Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 13:42:25 GMT
...to finance tax cuts for the wealthiest and foreign & domestic shareholders. "The United States plans to sell about $294 billion of debt, according to the Treasury Department. That's the highest for a week since the record set during the 2008 financial crisis. Federal revenue is declining because of President Trump's tax cuts, so the government needs to borrow more to make ends meet. At the same time, Washington's borrowing costs have climbed rapidly in recent months." money.cnn.com/2018/03/27/investing/us-debt-sale-record-treasury/index.htmlWe could have used all that money to hire more government workers (teachers, social workers, law enforcement, etc) to provide more services to more people (education, health, safety). Instead much of it is going into stock buybacks and the pockets of foreign and domestic owners of US shares. Even profits taken by US citizens don't necessarily stay in the US to "build more factories". That old pipe dream died long ago. Capital flies off to where it gets the most pleasure and/or the most returns. Capital has no allegiance to country. So, we're borrowing more than we have since the financial crisis so we could stuff the pockets of the least in need. Good job, America.
|
|
tracylynn
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,905
Jun 26, 2014 22:49:09 GMT
|
Post by tracylynn on Mar 29, 2018 14:57:29 GMT
I hope no one is shocked by this. These tax cuts are going to drown us.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 15:03:32 GMT
I wonder if the conservatives on this board will pop in and condemn trump & company for incurring this debt?
In the past almost every post by conservatives condemned President Obama for the debt he was incurring. Or thought he was incurring.
Lets be honest here. The economy was doing fine for most people so there was no reason for those tax cuts and no reason to incur this debt. The tax cuts are not going to help the people who felt they had been left behind.
|
|
Montannie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,486
Location: Big Sky Country
Jun 25, 2014 20:32:35 GMT
|
Post by Montannie on Mar 29, 2018 15:13:37 GMT
I got emails from my Repub senator and representative asking if my taxes had gone down, or if I'd received a bonus from my employer. 
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2018 15:39:45 GMT
Trump tax law slams N.J. harder than any other stateUpdated 7:14 AM; Posted 6:03 AM By Jonathan D. Salant jsalant@njadvancemedia.com, NJ Advance Media for NJ.com WASHINGTON -- Watch out New Jersey: President Donald Trump's tax law will hit you harder than any other state. The Tax Policy Center, a research group, says in a new report that 10.2 percent of New Jersey households will see their federal income taxes go up this year under the Republican tax measure.New Jersey was the only state where the percentage of those facing a tax hike reached double digits. Next came Maryland with 9.4 percent and California with 8.6 percent, according to the report by the center, a joint venture of the progressive Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. Its advisory board includes experts who formerly served in Democratic or Republican administrations. ** "This tax reform act could have been written in a way where nobody was penalized. It would have had true economic impact for every state. That wasn't done." ** A total of 61.5 percent of Garden State taxpayers, would see a tax cut, fifth lowest among the 50 states. Only Alaska, Florida, Georgia and New York have a smaller percentage gettign a tax cut. more at link: www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2018/03/trump_tax_plan_hits_nj_harder_than_any_other_state.html#incart_2box_nj-homepage-featured
|
|
Just T
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,145
Jun 26, 2014 1:20:09 GMT
|
Post by Just T on Mar 29, 2018 15:56:07 GMT
I got emails from my Repub senator and representative asking if my taxes had gone down, or if I'd received a bonus from my employer.  LOL I didn't get a bonus from my employer. Yeah, my taxes went down--by a whopping $7 every pay period (every two weeks). Woo hoo! What a windfall!
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Mar 29, 2018 16:18:11 GMT
$300 billion? How about that $1.3 TRILLION omnibus that was just signed, which is our budget for only SIX MONTHS. I find it outrageous that we continue to fund our government with borrowed money. No one has fiscal discipline – not the Republicans and not the Democrats. By next year, our projected debt will be $23 TRILLION. How does a country with a 2.9% GDP growth rate even service a debt that massive? We continuously mortgage our children’s and grandchildren’s futures and it’s beyond irresponsible. Personally, I consider the actions of both parties to be unconscionable. Debt is debt no matter whether it funds the Democrats’ priorities or the Republicans’ priorities. Paul Ryan, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, and Nancy Pelosi are all complicit in this orgy of runaway spending. The only lawmaker I supported in this omnibus circus is Rand Paul because he seems to be the only bulwark against this madness.
