Trump invites Gennifer Flowers to the debate

Once again you take what is said and apply it to/twist a different statement. I applied it to all the terrible despicable things he says. If you think the offensive and deplorable things he says daily are okay, and you support that then, yes, you're as despicable as he is.

So...since you answered the way you did and YOU put yourself there, and the shoe fits...I'll leave it up to you where you fit.


It's not just a matter of opinion. If you're ingrained that his actions and comments--deplorable, disgusting, racist, xenophobic, degrading and bullying and are all over supporting that--when it has nothing to do with the platform, party, or facts, it's no longer just a difference of opinion. It reeks on your character and one that is of "the basket".

Agreed.

But I was talking about the people who get lumped in the same basket as them because they believe immigrants should follow the laws to enter the country, because they believe vetting should be better than we're being warned that it is before we let the threat of ISIS into our country and all of the parameters like those that get them labeled as racists/xenopobes/deplorables, etc.

Wow! Talk about twisting what I said. Where in the hell did you ever see me say the offensive deplorable things he says are okay and that I support them? 

You've been hammering at me for months now and way too often it's with your mangled twisted version of what I ACTUALLY said.
You're starting to remind me of foolana and her antics.

There we have it folks, the perfect moderator for the debates! And there'd be extra security-Steve! Steve! Steve!

Deleted

Soooo, that's a "no"? you can't point to where I said the offensive deplorable things he says are okay?
Then stop making yourself look like foolana. 

Yes, he's still a much bigger liar...


The weekend America's newspapers called Donald Trump a liar
By Brian Stelter September 25, 2016 20:38PM EDT
On the weekend leading up to 2016's first presidential debate, four news organizations came to a similar and sweeping conclusion: Donald Trump lies more often than Hillary Clinton.
In a normal election year this would be extraordinary. On Sunday editors and reporters at the newsrooms used another word: necessary.
The New York Times story — "A Week of Whoppers" — came out first on Saturday. Politico, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times all followed within hours.

Several of the editors who were involved said the timing was a coincidence. But there was clearly a desire to publish stories before Monday's debate, when Trump and Clinton's truthfulness will surely be at issue.
"Never in modern presidential politics has a major candidate made false statements as routinely as Trump has," the L.A. Times declared on page one of Sunday's paper.
Politico Magazine's team analyzed every statement made by both Trump and Clinton for five days and said "the conclusion is inescapable: Trump's mishandling of facts and propensity for exaggeration so greatly exceed Clinton's as to make the comparison almost ludicrous."
The words "almost ludicrous" ricocheted around Twitter.
Politico found that Trump averaged "one falsehood every three minutes and 15 seconds over nearly five hours of remarks" while Clinton averaged one falsehood every twelve minutes.
Overall, the news outlet counted 87 "misstatements, exaggerations, falsehoods" from Trump and eight from Clinton.
The Times counted only Trump's "biggest whoppers," 31 of them, while skipping "dozens more."
All four of the newsrooms distinguished between the kind of misstatements Clinton makes and the kind Trump makes.
"Clinton has made her share of questionable claims," the Post said, but Trump "at times seems uniquely undeterred by facts."
The Post said Trump "continues to rely heavily on thinly sourced or entirely unsubstantiated claims."
The four stories were welcomed by the Clinton campaign; aides cited the statistics in television interviews on Sunday.
However, there is no indication that the Clinton campaign was involved.
Marty Baron, the executive editor of The Washington Post, said the timing of the stories was a coincidence.
"We don't coordinate coverage with anyone else," Baron said.
The Post did not label any of Trump's falsehoods as "lies" in its story. But the other three news outlets did.
Media critics detected an uptick in journalists accusing Trump of lying when the "birther" issue was revived earlier this month. Even while finally declaring that he knows President Obama was born in the United States, Trump invoked additional lies, falsely claiming that Clinton introduced "birtherism" in 2008 and that he put the conspiracy theory to rest in 2011.
The next day's New York Times headline explicitly used the "L word" journalists are usually reluctant to use.
"I do think that our story on the day that Trump sought to reverse himself on birtherism -- which said outright that Trump was 'lying' -- sent ripples through the journalistic world," Times political editor Carolyn Ryan said Sunday.
"Other news organizations are eager to capture what is clearly an unprecedented dynamic," she said.
The Times' latest story, on page one Sunday, concluded that Trump's falsehoods fit a pattern: "Virtually all" of them "directly bolstered a powerful and self-aggrandizing narrative depicting him as a heroic savior for a nation menaced from every direction."
Some Trump critics responded to the coverage by saying, in essence, "What took you so long?"
MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell tweeted the L.A. Times front page and said "Congrats to LA Times for finally calling a lie a lie. (A year late)."
Politico editor Susan Glasser noted that her publication examined a week's worth of Trump falsehoods during the primary season, with unflattering results for Trump.
Politico "thought it was the right time to do it again, given all the attention to the question of Trump's relation to the facts," she said, noting that Clinton's words were also scrutinized this time.
Glasser suggested that Trump's flouting of the truth has worsened since the primary season: The falsehoods went from "one every five minutes in that earlier piece to one every three in this one."
September 25 NEW YORK

But so many people don't care, so it doesn't even matter at this point.

By comparison to Trump he lied every 3 mins. 15 seconds in a 5 hr period, and Hillary 12 min.

Not sure where you were educated, but once again your declaration and math are off, wrong.

What that statement is saying is that Trump lies 4x more than Hillary.


"Politico Magazine's team analyzed every statement made by both Trump and Clinton for five days and said "the conclusion is inescapable: Trump's mishandling of facts and propensity for exaggeration so greatly exceed Clinton's as to make the comparison almost ludicrous."

"Overall, the news outlet counted 87 "misstatements, exaggerations, falsehoods" from Trump and eight from Clinton."

"The Post said Trump "continues to rely heavily on thinly sourced or entirely unsubstantiated claims."

^^^^^And that's Donald Trump folks!!!!

HOW VERY PRESIDENTIAL OF HIM.

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

I'm reading it as she's saying that Hillary lies every 12 minutes (period) vs Trump only lied x amount if times in a 5 hr timeframe. If that's incorrect-then I will correct it.

Seriously, no snark intended. Any snark in my previous post was not aimed at you, but the situation. 
This is the perfect illustration of how different people see things so differently sometimes.

In that article, you saw what was probably so obvious to you. Trump lies more than Hillary, she's clearly the one that belongs in the White House.

And I saw what seemed so obvious to me. That Hillary lies less, but even if she's the one that should be in the White House, she will lie to us about every 12 minutes. 

No animosity intended. I'm just talking to you person to person.

If you read it as, no matter which one makes it into office, we'll have a liar of epic proportions for a President, then yes, you read it correctly.