|
Post by kernriver on Jul 5, 2018 2:46:07 GMT
I am so terribly sorry that my answers on this message board are not addressing the entire fucking scope and history of the civil rights movement. And YOU need to educate yourself on how to not be so fucking condescending. Read up, dear. I’m sorry you feel so angry, but you sound ignorant when you make claims like “her protest doesn’t match the location.” If I’m coming across as condescending, it’s because I, too, am angry (but for a different reason). Rosa Parks refused to leave her seat. It took about 13 years between that and the signing of the Civil Rights Act. I know you feel like this person pulled a stunt, but protests don’t always have immediate results. It’s dangerous to romanticize things like Rosa Parks’s action as though it was a magical moment that changed everything instead of one part of a very large struggle that often resulted in violence. And I am so sorry that you feel so insecure that you need to correct me on a scrapbooking message board in such a condescending manner that it leads me to believe that you need psychological help. Please seek that help. We’re all here for you.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 2:48:58 GMT
I’m sorry you feel so angry, but you sound ignorant when you make claims like “her protest doesn’t match the location.” If I’m coming across as condescending, it’s because I, too, am angry (but for a different reason). Rosa Parks refused to leave her seat. It took about 13 years between that and the signing of the Civil Rights Act. I know you feel like this person pulled a stunt, but protests don’t always have immediate results. It’s dangerous to romanticize things like Rosa Parks’s action as though it was a magical moment that changed everything instead of one part of a very large struggle that often resulted in violence. And I am so sorry that you feel so insecure that you need to correct me on a scrapbooking message board in such a condescending manner that it leads me to believe that you need psychological help. Please seek that help. We’re all here for you. Hey, I’m cool. It’s pretty unkind to label people with mental illness for sharing facts and challenging people’s comments. Your discomfort with this conversation is clear, and while maybe I could’ve been “nicer” in addressing you, I stand by what I said.
|
|
|
Post by refugeepea on Jul 5, 2018 3:47:27 GMT
I guess I'm feeling selfish tonight. The last time I traveled anywhere was over 20 years ago. I was fortunate to go to NYC and be there on the 4th of July and see fireworks on top of The Empire State building. I worked my ass off to compete to get there and traveled by bus from Utah all the way to Niagra Falls and back. We stayed in mostly okay places and a couple of not so nice ones and endured the AC not working for a while.
It may not be a big deal to others who travel frequently. I'm sure it's a minor inconvenience not being able to see one of the touristy attractions. Or those that don't give a flying fuck about seeing some statue. As a teen, it was a giant deal for me.
Tonight, I couldn't even set up the sprinklers for my son to run through because he keeps shitting in his diaper. I don't travel because I'm courteous and think of other people. I don't fly because I know he'll be a PITA. I don't stay at hotels because he doesn't sleep in a bed. So good on her, sitting on a statue. I'm sure it will be easy enough for those inconvenienced. What a bunch of freaking whiners.
|
|
StephDRebel
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,718
Location: Ohio
Jul 5, 2014 1:53:49 GMT
|
Post by StephDRebel on Jul 5, 2018 4:03:30 GMT
I’m sorry you feel so angry, but you sound ignorant when you make claims like “her protest doesn’t match the location.” If I’m coming across as condescending, it’s because I, too, am angry (but for a different reason). Rosa Parks refused to leave her seat. It took about 13 years between that and the signing of the Civil Rights Act. I know you feel like this person pulled a stunt, but protests don’t always have immediate results. It’s dangerous to romanticize things like Rosa Parks’s action as though it was a magical moment that changed everything instead of one part of a very large struggle that often resulted in violence. And I am so sorry that you feel so insecure that you need to correct me on a scrapbooking message board in such a condescending manner that it leads me to believe that you need psychological help. Please seek that help. We’re all here for you. Teeeechnically this isn't a scrapbooking message board. The very title is 'not scrapbooking' It's disheartening to see mental illness hurled around as an insult.
|
|
smginaz Suzy
Pearl Clutcher
Je suis desole.
