Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:18:30 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:30:07 GMT
And he’s off...
trump..
“FBI Agent Peter Strzok (on the Mueller team) should have recused himself on day one. He was out to STOP THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP. He needed an insurance policy. Those are illegal, improper goals, trying to influence the Election. He should never, ever been allowed to........
remain in the FBI while he himself was being investigated. This is a real issue. It won’t go into a Mueller Report because Mueller is going to protect these guys. Mueller has an interest in creating the illusion of objectivity around his investigation.” ALAN DERSHOWITZ....
This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!”
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 1, 2018 13:35:21 GMT
This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!” Trump Tweet: Just on CNN!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:41:23 GMT
linkThey are called “junk policies” for a reason. Because they are. Huffington Post.. “Horrible Health Insurance Now Legal Again, Thanks To Trump “
from the article. The Trump administration on Wednesday finalized yet another set of new health insurance rules as part of its ongoing effort to roll back the Affordable Care Act’s consumer protections and restore the kind of market conditions that existed before the law took effect. The new rules affect so-called short-term, limited-duration insurance plans, which typically cover far fewer services than comprehensive policies and aren’t available to people who have pre-existing conditions. The plans, which because of Obama-era restrictions are currently available for only three months at a time, have historically served as a stopgap for people who have temporary lapses in coverage ― say, because they are between jobs. Now the Trump administration is undoing the Obama regulations and putting new ones in place. Under the Trump rules, which the administration formally proposed in February, insurers will be able to sell plans that last for 364 days ― by design, one day short of a year ― with a possibility of renewing coverage twice. As a result, consumers in some cases could buy and then hold on to these plans for what basically amounts to three years, making it much easier to use “short-term” policies as a substitute for the kind of comprehensive coverage available through the Affordable Care Act. It will be up to the insurers whether to offer renewals and under what conditions, administration officials explained in a conference call on Tuesday night. And states will still retain the right to regulate the plans more tightly, whether that means keeping the Obama rules in place or prohibiting the sale of short-term plans altogether. But whatever the insurers and state officials decide, the plans are likely to prove popular in some parts of the country and for some consumers. Their big allure will be their upfront cost. Because short-term plans leave out key benefits and because insurers can exclude people who already have serious medical problems, the policies usually have much lower premiums than plans with comprehensive coverage. For some people now struggling to pay for insurance, including those who are uninsured because they cannot afford coverage available through the Affordable Care Act, these short-term plans will seem like a big relief ― a point administration officials stressed Tuesday night. We do think those plans will be very attractive to those who have been most poorly served by the Affordable Care Act,” said Randy Pate, a deputy administrator at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. He mentioned in particular younger and healthier people who think comprehensive coverage isn’t worth the expense. “This could be an option for them.” But if people who buy short-term policies get seriously ill, they could end up spending a lot more money on medical care than they would with a comprehensive policy under the Affordable Care Act, because they’ll be paying out of pocket for services such as mental health care, maternity care or prescription drugs that short-term plans frequently don’t cover completely or simply don’t cover at all. One short-term plan now available in California, for example, limits HIV coverage to just $10,000, according to researchers from Georgetown’s Center for Health Insurance Reforms. Treatment for HIV can exceed that amount in just two months. An existing plan from UnitedHealth will help pay for prescriptions, but only up to $3,000. And it won’t cover mental health care at all, except in states that require it. Many consumers will buy these plans thinking they are getting a great deal,” Sabrina Corlette, a research professor at Georgetown University, told HuffPost before seeing the final rule. “But if they need health care services and the bills start to pile up, they’ll quickly discover that these plans cover very little.” Meanwhile, those seeking out comprehensive plans because they want or need them will discover those policies have gotten more expensive, thanks to the way short-term plans will affect the rest of the insurance market. Some insurance shoppers will have serious, even life-threatening diseases, such as cancer, which will mean their insurance must have a full set of benefits. But those kinds of policies will become more expensive than they can afford.”
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 1, 2018 13:43:17 GMT
I wish ALL the press would not report on anything he did for an entire week. Then we'd see him complain that they aren't paying him any attention... We wish!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:44:00 GMT
He’s still at it..
trump
“Paul Manafort worked for Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole and many other highly prominent and respected political leaders. He worked for me for a very short time. Why didn’t government tell me that he was under investigation. These old charges have nothing to do with Collusion - a Hoax!”
