Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 1:35:18 GMT
The Hill...
“McConnell plans to extend Senate workweeks to prevent red state Dems from campaigning: report hill.cm/1BlCKtI”
What is the GOP feel they need to do stuff like this to win? The best thing that could happen to the Republican Party is there is a blood bath and the majority are voted out of office. It just might force then to rethink what they need to do to win elections. Like come up with a message that is based on facts and not pull crap like this.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 19, 2018 1:50:30 GMT
November! I donate as often as I can get away with it. For my birthday I had my husband make a donation. My Republican husband. Oooh, that is sneaky! I wait until I get a little extra money (like my next check will have my money for running the after school choir). We've agreed not to make political donations from our regular salaries, but we consider bonuses fair game, so ... some of that's going to Beto.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 19, 2018 1:51:24 GMT
The Hill... “McConnell plans to extend Senate workweeks to prevent red state Dems from campaigning: report hill.cm/1BlCKtI” What is the GOP feel they need to do stuff like this to win? The best thing that could happen to the Republican Party is there is a blood bath and the majority are voted out of office. It just might force then to rethink what they need to do to win elections. Like come up with a message that is based on facts and not pull crap like this. Bunch of cheaters have to change the rules and cheat and lie to win. Fuckers.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 19, 2018 1:51:58 GMT
The Hill... “McConnell plans to extend Senate workweeks to prevent red state Dems from campaigning: report hill.cm/1BlCKtI” What is the GOP feel they need to do stuff like this to win? The best thing that could happen to the Republican Party is there is a blood bath and the majority are voted out of office. It just might force then to rethink what they need to do to win elections. Like come up with a message that is based on facts and not pull crap like this. Too bad for him Beto's in the House right now and not the Senate. McConnell can go suck a nut.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 19, 2018 1:56:24 GMT
The Hill... “McConnell plans to extend Senate workweeks to prevent red state Dems from campaigning: report hill.cm/1BlCKtI” What is the GOP feel they need to do stuff like this to win? The best thing that could happen to the Republican Party is there is a blood bath and the majority are voted out of office. It just might force then to rethink what they need to do to win elections. Like come up with a message that is based on facts and not pull crap like this. Too bad for him Beto's in the House right now and not the Senate. McConnell can go suck a nut. It is also pressure to get the nominated people passed. Like the Reps didn't hold nominations on Obama!
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 19, 2018 2:10:06 GMT
Too bad for him Beto's in the House right now and not the Senate. McConnell can go suck a nut. It is also pressure to get the nominated people passed. Like the Reps didn't hold nominations on Obama! *cough* Merrick Garland *cough*
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Apr 19, 2018 2:16:26 GMT
Kyle Griffin..... “Trump: "Melania and I send our prayers to Barbara's husband of 73 years. I'll never beat that record." Such compassion and somehow he makes it about him. Maybe he meant number of wives? He might have gotten confused.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Apr 19, 2018 2:34:47 GMT
For my birthday I had my husband make a donation. My Republican husband. Oooh, that is sneaky! I wait until I get a little extra money (like my next check will have my money for running the after school choir). We've agreed not to make political donations from our regular salaries, but we consider bonuses fair game, so ... some of that's going to Beto. I'm just twisted and get a thrill now that he gets emails from the campaign addressed to him To be fair, he is starting to get some of his news from better sources, sometimes listens to me, and is getting disillusioned with his party. He has begun to admit to himself he's "not as Republican as I thought I was." Hello, I have been saying that exact thing to him since we got together in 1993. Anyway, I'm hopeful he'll make a better choice this November.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 13:19:15 GMT
So, rural America. It looks like the irresistible force of wanting to go back to regressive cultural values, is meeting the immovable object of needing to earn a living off your land. What to do?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 13:37:57 GMT
So, rural America. It looks like the irresistible force of wanting to go back to regressive cultural values, is meeting the immovable object of needing to earn a living off your land. What to do? But it's okay because Trump said they are true patriots.
|
|
AmandaA
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,502
Aug 28, 2015 22:31:17 GMT
|
Post by AmandaA on Apr 19, 2018 13:45:07 GMT
No, no it is not okay. I am not a patriot by that definition.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 14:04:39 GMT
Axois...
