|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Dec 12, 2017 22:59:48 GMT
Alabama Supreme Court stays judge's order to preserve voting records in Senate electionBY AVERY ANAPOL - 12/12/17 10:30 AM ESTThe Alabama Supreme Court has reportedly stayed a lower court’s order to election officials that would have required the preservation of voting records in Tuesday’s Senate special election. A circuit judge on Monday ordered election officials to set voting machines to save all digital ballot images, which would preserve voting records in the event of a recount. Alabama's AL.com said Tuesday morning that the state's Supreme Court had blocked the order.
A group of four Alabama voters filed a lawsuit last Thursday arguing that the state is required by law to preserve the images. The voters’ attorney, Priscilla Duncan, said that the circuit judge’s order would protect votes if there were an “election challenge.” “People think that when they mark the ballots and they go into the machine that that's what counted," Duncan told AL.com. "But it's not, the paper ballot is not what's counted. That ballot is scanned and they destroy [the ballots] after the election.” The judge’s order, which argued that voters would “suffer irreparable and immediate harm if digital ballot images are not preserved,” would have required the images to be saved for six months. The Alabama Supreme Court’s decision to stay the order came just hours before polls opened in the special election to fill Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s former Senate seat, pitting Democrat Doug Jones against GOP candidate Roy Moore. More at link: thehill.com/homenews/campaign/364430-alabama-supreme-court-stays-order-to-preserve-voting-records-in-senateWhy would anyone not want the results secured? Nefarious or what?!? I truthfully thought that was a normal thing to do, particularly in an extremely contested race, with the world watching!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:01:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2017 0:28:20 GMT
Stinks to high heaven.
"Someone needs to file in Fed Dist Ct for emergency relief to reinstate State Court's ruling to preserve this information.They should have juris since this is for a Fed off. Not directly on point but interesting:Bay County Dem. Party, et al v. Land, et al 347 F.Supp.2d 404 (2004)"
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,248
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Dec 13, 2017 15:45:38 GMT
Ha! I wonder if they are regretting the judge’s decision now that Moore lost. I imagine he will want to challenge the results.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Dec 13, 2017 15:53:01 GMT
I thought that too. So very true!
|
|