|
Post by jackie on Apr 7, 2016 20:27:51 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. Oh fgs, this is just getting silly. You're sounding childish and ridiculous. You've decided I don't think of anyone but myself based on an accidental spoiler? For real? Listen, I get it, spoilers stink. I always try to be super careful to not spoil things for people and I am generally sympathetic to anyone who gets something spoiled. But when someone accidentally puts a potential spoiler out there, almost immediately removes it, and apologizes multiple times for it, and you STILL feel it necessary to throw personal insults at them, it might be time to step back from the TV. I won't go into how or why you are so ridiculously wrong about who I am as a person because that would give credence to your words and there's no need to do that. And yes, as sweet as everyone has been, my original title DID have a bit of a spoiler in it. The original title on this thread said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim)". Just want to make that clear--I'm not trying to hide what I did. It just truly didn't occur to me at the time that it was a spoiler. I wrote it a full day after the original show aired and I thought I was being careful, but in retrospect, I did make a mistake. The funny part about this whole post is that I created this post because I was trying not to spoil anything on the ORIGINAL TWD thread! I posted there that someone sent me a picture they grabbed from the show that they felt revealed who got killed. I didn't want to post it in the thread because people might not want to see it it. I was having all kinds of technical issues and couldn't link out to the image, and the spoiler feature in this board only lets you enter text, not images. So, someone suggests start another thread. I thought PERFECT! Now people can see the picture and I won't spoil it for the rest. Oh boy! Anyway, anyone can check my post history; TV shows, movies and books are some of my favorite things to talk about and you can see what my post titles look like--I am always so CAREFUL to not spoil. I really do appreciate all of you reasonable peas taking up for me. Debbie, you are so VERY sweet. I hope your opinion doesn't change of me when you read my original post title. And Rodeomom, you have a point, if she hadn't read any spoilers and didn't even know who lucille was, why would my original title have been a spoiler? Ah well, as if the show wasn't enough drama, we have this! Looking forward to getting an answer to the cliffhanger in October and to watching FTWD this Sunday. I promise, if I post I will behave responsibly and not be my usual oblivious, selfish self. Wait, if I'm oblivious, I won't even know it. Shoot!
|
|
|
Post by MorellisCupcake on Apr 7, 2016 20:59:06 GMT
I think you're cool, Jackie. How can you NOT see a spoiler of this show? It's everywhere. If you want to preserve the mystery of it, then avoid the internet. Rule #1 of the modern age - no internet = no spoiler. I have a friend who posted on Facebook asking no one to spoil it for her. Fine. Then she posted this morning (4 days later) that she watched it and is so aggravated at the end. And that she could buy the comics and read them to see who gets killed, but doesn't want to ruin it for herself. I thought, what rock are YOU living under? How do you not know by now that Glenn gets it in the comic books but is not necessarily who died on Sunday?
|
|
|
Post by mellyw on Apr 7, 2016 21:13:12 GMT
Oh, my word, go to the Hospital for a little heart procedure & come home to this! I will apologize to Jackie for being one to beg her to post the picture. But I'll thank her in the same breath because that picture was food for thought.
I'll admit to not gettting how the original thread title was a spoiler in any way, but I also know I could be seeing it thru eyes that have read the comics & watched the show live.
|
|
|
Post by jackie on Apr 7, 2016 21:54:00 GMT
Thanks again guys. No worries Melly! You're suggestion was a good one; you aren't the one who told me to type the stupid post title that I used. Hope all went will with your procedure.
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Apr 7, 2016 22:44:40 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. wow, that is super bitchy. Actually she started this thread based on a request from another thread because she couldn't get the picture to post. Honestly, I think 24 hours after the air showed was fine. Most people have to go out in the world and it was everywhere.
|
|
YooHoot
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,432
Jun 26, 2014 3:11:50 GMT
|
Post by YooHoot on Apr 8, 2016 0:11:52 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. She wasn't doing it to spoil it for people. WE asked her to post the photo. Jesus. Why do you have to come out with guns blazing in every single one of your responses to people? She didn't mean to spoil it. She apologized yet you still have to kick the puppy one more time.
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Apr 8, 2016 2:19:29 GMT
I didn't read your post But damn Your is a huge spoiler and that pisses me off. Now anyone who hasn't watched the finale yet knows Negan killed someone with Lucille but we don't know who. Thanks a lot. I have avoided all the thread here, FB, Yahoo, and other sites all day so I could wait to watch it with my husband. And now you spoiled it. In a title, Oh for god sake, no one knows who Negan killed. ETA: For months before that episode aired we knew he killed someone.
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Apr 8, 2016 2:26:05 GMT
So just so those who didn't see the originaly thread title, the spoiler was that we didn't get to see who was killed. If you recall, we had the conversation all week and part of the night wondering if we would. Then as we watched it live, we all posted about not getting to know.
I think myshelly knew someone would die, but she didn't know that we wouldn't know until October. I have to admit my heart was pumping not knowing if we would know or not.
She was definitely a bit bitchy about it though.
|
|
|
Post by canadianscrappergirl on Apr 8, 2016 15:04:05 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. That was uncalled for and untrue. Jackie is kind and thoughtful in any thread I have seen her post in. I always look forward especially to her posts regarding TWD/survivor and BB because she is such a fan of the shows. That supposed spoiler wasn't worth getting your panties all twisted up about its a tv show for goodness sake. She apologized profusely for something that in my opinion wasn't that huge of a deal. Her spoiler wasn't done maliciously. Move on.
|
|
|
Post by tara on Apr 8, 2016 17:11:34 GMT
Hey don't sweat it. You know what they say about pleasing everyone. I personally enjoy your conversations about TV shows.
|
|
|
Post by birukitty on Apr 9, 2016 0:25:27 GMT
I love you Jackie. You are one of my favorite Peas. Of course my opinion doesn't change about you after reading your original post title: "Walking Dead Spoiler (May Reveal Lucille's Victim), because it still isn't a spoiler! If you've been watching "The Walking Dead", reading these posts, and have not been living under a rock then you would have know that at the end of this season someone from our group gets killed. Your post simply said that Lucille did the killing. That's it. Was that a spoiler? Maybe. Personally I don't think so.
But I still maintain that if you haven't watched the episode and you don't want anything spoiled, it is your responsibility to avoid the internet until you do, because by being on it it's likely you'll come across something that will spoil the episode. This last episode has been covered all over the place in the news, on facebook, twitter, and so on.
It is NOT the Peas responsibility to watch what they post to protect you Myshelly until you watch the episode. It is your responsibility to watch it in a timely fashion or avoid the internet to avoid having the episode spoiled for you until you do.
Debbie in MD.
|
|
|
Post by jonda1974 on Apr 11, 2016 17:59:17 GMT
I guess I don't get it. My original title said "Walking Dead SPOILER ( *may* reveal Lucille's victim).That's quite a stretch to say that title spoils that we don't know who dies. It just says that I (or my post) may reveal the victim. If I hadn't watched the whole show I would actually assume by that title that the person writing it knows who the victim is. But whatever...I honestly think you're looking for reasons to stay mad at this point. What else could your title mean? Why would we need a thread about who is Lucille's victim of the show tells us who the victim is? I read your title and immediately knew what happened, so.... I know you didn't do it on purpose. I just think you are one of those people like we talk about on threads here who is oblivious and not thinking of anyone but themselves. You are just way off base here. It's a damn TV show. How about if you don't want spoilers...don't go online, go out in public, or listen to the radio or television. Or better yet, since you are so butt hurt about it...make a rule about how long we must wait in fear of spoiling someone.
|
|