amom23
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,635
Jun 27, 2014 12:39:18 GMT
|
Post by amom23 on Apr 13, 2017 19:29:14 GMT
On the thread about the DD sneaking out the mom said the DD was losing her phone for a month.
Seems crazy to me because my kids need their cell phones and I need them to have cell phones. My kids drive 10 miles one way to school, have sports practices, jobs, etc. If they could easily go a month without a phone then why have one in the 1st place? Taking away their phones isn't a punishment DH and I use.
|
|
psiluvu
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,217
Location: Canada's Capital
Jun 25, 2014 22:52:26 GMT
|
Post by psiluvu on Apr 13, 2017 19:34:55 GMT
No not here. My kids are 14 and 17 and I have taken away the PS4 but they are both involved in sports and after school activities so they have them for my convenience as well as theirs. Also they tend to use ipads or phones in their classes and don't always feel like taking the ipads to school.
They are pretty good kids and I haven't needed to bring out the "big gun" of punishment (yet).
|
|
|
Post by debmast on Apr 13, 2017 19:36:07 GMT
Mine are almost 21 and 16.
21 - at college and irrelevant
16 - nope. We take away her social life. Far more effective. (Luckily we seldom have to)
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Apr 13, 2017 19:40:26 GMT
No.
A teen not having a phone would be a huge inconvenience for *me* as the parent, so why would I punish myself?
I view a phone as more of a necessity/safety item than a privilege.
Now if there were some infraction related directly to the phone I might address that by, for example, locking down data or deleting a specific app.
|
|
johnnysmom
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,687
Jun 25, 2014 21:16:33 GMT
|
Post by johnnysmom on Apr 13, 2017 19:40:31 GMT
We have but not recently and in the past he's been allowed to have it during school hours, and had to return it as soon as he gets home. And the punishments we did that were actually related to the phone being an issue....he was prioritizing texting and such over more important things like chores and sleep. He also isn't driving yet, so that helps. At this point I think taking his phone would be a last resort.
|
|
anniebeth24
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,033
Jun 26, 2014 14:12:17 GMT
|
Post by anniebeth24 on Apr 13, 2017 19:42:17 GMT
I took away DD's phone because of phone-related infractions. These happened in middle school/early high school so it was before she was driving.
With a kid who is driving, I would probably utilize the family plan blocking features/turn off data access, etc. if needed rather than taking the phone away completely.
|
|
|
Post by JustCallMeMommy on Apr 13, 2017 19:43:09 GMT
I would if I really needed to get her attention, but it hasn't been necessary so far. She is tied at the hip to her phone, so this is the punishment that would sting the most.
If I actually took away the phone, I'd need to get her a way to communicate when home alone since we don't have a home phone. I could accomplish the same thing by turning off data/text and changing the wifi password, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by debmast on Apr 13, 2017 19:43:18 GMT
I will say when my 16 year old was in 7th grade, one of her friends was at someone's house and they decided to walk somewhere else. She did not notify her parents. They went by to get her and she wasn't there.
It was about this time of year (maybe late March/early April).
When they got her, they explained that her phone's #1 use was contact with the parents. Since she neglected to use it for that purpose first and foremost, they took away her smart phone. She received an old flip phone that could do nothing except call her parents. She had that for a good 3 months or so before she got her smart phone back.
|
|
|
Post by shescrafty on Apr 13, 2017 19:47:59 GMT
We have and more of a "zing" was that we deleted all of his apps. He could call and text, but nothing else. As it stands I have the code to unlock the security settings so he can't add any apps without approval.
I can imagine some think that is too much, but his grades in one quarter went from a 3.75 to a 3.2 and he was ALWAYS snap chatting or playing a game. For a month into the new quarter he didn't have apps. Then he got them back but not Snapchat. His GPA this quarter was a 4.0 He did get snapchat back with the stipulation that if there were any missing assignments that it was gone again. So far so good.