“Scoop: Trump sours on Middle East peace and sees denuclearization of North Korea as a “great man” moment only he can do”
Sours on the Middle East and putting all his eggs of greatness in a basket named North Korea. Yea, good luck with that.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 19, 2018 14:10:19 GMT
Speaking of farmers! Upstate NY farmer says ICE officers stormed his farm without a warrant, cuffed him, threw his phoneUpdated 9:00 AM; Posted Apr 18, 1:34 PM Collins said Aguilar had proper documentation to work for him. And he's been paying taxes since working for Collins.Collins said he isn't sure why ICE officers came for Aguilar and he was upset that they came onto his property without any notification or permission and roughed up Aguilar in front of his four children. Just like police officers, ICE officers are required to provide a warrant before they go onto private property."ICE needs a warrant. If they go on someone's property without one, they are violating the law," said immigration law expert and Cornell law professor Stephen Yale-Loehr. Collins attempted to take photos and video with his phone. When he did that, he said, one of the ICE officers grabbed his phone and threw it into the road. Then they handcuffed him and threatened to arrest him for hindering a federal investigation, he said. www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/upstate_ny_farmer_says_ice_officers_stormed_his_farm_without_a_warrant_cuffed_hi.html
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Apr 19, 2018 15:15:42 GMT
Speaking of farmers! Upstate NY farmer says ICE officers stormed his farm without a warrant, cuffed him, threw his phoneUpdated 9:00 AM; Posted Apr 18, 1:34 PM Collins said Aguilar had proper documentation to work for him. And he's been paying taxes since working for Collins.Collins said he isn't sure why ICE officers came for Aguilar and he was upset that they came onto his property without any notification or permission and roughed up Aguilar in front of his four children. Just like police officers, ICE officers are required to provide a warrant before they go onto private property."ICE needs a warrant. If they go on someone's property without one, they are violating the law," said immigration law expert and Cornell law professor Stephen Yale-Loehr. Collins attempted to take photos and video with his phone. When he did that, he said, one of the ICE officers grabbed his phone and threw it into the road. Then they handcuffed him and threatened to arrest him for hindering a federal investigation, he said. www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/upstate_ny_farmer_says_ice_officers_stormed_his_farm_without_a_warrant_cuffed_hi.htmlThis has always gone on. Years ago Immigration came onto my father-in-law's private property where he was farming and started hassling my husband and his father to show their papers, because they are brown. Both of them are US citizens, born here in the states and they owned that land. My husband had to get in their faces with a shotgun and threaten to have them arrested for trespassing to get them off his property. Nothing has changed in almost fifty years.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 15:24:27 GMT
link
MSNBC..... “.@maddowblog: "It’s a terrible state of affairs when the only responsible course is to treat pronouncements from the head of state for a global superpower as background noise that’s better left ignored." I may be wrong, but I’m not, but this is not how you #MAGA. One could make the argument that we should always put America first. That’s true. However, like it or not, we are part of a global economy and global security and the trick is to accept that and find ways to live in this global world and that benefits the United States. Unfortunately for us, that fool in the White House either doesn’t understand that or he does and he doesn’t care because he is going to do things his way. Regardless of the cost.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 15:47:12 GMT
Time....
“.@barackobama: “By bearing witness to carnage, by asking tough questions and demanding real answers, the Parkland students are shaking us out of our complacency” #TIME100”
And then there is trump who needs notes telling him what he needs to say when he met some of these kids.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 18:04:08 GMT
No, no it is not okay. I am not a patriot by that definition. I hope you realize I was being sarcastic. I have friends in the farming business that voted for Trump and it just infuriates me what he's doing to them.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 19, 2018 18:24:42 GMT
This is just NOT ok!!!! He is disgusting!UPDATE:“He does not actually say maggots. Obviously that would be an offensive slur,” Hudson told the Dallas Morning News. “What he’s actually saying is magnets, not maggots. What he’s talking about are entitlement programs.”
