Deleted
Posts: 0
May 1, 2024 17:11:53 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2019 18:57:47 GMT
What’s your point, jubejubes ? Proselytizing to children is not ok (to put it mildly), and especially to children of other faiths. Flip it around...if other non-Christian religions evangelized to disadvantaged American children I don’t think you’d be on board with that. The OP wants to hand out gifts with strings attached. Yuck. Re- Operation Christmas Child: Yeah, imagine if Muslim or Buddhist nations sent "missionaries" to rural Appalachia or those in poverty anywhere in America, to share resources the Quran or the Tripitaka children's book version tucked into the package. I'm sure Americans would be totes cool w/that.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Apr 26, 2019 20:27:57 GMT
Interesting that the website for Parkgate Pregnancy Clinic has a strong focus on abortion, but nothing about the religious affiliation.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 1, 2024 17:11:53 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2019 17:03:42 GMT
Nice try, but saying that you and 31 are just in this in this for the money, you want to take away women's right to choose and you didn't present this in the right way are most certainly attempts at discrediting the OP. FACT 31 makes money on this "fundraiser". If the OP benefits from having the "party" then it is also a fact that she benefits.
NOT a bit of that discredits the OP. It is just fact, plain and simple. Taking away a woman's right to choose? How ironic considering what the OP has posted. Turning away those who CHOOSE something that they don't agree with. And the poster who stated that IF the topic/fundraiser had been presented differently, then she may have considered donating. That is NOT discrediting the OP. It is expressing a DIFFERENT opinion. You know, that war cry that you post ad naseum, when you have nothing else to discuss (which is almost always). YOU don't like that others have a differing opinion, then you whine and gaslight that its only the liberals doing it. You are the biggest hypocrite on the board, and inkedup was correct...you have ZERO credibility here anymore. Nice try, but saying that you and 31 are just in this in this for the money, you want to take away women's right to choose and you didn't present this in the right way are most certainly attempts at discrediting the OP. Facts are not the issue. You can use facts and the way you present them shows that you either want to inform or you want to discredit. Some posts were clearly meant to inform, some posts were clearly meant to discredit and some posts were unmistakably meant to stick it to the OP.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 28, 2019 17:28:52 GMT
FACT 31 makes money on this "fundraiser". If the OP benefits from having the "party" then it is also a fact that she benefits.
NOT a bit of that discredits the OP. It is just fact, plain and simple. Taking away a woman's right to choose? How ironic considering what the OP has posted. Turning away those who CHOOSE something that they don't agree with. And the poster who stated that IF the topic/fundraiser had been presented differently, then she may have considered donating. That is NOT discrediting the OP. It is expressing a DIFFERENT opinion. You know, that war cry that you post ad naseum, when you have nothing else to discuss (which is almost always). YOU don't like that others have a differing opinion, then you whine and gaslight that its only the liberals doing it. You are the biggest hypocrite on the board, and inkedup was correct...you have ZERO credibility here anymore. Nice try, but saying that you and 31 are just in this in this for the money, you want to take away women's right to choose and you didn't present this in the right way are most certainly attempts at discrediting the OP. Facts are not the issue. You can use facts and the way you present them shows that you either want to inform or you want to discredit. Some posts were clearly meant to inform, some posts were clearly meant to discredit and some posts were unmistakably meant to stick it to the OP. The specific instances you tried to say were discrediting the op were not, as I pointed out. You attempted (and failed) once again to gaslight a bunch of bullshit. And now, with this post— once again— as your usual M.O., you’re moving the goalposts to try to make your {false} claims relevant. It won’t work—everyone here knows exactly what you do every single time. Gaslighting should be your paid profession.
|
|