|
Post by dealsamongus on Apr 15, 2016 6:16:45 GMT
Does anyone remember the attempted murder of the girl by her 2 best friend because they thought that Slenderman was going to get them? They want to be released after only 2 years in jail?
Do you think this is sufficient for two 13 year old girls?
I saw the 20/20 story about this and i think the girls should stay detained until 18 at the least.
|
|
M in Carolina
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,128
Jun 29, 2014 12:11:41 GMT
|
Post by M in Carolina on Apr 15, 2016 8:17:03 GMT
I agree. Two years is nowhere near enough punishment. I would have thought that they would be imprisoned or in a prison mental facility until they were 21.
What they did to their friend was horrific and planned. Yes, they were young, but they were old enough to know that Slenderman wasn't real. I think the ring leader is a true psychopath--Morgan or something?--she was the one really into Slenderman and her friend kinda tagged along and helped, but it was clear from the articles and TV reports that she was the mastermind.
I really think that if they release the girls that they may kill again--well the mastermind will--who knows what the other girl will do--if you'll help your friend kill somebody, what else will you do?
I think it's amazing that the victim survived--she is an incredibly tough little girl. I really hate that first degree premeditated attempted murderers get shorter sentences just because their victims don't die.
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Apr 15, 2016 11:01:57 GMT
I think there should be a whole lot of psychological testing before that is even considered and I think there should be a very lengthy, closely supervised probation. The reasons I believe this is because maybe these girls can be redeemed and go on to live productive lives. I also believe they should be banned from ever talking about it, going on tv, making money off of the case.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Apr 15, 2016 11:55:45 GMT
Im on the bench with M in Carolina and littleMama. I don't think 2 years is enough. There ought to be quite a bit of psychological testing before anyone would ever entertain the idea of releasing either of them.
Though like M said I doubt that the leader girl is redeemable she seemed like a real psychopath.
And if released just who would be responsible for protecting the victim? Because I doubt that the one would ever leave her alone.
|
|
|
Post by BlueDiamond on Apr 15, 2016 12:35:40 GMT
2 years is so not enough!!! I'm of the thought that, if you take a life, then you spend the rest of your life in jail, no parole. Barring self-defense, of course. Attempted murder should be at least half of the life expectancy of the victim. So in this case, half the life expectancy of the victim would be about 40 years (female, 80 years roughly). Add in a few years for collusion with the other girl, and that would be about 50 years each. To start.
I think it's a travesty that 2 years is even an option in this case.
|
|
|
Post by bbkeef on Apr 15, 2016 12:46:26 GMT
I found this on CBS news: link
|
|
|
Post by librarylady on Apr 15, 2016 13:52:29 GMT
I think the girls needed mental health help. While 13 year olds can be silly, those girls went over the edge with believing in the slender man and his powers and seemed mentally unstable (an under statement). I'd vote for some years in a mental health facility.
|
|
schizo319
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,030
Jun 28, 2014 0:26:58 GMT
|
Post by schizo319 on Apr 15, 2016 14:30:29 GMT
I don't believe that 2 years is long enough for them to be removed from society, however, I question the wisdom of putting them into the prison system where they can be influenced by more hardened criminals and not have access to adequate psychological evaluation/treatment. I don't think you can judge a child by the same standards as an adult with a fully developed brain.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 2, 2024 12:00:28 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2016 15:37:47 GMT
Jonathan Kellerman, the child psychologist turned novelist, wrote a book called Savage Spawn about kids like this. He said most of them don't recover and will always be dangerous. Our society has no good way to deal with them, so we end up letting them out and giving them lots of chances to hurt and kill, which they gladly do, surrounded by people who think they can be helped.
Ugh. 2 years is probably not enough.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Apr 15, 2016 15:41:39 GMT
What am I missing? The linked article says that they have applied for a bond reduction after two years of pretrial detention, and that they are charged as adults. Unless that article is wrong, they have not been tried, pleaded guilty, or sentenced. They are asking for a bond reduction because that is pretty standard when you have been held pretrial for an extended length of time and your case has not been tried.
|
|
|
Post by woodysbetty on Apr 15, 2016 15:43:04 GMT
These girls need serious mental health intervention for a long time.....sadly we seem to incarcerate better than deal with mental health issues.
|
|
|
Post by not2peased on Apr 15, 2016 15:52:12 GMT
I don't recall the girls doing the murder because they thought the slenderman was going to "get" them. they did it to impress slenderman
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 15, 2016 17:25:09 GMT
The judge actually refused to lower their bond stating they were flight risks, as they both tried to run away after the stabbing.