Slate has since updated its story to state that Truncale probably didn't say maggots. but the Department of Justice (DOJ) Spokesman Drew Hudson confirmed for The Hill that the word he used was "magnets," referring to social safety-net programs. thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/383966-justice-department-denies-judicial-nominee-once-called-illegal-immigrants-maggotsTrump judicial nominee once called illegal immigrants 'maggots'BY JOSH DELK - 04/19/18 01:56 PM EDT Michael Truncale, Trump's nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, allegedly made the remark during a 2014 candidate forum in a suburban Texas county in response to questions about border security. Truncale called the U.S.-Mexico border "porous" and said there were "bad influences coming in" such as drugs and "illegal gangs," and suggested the Pentagon give used military equipment from the war in Iraq to border patrol. "With regard to immigration, we must not continue to have the maggots coming in," he said, according to Slate. ** ......is a longtime Republican donor and former executive member of the Texas GOP who was reportedly recommended by Texas Sens. Ted Cruz (R) and John Cornyn (R). More at link: thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/383966-trump-judicial-nominee-once-called-illegal-immigrants-maggots
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 18:30:15 GMT
linkFolks, on both sides, have bitched there is too much money in politics. This judge thinks it’s too small and you all are just going to love this guy’s justification. 😀 Proof again elections have consequences. From ThinkProgress Trump-appointed judge uses his very first opinion to showcase his political hackery“Judge James Ho has been a federal judge for only a few months. Until Wednesday, he had never handed down a judicial opinion in his life. But the Trump appointee’s very first opinion, a dissent calling for a sweeping assault on campaign contribution limits, is a doozy. More than just an ideologically radical opinion, Judge Ho’s dissent from the full United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision not to rehear Zimmerman v. City of Austin is a monument to conservative political rhetoric and right-wing historical myths. It’s the sort of commentary one would expect to find in an especially strident political magazine — perhaps one of the publications one of Ho’s current law clerks used to write for. It is emphatically not the sort of writing one expects to find in a judicial opinion. Newly confirmed judges — or, at least, newly confirmed judges who aren’t named “Neil Gorsuch” — are typically more careful than this. They don’t use their very first opinion to burn down the distinction between law and political myth-making. The core issue in Zimmerman involves an Austin, Texas ordinance prohibiting candidates for mayor or city council from accepting campaign donations greater than $350. It is constitutional, even after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, to limit contributions directly to candidates — the federal contribution limit of $2,700, for example, is constitutional even under the Roberts Court’s reading of the Constitution. There are also some Supreme Court decisions suggesting that an excessively low contribution limit might violate the Constitution. But a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit held that Austin’s $350 limit is not too low, and 12 of Ho’s 14 colleagues voted not to rehear this case. Judge Ho was one of only two judges who thought that the panel’s decision needed further review. As it happens, Ho spends much of his opinion arguing that the $350 limit is, in fact, too low.But then he goes even farther. The newly minted judge suggests that all contribution limits “are simultaneously over- and underinclusive—defects that have been held fatal in other First Amendment contexts.” It appears that Judge Ho would even strike down the much higher federal limit.
The most striking part of Ho’s opinion, however, is his conclusion. There, he steps away from legal argument entirely to launch into a political rant against big government — complete with a gratuitous swipe at Obamacare.“To be sure, many Americans of good faith bemoan the amount of money spent on campaign contributions and political speech. But if you don’t like big money in politics, then you should oppose big government in our lives. Because the former is a necessary consequence of the latter. When government grows larger, when regulators pick more and more economic winners and losers, participation in the political process ceases to be merely a citizen’s prerogative—it becomes a human necessity. This is the inevitable result of a government that would be unrecognizable to our Founders. See, e.g., NFIB v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012).”
There’s a lot to break down here, but let’s start with the citation. NFIB v. Sebelius was a mostly unsuccessful attempt to convince the Supreme Court to repeal the Affordable Care Act. It has literally nothing to do with any of the legal issues present in Zimmerman. NFIB claimed that a health regulation exceeded Congress’ authority under Article I of the Constitution; Zimmerman is a First Amendment challenge to a campaign finance law. The only reason to cite NFIB to support the proposition that our government “would be unrecognizable to our Founders” is to take a political swipe at Obamacare and at the Supreme Court that disagreed with Ho’s view of this law. (Ho’s implication that the Affordable Care Act is inconsistent with the framers’ understanding of the Constitution is also dubious — to the extent that it is even possible to claim that a group of Eighteenth Century political leaders with divergent views shared a common understanding. The very first Supreme Court decision interpreting Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce provides a great deal of support for the Affordable Care Act.) Ho’s suggestion that a modern regulatory and welfare state necessarily requires a lax campaign finance regime is also inaccurate. Canada, with its single-payer health care system, has both strict limits on donations to candidates and even stricter limits on campaign spending. In 2015, for example, the Canada Elections Act limited spending by candidates for the most expensive parliamentary race to about $210,000 US dollars. That’s not nothing, but it is far less than the $28 million raised by competing candidates for a US House race last year. Great Britain, with its socialized medicine, has a similar regime limiting spending by candidates and parties. Judge Ho’s appeal to the Founders is James Madison fan fiction. It bears no more resemblance to the original understanding of the Constitution than a Harry Turtledove novel resembles the Civil War. And then there’s Ho’s suggestion that the Founding Fathers would be appalled by Austin’s limit on campaign contributions. Judge Ho begins his opinion with a flourish. “The unfortunate trend in modern constitutional law is not only to create rights that appear nowhere in the Constitution, but also to disfavor rights expressly enumerated by our Founders,” he writes, adding that “this case reinforces this regrettable pattern.” But Judge Ho’s appeal to the Founders is nothing more than James Madison fan fiction.