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Aug 1, 2018 13:51:26 GMT
And he’s off... trump.. “FBI Agent Peter Strzok (on the Mueller team) should have recused himself on day one. He was out to STOP THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP. He needed an insurance policy. Those are illegal, improper goals, trying to influence the Election. He should never, ever been allowed to........ remain in the FBI while he himself was being investigated. This is a real issue. It won’t go into a Mueller Report because Mueller is going to protect these guys. Mueller has an interest in creating the illusion of objectivity around his investigation.” ALAN DERSHOWITZ.... This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!” Does this mean Trump can't remain part of the administration while he is being investigated?
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 1, 2018 14:06:48 GMT
"Suppose there were a best-selling author, historian, essayist, public speaker, TV commentator, adviser to Ron Paul, secessionist advocate, Christian nationalist, Vladimir Putin apologist and expert on terrorism who was married to a senior intelligence official. Suppose he were a frequent commentator on an influential radio show with close ties to President Donald Trump, his family and his administration. Suppose this Trump-connected radio show routinely directed its listeners to this person’s blog, on which he wrote that it was “quite near time” for “well-armed citizens who voted for Trump” to “kill those seeking to impose tyranny,” of whom there was a “long and very precise list” that included journalists, activists, pundits, abortion providers, Republican and Democratic elected officials, federal judges, law professors, FBI agents, intelligence officials and Justice Department officials, along with “all who support them.” There is such a man, and such a show, on which he has declared that former President Barack Obama “deserves to be hung.” The broadcast promotes his blog (archived here), where for years, he has advocated the right of, and the approaching “necessity” for, “armed rebellion” by citizens seeking to “end the tyranny of their elected representatives,” and listed people cast as “tyrants” and “expendables” whom Trump voters should prepare to “eliminate” by stockpiling arms and ammunition."www.rawstory.com/2018/07/trump-endorsed-radio-show-promoted-ex-cia-agents-call-right-wing-rebellion/#.W2EktvgyagY.twitterWhy the ever loving F(*( would CNN have someone like this on as a commentator?!??! Is this that Michael Schumacher (or something like that) guy? I saw that on twitter and was horrified. Apparently the fbi has been notified about his blog posts by some D senators and media.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 14:08:52 GMT
Random tweet that I like..
“I'm super stoked to have a dangerously unstable president cracking under the strain of multiple criminal investigations and live-tweeting his own descent into madness. so much better than that icky lady who was careless with three emails, what a bullet we dodged there, am I right”
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 1, 2018 14:12:11 GMT
The Art of the Steal.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 1, 2018 14:18:07 GMT
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 1, 2018 14:24:24 GMT
I've never wished for someone to be brought down and karma to hit them as much as for this asshole. I can't stand to hear his voice or look at him. He is the lowest of low. He is so cocky and obnoxious and such a COWARD!
I can't wait to see his day come....Maybe not for treason, but he will be going down for crimes...he and his kids are nothing but modern day , slimy mobsters.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Aug 1, 2018 14:36:03 GMT
Wait. When was Trump under oath?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 14:49:01 GMT
Aaron Rupar...
“Strzok was so committed to "STOPPING THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP" that he decided not to leak about the FBI's active investigation into his campaign anytime between when it started in July 2016 and November 8 of that year. 🙄”
Good point
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 15:02:20 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 15:19:16 GMT
And he’s off... trump.. “FBI Agent Peter Strzok (on the Mueller team) should have recused himself on day one. He was out to STOP THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP. He needed an insurance policy. Those are illegal, improper goals, trying to influence the Election. He should never, ever been allowed to........ remain in the FBI while he himself was being investigated. This is a real issue. It won’t go into a Mueller Report because Mueller is going to protect these guys. Mueller has an interest in creating the illusion of objectivity around his investigation.” ALAN DERSHOWITZ.... This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!” I thought it was 12 or was it 13 angry "Dems"? Now it's 17? Man's fucking nuts.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 16:40:43 GMT
