rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,663
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Oct 21, 2016 0:01:22 GMT
What changes or rules do you wish would happen because of this election?
I hope there is a law that the candidate must release their tax returns.
Do you have any?
|
|
|
Post by mimi3566 on Oct 21, 2016 0:09:17 GMT
That we have a third party included in the debates and on the ballot in the next election.
|
|
|
Post by annaintx on Oct 21, 2016 0:12:51 GMT
That supreme court justices are nominated and then hearings are held in a timely manner. This GOP blocking thing is bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by gmcwife1 on Oct 21, 2016 0:24:45 GMT
That we have a third party included in the debates and on the ballot in the next election. Yes, this
|
|
|
Post by Freefallfast on Oct 21, 2016 0:27:47 GMT
Campaigning only 3 months before elections.
You may not speak of your opponent. Only yourself.
Limit to 3 million dollar budget for campaign.
|
|
|
Post by annabella on Oct 21, 2016 0:28:21 GMT
That the election cycle should be a shorter length of time. The amount of money fundraised and spent is ridiculous and could be spent elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by birukitty on Oct 21, 2016 21:34:01 GMT
That we reinstate Citizen's United which limited the amount of money a corporations or union can contribute, or spend to a campaign.
That we get rid of the "personhood" ruling that corporations now have.
Better yet, a new law that prohibits corporations from funding any political campaigns at all. Bernie Sanders proved this time that you don't need the money from corporations to fund a campaign. He funded his with contributions by individual people and the average donation was $27.00.
When you allow corporations to fund campaigns you end up with what happened this election, and much worse. The media is owned by only 6 or 7 corporations-since Hillary Clinton's campaign was heavily funded by corporations you then have the one sided media coverage we've had this entire election. No media coverage about Bernie Sanders while he was campaigning and still in the race, and now everything media that you hear on main stream media is pro Hillary Clinton.
I doubt it'll ever happen, but it would be great if it ever did.
Also I'd like to see equal coverage on ALL of the candidates-Democrat, Republican, and all independents, including as another Pea mentioned up line that ALL candidates be in the debates. We are down to 4 candidates, but all you ever hear about are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
|
|
|
Post by lisae on Oct 21, 2016 22:03:19 GMT
Years ago I heard a proposal that the primaries be changed so that we had them on only 3 dates. The East coast and South all voted on one date, the Central part of the country on one date and the Western part on the 3rd date. Every election cycle the dates would rotate so East was first in say 2020 and Central was first in 2024 and so on.
The benefits were that the candidates could keep all their travel and ad buys in one part of the country at a time. Mainly it kept a couple of small states from weeding out good candidates that might be embraced in higher population areas. No offense to anyone here from Iowa, NH and SC but why should those states decide who our nominees are or are not? Why is California which has the largest population nearly last every election so they get little say in who the nominee is?
|
|
Nink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,947
Location: North Idaho
Jul 1, 2014 23:30:44 GMT
|
Post by Nink on Oct 21, 2016 22:04:14 GMT
Primaries are all held on the same day.
Independents can vote in a primary.
Term limits on congress.
Third part candidates can debate.
The President serves one six year term. That way they can worry about getting shit done without spending their time worrying about re-election and have enough time to do it.
Congress has a set amount of time to hold hearings and vote on a Supreme Court justice or they are automatically "in".
|
|
|
Post by kimpossible on Oct 21, 2016 23:23:11 GMT
Term limits on the House and Senate
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Oct 22, 2016 0:10:04 GMT
I agree Iowa and New Hampshire have for too long dominated the primary process. This election cycle should dispel any myth that they should lead the process.
|
|
|
Post by Really Red on Oct 22, 2016 0:15:24 GMT
I am in favor of a two-party system. You want more candidates? That's why we have primaries. I am not surprised Trump won't release his taxes, but I cannot imagine living in a country like we do that forces a candidate to show his/her taxes. Term limits? That's why you have a voice. Vote.
