[Politics] "Clinton Cash", documentary based on the book

And, just to present the other side, the author has admitted on national TV that he can't prove the charges he makes in the book. Easy to accuse people, not so easy to prove when there's no evidence.

Clinton Cash Crushed by Facts: www.politicususa.com/2015/04/26/clinton-cash-crushed-facts-author-admits-evidence-clinton-crimes.html

Sorry I can't figure out how create the link on the phone.

Thank you.

It's true that he has no evidence that connects the dots. As in no smoking gun - no emails "exist" that reveal any connection or anything like that. But the indisputable, public record facts he lays out, in a timeline, show a clear pattern that is too vast to be coincidence and vast enough that she's still under federal investigation for public corruption in relation to this. That the FBI feels there's enough evidence to investigate speaks volumes.

Stephanopoulos asked Schweizer for hard evidence, and the author immediately tried to change the subject. The This Week host kept asking the author for a smoking gun, and all he could provide was a “pattern of behavior.”

It became very clear during this interview that there is no evidence that would merit a criminal investigation. Schweizer could not produce the smoking gun because there is no smoking gun.

Schweizer’s attempts to connect the Clinton Cash allegations and the McDonnell and Menendez cases were flimsy and did not hold up to the gentlest of inspections. In Gov. McDonnell’s case, there was evidence the governor promoted the donor’s company as a result of illegal gifts and loans. Sen. Menendez was charged because federal prosecutors believe that a case can be made that the senator used his position to intervene in Medicaid billing disputes in exchange for campaign contributions.

Schweizer’s argument that the three cases are equal is simply not true. There is no evidence that any donors to The Clinton Foundation received special treatment from former Sec. of State Clinton, which is why the mainstream press is not pushing the Clinton Cash scandal.

One of the main allegations in Schweizer’s congressional insider trading book had to be retracted after his claim that Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) committed insider trading was found to be factually incorrect and wrong.

The Washington Post and New York Times harmed their own credibility by attaching themselves to partisan conspiracy theory book that doesn’t measure up to the basic standards of journalism.

The Clinton Cash scandal will live on the ozone of right-wing conspiracy theories and conservative media, but there is no evidence to support these claims. ABC News can’t find it. The New York Times can’t find it. The Washington Post can’t find it.

By the end of the interview, Schweizer sounded like a conspiracy theorist, and it was clear that Clinton Cash is the latest in a long line of empty and time wasting right-wing conspiracies.

Here's a little gem in the article that made me do a double take!

 [bold mine] Star power decreasing? Wha...huh? Article was written last June and a link in the quote went to their article about how he was in hot water for comments about immigrants. Hot water, indeed. Heh.

Dude, I am sick and just realized I don't have the energy to Google and debate today, so backing out and going back to sitting on my hands. I'm sure someone will find some nefarious reason and let us know.

I'm with you on this one. It is just unbelievable what people try to stick onto them !! Conspiracy theory all over the place!

Why does airline travel cost more to go overseas?

Security costs? Travel costs? Because he's popular over there?