|
Post by Skellinton on Oct 23, 2021 14:30:02 GMT
Just saw The Rookie tv show is banning do functional firearms on set. Good for them, and I hope that is just the beginning.
The message also pointed out that, effective immediately, every firearm that will be used during the production of the series would not take traditional ammunition or blanks of any sort.
'As of today, it is now policy on The Rookie that all gunfire on set will be Air Soft guns with CG muzzle flashes added in post. There will be no more "live" weapons on the show. The safety our cast and crew is too important. Any risk is too much risk.'
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on Oct 23, 2021 14:38:21 GMT
Imagine all the outrage if this had been a school shooting. I don't understand what this post means. Are you referring to the tweet? Or this board? Or people in general?
|
|
edie3
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,684
Jun 26, 2014 1:03:18 GMT
|
Post by edie3 on Oct 24, 2021 0:19:28 GMT
I don't understand what this post means. What happened to Alec was horrible. People are talking about safety procedures and how to keep this from happening on TV/movie sets, yet it happens far to often in schools.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 1:50:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 0:29:46 GMT
I don't understand what this post means. While what happened to Alec was horrible, there needs to be more outrage over school shootings. Not meaning outrage here on the board, just on social media in general. Um...there is. Always. You might not be following people who care.
|
|
|
Post by **GypsyGirl** on Oct 24, 2021 0:30:31 GMT
TMZ article article posted about half an hour ago. States that the gun in the AB incident was allegedly being used for off-set target practice by crew members. Unbelievable that they didn't have tighter control over the guns on set if this is found to be true.
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on Oct 24, 2021 1:10:57 GMT
While what happened to Alec was horrible, there needs to be more outrage over school shootings. Not meaning outrage here on the board, just on social media in general. Um...there is. Always. You might not be following people who care. You definitely aren't following the right people if you don't see the outrage. And that is just a weird way to word your post here. There is always multiple pages of calls for gun regulation after school shootings on this board. People can care about multiple things at once. And the outrage and coverage over this incident is nowhere near the level of outrage or coverage I see after school shootings, either here or in "the real world"..
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Oct 24, 2021 1:41:33 GMT
Unbelievable that they didn't have tighter control over the guns on set if this is found to be true. Sadly, this doesn't surprise me given the number of accidental gun injuries and deaths that happen every frigging day in this country. The three previous incidences on set weren't investigated and didn't trigger a safety review. The armorer on set was a 24 year old woman whose main qualification seems to be her father is a veteran armorer.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 1:50:22 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 2:28:11 GMT
TMZ article article posted about half an hour ago. States that the gun in the AB incident was allegedly being used for off-set target practice by crew members. Unbelievable that they didn't have tighter control over the guns on set if this is found to be true. OMG. I hope that's not true. If it is, whatever asses need to go shoot their rocks off at tin cans or chipmunks and then couldn't be bothered to unload the gun, were partially responsible for the death of another human.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 1:50:22 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 13:34:09 GMT
Stories coming out about the AD: "The assistant director on the set of "Rust," where Alec Baldwin fired a prop gun that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injured director Joel Souza, had a history of failing to maintain a "safe working environment," a former colleague has said. In a statement to NBC News, Maggie Goll, a prop maker who worked with assistant director Dave Halls on Hulu's "Into the Dark" anthology series in February 2019, cited numerous examples of Hall's allegedly unsafe practices. In one instance, Goll told NBC News, Halls decided to keep filming after a pyrotechnician had a medical emergency and the set had become dangerous. Goll also said that, on the set of "Into the Dark," Halls neglected to hold safety meetings or make announcements before the appearance of a gun." www.insider.com/rust-shooting-assistant-director-failed-keep-sets-safe-former-colleague-2021-10
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 24, 2021 13:52:23 GMT
I just saw a major news outlet in Norway release a photo of Alec Baldwin. Supposedly a photo of him taken after he came out of a police station beung interviewed (which I am sure is standard procedure in a case like this). I have two thoughts about it: 1. He is absolutely devestated and crying in the picture. My heart breaks for him, and the trauma he will continue to live with after causing the death of a fellow himan being. 2. Why the fuck am I am seeing this photo? Who the hell is photographing someone in this situation? Who is buying them? Who is making the editorial decision to publish it? This should not be out there! Vultures! It was on the news outlet's front page, so I couldn't opt to not click on it. This is what comes to my mind too, I am devastated for him as well as the victim and her family. How will he ever recover from that? It's so awful for everyone involved.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 25, 2021 19:53:05 GMT
So as a registered gun owner, I do think Alec Baldwin has some responsibility here. Was it an accident? Yes. I do not believe he intended to harm anyone. But I also think he has some responsibility as a person who was pointing a gun to make sure (and absolutely verify) that the gun was not loaded when he knew he planned to shoot it. Baldwin has responsibly has a producer to make sure his set is safe for his crew. Now should he go to jail for this? I don't know but my gut says no. But I am not ready to just say 'poor Alec' either. If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun.
