|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Dec 31, 2016 5:46:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Dec 31, 2016 20:35:46 GMT
Well, those four kids are never going to see their parents for the next four years.
|
|
|
Post by peatlejuice on Dec 31, 2016 20:36:52 GMT
Well, those four kids are never going to see their parents for the next four years. The snarky side of me can't help but think, "Lucky kids." 
|
|
Nink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,963
Location: North Idaho
Jul 1, 2014 23:30:44 GMT
|
Post by Nink on Dec 31, 2016 20:41:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Dec 31, 2016 22:13:19 GMT
I thought KellyAnne wasn't taking a position because she said she had four small children.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Dec 31, 2016 22:22:05 GMT
I thought KellyAnne wasn't taking a position because she said she had four small children. Wait! What?  ? You mean KellyAnne LIED?   ??
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:56:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2016 22:33:06 GMT
He paid Trump to be considered for the position?
|
|
|
Post by mirabelleswalker on Dec 31, 2016 23:14:52 GMT
He paid Trump to be considered for the position? I don't see where this is pay to play. Nepotism, maybe.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:56:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2016 23:28:27 GMT
He paid Trump to be considered for the position? I don't see where this is pay to play. Nepotism, maybe. I agree but was questioning why OP called it pay to play. Many Presidents surround themselves with people they know and trust from their past. Two off the top of my head for Obama are Valerie Jarrett and Rahm Emanuel. IMO, it's really not a big deal with the exception of those simply looking for something else to rag on Trump about. My guess is anyone up in arms over either Conway didn't blink an eye over Valerie Jarrett or Rahm Emanuel being tapped by Obama.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:56:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2016 23:47:34 GMT
Could be this guy is being considered for one of 2 reasons.
1. A reward for Kellyanne because of all the lying she does for trump.
2. This is the best he could get. I doubt many of our "best and brightest" want to associate themselves to a trump presidency.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Dec 31, 2016 23:53:17 GMT
He paid Trump to be considered for the position? I don't see where this is pay to play. Nepotism, maybe. Okay, nepotism. Linda McManon & Betsy DeBos definitely paid to get where they are. Chao & Conway positions because of spouses connected to Trump. Trump kids initiated the "pay to play charity scams" pay to have coffee with Ivanka, pay min $25K to $1,000,000 to have access to Trumpster on day after inauguration. And for jenny2--- Pointing out a fact, you don't see me "ragging on anyone" like those who were screaming about pay to play on the other side. You might want to give the OP a good read before accusing me of "finding something else to rag on Trump", which is not anything remotely close to what I posted.
|
|
|
Post by terri on Dec 31, 2016 23:58:30 GMT
My guess is her husband is under consideration because Trump really wants Kellyanne Conway to work for him and she expressed she didn't want to leave her family. I don't know enough about him to know if he is qualified but this happens a lot in DC.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:56:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2017 0:05:54 GMT
I don't see where this is pay to play. Nepotism, maybe. Okay, nepotism. Linda McManon & Betsy DeBos definitely paid to get where they are. Chao & Conway positions because of spouses connected to Trump. Trump kids initiated the "pay to play charity scams" pay to have coffee with Ivanka, pay min $25K to $1,000,000 to have access to Trumpster on day after inauguration. And for jenny2--- Pointing out a fact, you don't see me "ragging on anyone" like those who were screaming about pay to play on the other side. You might want to give the OP a good read before accusing me of "finding something else to rag on Trump", which is not anything remotely close to what I posted. Except that it is not a fact. My guess is her husband is under consideration because Trump really wants Kellyanne Conway to work for him and she expressed she didn't want to leave her family. I don't know enough about him to know if he is qualified but this happens a lot in DC. Exactly. It happens on both sides. It's hardly new.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Jan 1, 2017 0:20:05 GMT
He paid Trump to be considered for the position? I don't see where this is pay to play. Nepotism, maybe. It's not nepotism. Trump is the one doing the nominating, not Kellyanne.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jan 1, 2017 0:50:26 GMT