|
|
casii
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,588
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Mar 29, 2018 16:19:59 GMT
What a mess. If I were EXTREMELY intellectually curious, I'd read up on what conservative news outlets are reporting, but I see nothing of this from conservative family & friends on social media, though a few of them have decided to join in on slamming victims of mass shootings.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 16:20:02 GMT
I got emails from my Repub senator and representative asking if my taxes had gone down, or if I'd received a bonus from my employer.  LOL I didn't get a bonus from my employer. Yeah, my taxes went down--by a whopping $7 every pay period (every two weeks). Woo hoo! What a windfall! PS - Not all debt is created equal. So, YES it does matter what the debt is funding!!!!!! Have a mortgage? That is a debt. It is a debt that allows your family to live in peace, health & safety in a home. It makes your life richer. You will earn money, house children/elderly, stay safe and healthy while making income to pay it back. Have a credit card debt for buying the latest fashion every month!?! That is a debt that may let you live in fashion, but it is not adding to your prosperity unless you hope to recoup more for the clothes/fashion/lifestyle than you put into it w/the clothes purchases. See the difference?!?!?! All debt is not equal!
|
|
PrettyInPeank
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,691
Jun 25, 2014 21:31:58 GMT
|
Post by PrettyInPeank on Mar 29, 2018 16:23:19 GMT
This makes me want to vomit.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 16:53:29 GMT
$300 billion? How about that $1.3 TRILLION omnibus that was just signed, which is our budget for only SIX MONTHS. I find it outrageous that we continue to fund our government with borrowed money. No one has fiscal discipline – not the Republicans and not the Democrats. By next year, our projected debt will be $23 TRILLION. How does a country with a 2.9% GDP growth rate even service a debt that massive? We continuously mortgage our children’s and grandchildren’s futures and it’s beyond irresponsible. Personally, I consider the actions of both parties to be unconscionable. Debt is debt no matter whether it funds the Democrats’ priorities or the Republicans’ priorities. Paul Ryan, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, and Nancy Pelosi are all complicit in this orgy of runaway spending. The only lawmaker I supported in this omnibus circus is Rand Paul because he seems to be the only bulwark against this madness. Say you have that line item veto trump wants and won’t be getting, what would you cut? I’m not trying to be argumentative here but I learned years ago in a meeting at work that if one is going to grouse about something they should have ideas on how to fix it otherwise they are just wasting everyone’s time. One of the reasons I’ll never support Bernie Sanders is because he wants to make everything free (slight exaggeration) and tax the hell out of the corporations and 1%ers to pay for it ( not an exaggeration) cause don’t you know they are our enemy. Bernie represents the far left. Rand Paul’s fiscal ideas represent the far right. IMO neither of these guys ideas are good for this country. This country functions at its best when it’s govern from the middle or slightly left or slightly right of middle. IMO. Oh yea and bring back that word that seems to have disappeared from the Federal Government’s vocabulary. “Compromise.”
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Mar 29, 2018 16:55:54 GMT
Oh yea and bring back that word that seems to have disappeared from the Federal Government’s vocabulary. “Compromise.” THIS!! I will never understand why compromising is seen as 'weak' and not lauded as doing what's best for the country, which is to get legislation actually PASSED. After all, that IS the main objective of their job, passing legislation. right?
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Mar 29, 2018 17:12:42 GMT
Say you have that line item veto trump wants and won’t be getting, what would you cut? I’m not trying to be argumentative here but I learned years ago in a meeting at work that if one is going to grouse about something they should have ideas on how to fix it otherwise they are just wasting everyone’s time. One of the reasons I’ll never support Bernie Sanders is because he wants to make everything free (slight exaggeration) and tax the hell out of the corporations and 1%ers to pay for it ( not an exaggeration) cause don’t you know they are our enemy. Bernie represents the far left. Rand Paul’s fiscal ideas represent the far right. IMO neither of these guys ideas are good for this country. This country functions at its best when it’s govern from the middle or slightly left or slightly right of middle. IMO. Oh yea and bring back that word that seems to have disappeared from the Federal Government’s vocabulary. “Compromise.” Here’s how we can fix it: (1) Stop with omnibus bills. Go back to the orderly procedure of Congress appropriations whereby we write, debate and vote separately each appropriation bill. As I said in another thread, these omnibus bills are a convenient way to hide wasteful spending (because in reality, who reads a 2,000+-page bill?). (2) Bring back spending caps. Right now, it’s being treated as a dirty concept when it is the basis of responsible appropriations. (3) Balance the budget – whether it’s a combination of increased taxes, or wealth tax, and spending caps, the common sense and responsible thing to do is not to spend money we do not have. Raised spending should be predicated on increased revenue. Make this a policy, as in actually vote in into policy.
