DEX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,438 
|
Post by DEX on Dec 21, 2017 21:34:59 GMT
|
|
zella
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,884
|
Post by zella on Dec 21, 2017 21:37:46 GMT
What a bitch! I don't believe this was accidental after looking at the picture and reading the text. Don't believe it for a moment. No one with any class would own that brooch in the first place, let alone wear it, let alone wear it to lunch with someone who is biracial.
Unbelievable!
|
|
moodyblue
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,381
Location: Western Illinois
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2014 21:07:23 GMT
|
Post by moodyblue on Dec 21, 2017 21:47:22 GMT
Wow! That certainly seems intentional!
|
|
|
|
Post by stampnscrap1128 on Dec 21, 2017 21:55:18 GMT
Whoa!! Talk about ballsy. And not in a good way either.
|
|
|
|
Post by busy on Dec 21, 2017 22:04:12 GMT
Intentional or not, it’s in extremely poor taste.
|
|
oh yvonne
Prolific Pea
Posts: 8,111
Jun 26, 2014 0:45:23 GMT
|
Post by oh yvonne on Dec 21, 2017 22:05:57 GMT
OMG, wow. Ugh, why? Why give this heinous woman attention? Poor Meghan, this should be all about her, and her happiness and joy of marrying Harry. Now this crap is going to overshadow the entire thing. I'm mad this happened, but more sad that it was noticed and picked up by the gleeful press for everyone to see. Yay! Let's sell more papers!  |
|
|
|
Post by mom on Dec 21, 2017 22:06:28 GMT
wow. Seems pretty intentional to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Dec 21, 2017 22:13:30 GMT
Beyond rude. Hopefully she will be told. Also not invited to the wedding either!!
|
|
|
|
Post by burningfeather on Dec 21, 2017 22:15:35 GMT
Well she looks like a first rate bitch.
And not for nothing, I kept reading the headline as "There's something off about the jewelry this Royal whore wore"
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Dec 21, 2017 22:16:51 GMT
And not for nothing, I kept reading the headline as "There's something off about the jewelry this Royal whore wore" I did too!!  |
|
georgiapea
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,846
|
Post by georgiapea on Dec 21, 2017 22:19:45 GMT
Well, shucks! And here I was so thrilled she's bi racial. How foolish of me to believe she would be treated with dignity.
|
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Dec 21, 2017 22:20:05 GMT
Well, that bitch is living proof that evil does exist.
|
|
|
|
Post by AussieMeg on Dec 21, 2017 22:23:59 GMT
W-T-actual-F ?!?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lexica on Dec 21, 2017 22:30:46 GMT
It isn't the typical choice for a Christmas brunch, is it? Yeah, that would seem to be a slight toward Ms. Markel. How rude and immature is this woman?
Meghan and Harry look to be truly in love, something not often seen in the royals before Dianna's two son's chose their wives. Why can't people leave them alone? I'm very happy for them, and really hope the queen can exert pressure on this family member. She should be ashamed.
|
|
IAmUnoriginal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,894
Jun 25, 2014 23:27:45 GMT
|
Post by IAmUnoriginal on Dec 21, 2017 22:31:52 GMT
Hm. C-word.
Who the hell does she think she is? Although, it took me a minute to see the brooch. I was stuck on her puckered Cat-Butt-Face. Those lips = a cat's ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Basket1lady on Dec 21, 2017 22:52:28 GMT
I'm the first to admit that I never knew jewelry like this existed and don't know the history, and the only photo I've seen is the one in the article. Is it possible that Princess Michael thought the brooch would SUPPORT Meghan? As in that she was wearing African inspired art? You sure can't miss it on that white coat.
|
|
scrapngranny
Pearl Clutcher
Only slightly senile
Posts: 4,948
|
Post by scrapngranny on Dec 21, 2017 23:01:18 GMT
Why would one even own that much less wear it? Meghan is a class act, I’m sure she killed the old bag with kindness.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:01:45 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 23:49:22 GMT
I knew before I saw the picture who it would be. I've read the story about Princess Michael and the restaurant previously.
Apparently she's the relative in the royal family that they all try to avoid at gatherings etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by mom on Dec 22, 2017 0:17:10 GMT
I'm the first to admit that I never knew jewelry like this existed and don't know the history, and the only photo I've seen is the one in the article. Is it possible that Princess Michael thought the brooch would SUPPORT Meghan? As in that she was wearing African inspired art? You sure can't miss it on that white coat. yeah, there is 0% chance she did not know what the jewelry signified. Based on her hatred previously, I will go as far as to say she very deliberately wore it today & was hoping someone would notice. SaveSave |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:01:45 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2017 0:25:18 GMT
I'd like to know who she thinks she is. What a creep.
|
|
|
|
Post by ScrapsontheRocks on Dec 22, 2017 0:33:52 GMT
I was also pretty sure it would be that particular Royal.
