rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,718
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Feb 22, 2018 15:38:56 GMT
Oh my god! These people are bat shit crazy. They are really pushing the US vs Them thing. People if we don't stop this kind of thinking we are going to have a civil war in this country.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:32:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2018 16:17:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by annabella on Feb 22, 2018 16:37:37 GMT
I read an interesting article written by a doctor at Temple University who specializes in gun shot wounds. She said she wished the media showed pictures of the dead children from Sandy Hook (which she said had extensive damage to their bodies) as she felt seeing images of dead white children could have moved the conversation/policy change more in the direction it needs to go. I wonder if the media stopped covering school shootings, would less people get the idea to do it?
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 22, 2018 16:50:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thundergal on Feb 22, 2018 16:54:48 GMT
"Many in the media love mass shootings," Dana Loesch tells the crowd at CPAC. "Crying white mothers are ratings gold." ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?  CRYING WHITE MOTHERS ARE RATINGS GOLD?!?!?!?
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,147
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Feb 22, 2018 16:55:07 GMT
She also asked where “the voice of the Junior ROTC members” was at the CNN special Wednesday,
Well at least 3 of them are dead, so they couldn't be there could they?
|
|
|
Post by coffeetalk on Feb 22, 2018 17:01:53 GMT
"Many in the media love mass shootings," Dana Loesch tells the crowd at CPAC. "Crying white mothers are ratings gold." ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?  CRYING WHITE MOTHERS ARE RATINGS GOLD?!?!?!? My DH was watching the news in the other room and heard her say that. He had the exact same reaction as yours. Nasty and despicable.
|
|
|
Post by JustCallMeMommy on Feb 22, 2018 17:02:05 GMT
In all fairness, both sides are pushing the us vs. them thing to an extreme right now. My Facebook feed is full of memes where people vilify the other side and call them hypocrites. The republicans are concerned about saving babies but not about saving school children. The democrats are fine with killing babies, but are concerned about saving school children. I saw memes with both of these themes yesterday.
I'm to the point where I am so sick of the way both sides are acting that I am dismissing almost everything I see as one-sided, and I think they have all lost their minds. There is no such thing as a friendly debate anymore. The other side is evil and has no good points, no matter which side you are on.
|
|
carhoch
Pearl Clutcher
Be yourself everybody else is already taken
Posts: 3,115
Location: We’re RV’s so It change all the time .
Jun 28, 2014 21:46:39 GMT
|
Post by carhoch on Feb 22, 2018 17:03:45 GMT
What she says was despicable , her believes are so extreme .
|
|
|
Post by thundergal on Feb 22, 2018 17:08:54 GMT
In all fairness, both sides are pushing the us vs. them thing to an extreme right now. My Facebook feed is full of memes where people vilify the other side and call them hypocrites. The republicans are concerned about saving babies but not about saving school children. The democrats are fine with killing babies, but are concerned about saving school children. I saw memes with both of these themes yesterday. I'm to the point where I am so sick of the way both sides are acting that I am dismissing almost everything I see as one-sided, and I think they have all lost their minds. There is no such thing as a friendly debate anymore. The other side is evil and has no good points, no matter which side you are on. Sorry but I'm pissed. Feel free to sit this one out and leave it to those of us who are prepared to fight. 17 people were murdered in their school last week. If there was ever an appropriate time to pick a side, this is it. And I'm super comfortable on the side I'm sitting on, and I'm pumped about all the people sitting next to me.
