trollie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,580
Jul 2, 2014 22:14:02 GMT
|
Post by trollie on Jun 30, 2019 22:05:15 GMT
Chelsea Clinton was a teenager during her father's presidency. Pardon, I was imagining an alternate timeline to this fucking hellmouth in which the President Clinton mentioned was not Bill, but Hillary. Go off, though. Ha! I read your post as: Pardon, I was imagining and alternate timeline to the fuckening... I will now always think of Trump taking office as The Fuckening. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jun 30, 2019 22:08:25 GMT
Pardon, I was imagining an alternate timeline to this fucking hellmouth in which the President Clinton mentioned was not Bill, but Hillary. Go off, though. Ha! I read your post as: Pardon, I was imagining and alternate timeline to the fuckening... I will now always think of Trump taking office as The Fuckening. Thank you. It works!
|
|
trollie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,580
Jul 2, 2014 22:14:02 GMT
|
Post by trollie on Jun 30, 2019 22:09:12 GMT
Ha! I read your post as: Pardon, I was imagining and alternate timeline to the fuckening... I will now always think of Trump taking office as The Fuckening. Thank you. It works! Sadly
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jun 30, 2019 22:27:51 GMT
So, now it is personal shots? Totally unnecessary. Come on, Darcy you are better than that. I didn’t take personal shots at you at least that was not my intent. Sorry if I sounded that way. I am not responsible for other people’s posts here or on Twitter. I went to the twitter page and read the comments. I saw quite a few posters who feel like you do. There are also quite a few people on this thread who don’t appreciate the sexist comments either. Hey if you want to call me out with the word no one completely ignoring the OP - whatever. The entire OP is offensive. And yes I am more than entitled to point out that very, very few took issue with it in their quest to jump on the Ivanka is an idiot bandwagon. I'll post my final thoughts and let you all carry on. I've spent my entire adult life working in predominantly male fields. I've dealt with it and even thrived and would have said I learned long ago to ignore the bullshit. A few weeks ago my daughter's team won a hacking competition and there was a little blurb about them in the local paper including a picture. I made the mistake of reading the comments. Barbie was just one of the comments directed at my extremely intelligent - but yes blonde and attractive daughter. The multitude of assumptions about her based on her appearance pisses me off. I guess I'd naively thought we'd made some progress in how we judge and yes criticize other women. But we haven't and it makes me alternate between sad and really, really mad. In a handful of months, the general public will be taking a look at the Democratic field which includes several women. I'd say don't be surprised at the language people use choose to criticize them - we've demonstrated over and over again as a society that even women will turn a blind eye and don't be surprised when large segments of the population will dismiss them out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jun 30, 2019 22:30:42 GMT
First ladies have often played a minor role in diplomatic affairs. I hate to post this as it will just bring out the Hillary Clinton haters, but it's the best actual documentation of a first lady's role on the international scene - both on trips with her husband and solo. It outlines the 82 international trips that Hillary Clinton took as first lady and the meetings she had with foreign heads of states. www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/dec/01/Hillary-travel-first-lady/I was going to say she was at the far end of the spectrum on first lady trips - as she was pretty heavily criticized for them at times. But a quick search of the "quieter" Laura Bush shows she visit 75 countries during GWB's presidency. Perhaps it was more that the press was quieter: www.nafsa.org/2018/2/20/laura-bush/Now again - I'm not posting to suggest that I'd like to see Ivanka Trump embark on international diplomacy. It's more to give perspective of the role family has ALWAYS played during a presidency. He difference being that HRC has the smarts, the experience and the intelligence to carry on, as a presidential spouse. Where Laura Bush did the same herself, she also was qualified. Here with ivanka-nope. Not qualified, shouldn’t have security clearance that she does, and she lacks any kind of foreign expertise to rep the USA.
|
|
|
Post by tryingtobewise on Jun 30, 2019 22:33:18 GMT
So embarrassing! They (Trumps) have just zero self awareness.