|
|
|
Post by workingclassdog on Mar 29, 2018 17:19:00 GMT
I don't care what side anyone is on.. Rep and Dem politicians are all crooked in my book. If a Dem was in office and did the same thing.. then what would the outrage be? (I am SO not political but I would be curious how people in general would spin it.)
I'm independent so I have no beef with either side.
|
|
Montannie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,486
Location: Big Sky Country
Jun 25, 2014 20:32:35 GMT
|
Post by Montannie on Mar 29, 2018 17:43:19 GMT
I read something the other day suggesting that a moderate amount of government debt is preferrable. Actually paying off the national debt would be disastrous for the economy. I'll try to find that.
|
|
|
Post by katlady on Mar 29, 2018 18:00:20 GMT
I read something the other day suggesting that a moderate amount of government debt is preferrable. Actually paying off the national debt would be disastrous for the economy. I'll try to find that. I don’t know how it works for government, but big businesses use debt to their advantage. They use money that is not theirs to make more money. And borrowing grows the amount of money in the economy. Business also want some debt so they are not a target for takeovers. I don’t know how much of this holds for the government though. I know local and state governments borrow funds all the time for local projects. But I don’t like that we just cut taxes so now we have to borrow. Doesn’t make sense! And my tax guy said our taxes will probably go up for the 2018 tax filing. 
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 18:17:17 GMT
Say you have that line item veto trump wants and won’t be getting, what would you cut? I’m not trying to be argumentative here but I learned years ago in a meeting at work that if one is going to grouse about something they should have ideas on how to fix it otherwise they are just wasting everyone’s time. One of the reasons I’ll never support Bernie Sanders is because he wants to make everything free (slight exaggeration) and tax the hell out of the corporations and 1%ers to pay for it ( not an exaggeration) cause don’t you know they are our enemy. Bernie represents the far left. Rand Paul’s fiscal ideas represent the far right. IMO neither of these guys ideas are good for this country. This country functions at its best when it’s govern from the middle or slightly left or slightly right of middle. IMO. Oh yea and bring back that word that seems to have disappeared from the Federal Government’s vocabulary. “Compromise.” Here’s how we can fix it: (1) Stop with omnibus bills. Go back to the orderly procedure of Congress appropriations whereby we write, debate and vote separately each appropriation bill. As I said in another thread, these omnibus bills are a convenient way to hide wasteful spending (because in reality, who reads a 2,000+-page bill?). (2) Bring back spending caps. Right now, it’s being treated as a dirty concept when it is the basis of responsible appropriations. (3) Balance the budget – whether it’s a combination of increased taxes, or wealth tax, and spending caps, the common sense and responsible thing to do is not to spend money we do not have. Raised spending should be predicated on increased revenue. Make this a policy, as in actually vote in into policy. Thanks for giving us your take. I need to ponder that fo awhile.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 18:48:08 GMT
Debt to finance roads and jobs (which has the DOUBLE BENEFIT of 1. Giving someone a job; 2. Giving someone else a service; ---- both of which often help the economy in additional ways!) is NOT THE SAME is deb to finance tax cuts for the wealthiest.