|
|
|
Post by Susie_Homemaker on Oct 25, 2021 20:00:11 GMT
If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun. In the non movie making world where we have no blanks, you never, never, never point a gun at anyone unless your intent is to shoot them. Loaded or not. You do not do it. Period. In the movie world where it's common to point a gun and "shoot" people, it's still irresponsible for the person "shooting" the weapon to not check the weapon for live rounds. My heart goes out to anyone that accidentally shoots another person. I hope that movie makers will change their practices to either use CGI to make it appear that guns are fired or to have many and multiple checks on the rounds (blanks) loaded in the weapon.
|
|
|
Post by workingclassdog on Oct 25, 2021 20:45:46 GMT
Something weird was said this morning on the radio during their entertainment news bit... Alec was seen having breakfast with the husband and son of the gal who was killed.
If this is true, is this weird? Seems weird to me. A few days after your wife is killed you are having breakfast with Alec?
|
|
|
Post by amp on Oct 25, 2021 20:59:31 GMT
So as a registered gun owner, I do think Alec Baldwin has some responsibility here. Was it an accident? Yes. I do not believe he intended to harm anyone. But I also think he has some responsibility as a person who was pointing a gun to make sure (and absolutely verify) that the gun was not loaded when he knew he planned to shoot it. Baldwin has responsibly has a producer to make sure his set is safe for his crew. Now should he go to jail for this? I don't know but my gut says no. But I am not ready to just say 'poor Alec' either. If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun. Yep, as another registered gun owner, I can tell you that I was taught two things very early on: 1) (most important) do not aim any weapon, even one you believe to be unloaded, at anything/anyone you are not intending to shoot. 2) check and verify if the gun is loaded or not, also, check to see if a round is chambered... But rule number one is the rule I couldn't possibly forget, ever.
I did read in multiple places that the person who handed it to Alec said it was "cold"...but obviously, it was not. That person should bear a lot of the responsibility!!
|
|
|
Post by jenjie on Oct 25, 2021 23:58:55 GMT
Something weird was said this morning on the radio during their entertainment news bit... Alec was seen having breakfast with the husband and son of the gal who was killed. If this is true, is this weird? Seems weird to me. A few days after your wife is killed you are having breakfast with Alec? I don’t know if it’s probable but I wouldn’t say weird. he may have reached out in kindness, checking on them, feeling the weight of responsibility. They have to know he didn’t intend to kill her.
|
|
|
Post by rainangel on Oct 26, 2021 6:42:42 GMT
Something weird was said this morning on the radio during their entertainment news bit... Alec was seen having breakfast with the husband and son of the gal who was killed. If this is true, is this weird? Seems weird to me. A few days after your wife is killed you are having breakfast with Alec? I would not be surprised by this actually. It would be like a shared trauma. Her family might want to know what happened, and Alec Baldwin might want to talk about what happened. This is a huge tragedy for both sides of this breakfast table, and I can see them wanting to share their experiences about it.
|
|
|
Post by peasapie on Oct 26, 2021 11:04:14 GMT
So here we are, days later, and the local PD has not issued any statement about what happened. The only information anyone has is anecdotal information from people on the set. At first I thought they might be waiting until they had interviewed everyone, but the news media still hasn't been informed about whether it was a bullet, shrapnel, etc. or any other information about what happened that day.
|
|
|
Post by busy on Oct 26, 2021 13:30:07 GMT
Something weird was said this morning on the radio during their entertainment news bit... Alec was seen having breakfast with the husband and son of the gal who was killed. If this is true, is this weird? Seems weird to me. A few days after your wife is killed you are having breakfast with Alec? I don't find that weird. I don't like Alec Baldwin, but I can't imagine any human being doesn't feel deep remorse and regret about what happened. I think most people would want to talk to the family, and I think most families would want to understand what happened (first hand, not via media and rumors and the like). Also, Hollywood is a small town. It's entirely possible they already know each other, and that would make it even more likely IMO that they would get together.