|
|
trollie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,580
Jul 2, 2014 22:14:02 GMT
|
Post by trollie on Jun 30, 2019 22:45:09 GMT
So, now it is personal shots? Totally unnecessary. Come on, Darcy you are better than that. I didn’t take personal shots at you at least that was not my intent. Sorry if I sounded that way. I am not responsible for other people’s posts here or on Twitter. I went to the twitter page and read the comments. I saw quite a few posters who feel like you do. There are also quite a few people on this thread who don’t appreciate the sexist comments either. Hey if you want to call me out with the word no one completely ignoring the OP - whatever. The entire OP is offensive. And yes I am more than entitled to point out that very, very few took issue with it in their quest to jump on the Ivanka is an idiot bandwagon. I'll post my final thoughts and let you all carry on. I've spent my entire adult life working in predominantly male fields. I've dealt with it and even thrived and would have said I learned long ago to ignore the bullshit. A few weeks ago my daughter's team won a hacking competition and there was a little blurb about them in the local paper including a picture. I made the mistake of reading the comments. Barbie was just one of the comments directed at my extremely intelligent - but yes blonde and attractive daughter. The multitude of assumptions about her based on her appearance pisses me off. I guess I'd naively thought we'd made some progress in how we judge and yes criticize other women. But we haven't and it makes me alternate between sad and really, really mad. In a handful of months, the general public will be taking a look at the Democratic field which includes several women. I'd say don't be surprised at the language people use choose to criticize them - we've demonstrated over and over again as a society that even women will turn a blind eye and don't be surprised when large segments of the population will dismiss them out of hand. Won't be surprised AT ALL. Why are you? Hillary got plenty of sexist remarks and criticisms during the 2016 election as did Michelle Obama during her husband's administration. (Add racist to Michelle criticisms, some of which came from women!) I have no doubt that it will happen to Harris or Warren if one of those 2 and up being on the Democratic ticket. It is not right and it is certainly not fair. We have come a long way, but still have a long way to go. I still contend that NONE of the posters on this thread referred to Ivanka inappropriately. Sorry to hear about the treatment of your daughter. Her achievements are incredible. Women are constantly being marginalized. Hopefully that will be different in the future.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jul 1, 2019 0:30:46 GMT
Darcy Collins not one person in this thread said anything misogynistic about her. The majority commented on her lack of experience. Don’t chastise us. Your comments would be better served directed at the French Government, who released the video. Ummm - clearly you didn't read the OP - or don't know recognize misogynistic language - perhaps I can add some commentary about your lack of reading skills that also tie into your appearance to help you understand. I would never expect an OP that used blatant racist language to garner likes and subsequent commentary without calling out the OP. But yet again our tolerance for sexism is way higher than racism in our world. Which was addressed in the very next post which a lot of peas agreed with/liked. And I will personally admit to not recognizing misogynistic language as easily as I do racist language, I think that it is because it has come to the forefront more recently. Truthfully, I sometimes find myself saying something that people have been saying for ages and then literally gasp when I realize what it actually means/implies. My problem isn’t with her being a woman, it’s that she is not the First Lady and she is often inserted into situations and takes on roles where she doesn’t belong. And she would have a larger role if allowed. This is not a one or two time thing. I definitely have the same issue with her husband, even more so actually because it seems he is more involved with policy. eta: Did we do the Miss Piggy memes here? I do remember a few comments about SHS looks, but many of us shot that down when it happened. I agree that these things about SHS and Ivanka are all over the internet and are disgusting, but I haven’t personally noticed much of it here. But again, I wouldn’t recognize the comments as easily as I would racist comments. That’s not to say I don’t care, just that I haven’t been as aware of it for nearly as long a time and I suspect I’m not the only one. IME, as a society we have been aware of racist attitudes/comments for a lot longer than the more veiled misogynistic comments so I would think that they are much more easily recognized and the expectations much higher, if that makes sense. My fibromyalgia is acting up so I can’t think of my words but I guess what I’m trying to say is that, to me, detecting/avoiding racist language is like a skill/rule we learned in High School. We’ve been doing it a long time so expectations are higher, consequences more severe when not done well or the rule is broken. Again, for me, recognizing some misogynistic attitudes/language is more an on the job training skill/rule we learned much more recently. Still not okay to be broken, but when done so, a little more grace is appropriate when pointing that out. Especially when done so for the first time. I think, were the OP a repeat offender or she came back or someone argued that her comments weren’t misogynistic, this would have gone down a lot differently.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jul 1, 2019 0:31:46 GMT
Pardon, I was imagining an alternate timeline to this fucking hellmouth in which the President Clinton mentioned was not Bill, but Hillary. Go off, though. Ha! I read your post as: Pardon, I was imagining and alternate timeline to the fuckening... I will now always think of Trump taking office as The Fuckening.