The drop in grades was because of missing assignments/homework. If it had been because all of his work was done and he just did not understand the content he would not have been in trouble.
|
|
|
Post by myboysnme on Apr 13, 2017 19:49:37 GMT
Hmmm. I guess if that was an appropriate consequence they could leave them in the docking stations while they are home and take them the next day. I never did but I guess if they need the phones away from home they might not need them at home for whatever period of time.
|
|
Kerri W
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,836
Location: Kentucky
Jun 25, 2014 20:31:44 GMT
|
Post by Kerri W on Apr 13, 2017 19:50:15 GMT
I have a couple times yes but it was a serious infraction that caused that punishment. I pay the bill...I will take it away as I please and I will read anything on it anytime I want. I do not consider it an invasion of privacy because they know that from the minute they get the phone.
We got them phones because the phones were a convenience for all of us, we can afford it and we gifted them that luxury. DDs were twins and did all the same activities so it was likely her sister would be with her and had access to whatever the other one didn't if practice changed, etc. They never got in trouble at the same time. DS had his phone taken away for two weeks. He was expected to communicate prior to leaving the house. If something changed, he drove home, told us, then with permission went and did whatever. We live a couple blocks from the school and a couple miles from his job. It was probably inconvenient for him but doable. Both places also have phones he can use if he needed to. If his car happened to break down we live in town and he's perfectly capable of walking home to get help.
The phone is a privilege. I have no qualms about suspending that privilege because they need to have the importance of a lesson impressed upon them. I honestly think it was once for each of the kids once they reached their teen years.
|
|
|
Post by padresfan619 on Apr 13, 2017 19:51:28 GMT
Obviously cell phones were a lot different when I was a teen 10 years ago. I got in trouble often for going over my text limit, my mom would take my phone when I got home from school and give it back to me in the morning. So I still had it when I was out of the house, but when I was at home I couldn't use it.
|
|
smartypants71
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,992
Location: Houston, TX
Jun 25, 2014 22:47:49 GMT
|
Post by smartypants71 on Apr 13, 2017 20:00:46 GMT
Absolutely and I don't care of it inconveniences me. More importantly, it punished DS. When all you do is dick around and play games and text on your phone but then fail several classes? Yeah, the phone is gone. As are Xbox and the computer. The only time he is out of my sight is when he's at school and if it's that big of an emergency, he can call from a school phone.
|
|
|
Post by cmpeter on Apr 13, 2017 20:09:48 GMT
I haven't had the need but I would if it was warranted.
|
|
|
Post by brina on Apr 13, 2017 20:32:32 GMT
I have taken them away, but my kids can all walk to their schools. I might have a different attitude about them being without it if they were driving to and from.
One idea is to take their phones while they are in the house - they walk in the door, the phone goes into your pocket. That way they cannot communicate with their friends.
|
|
|
Post by workingclassdog on Apr 13, 2017 20:35:24 GMT
It was rare but I think I took DD phone away for like an evening or weekend... it was like a time frame where she was home and in trouble. And it killed her and it was effective! But it didn't happen much.
|
|
freebird
Drama Llama

'cause I'm free as a bird now
Posts: 6,927
Jun 25, 2014 20:06:48 GMT
|
Post by freebird on Apr 13, 2017 20:36:54 GMT
I survived childhood without a phone. amazing.
And no, the world is no more dangerous than it was when I was a kid.
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Apr 13, 2017 20:40:07 GMT
I am a firm believer that kids can survive just fine without a cell phone for a week or two or even more. Yes, it is a pain for your kid not to have one when you want something, but being a parent isn't easy. My mom taught me that. For us, finding the thing the kid loved the most (phone, car etc.) was the best way to get a point across. We only did it once and everyone survived. I am not sure how cell phones have evolved into such an important way of life for many people. I could survive without mine. I often do.