Posts: 2,608
Jun 26, 2014 17:27:30 GMT
|
Post by smginaz Suzy on Jul 5, 2018 4:03:56 GMT
So I guess this gets added to the list of "Ways It Is Not OK to Protest" then. Still waiting for the list of "Ways It Is Acceptable to Protest". Perhaps people who were lucky enough to go to Liberty Island today can reframe the experience of being a part of history. I remember being in NYC during Occupy Wall Street and staying in a hotel overlooking Zucotti Park. It was crazy with the occupy people and the law enforcement. I guess I could have complained that my vacation was ruined because it was really difficult to get to and from the hotel. I thought it was amazing to be in the midst of a revolution regardless of my level of involvement or short-term inconvenience.
|
|
|
Post by gmcwife1 on Jul 5, 2018 4:14:17 GMT
All of you complaining about the inconvenience of this protest need to re-read MLK's "Letter from a Birmingham Jail." Specifically: I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
— Martin Luther King, Jr., in Letter From Birmingham JailThe way some of you talk, the Freedom Riders would've had to reimburse the police. Man. You do realize that just because people have a different opinion on something then you do, they are not complaining. I’m not going to re-read the entire thread, but I think there were only a couple of people that mentioned having the protester repay the costs. It’s sad that people don’t realize that it’s ok for us to not all agree on all actions.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 4:25:07 GMT
All of you complaining about the inconvenience of this protest need to re-read MLK's "Letter from a Birmingham Jail." Specifically: I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
— Martin Luther King, Jr., in Letter From Birmingham JailThe way some of you talk, the Freedom Riders would've had to reimburse the police. Man. You do realize that just because people have a different opinion on something then you do, they are not complaining. I’m not going to re-read the entire thread, but I think there were only a couple of people that mentioned having the protester repay the costs. It’s sad that people don’t realize that it’s ok for us to not all agree on all actions. My comments apply to the people to whom they apply. Having a different opinion is fine, but if you share it, I may comment and I may not agree. And others won’t agree with me. It’s fine. I can handle it.
|
|
anniebygaslight
Drama Llama

I'd love a cup of tea. #1966
Posts: 7,412
Location: Third Rock from the sun.
Jun 28, 2014 14:08:19 GMT
|
Post by anniebygaslight on Jul 5, 2018 6:12:00 GMT
I’m sorry you feel so angry, but you sound ignorant when you make claims like “her protest doesn’t match the location.” If I’m coming across as condescending, it’s because I, too, am angry (but for a different reason). Rosa Parks refused to leave her seat. It took about 13 years between that and the signing of the Civil Rights Act. I know you feel like this person pulled a stunt, but protests don’t always have immediate results. It’s dangerous to romanticize things like Rosa Parks’s action as though it was a magical moment that changed everything instead of one part of a very large struggle that often resulted in violence. And I am so sorry that you feel so insecure that you need to correct me on a scrapbooking message board in such a condescending manner that it leads me to believe that you need psychological help. Please seek that help. We’re all here for you. Wow. Just. Wow, lady. FYI this section of the board is most emphatically not scrap book related. The clue is in the title. I haven't noticed you object on this basis to people disagreeing vociferously in, oh, for example, the political threads in this section. Your assertion that someone has psychological difficulties just because they disagree with you is plainly ridiculous, and says far more about you than it does about the object of your insults.
|
|
|
Post by librarylady on Jul 5, 2018 12:55:34 GMT
Evening news says she was NOT part of the group protesting. That group tweeted that she was NOT part of their group. I think they should have left her up there awhile and see if she could get down the way she got up there. Ruined the day for some and cost $$ to bring her down. This morning the news says she WAS part of the group. But, it sounds like the group wants to distance itself from her. "We had no idea she was going to do that."