|
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,488
Jun 26, 2014 5:46:37 GMT
|
Post by lindas on Feb 22, 2018 17:13:02 GMT
She also asked where “the voice of the Junior ROTC members” was at the CNN special Wednesday, Well at least 3 of them are dead, so they couldn't be there could they? One Junior ROTC member wasn't there because he wouldn't read the scripted question CNN wanted him to read. link
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,147
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Feb 22, 2018 17:16:55 GMT
She also asked where “the voice of the Junior ROTC members” was at the CNN special Wednesday, Well at least 3 of them are dead, so they couldn't be there could they? One Junior ROTC member wasn't there because he wouldn't read the scripted question CNN wanted him to read. linkA fact that CNN adamantly disputes. amp.local10.com/news/parkland-school-shooting/cnn-refutes-parkland-school-shooting-survivors-scripted-question-claim“There is absolutely no truth to this,” the network said in part via a statement released on Twitter. “CNN did not provide or script questions for anyone in last night’s town hall, nor have we ever.” “After seeing an interview with Colton Haab, we invited him to participate in our town hall along with other students and administrators from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School,” the statement from CNN explained. “Colton’s father withdrew his name from participation before the forum began, which we regretted but respected. We welcome Colton to join us on CNN today to discuss his views on school safety.” ew.com/tv/2018/02/22/cnn-gun-control-town-hall-scripted-question/
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Feb 22, 2018 17:23:05 GMT
In all fairness, both sides are pushing the us vs. them thing to an extreme right now. My Facebook feed is full of memes where people vilify the other side and call them hypocrites. The republicans are concerned about saving babies but not about saving school children. The democrats are fine with killing babies, but are concerned about saving school children. I saw memes with both of these themes yesterday. I'm to the point where I am so sick of the way both sides are acting that I am dismissing almost everything I see as one-sided, and I think they have all lost their minds. There is no such thing as a friendly debate anymore. The other side is evil and has no good points, no matter which side you are on. Sorry but I'm pissed. Feel free to sit this one out and leave it to those of us who are prepared to fight. 17 people were murdered in their school last week. If there was ever an appropriate time to pick a side, this is it. And I'm super comfortable on the side I'm sitting on, and I'm pumped about all the people sitting next to me. I understand the rage. For me the issue is that while there are the extremes on both sides, the vast majority of people are not extreme - but there IS common ground. And when we let the extremes scream and yell and rant - nothing gets done. We let the most basic, common-sense, non-controversial things fall by the wayside as these two sides dig in and distract, distract and distract. We argue about memes and tweets and semantics and NOTHING GETS DONE. I want to discuss standardizing background checks for all purchases in every state, discuss appropriate age limits for purchases, understanding what's working and not working with access guns to those with mental health issues (and I'll tag Merge as she posted yesterday about gun restraining orders - something I've never heard of and think is really interesting) and I'm more than willing to listen those who use guns for hunting, target shooting and personal safety to understand how current or proposed laws impact them. I'm happy to discuss where current laws are not being enforced or law enforcement is underfunded. What I'm not happy to do is nothing. The status quo is unacceptable. And posting and debating bullshit memes does nothing but provide distraction.
|
|
|
Post by JustCallMeMommy on Feb 22, 2018 17:29:16 GMT
In all fairness, both sides are pushing the us vs. them thing to an extreme right now. My Facebook feed is full of memes where people vilify the other side and call them hypocrites. The republicans are concerned about saving babies but not about saving school children. The democrats are fine with killing babies, but are concerned about saving school children. I saw memes with both of these themes yesterday. I'm to the point where I am so sick of the way both sides are acting that I am dismissing almost everything I see as one-sided, and I think they have all lost their minds. There is no such thing as a friendly debate anymore. The other side is evil and has no good points, no matter which side you are on. Sorry but I'm pissed. Feel free to sit this one out and leave it to those of us who are prepared to fight. 17 people were murdered in their school last week. If there was ever an appropriate time to pick a side, this is it. And I'm super comfortable on the side I'm sitting on, and I'm pumped about all the people sitting next to me. I don't believe that meaningful change can occur without meaningful discourse. And I believe the us vs. them mentality is preventing the discourse. You can sit firmly on your own side and surround yourself with people just like you and you can all convince each other that you as a group are absolutely right, but that doesn't change anything. It may even put you in a position where you THINK everyone else thinks the same way you do, because everyone around you does. But the other side that you aren't talking to votes, too, and they are all sitting on their side thinking that everyone else thinks just like they do. If you turn off the moderates - the ones who think both sides of the aisle have some good points and would like to discuss the options and pick the best from both sides - I think you are creating a no-win situation because the county is pretty evenly split.
|
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,488
Jun 26, 2014 5:46:37 GMT
|
Post by lindas on Feb 22, 2018 17:37:18 GMT
One Junior ROTC member wasn't there because he wouldn't read the scripted question CNN wanted him to read. linkA fact that CNN adamantly disputes. amp.local10.com/news/parkland-school-shooting/cnn-refutes-parkland-school-shooting-survivors-scripted-question-claim“There is absolutely no truth to this,” the network said in part via a statement released on Twitter. “CNN did not provide or script questions for anyone in last night’s town hall, nor have we ever.” “After seeing an interview with Colton Haab, we invited him to participate in our town hall along with other students and administrators from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School,” the statement from CNN explained. “Colton’s father withdrew his name from participation before the forum began, which we regretted but respected. We welcome Colton to join us on CNN today to discuss his views on school safety.” ew.com/tv/2018/02/22/cnn-gun-control-town-hall-scripted-question/I'm well aware of CNN's response however I'm more inclined to believe the boy. He has nothing to gain and CNN loses a ton of credibility if they did script it.