The tax cuts turn around and either leave the economy in search of greater returns, or are put to use in the US to fund automation, or other ways to get MORE PROFITS with LESS WORKERS.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN DEBT.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2018 18:55:39 GMT
I don’t know how it works for government, but big businesses use debt to their advantage. They use money that is not theirs to make more money. And borrowing grows the amount of money in the economy The trouble with this is that CHINA and others foreign countries are carrying our debt. I agreee Bernie's plans are too far out as are Paul's, but in the past congress talk to each other and there was compromise! Marriages/families are compromise. That my be part of the problem though. Old white men are in charge in DC and at home? Reasonable tax cuts would have been better. Not all/most for the 1%, or even the top 10%. Scrap the WALL! Left more dollars in for medical care at all levels Scrap his parade. Monitor Cabinet Secretaries' spending more closely, cut the excesses.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Mar 29, 2018 19:16:55 GMT
Debt to finance roads and jobs (which has the DOUBLE BENEFIT of 1. Giving someone a job; 2. Giving someone else a service; ---- both of which often help the economy in additional ways!) is NOT THE SAME is deb to finance tax cuts for the wealthiest. The tax cuts turn around and either leave the economy in search of greater returns, or are put to use in the US to fund automation, or other ways to get MORE PROFITS with LESS WORKERS. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN DEBT. I was not in favor of the tax cuts because as I said in other threads, it is heavily skewed in favor of corporations and the very wealthy. Although it’s true that deficit spending (which adds to sovereign debt) boosts the economy, over the long term, if we continue growing the debt, our interest payments alone will become a massive burden, if it isn’t already. At the end of the day, no matter how noble our goals are, we are borrowing more than we can reasonably service. The current US debt-to-GDP ratio is 104%. The sources from whom we can borrow are beginning to show stress or slack. The Social Security Trust Fund, which is one of our biggest lenders will soon face a reckoning as more and more Boomers are retiring. China and Japan, two of our biggest debt-holders are beginning to scale back on buying US Treasuries, and could, at any time, demand higher interest payments. Do we just keep borrowing? Do we just keep raising the debt ceiling? In my view, deficit spending is justifiable only in recessionary times. When our economy is in the range it is now, there is no justification for it. Just my opinion, of course.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Mar 29, 2018 19:18:34 GMT
Not all debt is created equal. Ain't that the (basic) truth.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 21:15:14 GMT
Not all debt is created equal. Ain't that the (basic) truth. You would think it was basic - but WAY TOO MANY don't get it. A dollar of debt to finance something that maximizes human flourishing (jobs, roads, care, education) is different than a dollar of debt to finance something that creates more wealth for those LEAST in need and who are MOST likely to take that benefit and create MORE WEALTH for themselves out of it (sometimes completely outside of the US economy) - instead of more peace, education, health and safety for SOCIETY AS A WHOLE.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Mar 29, 2018 21:21:22 GMT
I think in tough fiscal times or time of war, governmental borrowing is fine. When the economy is thriving, then it's time to pay off some of that debt. I get mad no matter who's in charge in Washington when they just keep spending more.
Lowering taxes during good times, and then turning around and borrowing more money, is the height of irresponsibility. So natch, that's exactly what our friend Trump is doing.
(And no, I'm not a damn economist, but even I get an opinion, right?)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2018 21:47:59 GMT
Spending caps and a balance budget are nice but before we get there some work needs to be done before hand.
The infrastructure has been ignored way too long. Any work that has been is being done is because of what I call “if we don’t do something this dam, bridge, electrical grid etc is going to fail” mode. So we are way behind which means the work needs to be done now and regardless of the cost.
trump’s plan of having private companies “invest” in various projects is a non starter for me. When one invests in something they expect a return on that investment which would mean toll roads and other charges so these private investors can recoup from their investments. Yes I get there are toll roads in parts of the country but aren’t they state controlled? If so the citizens can vote out those who go crazy with the tolls. Kind of hard to do with private companies.
The other thing we need to invest in are the people. At the end of January there were 6.3 M job openings. You have employers saying they can’t find people to do some of these jobs because they don’t have skills or they can’t pass a drug test. We are in a modern version of an industrial revolution.
Hillary made some comments in India that got people all railed up, even some Democrats. But there was a lot of truth in what she said. Instead everyone jumping up and down about what she said, the questions that should asked are how do we, as a country, move some of what is happening on both coasts to the mid-west? How do we, as a country, move people from below the poverty level into the middle class and make sure they have the skills they need to get these? How do we, as a country, beat this opioid epidemic? Guidance and funding should come from the Feds. If, we as a country, can get this done, a bigger middle class means more income to the feds, the states, and the cities. It also means spending less money on health care and the various safety nets. And it actually helps in the over all security of the country. And makes it easier to obtain a balance budget.