I agree with set time limits to put in a SC Justice, but that has nothing to do with the next election. I do like a limit on what you can spend, but not sure how you'd accomplish that. $3M is ridiculously low - that's less than they raise in one month! I do agree that corporations should not be able to contribute.
The big BIG thing I'd like is to abolish the electoral college. It served its purpose and it now obsolete. We need to go to popular vote. It is beyond ridiculous that a couple states can decide the outcome of our election. It is not right and it's not fair and doesn't help the electorate believe in "your vote counts."
|
|
|
Post by nepean on Oct 22, 2016 0:19:56 GMT
Campaigning only 3 months before elections. You may not speak of your opponent. Only yourself. Limit to 3 million dollar budget for campaign. I LOVE these ideas! Primaries are all held on the same day. Independents can vote in a primary. Term limits on congress. Third part candidates can debate. The President serves one six year term. That way they can worry about getting shit done without spending their time worrying about re-election and have enough time to do it. Congress has a set amount of time to hold hearings and vote on a Supreme Court justice or they are automatically "in". I also like the idea of one six year term. Regarding term limits - I think a spouse of a current / previous President should not be able to run for president. Term limits are in place for good reason, I think a spouse running and potentially taking office circumvents the term limits.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Oct 22, 2016 0:24:18 GMT
I would like for our elected officials to work together for the good of the American people instead of wasting our time and tax dollars with mudslinging and obstructionism and a continual hand out for re-election. Pie in the sky, I know.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Oct 22, 2016 0:24:32 GMT
Campaigning only 3 months before elections. You may not speak of your opponent. Only yourself. Limit to 3 million dollar budget for campaign. I LOVE these ideas! Primaries are all held on the same day. Independents can vote in a primary. Term limits on congress. Third part candidates can debate. The President serves one six year term. That way they can worry about getting shit done without spending their time worrying about re-election and have enough time to do it. Congress has a set amount of time to hold hearings and vote on a Supreme Court justice or they are automatically "in". I also like the idea of one six year term. Regarding term limits - I think a spouse of a current / previous President should not be able to run for president. Term limits are in place for good reason, I think a spouse running and potentially taking office circumvents the term limits. We have had two sets of father/son presidents, and other related presidents and multiple brothers of former presidents running, and it is just now we are worrying about the relationships? Hm. I would like to see changes in campaign finance, consolidated primaries, and a shortened season.
|
|
|
Post by nepean on Oct 22, 2016 0:42:41 GMT
I LOVE these ideas! I also like the idea of one six year term. Regarding term limits - I think a spouse of a current / previous President should not be able to run for president. Term limits are in place for good reason, I think a spouse running and potentially taking office circumvents the term limits. We have had two sets of father/son presidents, and other related presidents and multiple brothers of former presidents running, and it is just now we are worrying about the relationships? Hm. I would like to see changes in campaign finance, consolidated primaries, and a shortened season. As it happens, I would also like to see sons, daughters, brothers, sisters etc. of current or previous Presidents ineligible. I shuddered when Jeb Bush was in the running. Honestly though, I am more passionate about the spouse issue, because that put the same individuals back in the White House, not just relatives. This is not specifically a Clinton issue. I would feel the same way if the same scenario presented in the future, regardless of party affiliation.
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Oct 22, 2016 1:01:17 GMT
My hope is that trump will lose in such a huge, overwhelming landslide that there will be no question that the citizens will not put up with this nonsense ever again.
|
|
|
Post by amblet on Oct 22, 2016 2:24:03 GMT
I am all for term limits and decreasing the amount of time spent campaigning. I would like to see the primaries change too so that they are all on the same day or close to it.
|
|
Loydene
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,639
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Jul 8, 2014 16:31:47 GMT
|
Post by Loydene on Oct 22, 2016 2:50:34 GMT
Only real, individual citizens can contribute money to a campaign -- no business money, no union money, no PAC money -- no money but grass roots money from REAL identifiable people.
The media is required to provide free time to all legitimate candidates -- but it can be limited as to time and time period -- but it isn't advertisements -- a candidiate faces a camera is asked a relevant question and answers the question - straight up. No debate, no hedging -- say what you believe, believe what you say.