linkFrom The Atlantic.. “Fear Is Motivating Conservatives Under Trump” “Liberals decry the forward march of a right-wing agenda. But people on the right believe they’re on the defensive. “ From the article... “For groups like FRC—which exists “to advance faith, family, and freedom … from a Christian worldview”—“. the Trump era should be a time of total triumph. FRC’s leader, Tony Perkins, is a regular White House visitor and one of the president’s evangelical advisers. The administration has prioritized issues that top the group’s agenda, including religious-freedom protections and rights for the unborn. Officials like DeVos, sympathetic to the religious right, have been working to promote private religious education and roll back Obama-era protections for LGBTQ students, for example. And with Brett Kavanaugh’s potential appointment, the Supreme Court is slowly shifting toward a solid conservative majority. FRC is the Family Research Council & “We have gotten to the point where courts have held that morality cannot be a basis for law; where ministers are fearful to affirm, as they understand it, holy writ from the pulpit; and where one group can actively target religious groups by labeling them a “hate group” on the basis of their sincerely held religious beliefs. This president and the Department of Justice are determined to protect and even advance this magnificent heritage. “ I think the the article is an interesting read and worth a gander. I highlighted these parts because... 1. I think it’s ironic the right mourns the fact you can’t decide law by morality, but have attached themselves to a man who has no morals. But, to me, it proves why morality can’t be a basis for law, because it’s subjective. 2. I’m not a religious person and I don’t really care if others are. It’s their choice and I understand some receive comfort from their religious beliefs. Having said that I believe they should keep their religious beliefs to themselves and not expect or demand that others live by those beliefs as well. To me “religious freedom” means it gives the religious right the right to force their beliefs on me through laws. A perfect example of that over reach was the Defensive Marriage Act. Yes I understand Clinton signed it, but it should never have reached his desk because the foundation of this law was based on religious beliefs which had no business in our government. You know, the separation of church and state.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Aug 1, 2018 16:44:05 GMT
#civility I'm sure their kids would be so proud to see mom and dad acting that way at a political rally. All of those conservatives have been silenced, apparently.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 17:00:16 GMT
ABC News...
“Senate defeats push by Democrats to set aside additional $250 million for states to upgrade their voting systems to protect against hacking and other cyberattacks. abcn.ws/2OANOV6”
Unbelievable.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 22, 2024 6:34:46 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 17:16:09 GMT
trump...
“This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!”
Kyle Griffin..
“Giuliani and Sekulow seem to be downplaying Trump's tweet, saying that Trump was not ordering Sessions to take specific action.
Sekulow: "The president has issued no order or direction..."
Giuliani: "...the president uses tweets to express his opinion."
Interesting take on trump’s tweet. But he IS the president and Sessions “serves at the pleasure of the president” Sonis it an order or an opinion and coming from the president is there really a difference?
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Aug 1, 2018 17:29:17 GMT
Those videos are very scary. Those “people” are so angry..just a step away from mob mentality. I'm sure if The orange buffoon told them to go out and break windows and hurt liberals, they would. He has brainwashed so many with his gaslighting and hatred for the media. It's very concerning. I wish ALL the press would not report on anything he did for an entire week. Then we'd see him complain that they aren't paying him any attention... And he continues to do this in his daily emails that bash the media and identify the media as the enemy.
|
|
|
Post by peano on Aug 1, 2018 18:26:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Aug 1, 2018 18:50:44 GMT
"Suppose there were a best-selling author, historian, essayist, public speaker, TV commentator, adviser to Ron Paul, secessionist advocate, Christian nationalist, Vladimir Putin apologist and expert on terrorism who was married to a senior intelligence official. Suppose he were a frequent commentator on an influential radio show with close ties to President Donald Trump, his family and his administration. Suppose this Trump-connected radio show routinely directed its listeners to this person’s blog, on which he wrote that it was “quite near time” for “well-armed citizens who voted for Trump” to “kill those seeking to impose tyranny,” of whom there was a “long and very precise list” that included journalists, activists, pundits, abortion providers, Republican and Democratic elected officials, federal judges, law professors, FBI agents, intelligence officials and Justice Department officials, along with “all who support them.” There is such a man, and such a show, on which he has declared that former President Barack Obama “deserves to be hung.” The broadcast promotes his blog (archived here), where for years, he has advocated the right of, and the approaching “necessity” for, “armed rebellion” by citizens seeking to “end the tyranny of their elected representatives,” and listed people cast as “tyrants” and “expendables” whom Trump voters should prepare to “eliminate” by stockpiling arms and ammunition."www.rawstory.com/2018/07/trump-endorsed-radio-show-promoted-ex-cia-agents-call-right-wing-rebellion/#.W2EktvgyagY.twitterWhy the ever loving F(*( would CNN have someone like this on as a commentator?!??! Good question!