It bears no more resemblance to the original understanding of the Constitution than a Harry Turtledove novel resembles the Civil War.For one thing, attempting to figure out how the framers understood the First Amendment is a fool’s game. As Jud Campbell, a young conservative legal scholar, writes in the Yale Law Journal, “after a century of academic debate . . . the meanings of speech and press freedoms at the founding remain remarkably hazy.” First Amendment scholar Rod Smolla is even more pointed — “One can keep going round and round on the original meaning of the First Amendment, but no clear, consistent vision of what the framers meant by freedom of speech will ever emerge.” Judge Ho, in other words, is claiming a level of certainty about the founding era understanding of the First Amendment that evaded scholars for generations. Ho is either a singular and transformative genius in the field of First Amendment history, or he is letting his political desires get ahead of what anyone actually knows. But here’s something we actually do know about political campaigns at the time of the founding: Fans of the musical Hamilton may remember President Thomas Jefferson’s dismissive swipe at Vice President Aaron Burr near the end of the play — “Man openly campaigns against me, talkin’ bout ‘I look forward to our partnership.'” One reason this line is so biting is because, for much of American history, the idea that a presidential candidate would actively campaign for their own election was considered a vulgarity. Campaigns were typically conducted by surrogates. As President Andrew Jackson once said to a friend, “I meddle not with elections. I leave the people to make their own President.” And here’s something else we know about the founding era: they didn’t have television. Or the Internet. Or anything resembling modern political communications. The Founders and their contemporaries had no concept of what a modern political race would look like, or myriad of ways that contemporary technology allows big spenders to shape elections. There is simply no way to know, in other words, whether modern campaign finance laws “disfavor rights” that the founding generation understood the Constitution to protect. As Doug Kendall and Jim Ryan once wrote of Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalism, asking how 18th Century figures would have reacted to such a transformed landscape is “as productive as asking an only child: Imagine you have a sister. Now, does she like cheese?”
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 19, 2018 18:46:54 GMT
It gets worse every day........
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 19, 2018 18:51:11 GMT
Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorneyBy Pamela Brown, CNN Updated 2:06 PM ET, Thu April 19, 2018 Washington (CNN)The Justice Department's inspector general has sent a criminal referral regarding former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to the US attorney's office in Washington, according to a source familiar with the matter. A McCabe spokesperson, the Justice Department and US attorney's office all declined to comment. The IG had found that McCabe "lacked candor" on four occasions when discussing the disclosure of information for a Wall Street Journal article about the FBI's Clinton Foundation investigation, according to a copy of the report obtained by CNN. In addition, the inspector general determined that McCabe was not authorized to disclose the existence of the investigation because it was not within the department's "public interest" exception for disclosing ongoing investigations. The disclosure to the Journal was made "in a manner designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of department leadership," the report said. The findings formed the basis of McCabe's firing last month by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.htmlI guess we knew it was coming. How soon until the gloating tweets from dt? ** McCabe attorney calls criminal referral 'unjustified'
BY BRETT SAMUELS - 04/19/18 05:24 PM EDT An attorney for fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe on Thursday called a criminal referral recommending criminal charges be considered for his client “unjustified,” and said he’s confident the U.S. attorney’s office won’t prosecute. Attorney Michael Bromwich confirmed that McCabe is the subject of a criminal referral from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. But he said in a statement that the standard for such a referral is “very low.” Bromwich said he’s met with representatives from the U.S. attorney’s office, and believes “unless there is inappropriate pressure from high levels of the administration, the U.S. attorney’s office will conclude that it should decline to prosecute.” The referral came in "the last few weeks" after the inspector general concluded that McCabe had lied to internal investigators and former FBI Director James Comey over his contacts with the media during the 2016 presidential campaign. more at link: thehill.com/policy/national-security/384033-mccabe-attorney-calls-criminal-referral-unjustifiedOK hope so!
|
|
AmandaA
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,502
Aug 28, 2015 22:31:17 GMT
|
Post by AmandaA on Apr 19, 2018 19:35:17 GMT
No, no it is not okay. I am not a patriot by that definition. I hope you realize I was being sarcastic. I have friends in the farming business that voted for Trump and it just infuriates me what he's doing to them. Oh I know! I live in the middle of Trumpland, where 2018 candidates are all in a contest to be the biggest Trump fan It just infuriates me that he thinks a.) we all support him and b.) that we are willing to put our entire livelihoods (and potentially that of our children and their children....) on the line for this trade war he wants to start.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 20:39:41 GMT
The Hill...