|
|
grammanisi
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,741
Jun 26, 2014 1:37:37 GMT
|
Post by grammanisi on Oct 26, 2021 14:52:12 GMT
So as a registered gun owner, I do think Alec Baldwin has some responsibility here. Was it an accident? Yes. I do not believe he intended to harm anyone. But I also think he has some responsibility as a person who was pointing a gun to make sure (and absolutely verify) that the gun was not loaded when he knew he planned to shoot it. Baldwin has responsibly has a producer to make sure his set is safe for his crew. Now should he go to jail for this? I don't know but my gut says no. But I am not ready to just say 'poor Alec' either. If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun. Thank you for saying this. My husband and I are also registered gun owners and we take handling guns very seriously. I've said this same thing in a couple of groups I belong to and had my ass handed to me. Not one person thought that Baldwin should've checked that gun. They said it wasn't his responsibility.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 26, 2021 15:02:06 GMT
So as a registered gun owner, I do think Alec Baldwin has some responsibility here. Was it an accident? Yes. I do not believe he intended to harm anyone. But I also think he has some responsibility as a person who was pointing a gun to make sure (and absolutely verify) that the gun was not loaded when he knew he planned to shoot it. Baldwin has responsibly has a producer to make sure his set is safe for his crew. Now should he go to jail for this? I don't know but my gut says no. But I am not ready to just say 'poor Alec' either. If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun. Thank you for saying this. My husband and I are also registered gun owners and we take handling guns very seriously. I've said this same thing in a couple of groups I belong to and had my ass handed to me. Not one person thought that Baldwin should've checked that gun. They said it wasn't his responsibility. lol I was expecting the same response.
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Oct 26, 2021 15:15:38 GMT
My son (who has worked on movie sets) walked me through the several steps that are taken by the people on set who ARE responsible for checking the gun and claimed that the actor would be flouting protocol by checking it himself after the hired experts do.
His argument is it’s much more than “It’s not the actor’s responsibility,” which makes it seem that it COULD BE his responsibility and he chooses not to out of disinterest or poor personal safety priorities. It’s more that he is INSTRUCTED to leave it to the experts. It’s not analogous to being a responsible gun owner any more than using other potentially dangerous props on a film is analogous to bring a responsible scuba diver or skydiver or whatever. Are there big name stars who do it? Possibly, because of their clout. But it’s neither routine or encouraged.
My take: I don’t think we should cast blame on somebody following industry standards. Also, I’m not going to judge a widower who accepted a breakfast invitation during which shared grief or healing or arrangements could have happened.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Oct 26, 2021 15:24:29 GMT
So as a registered gun owner, I do think Alec Baldwin has some responsibility here. Was it an accident? Yes. I do not believe he intended to harm anyone. But I also think he has some responsibility as a person who was pointing a gun to make sure (and absolutely verify) that the gun was not loaded when he knew he planned to shoot it. Baldwin has responsibly has a producer to make sure his set is safe for his crew. Now should he go to jail for this? I don't know but my gut says no. But I am not ready to just say 'poor Alec' either. If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun. Thank you for saying this. My husband and I are also registered gun owners and we take handling guns very seriously. I've said this same thing in a couple of groups I belong to and had my ass handed to me. Not one person thought that Baldwin should've checked that gun. They said it wasn't his responsibility. These people are mostly not registered gun owners, through. They’re actors dealing with what are viewed as props, where people are employed specifically to oversee the safety of their use. IMO, that might be the problem. Although given the amount of films produced on any given year involving even minor gun use, it doesn’t happen much (although the few times I’m aware of is more than enough). The fact it’s almost routine for these sets, and actual tragic outcomes (that result in process changes)are relatively rare - leads to a false or status quo sense of security, despite unsafe gun handling practices being common. Personally I think because they’re being put in the hands of people who are not used to handling guns regularly or trained in gun safety, is a very strong argument for not having working guns used on any set that can fire, even blanks.