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Apr 13, 2017 20:41:17 GMT
I survived childhood without a phone. amazing. And no, the world is no more dangerous than it was when I was a kid. Yes, and if there is an emergency there are usually friends around who have one.
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Apr 13, 2017 20:42:30 GMT
I have taken them away, but my kids can all walk to their schools. I might have a different attitude about them being without it if they were driving to and from. One idea is to take their phones while they are in the house - they walk in the door, the phone goes into your pocket. That way they cannot communicate with their friends. You have to take away all electronics, or else they get on their iPad, Xbox, etc. and they can message each other.
|
|
IAmUnoriginal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,894
Jun 25, 2014 23:27:45 GMT
|
Post by IAmUnoriginal on Apr 13, 2017 20:45:32 GMT
I've taken it away once he crosses the threshold of our house and it stays with me until he needs to leave for school or work. And, the wifi password gets changed at the same time to avoid him using his iPad for communication. But, he drives between my house, exH's house, school and work. Work needs to be able to contact him. He needs to be able to call for help if he has car trouble. I'd feel awful if my kid were at the side of the road and had no way to call a parent or for a tow. Physical labor is a more effective punishment for him anyhow. His phone hasn't caused him or us problems once he learned that responding to me was not an optional activity. Reply to your momma or she shuts shit down. I did temporarily suspend his service once, but it was before he had his license.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:17:10 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 20:50:51 GMT
Definitely not. I can't even imagine what a huge pain in the butt that would be for ME.
Then again for various reasons, we haven't needed to punish her in quite some time.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:17:10 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 21:02:38 GMT
My only one with a phone is my 17 yo DD. She pays for it so it's off limits.
When she was younger and I still paid for it I tried to use that for punishment but it never worked. This was before she got into Snapchat and Facebook and she didn't have any friends anyways to text. She never straightened up her act. Which is why she lives with her dad.
|
|
theshyone
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,458
Jun 26, 2014 12:50:12 GMT
|
Post by theshyone on Apr 13, 2017 22:11:03 GMT
No, my teens phone could literally be her lifeline one day.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:17:10 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 22:15:16 GMT
Last summer I kicked my son son off my plan. He was using all the data. It was time.
But no, I never took phones away. First it really didn't do anything but inconvenience me. Second: Everybody who got their phone taken away, will go use a friend's phone.
|
|
|
Post by workingclassdog on Apr 13, 2017 22:38:30 GMT
I survived childhood without a phone. amazing. And no, the world is no more dangerous than it was when I was a kid.  exactly
|
|
|
Post by walkerdill on Apr 13, 2017 22:47:28 GMT
I have taken phones away. I have given them an old flip phone that is a pita to text on & can't go on the internet. That way I can still reach them after school & when needed. Plus we have no home phone so I don't want to leave them no way to call in case of an emergency.
|
|
|
Post by gypsymama on Apr 13, 2017 23:51:37 GMT
have several times and will again in the future. but then my definition of NEED seems to be way different than many of you!
|
|
|
Post by AussieMeg on Apr 13, 2017 23:56:36 GMT
16 - nope. We take away her social life. Far more effective. (Luckily we seldom have to) For most teenagers I know, their phone IS their social life! I haven't had to do it yet but that's not to say I never would. I understand that it can actually end up being a nuisance for the parents when the kids don't have a phone, so I would probably let them have the phone when they are not at home, but then confiscate it when they are home.
|
|
|
Post by debmast on Apr 14, 2017 0:04:50 GMT
16 - nope. We take away her social life. Far more effective. (Luckily we seldom have to) For most teenagers I know, their phone IS their social life! I haven't had to do it yet but that's not to say I never would. I understand that it can actually end up being a nuisance for the parents when the kids don't have a phone, so I would probably let them have the phone when they are not at home, but then confiscate it when they are home. Not for mine. She wants to BE with people - at a school sporting event, hanging out, eating out, etc. If she has to stay home and they are all Instagramming & Snapchatting how much fun they are having, that's punishment!
|
|