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jul 5, 2018 13:12:46 GMT
Rosa Parks probably made people late for work the day she refused to get off the bus, fam.  Rose Parks made a stand on the very thing she had he problem with. No one to my knowledge has a gripe against the Statue of Liberty. So Rosa had a problem with a bus? 😖
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Jul 5, 2018 14:20:20 GMT
I’m sorry you feel so angry, but you sound ignorant when you make claims like “her protest doesn’t match the location.” If I’m coming across as condescending, it’s because I, too, am angry (but for a different reason). Rosa Parks refused to leave her seat. It took about 13 years between that and the signing of the Civil Rights Act. I know you feel like this person pulled a stunt, but protests don’t always have immediate results. It’s dangerous to romanticize things like Rosa Parks’s action as though it was a magical moment that changed everything instead of one part of a very large struggle that often resulted in violence. And I am so sorry that you feel so insecure that you need to correct me on a scrapbooking message board in such a condescending manner that it leads me to believe that you need psychological help. Please seek that help. We’re all here for you. Ah. The quintessential pea “I’ve lost the argument and don’t know what I’m talking about so you need to SEEK HELP” post. It’s possible to learn from a “scrapbooking” message board, you know. Instead of just digging in to defend ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Jul 5, 2018 14:24:37 GMT
But can she even get down on her own? It's one thing to get up there, but another to get down. I can't remember anyone doing this before. That's what I was thinking...it often seems easier to get yourself to a higher place than to get back down. I'm glad they were able to get her down safely. I'm afraid of heights as well, so seeing those images made me very nervous for her.
ETA: Sorry..once again I failed to read the entire thread first and didn't realize we had moved way past this part of the conversation.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Jul 5, 2018 15:06:23 GMT
So in regards to the rest of the thread, I am of 2 minds on it, really. On the one hand, I get that she wanted to protest in a way that would achieve more attention and she succeeded. A group quietly protesting at Ellis Island or the Statue would likely never have made the news, meaning only a small number of people would even have been aware of them. She made sure the protest received much more coverage...whether she was actually with the group or not, and she did so without do anything that might endanger anyone, which I appreciate & respect.
And the flip side, I will say that I would feel badly if people started protesting in ways which shut down the Statue and/or Ellis Island regularly. I think these days, it's a good thing for more and more people to visit the statue & Ellis Island and hopefully remember that their own families weren't guaranteed entry into this country when they arrived. That they are not somehow more entitled to be here then families just trying to arrive now. So while I totally get why the statue is a very poignant place to stage a protest, I also feel like it might be a place we don't want to shut down over and over again. And that's not to say that I think people will start staging similar protests in the future, just that I would likely be concerned about it if something like that were to start happening.
I'm not sure I'm explaining my thoughts well today. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 15:24:24 GMT
So in regards to the rest of the thread, I am of 2 minds on it, really. On the one hand, I get that she wanted to protest in a way that would achieve more attention and she succeeded. A group quietly protesting at Ellis Island or the Statue would likely never have made the news, meaning only a small number of people would even have been aware of them. She made sure the protest received much more coverage...whether she was actually with the group or not, and she did so without do anything that might endanger anyone, which I appreciate & respect. And the flip side, I will say that I would feel badly if people started protesting in ways which shut down the Statue and/or Ellis Island regularly. I think these days, it's a good thing for more and more people to visit the statue & Ellis Island and hopefully remember that their own families weren't guaranteed entry into this country when they arrived. That they are not somehow more entitled to be here then families just trying to arrive now. So while I totally get why the statue is a very poignant place to stage a protest, I also feel like it might be a place we don't want to shut down over and over again. And that's not to say that I think people will start staging similar protests in the future, just that I would likely be concerned about it if something like that were to start happening. I'm not sure I'm explaining my thoughts well today. Sorry. You totally make sense. I have empathy for those who didn't get to go to Liberty Island because of the protest. I understand why they might be disappointed. I also understand and support why Therese Patricia Okoumou staged her protest. It's possible to have more than one feeling about this. I know I do.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 17:02:55 GMT
But can she even get down on her own? It's one thing to get up there, but another to get down. I can't remember anyone doing this before. That's what I was thinking...it often seems easier to get yourself to a higher place than to get back down. I'm glad they were able to get her down safely. I'm afraid of heights as well, so seeing those images made me very nervous for her.
ETA: Sorry..once again I failed to read the entire thread first and didn't realize we had moved way past this part of the conversation.