Pfft, I say. When an insult is lobbed at me I try to focus on who is doing the lobbing. If it is a known biotch, then I try to see it as a compliment. Or at least an irrelevancy.
|
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Dec 22, 2017 0:42:10 GMT
Who is princess Michael? How does she fit in?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:01:45 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2017 0:57:25 GMT
Who is princess Michael? How does she fit in? King George V was the father of Queen Elizabeth II and also the father of a 4th son Prince George who died in the 1942; his son is Prince Michael of Kent who is married to the woman now known as Princess Michael of Kent. So that would make her the niece in law of the Queen (I think) Eta: I was wrong. He is a cousin to the Queen: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Michael_of_Kent Apparently when Prince Michael married in 1978 the Queen allowed him to rent an apartment in Kensington. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:01:45 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2017 1:02:37 GMT
Who is princess Michael? How does she fit in? King George V was the father of Queen Elizabeth II and also the father of a 4th son Prince George who died in the 1942; his son is Prince Michael of Kent who is married to the woman now known as Princess Michael of Kent. So that would make her the niece in law of the Queen (I think) Apparently when Prince Michael married in 1978 the Queen allowed him to rent an apartment in Kensington. Actually George V was the Queen's grandfather. George VI was her father and one of George V's sons. George V had five sons and one of them was the father of Prince Michael. Prince Michael is the Queen's first cousin. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:01:45 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2017 1:43:03 GMT
I'm the first to admit that I never knew jewelry like this existed and don't know the history, and the only photo I've seen is the one in the article. Is it possible that Princess Michael thought the brooch would SUPPORT Meghan? As in that she was wearing African inspired art? You sure can't miss it on that white coat. It's Blackamoors jewellery apparently. I have no idea if they're classed as racist but Dolce and Gabbana caused a stir when they used earrings on their cat walk a few years ago. The statement then was Dolce and Gabbana clarified that the earrings used in its spring/summer 2013 show are a reference to Sicily's traditional Moorish-inspired artefacts. LINKPrincess Michael is a very low key royal and not that well liked, she just happens to be married to the Queen's cousin that is virtually all her roll is. Whatever her reasons for wearing that brooch I'm sure she could have found a more suitable one than that. I doubt Meghan Markle will come into much contact with her very often anyhow. |
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on Dec 22, 2017 2:00:57 GMT
She tends to be referred to as Princess Pushy in some of our press. I don’t take much notice of her but I don’t recall reading anything that puts her in a flattering light.
Jewellery like this may have its’ place in an historical setting, a museum or the like, but it is totally inappropriate to be worn IMO.
I imagine I have more chance of being invited to Prince Harry and Meghan’s wedding than Princess Michael.
|
|
|
|
Post by Basket1lady on Dec 22, 2017 2:01:51 GMT
I'm the first to admit that I never knew jewelry like this existed and don't know the history, and the only photo I've seen is the one in the article. Is it possible that Princess Michael thought the brooch would SUPPORT Meghan? As in that she was wearing African inspired art? You sure can't miss it on that white coat. It's Blackamoors jewellery apparently. I have no idea if they're classed as racist but Dolce and Gabbana caused a stir when they used earrings on their cat walk a few years ago. The statement then was Dolce and Gabbana clarified that the earrings used in its spring/summer 2013 show are a reference to Sicily's traditional Moorish-inspired artefacts. LINKPrincess Michael is a very low key royal and not that well liked, she just happens to be married to the Queen's cousin that is virtually all her roll is. Whatever her reasons for wearing that brooch I'm sure she could have found a more suitable one than that. I doubt Meghan Markle will come into much contact with her very often anyhow. Thanks for the info. I’ll do a little research so that I know about this jewelry. I’ve never heard of it before now. |
|
|
|
Post by ShesaRenegade on Dec 22, 2017 2:05:19 GMT
Princess Michael has always been known as a bit of a b**ch. She was quite nasty to Princess Diana, too.
|
|
camcas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,414
|
Post by camcas on Dec 22, 2017 3:16:36 GMT
And....what has P Michael done to her face......weird.......
|
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Dec 22, 2017 3:21:29 GMT
She tends to be referred to as Princess Pushy in some of our press. I don’t take much notice of her but I don’t recall reading anything that puts her in a flattering light. Jewellery like this may have its’ place in an historical setting, a museum or the like, but it is totally inappropriate to be worn IMO. I imagine I have more chance of being invited to Prince Harry and Meghan’s wedding than Princess Michael. You'll have to let us know how it goes  |
|