They have not been tried yet.
|
|
NoWomanNoCry
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,856
Jun 25, 2014 21:53:42 GMT
|
Post by NoWomanNoCry on Apr 15, 2016 17:45:38 GMT
No, not at all.
|
|
|
Post by PolarGreen12 on Apr 15, 2016 18:02:38 GMT
They stabbed her 19 times! No way should they get out. This was planned and thought out. Releasing them after two years just lets them feel that it wasn't that big of a deal.
|
|
gottapeanow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,760
Jun 25, 2014 20:56:09 GMT
|
Post by gottapeanow on Apr 15, 2016 20:14:51 GMT
The judge actually refused to lower their bond stating they were flight risks, as they both tried to run away after the stabbing. They have not been tried yet. The fact that they haven't been tried yet is really strange to me. First of all, the defense should want the world to see two little girls. By waiting, the world instead sees two older girls. Even though everyone cognitively gets that the attack happened when they were young, it's hard to treat the defendants that way when you see them standing before you. Not sure what the delay is here. What ever it is, it does not bode well for the defense. However, they will likely receive credit for their time in custody, no matter how long the sentence is. Lisa
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Apr 15, 2016 20:16:41 GMT
Now that I actually saw an accurate article, I see that they aren't asking to be released after 2 years of incarceration (as in, convicted and incarcerated), they are asking to have their bonds lowered so they can await trial at home. Totally different story.
|
|
|
Post by whipea on Apr 15, 2016 20:20:34 GMT
My students have been following and researching this case and it is my understanding they were acting as a proxy for Slenderman. I also thought they were still pre-trial at the least determining competency or treating for competency restoration.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 15, 2016 22:02:38 GMT
The judge actually refused to lower their bond stating they were flight risks, as they both tried to run away after the stabbing. They have not been tried yet. The fact that they haven't been tried yet is really strange to me. First of all, the defense should want the world to see two little girls. By waiting, the world instead sees two older girls. Even though everyone cognitively gets that the attack happened when they were young, it's hard to treat the defendants that way when you see them standing before you. Not sure what the delay is here. What ever it is, it does not bode well for the defense. However, they will likely receive credit for their time in custody, no matter how long the sentence is. Lisa I believe it has to do with the filings of their mental state. The leader of the 2 has been diagnosed as schizophrenia with no remorse, the judge ruled that he wants them to stay locked up and tried as adults because of their likelihood of doing it again. Lots of filings and medical to plow through.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Apr 15, 2016 23:05:57 GMT
The judge actually refused to lower their bond stating they were flight risks, as they both tried to run away after the stabbing. They have not been tried yet. The fact that they haven't been tried yet is really strange to me. First of all, the defense should want the world to see two little girls. By waiting, the world instead sees two older girls. Even though everyone cognitively gets that the attack happened when they were young, it's hard to treat the defendants that way when you see them standing before you. Not sure what the delay is here. What ever it is, it does not bode well for the defense. However, they will likely receive credit for their time in custody, no matter how long the sentence is. Lisa In theory, you have a federal constitutional right to a speedy trial (that doesn't have specific time limits) as well as (usually) a state constitutional or statutory speedy trial right (which often does have specific time limits). In practice, serious cases routinely take longer than speedy trial requires. There are a lot of reasons and it is hard to know exactly what is happening here -- cases where there are mental health issues usually do take longer (because sometimes the accused person decompensates/isn't competent to stand trial for a period of time, and because there are generally multiple rounds of mental health evaluations), although in my experience that is rarely the sole reason. Often there are delays on the prosecution end for various reasons. If their lawyers moved for a bond reduction, usually that reflects that the delay is on the state end (and you may well be right that their lawyers would prefer for them to look closer to the young age they were at the time). I sometimes tactically moved for a bond reduction to get the judge to order the prosecutors to hurry up and try the case, even if I thought the judge probably wouldn't lower the bond (violation of speedy trial is a perfectly legitimate reason to ask for a bond reduction, even if you think the judge won't let your high-profile client out). When I was in practice I had a number of cases that were 2+ years old, and there wasn't a single one where I was the reason for the delay. Most of the time the prosecutor for various reasons just wasn't ready to go. Although there were a few where I wasn't sorry for the delay, because the longer that time goes by in many cases, the more likely it is that witnesses become unfindable or that a prosecutor offers a deal just to get a case closed.