Okay, nepotism. Linda McManon & Betsy DeBos definitely paid to get where they are. Chao & Conway positions because of spouses connected to Trump. Trump kids initiated the "pay to play charity scams" pay to have coffee with Ivanka, pay min $25K to $1,000,000 to have access to Trumpster on day after inauguration. And for jenny2--- Pointing out a fact, you don't see me "ragging on anyone" like those who were screaming about pay to play on the other side. You might want to give the OP a good read before accusing me of "finding something else to rag on Trump", which is not anything remotely close to what I posted. Except that it is not a fact. My guess is her husband is under consideration because Trump really wants Kellyanne Conway to work for him and she expressed she didn't want to leave her family. I don't know enough about him to know if he is qualified but this happens a lot in DC. Exactly. It happens on both sides. It's hardly new. Yes, my OP is a fact. KellyAnne Conway's husband is being considered/vetted for a position. That is all my post stated, nothing more. You came back to the group and have been angsty, argumentative (where really, there is no need) and ready to jump on people. And your response making accusations still is wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:56:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2017 1:38:50 GMT
Except that it is not a fact. Exactly. It happens on both sides. It's hardly new. Yes, my OP is a fact. KellyAnne Conway's husband is being considered/vetted for a position. That is all my post stated, nothing more. You came back to the group and have been angsty, argumentative (where really, there is no need) and ready to jump on people. And your response making accusations still is wrong. You called it a pay for play. That is NOT factual unless you're changing the definition.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jan 1, 2017 1:51:09 GMT
Yes, my OP is a fact. KellyAnne Conway's husband is being considered/vetted for a position. That is all my post stated, nothing more. You came back to the group and have been angsty, argumentative (where really, there is no need) and ready to jump on people. And your response making accusations still is wrong. You called it a pay for play. That is NOT factual unless you're changing the definition. I also agreed in a post that it was more nepotism and clarified. I even edited the title after mirabelle suggested a better word to describe it. I STILL didn't "rag" on anyone as you've accused. But hey, go ahead and keep on being attacking and argumentative-- My OP ONLY pointed out the FACT that he was being vetted and considered--that is STILL a fact. No where in the rest of the thread do you see me saying anything else regarding what you're trying to imply.
|
|
|
Post by mirabelleswalker on Jan 1, 2017 2:41:08 GMT
I don't see where this is pay to play. Nepotism, maybe. It's not nepotism. Trump is the one doing the nominating, not Kellyanne. It could still be nepotism. Is he doing it as a favor to Kellyanne? Is the husband qualified?
|
|
trollie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,580
Jul 2, 2014 22:14:02 GMT
|
Post by trollie on Jan 1, 2017 2:46:07 GMT
My guess is her husband is under consideration because Trump really wants Kellyanne Conway to work for him and she expressed she didn't want to leave her family. I don't know enough about him to know if he is qualified but this happens a lot in DC. Maybe he'll let her bring the kids to the office and press conferences.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jan 1, 2017 3:14:47 GMT
It's not nepotism. Trump is the one doing the nominating, not Kellyanne. It could still be nepotism. Is he doing it as a favor to Kellyanne? Is the husband qualified? Yes, I think nepotism is fitting-- nep·o·tism ˈnepəˌtizəm/ noun noun: nepotism the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs. synonyms: favoritism, preferential treatment, the old boy network, looking after one's own, bias, partiality, partisanship And thank you mirabelleswalker for a better word than what I originally used in title 
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Jan 1, 2017 3:20:19 GMT
It's not nepotism. Trump is the one doing the nominating, not Kellyanne. It could still be nepotism. Is he doing it as a favor to Kellyanne? Is the husband qualified? I don't know if he's qualified as the only thing I've read about him is that he was one of the lawyers involved in the Bill Clinton-Paula Jones scandal. I ordinarily equate nepotism to the hiring of relatives. The hiring of friends or people within one's sphere of influence would be cronyism to me. Just my opinion.
|
|