I'd like to see national electronic voting -- no electoral college. If you are properly registered to vote, you are given a card with a unique ID or PIN -- on election day you go to a site, enter the identifier, and vote.
|
|
|
Post by cadoodlebug on Oct 22, 2016 3:16:26 GMT
Many great ideas. How about term limits on the Supreme Court justices?
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on Oct 22, 2016 3:27:55 GMT
no term limits.. it limits the institutional knowledge to the insiders..who are working to lobby for everyone..and not enough time for the legislator to be an expert in an area of interest. great laws have been made by people working on them for 10 yrs or more... 3 million bucks to reach 175 million voters is too little. if voting goes all electronic...it can be hacked. better to keep the hard systems..and the paper back up in place.
I don't want to restrict who can run..if you can get the votes..why not. we have survived this long..
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 9, 2024 19:45:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 4:08:42 GMT
Many great ideas. How about term limits on the Supreme Court justices? You'll have to change the constitution for that.
Specifically Article III, Section 1
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 9, 2024 19:45:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 4:10:54 GMT
no term limits.. it limits the institutional knowledge to the insiders..who are working to lobby for everyone..and not enough time for the legislator to be an expert in an area of interest. great laws have been made by people working on them for 10 yrs or more... 3 million bucks to reach 175 million voters is too little. if voting goes all electronic...it can be hacked. better to keep the hard systems..and the paper back up in place. I don't want to restrict who can run..if you can get the votes..why not. we have survived this long.. I completely agree. Term limits aren't the answer.
I think there needs to be a limit to the power of K Street.
|
|
|
Post by cadoodlebug on Oct 22, 2016 4:11:52 GMT
Many great ideas. How about term limits on the Supreme Court justices? You'll have to change the constitution for that.
Specifically Article III, Section 1
I know. It's just wishful thinking. Like a lot of other things on this thread.
|
|
|
Post by nlwilkins on Oct 22, 2016 8:07:06 GMT
Limit the salaries of congress. How come we have so many millionaires in Congress? Make Congress have to have the same healthcare we do with the same restirctions, etc. One bill=one subject, quit adding all these extras to each bill. I realize some of it is done to save time, but our Congressional members have so much extra time off as it is why worry about the time. Attedance rules that limit number of days/votes missed by Congress. Enforcement of laws on the books. No handslapping and minor penalities for the Wall Street dudes. They should not be able to almost bankrupt our nation and then expect us to bail them out. Limit their size so if they go under we can let them without hurting our economy.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 9, 2024 19:45:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 11:01:17 GMT
|
|
ginacivey
Pearl Clutcher
refupea #2 in southeast missouri
Posts: 4,685
Jun 25, 2014 19:18:36 GMT
|
Post by ginacivey on Oct 22, 2016 12:30:39 GMT
I hope there is a law that the candidate must release their tax returns. I am not surprised Trump won't release his taxes, but I cannot imagine living in a country like we do that forces a candidate to show his/her taxes. i am against a law requiring a tax return mandate
|
|
purplebee
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,742
Jun 27, 2014 20:37:34 GMT
|
Post by purplebee on Oct 22, 2016 12:36:58 GMT
So many great ideas in this thread.
I especially like the limits on campaign length and spending with the media providing free and equal "no BS" time to major candidates. If they can't get their message across with three months and three mil, there's something wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Sharon on Oct 22, 2016 13:58:07 GMT
What changes or rules do you wish would happen because of this election? I hope there is a law that the candidate must release their tax returns. Do you have any? I disagree with this. Tax returns are personal and private. I don't think we should expect anybody to release their returns. All we really need to know is if the person is current in their taxes and isn't filing fraudulent returns. We don't need to see their deductions or how much money they made. That goes for both candidates.
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Oct 22, 2016 14:38:03 GMT
Not sure how, but I would like to see a change in the electoral process-the system we have in place now doesn't always reflect the will of the people.
|
|