|
|
|
Post by chances on Oct 26, 2021 15:24:32 GMT
Thank you for saying this. My husband and I are also registered gun owners and we take handling guns very seriously. I've said this same thing in a couple of groups I belong to and had my ass handed to me. Not one person thought that Baldwin should've checked that gun. They said it wasn't his responsibility. lol I was expecting the same response. I think one issue is understanding what a “prop gun” is. I had no idea that real guns with real bullets were being used. That’s not a prop in my mind. So I think people may just be reacting to what responsibility is necessary for handling something that isn’t supposed to be dangerous. If someone hands me a toy oven, I’m not going to check and make sure the burners are cool before touching it. However, given that they are real guns and apparently even blanks can kill, moving forward, everyone should check every time. All standard gun safety protocols can’t be in place though bc actors are literally playing with the weapons. I don’t think gun safety is compatible with acting. The proper respect for a a deadly weapon can’t be accomplished when playing pretend.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 26, 2021 15:27:36 GMT
So as a registered gun owner, I do think Alec Baldwin has some responsibility here. Was it an accident? Yes. I do not believe he intended to harm anyone. But I also think he has some responsibility as a person who was pointing a gun to make sure (and absolutely verify) that the gun was not loaded when he knew he planned to shoot it. Baldwin has responsibly has a producer to make sure his set is safe for his crew. Now should he go to jail for this? I don't know but my gut says no. But I am not ready to just say 'poor Alec' either. If you are handling a gun, you check to see if its loaded. PERIOD. It shouldn't matter if your prop guy, your husband, or your dad tells you it is unloaded. You check and verify, every time. And if you aren't willing to do that, then don't handle a real gun. Thank you for saying this. My husband and I are also registered gun owners and we take handling guns very seriously. I've said this same thing in a couple of groups I belong to and had my ass handed to me. Not one person thought that Baldwin should've checked that gun. They said it wasn't his responsibility. IMO, this is a much different situation than an individual gun owner handling their gun. There was unsafe gun usage, but not by Alec Baldwin.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 1:50:22 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2021 15:33:07 GMT
Yeah, and what I don't get about the "he should have checked" logic is, if he'd checked and seen it loaded, would he know the difference between a blank and a bullet? If he was just rehearsing, wouldn't he just assume he could shoot it as a rehearsal, armed with a blank?
The whole reason they use blanks is so they have a flash, sound and recoil. I'd assume an actor would want that in their rehearsal.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 26, 2021 15:36:48 GMT
Yeah, and what I don't get about the "he should have checked" logic is, if he'd checked and seen it loaded, would he know the difference between a blank and a bullet? If he was just rehearsing, wouldn't he just assume he could shoot it as a rehearsal, armed with a blank? The whole reason they use blanks is so they have a flash, sound and recoil. I'd assume an actor would want that in their rehearsal. Yes there is a difference between a blank and a real bullet.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 26, 2021 15:37:11 GMT
Thank you for saying this. My husband and I are also registered gun owners and we take handling guns very seriously. I've said this same thing in a couple of groups I belong to and had my ass handed to me. Not one person thought that Baldwin should've checked that gun. They said it wasn't his responsibility. IMO, this is a much different situation than an individual gun owner handling their gun. There was unsafe gun usage, but not by Alec Baldwin. Gonna have to agree to disagree. Edited- forgot to add ‘agree’.
|
|
|
Post by scrapmaven on Oct 26, 2021 15:43:00 GMT
While I'm not someone who respects, nor, likes Alec Baldwin I feel so sad for him. Of course, the victims and their families are at the forefront. However, I can't imagine the agony that he must be feeling knowing that he took a life, albeit accidentally. I am surprised that the chamber and magazine weren't checked before handing him the gun. Furthermore, I would think that he would check it, as well. The investigation is ongoing and I would hope that this incident changes the way that Hollywood armorers do their jobs. There must be double and even triple checks. They used the gun for target practice and then used it in the movie. That's just stupidity in action.
|
|
|
Post by katlady on Oct 26, 2021 15:50:08 GMT
Some of you are talking about this from the side of a gun-owner. Some of us are not gun owners. I wouldn’t know the difference between a blank and a bullet. If I was actress, I would assume the “prop” handed to me was safe. This incident is so tragic. I believe the fault lies with whomever was responsible for watching over the props.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Oct 26, 2021 15:52:19 GMT
Yeah, and what I don't get about the "he should have checked" logic is, if he'd checked and seen it loaded, would he know the difference between a blank and a bullet? If he was just rehearsing, wouldn't he just assume he could shoot it as a rehearsal, armed with a blank? The whole reason they use blanks is so they have a flash, sound and recoil. I'd assume an actor would want that in their rehearsal. I bet he (and most actors not used to handling them) wouldnt know the difference. It’s why they employ safety experts on set.
|
|