Thank you. [/quote]I sincerely think there is already a meme for that.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 29, 2024 7:27:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2019 0:51:04 GMT
I've been trying to decide how I feel about this. Did he bring Melania? Most first ladies do some diplomatic work. Is Ivanka replacing Melania for this? Spouses typically go to the G20 - it's where Michelle Obama was heavily criticized for "hugging" the Queen - which was ridiculous - but we do love to tear our women down, don't we. You can see a bunch of pictures of the current G20 summit including spouses. It's been abundantly clear for some time that Ivanka is filling the role of first lady instead of Melania - for whatever reason. It's not the first time a child has stood in as first lady, although this situation is exacerbated by the fact that there is an actual, current, living wife. I do wonder why women are so quick to jump into misogynistic language about other women. It doesn't look good whatever your political persuasion. I find the Trumps rather easy to criticize on their merits - or lack thereof. While some, but not all take their spouses to the G20 summit they do not " but" in on conversations or attend meetings between world leaders.,economists and representatives of businesses . They are there for the social gatherings such as receptions and dinners put on by the host country, which is where Michelle Obama was, at a reception given by the Queen on behalf of the host country and had little to do with the "business" side of the summit held here. I have not seen Sophie Trudeau,Brigitte Macron or Phillip May or anyone else's wife/husband/partner taking the same stance as Ivanka has in that video. If, as you point out, Ivanka is standing in for Melania why didn't she join the other wives and Phillip May for the planned programme laid out for them while the leaders were attending to global issues?
|
|
Sarah*H
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,011
Jun 25, 2014 20:07:06 GMT
|
Post by Sarah*H on Jul 1, 2019 1:15:43 GMT
If it was Eric or Don Jr, equally unqualified, equally dressed inappropriately, equally inserting themselves inappropriately into that conversation, I would have referred to them as grifter spawn. I would not have referred to either of them as Nepotism Kens because sadly, even plastic surgery can't fix everything. Some of the criticism of Ivanka is probably based in misogyny but given the shitstorm of evil her family has released on the world, her tacit support of it and her endless enabling of her incompetent and mentally ill father, I'm not going to cry over some unfair attacks on her womanhood. Maybe Maggie Haberman will write a sympathetic piece tomorrow about how sad Ivanka is about mucus covered, starving, deathly ill toddlers sleeping on concrete floors and her image will be rehabilitated.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 29, 2024 7:27:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2019 7:15:26 GMT
First ladies have often played a minor role in diplomatic affairs. I hate to post this as it will just bring out the Hillary Clinton haters, but it's the best actual documentation of a first lady's role on the international scene - both on trips with her husband and solo. It outlines the 82 international trips that Hillary Clinton took as first lady and the meetings she had with foreign heads of states. www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/dec/01/Hillary-travel-first-lady/I was going to say she was at the far end of the spectrum on first lady trips - as she was pretty heavily criticized for them at times. But a quick search of the "quieter" Laura Bush shows she visit 75 countries during GWB's presidency. Perhaps it was more that the press was quieter: www.nafsa.org/2018/2/20/laura-bush/Now again - I'm not posting to suggest that I'd like to see Ivanka Trump embark on international diplomacy. It's more to give perspective of the role family has ALWAYS played during a presidency. I do not have a problem with wives holding her husband’s diplomatic place...AT ALL. But you are leaving out the integral part of what those of us have commented on. All of these women you list above, journeyed with their husbands throughout their career. Undoubtedly they have received training and direction on the diplomatic mine fields that they went through. Ivanka DID not! Now the Barbie references are complete bullshit. Dumb she is NOT! Please point out out where in any of our posts that myself or other peas are being misogynistic. It is her lack of experience that we are speaking to. I would feel THE SAME way if it were a MAN!