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Aug 1, 2018 18:53:21 GMT
"Suppose there were a best-selling author, historian, essayist, public speaker, TV commentator, adviser to Ron Paul, secessionist advocate, Christian nationalist, Vladimir Putin apologist and expert on terrorism who was married to a senior intelligence official. Suppose he were a frequent commentator on an influential radio show with close ties to President Donald Trump, his family and his administration. Suppose this Trump-connected radio show routinely directed its listeners to this person’s blog, on which he wrote that it was “quite near time” for “well-armed citizens who voted for Trump” to “kill those seeking to impose tyranny,” of whom there was a “long and very precise list” that included journalists, activists, pundits, abortion providers, Republican and Democratic elected officials, federal judges, law professors, FBI agents, intelligence officials and Justice Department officials, along with “all who support them.” There is such a man, and such a show, on which he has declared that former President Barack Obama “deserves to be hung.” The broadcast promotes his blog (archived here), where for years, he has advocated the right of, and the approaching “necessity” for, “armed rebellion” by citizens seeking to “end the tyranny of their elected representatives,” and listed people cast as “tyrants” and “expendables” whom Trump voters should prepare to “eliminate” by stockpiling arms and ammunition."www.rawstory.com/2018/07/trump-endorsed-radio-show-promoted-ex-cia-agents-call-right-wing-rebellion/#.W2EktvgyagY.twitterWhy the ever loving F(*( would CNN have someone like this on as a commentator?!??! When was he on cnn? I am not finding anything remotely recent.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 1, 2018 18:53:26 GMT
Press Sec. Sanders tells @ceciliavega she's "not sure" when Pres. Trump last went to the grocery sore, following the president's comment that "you need ID" to buy groceries.
"If you go to the grocery store and you buy beer and wine, you're going to show your ID," Sanders says.
1:48 PM - Aug 1, 2018
I go to several grocery stores to buy GROCERIES. I have never bought beer or wine in a grocery store!
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Aug 1, 2018 19:01:01 GMT
Press Sec. Sanders tells @ceciliavega she's "not sure" when Pres. Trump last went to the grocery sore, following the president's comment that "you need ID" to buy groceries.
"If you go to the grocery store and you buy beer and wine, you're going to show your ID," Sanders says.
1:48 PM - Aug 1, 2018I go to several grocery stores to buy GROCERIES. I have never bought beer or wine in a grocery store! And even so, the relevant part of that equation is not the location, but the alcohol. Which has an age limit, necessitating the need for ID. But that wouldn't work with his narrative.
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,073
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Aug 1, 2018 19:01:47 GMT
Press Sec. Sanders tells @ceciliavega she's "not sure" when Pres. Trump last went to the grocery sore, following the president's comment that "you need ID" to buy groceries.
"If you go to the grocery store and you buy beer and wine, you're going to show your ID," Sanders says.
1:48 PM - Aug 1, 2018I go to several grocery stores to buy GROCERIES. I have never bought beer or wine in a grocery store! There are still states where you can’t even buy beer or wine at the grocery store right?
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Aug 1, 2018 19:04:46 GMT
ABC News... “Senate defeats push by Democrats to set aside additional $250 million for states to upgrade their voting systems to protect against hacking and other cyberattacks. abcn.ws/2OANOV6” Unbelievable. Haha I bet their tune would change if a different source not working for them did the hacking.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Aug 1, 2018 19:06:27 GMT
Press Sec. Sanders tells @ceciliavega she's "not sure" when Pres. Trump last went to the grocery sore, following the president's comment that "you need ID" to buy groceries.
"If you go to the grocery store and you buy beer and wine, you're going to show your ID," Sanders says.
1:48 PM - Aug 1, 2018I go to several grocery stores to buy GROCERIES. I have never bought beer or wine in a grocery store! There are still states where you can’t even buy beer or wine at the grocery store right? Yes, my state. The liquor store HAS to be separate even if it’s the same brand or ownership as the grocery store. They can be connected but must have separate check outs and can’t check out things for the other
|
|
|
Post by peano on Aug 1, 2018 19:08:44 GMT
Press Sec. Sanders tells @ceciliavega she's "not sure" when Pres. Trump last went to the grocery sore, following the president's comment that "you need ID" to buy groceries.
"If you go to the grocery store and you buy beer and wine, you're going to show your ID," Sanders says.
1:48 PM - Aug 1, 2018I go to several grocery stores to buy GROCERIES. I have never bought beer or wine in a grocery store! There are still states where you can’t even buy beer or wine at the grocery store right? Connecticut: beer but not wine
|
|