
Post by birukitty on Apr 7, 2016 19:40:17 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. I think you're mad at yourself for opening a thread about this episode of The Walking Dead when you haven't watched it yet, and spoiling it for yourself. Jackie's title didn't spoil anything. There has been talk about this episode for weeks now everywhere, online and on air. Basically you are to blame for spoiling it for yourself, but like so many others these days you simply can't shoulder that blame. You just can't admit that it's your own fault. So you lash out and blame whoever you can that is close by. What are you doing even reading this thread if you don't want it spoiled for yourself since you haven't watched the episode yet? Jackie is innocent. She apologized even though she had no reason to because that is the kind of person she is-thoughtful and considerate of other's feelings. Let's just face facts here, shall we? Jackie didn't spoil this episode of The Walking Dead for you by the title of this thread. You did that by choosing to read the whole thread. Your choice. No one twisted your arm and made you read it. Debbie in MD.
|
|
|
Post by padresfan619 on Apr 7, 2016 19:43:04 GMT
What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. I think you're mad at yourself for opening a thread about this episode of The Walking Dead when you haven't watched it yet, and spoiling it for yourself. Jackie's title didn't spoil anything. There has been talk about this episode for weeks now everywhere, online and on air. Basically you are to blame for spoiling it for yourself, but like so many others these days you simply can't shoulder that blame. You just can't admit that it's your own fault. So you lash out and blame whoever you can that is close by. What are you doing even reading this thread if you don't want it spoiled for yourself since you haven't watched the episode yet? Jackie is innocent. She apologized even though she had no reason to because that is the kind of person she is-thoughtful and considerate of other's feelings. Let's just face facts here, shall we? Jackie didn't spoil this episode of The Walking Dead for you by the title of this thread. You did that by choosing to read the whole thread. Your choice. No one twisted your arm and made you read it. Debbie in MD. The title was edited. And for the record I think Jackie apologizing was plenty, we don't need to keep rehashing over and over, but the title was different and did include a mild (IMO) spoiler.
|
|
|
Post by Laurie on Apr 7, 2016 19:55:52 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. I think this is a stretch. People post thread titles all the time saying "may contain spoilers." This isn't any different. I haven't watched the show either and I read the title as in she isn't posting who the killer is but it may come up in the thread. Since I hadn't watched the show yet my first thought after reading the title is that it may or may not have spoilers...not that a victim wasn't revealed.
|
|