Rainbow
Pearl Clutcher
Where salt is in the air and sand is at my feet...
Posts: 4,103
Jun 26, 2014 5:57:41 GMT
|
Post by Rainbow on Nov 12, 2018 3:54:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mom on Nov 12, 2018 3:58:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Nov 12, 2018 4:05:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 12, 2018 4:20:20 GMT
The #walkaway thing didn’t work out so well for you, huh?
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Nov 12, 2018 4:43:59 GMT
Well, if science says, it must be.
|
|
eleezybeth
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,784
Jun 28, 2014 20:42:01 GMT
|
Post by eleezybeth on Nov 12, 2018 4:47:41 GMT
Please link to the peer reviewed journal article in which this was published. I am interested in seeing their research design and data. I’d also like to see how an actual scientist applied a medical diagnosis to a political affiliation. Thanks!
|
|
DEX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,396
Aug 9, 2014 23:13:22 GMT
|
Post by DEX on Nov 12, 2018 5:07:00 GMT
FFS
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Nov 12, 2018 5:23:48 GMT
Statics say conservatives, not liberals, commit the vast majority of mass shootings.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Nov 12, 2018 5:28:25 GMT
Statics say conservatives, not liberals, commit the vast majority of mass shootings. Thanks for that!!
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Nov 12, 2018 5:36:39 GMT
Oh, Lordy, that article!
Where, oh where, oh where to start....
Even just pondering all the dozens of starting possibilities might launch me into a full on psychotic “psychoticism” break.
(Apologies to anybody here who actually suffers from psychosis, but my guess is everybody is going to see the humor in this doozy.)
~AmeliaBloomer Psychoticistic
|
|
Rainbow
Pearl Clutcher
Where salt is in the air and sand is at my feet...
Posts: 4,103
Jun 26, 2014 5:57:41 GMT
|
Post by Rainbow on Nov 12, 2018 5:37:27 GMT
Well, if science says, it must be. I know, right? Isn't science the be all end all of everything?
|
|
Rainbow
Pearl Clutcher
Where salt is in the air and sand is at my feet...
Posts: 4,103
Jun 26, 2014 5:57:41 GMT
|
Post by Rainbow on Nov 12, 2018 5:38:15 GMT
Please link to the peer reviewed journal article in which this was published. I am interested in seeing their research design and data. I’d also like to see how an actual scientist applied a medical diagnosis to a political affiliation. Thanks! You can search for it if you like, I'm not going to do it for you.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Nov 12, 2018 5:41:10 GMT
Statics say conservatives, not liberals, commit the vast majority of mass shootings. Thanks for that!! Goes to show you can find just about anything you want on the interwebs! (And the mass shooting data in that chart doesn't even have 2018.)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 5, 2024 3:39:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2018 5:53:07 GMT
Please link to the peer reviewed journal article in which this was published. I am interested in seeing their research design and data. I’d also like to see how an actual scientist applied a medical diagnosis to a political affiliation. Thanks! You can search for it if you like, I'm not going to do it for you.So you didn’t read the article I take it. So how do you know if the story is factual or the Post is spinning it? I mean usually in the story there is a link to the article they are writing the story about. Well at least reputable news organizations do. Like I said once before, Russian Bots and right wing conspiracy theorist must have you on speed dial.
|
|
PrettyInPeank
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,691
Jun 25, 2014 21:31:58 GMT
|
Post by PrettyInPeank on Nov 12, 2018 5:53:47 GMT
I thought you guys didn't believe in science?
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,856
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Nov 12, 2018 6:10:36 GMT
Leave it to Rainbow not to investigate first before posting. All she cares about is that there’s a lurid anti-Liberal title that doesn’t even correctly represent the paper being mentioned in a rag that’s pro-Trump.
Pete Hatemi, a political scientist at Penn State University and co-author on three of the papers, explained why the swapped political beliefs and personality traits do not affect the conclusions: We only cared about the magnitude of the relationship and the source of it … None of our papers actually give a damn about whether it’s plus or minus.
When we asked Hatemi to elaborate on what that magnitude was — how much more likely were people who held conservative or liberal views to exhibit certain traits? — he said: [T]he correlations are spurious, so the direction or even magnitude is not suitable to elaborate on at all- that’s the point of all our papers and the general findings.
We (RetractionWatch) turned to Andrew Gelman, a statistician at Columbia not involved with the work, to explain the AJPS paper to us. He said: I don’t find this paper at all convincing, indeed I’m surprised it was accepted for publication by a leading political science journal. The causal analysis doesn’t make any sense to me, and some of the things they do are just bizarre, like declaring that correlations are “large enough for further consideration” if they are more than 0.2 for both sexes. Where does that come from? The whole thing is a mess.
(Source: RetractionWatch)
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Nov 12, 2018 6:10:41 GMT
So you didn’t read the article I take it. [snip] What’s infinitely funnier is that it seems the headline writer didn’t even bother to read the article.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Nov 12, 2018 6:22:44 GMT
I thought you guys didn't believe in science?
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Nov 12, 2018 7:04:27 GMT
I thought you guys didn't believe in science?
|
|
|
Post by LiLi on Nov 12, 2018 9:26:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gar on Nov 12, 2018 9:41:24 GMT
What’s infinitely funnier is that it seems the headline writer didn’t even bother to read the article. Worth repeating But let's not feed into Rainbow's cheap thrills
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 12, 2018 11:10:39 GMT
I thought you guys didn't believe in science? Well, in all fairness to bunny, trump did tell her/them that he “had a natural instinct for science” so I’m sure she’s lapping it up like a good sheeple would.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 12, 2018 11:12:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Nov 12, 2018 11:19:34 GMT
Well, I think the look on this jello’s face says it all.
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Nov 12, 2018 11:27:45 GMT
And we are off...........
|
|
|
Post by monklady123 on Nov 12, 2018 11:42:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by monklady123 on Nov 12, 2018 11:44:47 GMT
Well, I think the look on this jello’s face says it all. That's jello? I am almost afraid to ask...but what kind? It looks like tomato jello.
|
|
|
Post by dasmith2 on Nov 12, 2018 12:13:13 GMT
She just never quits 🙄
|
|
|
Post by nurseypants on Nov 12, 2018 12:23:11 GMT
Trolling gives her a pea-gasm.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 5, 2024 3:39:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2018 13:33:32 GMT
|
|