|
|
gottapeanow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,760
Jun 25, 2014 20:56:09 GMT
|
Post by gottapeanow on Apr 15, 2016 23:49:54 GMT
Thanks for your insight, epeanymous. I did know all of that. I worked in l.e. for more than a decade although not as a cop and not as a prosecutor or defense attorney. Even so, I have a much better grasp on the criminal justice system than most. My main point was that while delays are understandable in adult cases and can even benefit the defense, the need for a speedy trial seems much more critical in juvenile cases. If they are found guilty, get the case through the system. If they are not guilty, then get them released. Lisa
|
|
|
Post by annabella on Apr 15, 2016 23:51:25 GMT
Can someone explain this whole slenderman thing to me? I read his wiki profile and read a couple articles on these girls. But I still don't understand how they thought he was real???
|
|
|
Post by refugeepea on Apr 15, 2016 23:54:52 GMT
The ring leaders home life sounded dysfunctional at best. It would be scary to have her parents in charge of her while awaiting trial. I can't decide about the other girl.
|
|
M in Carolina
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,128
Jun 29, 2014 12:11:41 GMT
|
Post by M in Carolina on Apr 15, 2016 23:59:17 GMT
I think if there was mental insanity, they'd have found it by now and tried to plead that instead of having to go to trial.
I wish the girls were redeemable. I hope they are. They killed to impress a fictional character and stabbed a FRIEND they had known for years NINETEEN times.
Imagine stabbing into something living one, two, three, four, five--the mess, the screams, yet they continued. Nineteen times.
I think that's the clinical definition of psychopath.
I'm from a family of law enforcement. I've heard lots of horrible things people have done. This is one of the absolute worst--even if by an adult.
ETA: if an adult who had done bad things stabbed someone 19 times it would be frenzied and horrible and unbelievable. This was a little.girl. who had not done anything like this before.
They didn't just freak out one day and stab the girl in their room or hit her with a baseball bat because they were scared of the boogeyman.
They lured her, stole a knife, snuck out of the house, walked how many miles into the woods, then stabbed her NINETEEN times.
I do wonder if the 2nd girl stabbed her at all. I wonder if she was somehow not as old and mature and maybe she was somehow coerced--that's what my heart wants to think. She's been in lockup for 2 years and nobody has said, hey, she has diminished capacity, so I'm not holding out much hope.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Apr 16, 2016 0:19:15 GMT
Thanks for your insight, epeanymous. I did know all of that. I worked in l.e. for more than a decade although not as a cop and not as a prosecutor or defense attorney. Even so, I have a much better grasp on the criminal justice system than most. My main point was that while delays are understandable in adult cases and can even benefit the defense, the need for a speedy trial seems much more critical in juvenile cases. If they are found guilty, get the case through the system. If they are not guilty, then get them released. Lisa Sorry, I re-read and it was a little pedantic. I agree that juvenile cases should move faster. Although I also think it is unreasonable to be charging 13-year-olds as adults, which is probably a different thread. I love my 13-year-old to bits, but wow, is she ever young.
|
|
|
Post by dealsamongus on Apr 16, 2016 2:31:40 GMT
Can someone explain this whole slenderman thing to me? I read his wiki profile and read a couple articles on these girls. But I still don't understand how they thought he was real??? I am with 100% - shortly after the 20/20 story my husband and I did some research and it seems far reaching that they would believe this.. then I remembered being naive and that age. I would not have believed that there was a "slenderman" who lives in the woods that i needed to impress, but I did trust people that maybe I should not have trusted. I do not have kids, so take this for what you will but I think that kids today have SO MUCH more access to everything than I did as a kid that it is easy to convince them of almost anything - it is a sad situation - if it is on the internet than they believe it is true in most cases. I am not sure the solution, I am not even sure if this is not the way life goes, but it is worrysome! Jennifer
|
|
|
Post by dealsamongus on Apr 16, 2016 2:33:39 GMT
My students have been following and researching this case and it is my understanding they were acting as a proxy for Slenderman. I also thought they were still pre-trial at the least determining competency or treating for competency restoration. I spoke wrong - they were trying to impress Slenderman. Thanks for the clarification!
|
|