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 1, 2019 13:12:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jul 1, 2019 13:12:21 GMT
First ladies have often played a minor role in diplomatic affairs. I hate to post this as it will just bring out the Hillary Clinton haters, but it's the best actual documentation of a first lady's role on the international scene - both on trips with her husband and solo. It outlines the 82 international trips that Hillary Clinton took as first lady and the meetings she had with foreign heads of states. www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/dec/01/Hillary-travel-first-lady/I was going to say she was at the far end of the spectrum on first lady trips - as she was pretty heavily criticized for them at times. But a quick search of the "quieter" Laura Bush shows she visit 75 countries during GWB's presidency. Perhaps it was more that the press was quieter: www.nafsa.org/2018/2/20/laura-bush/Now again - I'm not posting to suggest that I'd like to see Ivanka Trump embark on international diplomacy. It's more to give perspective of the role family has ALWAYS played during a presidency. I do not have a problem with wives holding her husband’s diplomatic place...AT ALL. But you are leaving out the integral part of what those of us have commented on. All of these women you list above, journeyed with their husbands throughout their career. Undoubtedly they have received training and direction on the diplomatic mine fields that they went through. Ivanka DID not! Now the Barbie references are complete bullshit. Dumb she is NOT! Please point out out where in any of our posts that myself or other peas are being misogynistic. It is her lack of experience that we are speaking to. I would feel THE SAME way if it were a MAN! I think she is referring to the comments right in the OP. Not the article, but the words that the OP used in describing her response to the article. I think a lot of people read the article and didn't even remember what she wrote with it.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jul 1, 2019 13:19:43 GMT
I think I need more information on this. Where was it held? What type of event? What was the conversation about? What was the intent of the French government in posting it? I am not picking up on the negative vibes that others seem to be? It's hard to say if they all looked serious during the whole conversation, or just when she was shown. I don't think that Ivanka should be involved in the administration at all based on nepotism, but I guess we are in strange times here. At this point I am more comfortable with her talking to heads of state than I am her dad. Either way, the whole family is an embarrassment to the country.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Jul 1, 2019 16:12:48 GMT
Oh my word, that was super cringy. WTH is she even doing there???
|
|
|
Post by Prenticekid on Jul 1, 2019 16:15:55 GMT
Now let's just imagine for a moment if Chelsea Clinton had inserted herself on the political stage during President Clinton's administration. What? Not cool? I remember quite a bit of uproar about Hillary being involved on the political stage (with healthcare) and she was a lawyer and professionally qualified to participate. We are still paying for that!
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 1, 2019 16:20:03 GMT
Oh my word, that was super cringy. WTH is she even doing there??? She was giving some kind of keynote at a special event, and there as part of Trump's delegation. The thing is, she shouldn't be an adviser in the first place. She's unqualified. Highly unqualified. But, then so is he, so here we are. And shit's about to get real in Iran. Fuck.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Jul 1, 2019 16:22:40 GMT
Oh my word, that was super cringy. WTH is she even doing there??? She was giving some kind of keynote at a special event, and there as part of Trump's delegation. The thing is, she shouldn't be an adviser in the first place. She's unqualified. Highly unqualified. But, then so is he, so here we are. And shit's about to get real in Iran. Fuck. I've never been comfortable with Ivanka anywhere near the Oval Office, and her awkwardness and forced behavior just exemplifies the reasons she simply doesn't belong there. Like, at all.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jul 1, 2019 16:23:12 GMT
I remember quite a bit of uproar about Hillary being involved on the political stage (with healthcare) and she was a lawyer and professionally qualified to participate. We are still paying for that! Yeah, it is awful that what she was able to do was ensure that children in this country had healthcare, even if their parents didn’t have and/or couldn’t afford private coverage. <sarcasm> but, thank you for proving that I didn’t fabricate that memory, since people are *still* griping about it 18+ years later. LOL!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 1, 2019 16:27:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MichyM on Jul 1, 2019 16:29:49 GMT
I think I need more information on this. Where was it held? What type of event? What was the conversation about? What was the intent of the French government in posting it? I am not picking up on the negative vibes that others seem to be? It's hard to say if they all looked serious during the whole conversation, or just when she was shown. I don't think that Ivanka should be involved in the administration at all based on nepotism, but I guess we are in strange times here. At this point I am more comfortable with her talking to heads of state than I am her dad. Either way, the whole family is an embarrassment to the country. You can google her comments. They were irrelevant to the conversation at that time.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 1, 2019 16:45:00 GMT
Oh, lord. www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-39706331/groans-at-ivanka-at-g20-women-s-summitThere were literal GROANS at her comments about her father's treatment of women. When she got called on it and asked about it, she blamed the media. "The thousands of women who worked with and for my father are a testament to his belief about the potential of women and their ability to do the job as well as any man." She sounds so ignorant. MY dad was nice to me at home. GTFO. Bitch, what!?
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Jul 1, 2019 16:52:27 GMT
Best comment I've seen so far..."She's like a little kid who's trying to get on the adult table at the Thanksgiving dinner" Twitter: Juha KeskinenSo, so painfully true.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 1, 2019 17:34:14 GMT
From the same BBC video.......... What drew the major groan!! The media? Try separating families which he has admitted live on TV! No made up stores there!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 29, 2024 7:27:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2019 18:03:09 GMT
This photo makes me LOL. The look on Theresa May's face as if she's thinking " YOU are trying to lecture ME on women's empowerment?" Teaching your granny to suck eggs comes to mind.
|
|