|
|
|
Post by thundergal on Feb 22, 2018 17:54:42 GMT
I understand the rage. For me the issue is that while there are the extremes on both sides, the vast majority of people are not extreme - but there IS common ground. And when we let the extremes scream and yell and rant - nothing gets done. We let the most basic, common-sense, non-controversial things fall by the wayside as these two sides dig in and distract, distract and distract. We argue about memes and tweets and semantics and NOTHING GETS DONE. I want to discuss standardizing background checks for all purchases in every state, discuss appropriate age limits for purchases, understanding what's working and not working with access guns to those with mental health issues (and I'll tag Merge as she posted yesterday about gun restraining orders - something I've never heard of and think is really interesting) and I'm more than willing to listen those who use guns for hunting, target shooting and personal safety to understand how current or proposed laws impact them. I'm happy to discuss where current laws are not being enforced or law enforcement is underfunded. What I'm not happy to do is nothing. The status quo is unacceptable. And posting and debating bullshit memes does nothing but provide distraction. I'm with you Darcy. I'm not paying attention to memes. I'm not sure I've seen any actually. You know what Rubio said last night that had been needling in the back of my mind for years but had never formed a complete thought for me? With regard to background checks, what about HIPPA? What has to happen in the medical profession to allow gun sellers to see what they need to see before making a sale? It's a huge part of the picture and one I had contemplated, but not on that scale. Age limits...yes. If you can't buy a beer, you don't get a damn gun. A little off the subject but something that also hit me in the head yesterday that I just hadn't given thought to...we have 16 year olds working and paying taxes, but they can't vote. That needs to be addressed. I also feel that something has to be done about money in politics. The millions and millions of dollars spent by the NRA...it's just wrong. It's GOT to change. I don't want to make it seem that Rubio made a ton of sense to me last night because I still think he is spineless. But he may have been smart to point out that the NRA buys in to HIS agenda and not the other way around. Which in my opinion gives us more incentive to pay more attention to how each and every candidate in every level of our government feels about guns.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Feb 22, 2018 18:04:56 GMT
I understand the rage. For me the issue is that while there are the extremes on both sides, the vast majority of people are not extreme - but there IS common ground. And when we let the extremes scream and yell and rant - nothing gets done. We let the most basic, common-sense, non-controversial things fall by the wayside as these two sides dig in and distract, distract and distract. We argue about memes and tweets and semantics and NOTHING GETS DONE. I want to discuss standardizing background checks for all purchases in every state, discuss appropriate age limits for purchases, understanding what's working and not working with access guns to those with mental health issues (and I'll tag Merge as she posted yesterday about gun restraining orders - something I've never heard of and think is really interesting) and I'm more than willing to listen those who use guns for hunting, target shooting and personal safety to understand how current or proposed laws impact them. I'm happy to discuss where current laws are not being enforced or law enforcement is underfunded. What I'm not happy to do is nothing. The status quo is unacceptable. And posting and debating bullshit memes does nothing but provide distraction. I'm with you Darcy. I'm not paying attention to memes. I'm not sure I've seen any actually. You know what Rubio said last night that had been needling in the back of my mind for years but had never formed a complete thought for me? With regard to background checks, what about HIPPA? What has to happen in the medical profession to allow gun sellers to see what they need to see before making a sale? It's a huge part of the picture and one I had contemplated, but not on that scale. Age limits...yes. If you can't buy a beer, you don't get a damn gun. A little off the subject but something that also hit me in the head yesterday that I just hadn't given thought to...we have 16 year olds working and paying taxes, but they can't vote. That needs to be addressed. I also feel that something has to be done about money in politics. The millions and millions of dollars spent by the NRA...it's just wrong. It's GOT to change. I don't want to make it seem that Rubio made a ton of sense to me last night because I still think he is spineless. But he may have been smart to point out that the NRA buys in to HIS agenda and not the other way around. Which in my opinion gives us more incentive to pay more attention to how each and every candidate in every level of our government feels about guns. Actually HIPAA has been address for mental health that's currently required for background checks: Unfortunately it's STILL not being done. There's no federal requirements for states to provide the information and compliance is extremely variable. We can debate whether the current standards are sufficient, but there should be no debate that we should DEMAND 100% compliance with current standards. These are not people with minor mental health issues. These are people who have been declared mentally unfit by a COURT. Every state and US MILITARY and VA needs to comply.
|
|
|
Post by thundergal on Feb 22, 2018 18:06:33 GMT
Ya know, the other thing I find frustrating about the discussion on a large scale is my lack of knowledge about guns. And I'm not sure to what extent I want to go to learn. I don't like guns...but I don't HATE them either. I wasn't raised in a gun family.