Oh, I hate heights and was like, "She did that in pink tennies. My goodness." She is brave.
|
|
scrappinmama
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,672
Jun 26, 2014 12:54:09 GMT
|
Post by scrappinmama on Jul 5, 2018 19:24:44 GMT
I'm conflicted about this. As the grandchild of immigrants, I support those who are protesting. But I also understand that this method of protest took resources away from the city. This cost taxpayers money. It put lives of the first responders in danger. So yeah, I'm conflicted about this.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 19:28:52 GMT
I'm conflicted about this. As the grandchild of immigrants, I support those who are protesting. But I also understand that this method of protest took resources away from the city. This cost taxpayers money. It put lives of the first responders in danger. So yeah, I'm conflicted about this. Understandable. But protests are designed to disrupt, to “cost” something. First responders were probably in greater danger from fireworks yesterday than from this protest. But I can understand your conflict.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jul 5, 2018 19:39:30 GMT
I'm conflicted about this. As the grandchild of immigrants, I support those who are protesting. But I also understand that this method of protest took resources away from the city. This cost taxpayers money. It put lives of the first responders in danger. So yeah, I'm conflicted about this. Understandable. But protests are designed to disrupt, to “cost” something. First responders were probably in greater danger from fireworks yesterday than from this protest. But I can understand your conflict. Protests start conversation.
|
|
|
Post by lisacharlotte on Jul 5, 2018 20:35:22 GMT
I’m more disappointed that this thread could have been a discussion of the history of protesting and how it has been successful or not. Instead it turns into a hand slap marathon between a few trying to show how they are right. Condescension doesn’t promote discussion, which is a never ending issue on this board.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 20:38:02 GMT
I’m more disappointed that this thread could have been a discussion of the history of protesting and how it has been successful or not. Instead it turns into a hand slap marathon between a few trying to show how they are right. Condescension doesn’t promote discussion, which is a never ending issue on this board. Considering the post began with calling the protester an “idiot,” I think it went quite a bit better than it could have. If people feel uncomfortable with the things I’m bringing up, perhaps examine that a bit. What can be learned?
|
|
|
Post by lisacharlotte on Jul 5, 2018 20:44:33 GMT
Calling the protester an idiot is a valid position to take. So is agreeing with the protester. Having a discussion about why you think one side or other (or both) has a valid position is part of the discussion. The quote from MLK was a masterful touch. Too bad it’s marred by the petty back and forth of thinly veiled (and not so thinly veiled) insults.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Jul 5, 2018 20:52:26 GMT
No, we said the French liberals were coming to storm the Statue of Liberty for Bastille Day, the 14th, not the 4th... The perils of miscommunication, comrades! 
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 20:53:57 GMT
Calling the protester an idiot is a valid position to take. So is agreeing with the protester. Having a discussion about why you think one side or other (or both) has a valid position is part of the discussion. The quote from MLK was a masterful touch. Too bad it’s marred by the petty back and forth of thinly veiled (and not so thinly veiled) insults. Okay, well let's talk about it! The protester is definitely getting a lot of attention, both positive and negative. She's an activist, and can be seen speaking here: cbslocal.com/video/3894377-statue-of-liberty-climber-therese-okoumou-speaks-outside-court/
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 20:56:04 GMT
Therese Patricia Okonoumou said she wouldn't do it again, but that she is satisfied that the message was sent.
On the denial of people's vacation, her attorney commented that she hopes that the inconvenienced people appreciate that there are protesters willing to protect their civil liberties.
|
|
|
Post by lisacharlotte on Jul 5, 2018 21:06:02 GMT
I think her message is getting lost in the disappointment of all the people turned away. It would have been more powerful to do this not on the 4th when the focus was on her message instead of how she ruined everyone’s 4th. Oh, and it’s the 4th so nobody’s really paying attention anyway.
I will also say there is power in dignity. Scrambling around the base of the SOL playing keep away from the authorities looked ridiculous on the news. She had everyone’s attention. When they came up to get her she should have stood proud and allowed herself to be escorted off the platform.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 21:10:04 GMT
I think her message is getting lost in the disappointment of all the people turned away. It would have been more powerful to do this not on the 4th when the focus was on her message instead of how she ruined everyone’s 4th. Oh, and it’s the 4th so nobody’s really paying attention anyway. I will also say there is power in dignity. Scrambling around the base of the SOL playing keep away from the authorities looked ridiculous on the news. She had everyone’s attention. When they came up to get her she should have stood proud and allowed herself to be escorted off the platform. I have some questions. Do you think the media pays more or less attention to the Statue of Liberty on the 4th of July? Do you think it would be more or less disruptive to protest on the 4th, and when you consider the purpose of protest, would you say it was more or less effective? You may think she looked ridiculous. I disagree. She chose to be forcibly removed for a reason.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 5, 2018 21:14:18 GMT
To give some historical connections, how do you feel Therese Patricia Okoumou's protest relates to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s words when speaking about the Birmingham Campaign in 1963, in which he says the "purpose of direct action" being to create a "situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation?" (from www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0115/Martin-Luther-King-Jr.-8-peaceful-protests-that-bolstered-civil-rights/The-Birmingham-campaign-1963) The Birmingham Campaign Lasting about two months in 1963, the Birmingham campaign was a strategic effort started by Dr. King's Southern Christian Leadership Conference to end discriminatory economic policies in the Alabama city. Some of the protests included boycotting certain businesses that hired only white people or that had segregated restrooms.