|
|
|
Post by redhead32 on Mar 29, 2018 23:14:46 GMT
What a mess. If I were EXTREMELY intellectually curious, I'd read up on what conservative news outlets are reporting, but I see nothing of this from conservative family & friends on social media, though a few of them have decided to join in on slamming victims of mass shootings. I have made it through the election cycle and a year of being a minority (ETA: wrong word. I'm not a minority. I am in the minority, as a moderate. Just wanted to be clear.) non-Republican in my online world. But that is my line in the sand. If I see someone mocking, taunting or slamming the Parkland victims on a personal level, it is an automatic unfriend. I don't care how I know them.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2018 1:14:32 GMT
I wonder if the conservatives on this board will pop in and condemn trump & company for incurring this debt? In the past almost every post by conservatives condemned President Obama for the debt he was incurring. Or thought he was incurring. Lets be honest here. The economy was doing fine for most people so there was no reason for those tax cuts and no reason to incur this debt. The tax cuts are not going to help the people who felt they had been left behind. You think Trump incurred all of this debt? We, the people, incurred all this debt by allowing the out of control spending. Let's be honest here. Your statement "the economy was doing fine for most people so there was no reason for those tax cuts and no reason to incur this debt" is BS. I'm guessing you get a tax return each year. You can always donate it back to the government if you believe what you're posting.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:40:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2018 1:24:42 GMT
Say you have that line item veto trump wants and won’t be getting, what would you cut? I’m not trying to be argumentative here but I learned years ago in a meeting at work that if one is going to grouse about something they should have ideas on how to fix it otherwise they are just wasting everyone’s time. One of the reasons I’ll never support Bernie Sanders is because he wants to make everything free (slight exaggeration) and tax the hell out of the corporations and 1%ers to pay for it ( not an exaggeration) cause don’t you know they are our enemy. Bernie represents the far left. Rand Paul’s fiscal ideas represent the far right. IMO neither of these guys ideas are good for this country. This country functions at its best when it’s govern from the middle or slightly left or slightly right of middle. IMO. Oh yea and bring back that word that seems to have disappeared from the Federal Government’s vocabulary. “Compromise.” Here’s how we can fix it: (1) Stop with omnibus bills. Go back to the orderly procedure of Congress appropriations whereby we write, debate and vote separately each appropriation bill. As I said in another thread, these omnibus bills are a convenient way to hide wasteful spending (because in reality, who reads a 2,000+-page bill?). (2) Bring back spending caps. Right now, it’s being treated as a dirty concept when it is the basis of responsible appropriations. (3) Balance the budget – whether it’s a combination of increased taxes, or wealth tax, and spending caps, the common sense and responsible thing to do is not to spend money we do not have. Raised spending should be predicated on increased revenue. Make this a policy, as in actually vote in into policy.  #3- balance the budget. STOP spending what we don't have.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Mar 30, 2018 1:54:49 GMT
...to finance tax cuts for the wealthiest and foreign & domestic shareholders. "The United States plans to sell about $294 billion of debt, according to the Treasury Department. That's the highest for a week since the record set during the 2008 financial crisis. Federal revenue is declining because of President Trump's tax cuts, so the government needs to borrow more to make ends meet. At the same time, Washington's borrowing costs have climbed rapidly in recent months." money.cnn.com/2018/03/27/investing/us-debt-sale-record-treasury/index.htmlWe could have used all that money to hire more government workers (teachers, social workers, law enforcement, etc) to provide more services to more people (education, health, safety). Instead much of it is going into stock buybacks and the pockets of foreign and domestic owners of US shares. Even profits taken by US citizens don't necessarily stay in the US to "build more factories". That old pipe dream died long ago. Capital flies off to where it gets the most pleasure and/or the most returns. Capital has no allegiance to country. So, we're borrowing more than we have since the financial crisis so we could stuff the pockets of the least in need. Good job, America. #MAGA 🙄
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Mar 30, 2018 1:55:39 GMT
I wonder if the conservatives on this board will pop in and condemn trump & company for incurring this debt? In the past almost every post by conservatives condemned President Obama for the debt he was incurring. Or thought he was incurring. Lets be honest here. The economy was doing fine for most people so there was no reason for those tax cuts and no reason to incur this debt. The tax cuts are not going to help the people who felt they had been left behind. Never will happen.
|
|
|
Post by megop on Mar 30, 2018 2:28:42 GMT
I wonder if the conservatives on this board will pop in and condemn trump & company for incurring this debt? In the past almost every post by conservatives condemned President Obama for the debt he was incurring. Or thought he was incurring. Lets be honest here. The economy was doing fine for most people so there was no reason for those tax cuts and no reason to incur this debt. The tax cuts are not going to help the people who felt they had been left behind. Here is your condemnation.
|
|