The first time my ex-DH took me to a gun range to shoot (a handgun), a guy next to us was shooting an AR and it was so loud and scary, my eyes were filling with tears, my safety goggles fogged up and we left.
So we went to a piece of land owned by some friends and shot there. That was fine. I'm a decent shot. It wasn't terrifying.
But last night when they were talking about the prospect banning of ALL assault rifles, I realized that there are a shit-ton of guns and gun types and maybe I'm not informed enough to say that every single AR should be banned. I'm a little resentful that I likely really do need to educate myself more in order to be a more valued participant in the discussion. Blergh.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:32:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2018 18:07:24 GMT
I'm well aware of CNN's response however I'm more inclined to believe the boy. He has nothing to gain and CNN loses a ton of credibility if they did script it.Actually the boy might be pushing his own agenda. Too many folks are predisposed to believe the worst for agencies like CNN while not questioning the motives of the boy. CNN has taken the step to invite the boy to appear on CNN. So we will see.
|
|
|
Post by thundergal on Feb 22, 2018 18:07:50 GMT
Thank you for that information and the link, Darcy.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Feb 22, 2018 18:11:22 GMT
I read an interesting article written by a doctor at Temple University who specializes in gun shot wounds. She said she wished the media showed pictures of the dead children from Sandy Hook (which she said had extensive damage to their bodies) as she felt seeing images of dead white children could have moved the conversation/policy change more in the direction it needs to go. I wonder if the media stopped covering school shootings, would less people get the idea to do it? I read the same article. I used to have to look at autopsy and crime scene photos in practice and I always thought I would build up a tolerance for them, but it actually got harder, not easier, to see the pictures. I think that it ended up being emotionally cumulative for me. And that article is right -- it doesn't look like it does on Law and Order re-runs.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:32:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2018 18:21:39 GMT
Ya know, the other thing I find frustrating about the discussion on a large scale is my lack of knowledge about guns. And I'm not sure to what extent I want to go to learn. I don't like guns...but I don't HATE them either. I wasn't raised in a gun family. The first time my ex-DH took me to a gun range to shoot (a handgun), a guy next to us was shooting an AR and it was so loud and scary, my eyes were filling with tears, my safety goggles fogged up and we left. So we went to a piece of land owned by some friends and shot there. That was fine. I'm a decent shot. It wasn't terrifying. But last night when they were talking about the prospect banning of ALL assault rifles, I realized that there are a shit-ton of guns and gun types and maybe I'm not informed enough to say that every single AR should be banned. I'm a little resentful that I likely really do need to educate myself more in order to be a more valued participant in the discussion. Blergh. Something like banning "assault rifles" is difficult because it all gets down to definitions. I'd rather stick w/number and easier things to define like: 1. No more than 6 or 8 capacity magazines 2. No auto-loading of chambers - require some kind of manual effort to unload/reload next round from the magazine 3. Buy only from state stores (like many states used to do and some still do for alcohol) 4. Make a maximum purchase per period on ammunition - maybe different maximums based on how a gun is registered, how the user is trained, etc. I'm sure there are no perfect answers, but there are better answers than "thoughts and prayers and on to the next".
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:32:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2018 18:22:54 GMT
You know what Rubio said last night that had been needling in the back of my mind for years but had never formed a complete thought for me? With regard to background checks, what about HIPPA? What has to happen in the medical profession to allow gun sellers to see what they need to see before making a sale? It's a huge part of the picture and one I had contemplated, but not on that scale. We have a similar law to your HIPPA in so far as medical data protection if concerned. When you apply for a gun license in the UK you have to provide a medical certificate from a Dr that confirms that you are mentally competent to be issued with one. Without that certificate it's a waste of time applying.