“Pentagon: Syria still has capability to carry out chemical attack after Trump's missile strikes hill.cm/0lKnj74”
“Mission Accomplished!”
Now what?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 21:00:46 GMT
linkFrom the Hill... “ Judge rules against Trump administration in teen pregnancy prevention case”
“A federal judge in D.C. ruled Thursday that the Trump administration's cuts to the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program were unlawful. Last summer, the administration notified 81 organizations that their five-year grants through the program would end in 2018, rather than in 2020, prompting multiple lawsuits. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson ruled in one of those cases Thursday, ordering the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to accept and process applications of four grantees as if they had not been terminated. The Public Citizen, a consumer rights group in D.C., represented Policy and Research LLC, Project Vida Health Center, Sexual Health Initiatives for Teens and the South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy - four of 81 grantees who had their funds cut short by the administration last year.” Just about everything trump does results in someone suing him for it. And in the majority of cases he loses. From what understand this was working so why cut it? Oh yea tax cuts for the rich.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 21:22:27 GMT
linkFrom The Hill... “The Republican National Committee (RNC) is sending a mascot - Lyin' Lion Comey - to trail former FBI Director James Comey on his cross-country book tour. The lion mascot's mission was first reported Thursday by CNN, before the GOP itself appeared to confirm the news in a tweet. The RNC later confirmed the effort in an email to The Hill.” Sooo how old are these guys at the RNC?
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on Apr 19, 2018 21:42:31 GMT
linkFrom The Hill... “The Republican National Committee (RNC) is sending a mascot - Lyin' Lion Comey - to trail former FBI Director James Comey on his cross-country book tour. The lion mascot's mission was first reported Thursday by CNN, before the GOP itself appeared to confirm the news in a tweet. The RNC later confirmed the effort in an email to The Hill.” Sooo how old are these guys at the RNC? Can you even imagine the uproar if anyone from the Democratic Party started sending a Giant Tangerine mascot to Maralogo when Trump was there? Or Chester Cheetah? Good lord, they are an embarrassment only to themselves.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 21:43:55 GMT
trump....
“Democrats are obstructing good (hopefully great) people wanting to give up a big portion of their life to work for our Government, hence, the American People. They are “slow walking” all of my nominations - hundreds of people. At this rate it would take 9 years for all approvals!”
You mean like Pruitt? And Ben Carson? Who thinks it’s ok to gouge the American taxpayer?
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Apr 19, 2018 21:45:45 GMT
they're NOT obstructing his candidates-- he doesn't pick them!! And the ones he DOES pick are pathetically unqualified!!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 21:50:05 GMT
AP....
“Rudy Giuliani joins team of lawyers representing Trump in Russia probe.”
Well I believe we have gone from a “three ring circus” to a “shit show”.
By the way Giullani may have his own problems. He, apparently, knew about the Comey letter about nothing before it was released and hinted about it on some news show. Which would mean someone at the NY Office of the FBI told Giuliani about it. Look for that to pop up now that he has put himself back into the spotlight since folks are all excited about leaks.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 21, 2024 11:45:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2018 22:00:35 GMT
linkFrom the Washington Post 11/14/ 2016
“Rudy Giuliani is claiming to have insider FBI knowledge. Does he really?”From the article... “Rudy Giuliani told Fox News's Martha MacCallum on Oct. 26 that Donald Trump had "a surprise or two that you're going to hear about in the next two days." "I'm talking about some pretty big surprise," he said. Two days later, FBI Director James Comey revealed to Congress that his agents had resumed their investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, after agents in an unrelated case discovered emails that could potentially be relevant to the server case.” Giuliani is a former U.S. attorney and New York mayor whose former law firm represents the FBI Agents Association, as the Daily Beast points out. But does he have inside sources at the bureau who might have given him a heads-up about what was to come?” Giuliani claims no but can he be believed? Especially after his comments on 10/26/2016. Shouldn’t there be an investigation?
|
|