edie3
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,117 
|
Post by edie3 on Oct 15, 2019 20:31:14 GMT
Tell Macmillan Publisher CEO John Sargent that you demand #eBooksforAll America’s libraries are committed to promoting literacy and a love of reading with diverse collections, programs and services for all ages. In an increasingly digital world, our libraries are investing more in eBooks and downloadable media. And millions of people discover and explore new and favorite authors through both our digital and print collections. But now one publisher has decided to limit readers’ access to new eBook titles through their libraries. Beginning November 1, 2019, Macmillan Publishers will allow libraries to purchase only one copy of each new eBook title for the first eight weeks after a book’s release. Readers cannot stay silent! We need your help! This embargo would limit libraries’ ability to provide access to information for all. It particularly harms library patrons with disabilities or learning issues. One of the great things about eBooks is that they can become large-print books with only a few clicks, and most eBook readers offer fonts and line spacing that make reading easier for people who have dyslexia or other visual challenges. Because portable devices are light and easy to hold, eBooks are easier to use for some people who have physical disabilities. Here's the truth: Limiting access to new titles for libraries means limiting access for readers like you. Macmillan is the only major publisher to propose such an embargo. The American Library Association and libraries across the country ask you to voice your opposition to Macmillan's new policy by signing this petition and telling Macmillan CEO John Sargent that access to eBooks should not be delayed or denied. We must have #eBooksForAll Not sure how you feel about petitions, but here is a link for this one link |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:57:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2019 20:48:05 GMT
If I'm reading this correctly, then I don't have a problem with this. Sounds like they are only limiting purchases to one copy for the first eight weeks of a book release vs. fully restricting access to their books.
|
|
maryannscraps
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,948
Aug 28, 2017 12:51:28 GMT
|
Post by maryannscraps on Oct 15, 2019 20:49:18 GMT
Thank you! I read most books as ebooks, almost all from the library. Signed, a public library supporter and Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Post by roberta on Oct 15, 2019 21:41:04 GMT
It seems to me that limiting ebooks and not print copies would be discrimination against those with disabilities who cannot use regular books.
|
|
|
|
Post by jenr on Oct 15, 2019 21:45:16 GMT
why are they proposing this, do you know?
|
|
|
|
Post by wimom on Oct 15, 2019 21:59:41 GMT
When I was younger I was a major reader and most of my books came from the library. Libraries fueled my love of reading, made me a better writer, speller, student, thinker and, eventually, helped me in my job. So I believe libraries are important. My gut reaction was that this limit would be wrong, wrong, wrong.
But I don't read as much these days, have never read an ebook and don't really understand the mechanics of ebooks and library lending. Do libraries get ebooks and paper books at a discount? Are there limits on how many new-release paper books libraries can buy? How do publishers control who buys their books? Could library staff just buy more new-release ebooks in their names to circumvent this, for example?
And what does the publisher hope to accomplish? Do they think a whole bunch of people who normally would borrow an ebook from the library will instead buy their own copy?
Maybe a pea librarian can help me understand? Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:57:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2019 22:00:30 GMT
It seems to me that limiting ebooks and not print copies would be discrimination against those with disabilities who cannot use regular books. That's a good point. I wonder if print is being limited to the same restrictions? |
|
|
|
Post by CarolinaGirl71 on Oct 15, 2019 22:07:04 GMT
It seems to me that limiting ebooks and not print copies would be discrimination against those with disabilities who cannot use regular books. That's a good point. I wonder if print is being limited to the same restrictions? According to the email I received from my local library, only ebooks are being restricted (at this time). If it works with ebooks, I think print books will be next. I've already signed the petition. |
|
|
|
Post by tampascrapper on Oct 15, 2019 22:51:18 GMT
Thank you for posting the link. I happily signed it.
|
|
|
|
Post by mustlovecats on Oct 15, 2019 22:53:34 GMT
It seems to me that limiting ebooks and not print copies would be discrimination against those with disabilities who cannot use regular books. That's a good point. I wonder if print is being limited to the same restrictions? My former classmate and current neighbor is our library director and I’m on Friends. Print is not being limited to the same restrictions, libraries will still purchase new books (most new books held in quantity are “rented” and the multiples are later returned to the distributor and resold on the secondary market). This embargo is intended to drive sales of initial printings of new books but I suspect their analysis has led them to the wrong conclusion, I think libraries drive interest in authors and support publishers overall. This embargo treats libraries like the enemy of the publisher and I think that’s incorrect. |
|
|
|
Post by ceepea on Oct 16, 2019 3:11:57 GMT
I signed it. Thanks for posting.
|
|