|
|
|
Post by mrssmith on Feb 22, 2018 18:23:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thundergal on Feb 22, 2018 18:24:04 GMT
Something like banning "assault rifles" is difficult because it all gets down to definitions. I'd rather stick w/number and easier things to define like: 1. No more than 6 or 8 capacity magazines 2. No auto-loading of chambers - require some kind of manual effort to unload/reload next round from the magazine 3. Buy only from state stores (like many states used to do and some still do for alcohol) 4. Make a maximum purchase per period on ammunition - maybe different maximums based on how a gun is registered, how the user is trained, etc. I'm sure there are no perfect answers, but there are better answers than "thoughts and prayers and on to the next". I agree with all of this and would support legislation leading to everything you listed.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 22, 2018 18:36:30 GMT
A little off the subject but something that also hit me in the head yesterday that I just hadn't given thought to...we have 16 year olds working and paying taxes, but they can't vote. That needs to be addressed. I don't think that is a big issue, there are many kids who 'work', some from infancy, models, actors......... I worked and paid taxes before I was 14. I was selling cards etc from 6 yrs old, but not sure there were any tax consequences, it was the 'dark ages' But he may have been smart to point out that the NRA buys in to HIS agenda and not the other way around. Which in my opinion gives us more incentive to pay more attention to how each and every candidate in every level of our government feels about guns. Raised Catholic, time with LDS, pro-birth, pro guns before NRA could be. It is a point, but they are so very hard line, little flexibility, give nothing. I don't like or own guns of any kind. I will defend reasonable gun ownership for those who are qualified through background checks.. I see no reason for anyone to have AR-15/any semi-automatic gun or automatic guns.
|
|
eleezybeth
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,784
Jun 28, 2014 20:42:01 GMT
|
Post by eleezybeth on Feb 22, 2018 18:38:17 GMT
I wish I had Bill Gates money... Want your assault rifles? Keep your assault rifles. I'd find a way to buy the companies that make pieces of the weaponry. Magazines? Bullets? Something. And then I'd raise the price x a gazillion. I'd use the patent system to block or litigate any new companies trying to create something new. I know, I know, it's just a foolish dream but I wish I could do it. There is no reason that you need a large capacity magazine. You get a 3 round max magazine. Give these poor kids and extra 4 seconds to run while you reload. Defeats the point? Maybe but you kept your gun! And my kid was given time to play dead. 
|
|
azredhead
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,755
Jun 25, 2014 22:49:18 GMT
|
Post by azredhead on Feb 22, 2018 18:44:06 GMT
In all fairness, both sides are pushing the us vs. them thing to an extreme right now. My Facebook feed is full of memes where people vilify the other side and call them hypocrites. The republicans are concerned about saving babies but not about saving school children. The democrats are fine with killing babies, but are concerned about saving school children. I saw memes with both of these themes yesterday. I'm to the point where I am so sick of the way both sides are acting that I am dismissing almost everything I see as one-sided, and I think they have all lost their minds. There is no such thing as a friendly debate anymore. The other side is evil and has no good points, no matter which side you are on. Sorry but I'm pissed. Feel free to sit this one out and leave it to those of us who are prepared to fight. 17 people were murdered in their school last week. If there was ever an appropriate time to pick a side, this is it. And I'm super comfortable on the side I'm sitting on, and I'm pumped about all the people sitting next to me. I'm comfortable too.. that might be fine for you but A LOT of us ARE Frustrated and ANGRY! NO one is listening! I've read so much the last few days I feel like exploding.. it does go both ways! nasty and dispicable was the town hall last night. That didn't accomplish a damn thing except shout down people. ETA -I also agree that Rubio is spineless but he wasn't even able to explain the laws and why things are harder..
|
|
|
Post by birukitty on Feb 22, 2018 18:57:31 GMT
I wish I had Bill Gates money... Want your assault rifles? Keep your assault rifles. I'd find a way to buy the companies that make pieces of the weaponry. Magazines? Bullets? Something. And then I'd raise the price x a gazillion. I'd use the patent system to block or litigate any new companies trying to create something new. I know, I know, it's just a foolish dream but I wish I could do it. There is no reason that you need a large capacity magazine. You get a 3 round max magazine. Give these poor kids and extra 4 seconds to run while you reload. Defeats the point? Maybe but you kept your gun! And my kid was given time to play dead.  What a brilliant idea! Hey, if that ahole Martin Shkreli can raise the price of a medication 5000% overnight why can't we do the same with the price of bullets and magazines? All bullets and magazines. And then just to be super cautious we make 3D printers illegal to be owned privately and if caught with one the penalty is death. This way the only way you could make bullets yourself would be the old fashioned way by melting metal.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Feb 22, 2018 19:04:32 GMT
Oh my god! These people are bat shit crazy. They are really pushing the US vs Them thing. People if we don't stop this kind of thinking we are going to have a civil war in this country. I agree with the us vs them mentality. It’s coming from both sides though.
|
|