When businesses refused to change their policies, protesters held sit-ins and marches, with the aim of getting arrested. King encouraged these nonviolent tactics so that the city’s jails would overflow. Police used high-pressure water hoses and dogs to control protesters, some of whom were children. By the end of the campaign, many segregation signs at Birmingham businesses came down, and public places became more open to all races.
Of the tactic used in the Birmingham campaign, King said, “The purpose of … direct action is to create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation.”
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 9,890
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Jul 5, 2018 21:20:56 GMT
So in regards to the rest of the thread, I am of 2 minds on it, really. On the one hand, I get that she wanted to protest in a way that would achieve more attention and she succeeded. A group quietly protesting at Ellis Island or the Statue would likely never have made the news, meaning only a small number of people would even have been aware of them. She made sure the protest received much more coverage...whether she was actually with the group or not, and she did so without do anything that might endanger anyone, which I appreciate & respect. And the flip side, I will say that I would feel badly if people started protesting in ways which shut down the Statue and/or Ellis Island regularly. I think these days, it's a good thing for more and more people to visit the statue & Ellis Island and hopefully remember that their own families weren't guaranteed entry into this country when they arrived. That they are not somehow more entitled to be here then families just trying to arrive now. So while I totally get why the statue is a very poignant place to stage a protest, I also feel like it might be a place we don't want to shut down over and over again. And that's not to say that I think people will start staging similar protests in the future, just that I would likely be concerned about it if something like that were to start happening. I'm not sure I'm explaining my thoughts well today. Sorry. You totally make sense. I have empathy for those who didn't get to go to Liberty Island because of the protest. I understand why they might be disappointed. I also understand and support why Therese Patricia Okoumou staged her protest. It's possible to have more than one feeling about this. I know I do. Ditto^^^ on the other had, it would have been cool to look back at an event that made history/changes, like Freedom Riders, Rosa Parks, luncheon sit-ins etc, and say "hey, I was there. I remember..." the "inconvenience" could spark your memory.
|
|
|
Post by lisacharlotte on Jul 5, 2018 21:29:06 GMT
I think this is a hot button issue that would have been on the nightly news with discussion. I saw the one clip, but then there were fireworks, and oppressive heat, and a huge storm rolling into town. Other than here, it was long off my news radar before the evening was over.
ETA: I think in this age of everyone looking for their viral video fame, dignity has a place to differentiate your cause being serious instead of “look at me, I went viral”. I believe most people only know some lady in pink shoes climbed up the SOL and ruined a bunch of tourist’s visit. I doubt 75% of American’s know why she did it. Protesters have to control their message for maximum effect. So after thinking about it I’m siding with she leans toward idiot. She squandered an opportunity due to lack of planning and knowing how to get the message across.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Jul 5, 2018 21:33:05 GMT
So I guess this gets added to the list of "Ways It Is Not OK to Protest" then. Still waiting for the list of "Ways It Is Acceptable to Protest". Perhaps people who were lucky enough to go to Liberty Island today can reframe the experience of being a part of history. I remember being in NYC during Occupy Wall Street and staying in a hotel overlooking Zucotti Park. It was crazy with the occupy people and the law enforcement. I guess I could have complained that my vacation was ruined because it was really difficult to get to and from the hotel. I thought it was amazing to be in the midst of a revolution regardless of my level of involvement or short-term inconvenience. My understanding is that it is fine to protest in your own home.
|
|