sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Jan 26, 2022 16:27:12 GMT
I don't think its hypocrisy if you're making a false comparison. ย You can be outraged at what Trump said about women or directly to reporters and not be concerned about what Biden said. ย The difference - Trump did it deliberately to a room full of reporters. ย What Biden said wasn't presidential or gentlemanly, but he said it when reporters were leaving the room and he thought the microphone was off. ย He made a mistake, took responsibility and called to apologize. I'm not using what Trump did or said to justify what Biden did, I just don't think it's a fair comparison or hypocrisy. My thought on hypocrisy is that if a (not trump) Republican president called a journalist for a progressive institution a stupid SOB, I believe the democrats on this board would be outraged, not applauding. I guess that would depend on the journalist. There are some progressive journalists I feel are not being serious journalists with some questions they ask. I put Peter Doocy in this category, just on the other side. I donโt feel he takes his job seriously, either.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jan 26, 2022 16:28:16 GMT
Honestly, we're still talking about this?!?! It was a Biden "supporter" who started the thread - they thought it was cute. I said it was inappropriate. I'm not outraged. I didn't expect anyone to denounce Biden. I didn't post on social media about it. I said yesterday that the parties apologized and hopefully the news cycle will move on. It wasn't "Breaking News" to begin with, but if you don't want people to comment on the President behavior, don't start a thread about it and if you do, realize that some people might not think it was dignified. That isn't a commentary on his behavior vs Trump or an expectation that anyone else will comment. Darcy, you know how this works. Someone posts something that interest you, or that you have a different take on, and you respond. Many threads outlive their news value, but that doesnโt automatically mean that people donโt have something to say. This thread is no different. Sure but when I continue to be quoted about something I never said it gets a little old. I haven't even responded to half the people who quoted me and then went on a rant about Trump, weak Democrats or me holding them up to different standards. I never defended Trump's behavior - I never voted for the man. I voted for Biden and can still say - hey you can do better Joe - and move on with my day.
|
|
|
Post by MichyM on Jan 26, 2022 16:40:01 GMT
My thought on hypocrisy is that if a (not trump) Republican president called a journalist for a progressive institution a stupid SOB, I believe the democrats on this board would be outraged, not applauding. I guess that would depend on the journalist. There are some progressive journalists I feel are not being serious journalists with some questions they ask. I put Peter Doocy in this category, just on the other side. I donโt feel he takes his job seriously, either. I donโt have cable, so I am unable to discern what yโall deem โserious journalistsโ or โnot-seriousโ journalists. Nor do I care. Yโall are qualifying your reactions based on how you view the journalist. If he was a โserious conservative journalistโ I believe the collective response here would have been the same as it is now. That said, I still stand behind what I believe would have been this boards response had the tables been turned. The result certainly would not be a thread with this title and a smiling face. With that, Iโm done defending my remark about hypocrisy and all the whataboutisms. I see it on this board nearly daily. Itโs amazing how the tides have turned and the reactions here on the board have changed in the last year.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jan 26, 2022 16:40:32 GMT
Darcy, you know how this works. Someone posts something that interest you, or that you have a different take on, and you respond. Many threads outlive their news value, but that doesnโt automatically mean that people donโt have something to say. This thread is no different. Sure but when I continue to be quoted about something I never said it gets a little old. I haven't even responded to half the people who quoted me and then went on a rant about Trump, weak Democrats or me holding them up to different standards. I never defended Trump's behavior - I never voted for the man. I voted for Biden and can still say - hey you can do better Joe - and move on with my day. I suspect that many of us are on edge for one reason or another. I certainly feel irritable today. And we should be able to agree without being disagreeable. I had a think about what Biden said, and although I think that Doocy is a tool, itโs bad form for a President to say it. You are right; we need to have expectations of POTUS.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Jan 26, 2022 17:03:15 GMT
I guess that would depend on the journalist. There are some progressive journalists I feel are not being serious journalists with some questions they ask. I put Peter Doocy in this category, just on the other side. I donโt feel he takes his job seriously, either. I donโt have cable, so I am unable to discern what yโall deem โserious journalistsโ or โnot-seriousโ journalists. Nor do I care. Yโall are qualifying your reactions based on how you view the journalist. If he was a โserious conservative journalistโ I believe the collective response here would have been the same as it is now. That said, I still stand behind what I believe would have been this boards response had the tables been turned. The result certainly would not be a thread with this title and a smiling face. With that, Iโm done defending my remark about hypocrisy and all the whataboutisms. I see it on this board nearly daily. Itโs amazing how the tides have turned and the reactions here on the board have changed in the last year. I donโt have cable either, but I do pay attention to the White House press conferences. Theyโre mostly informative. I get to see what questions are asked, and by who - and that is what Iโm basing my response on. Peter Doocy is not alone in appearing (at times) more interested in a gotcha sound bite than asking a question in good faith with the intent to inform, with the questions asked. I hold journalists to standards too,- which is why I said it depends. If a progressive journalist had of asked a question like that, I wouldโve rolled my eyes too - and have done so in the past. Thatโs an unfortunately frustrating aspect of them, the just not serious questions at times, on really important topics, though.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 17:12:02 GMT
Darcy, you know how this works. Someone posts something that interest you, or that you have a different take on, and you respond. Many threads outlive their news value, but that doesnโt automatically mean that people donโt have something to say. This thread is no different. Yes, but this is also a little different than the norm. Darcy, me and a number of other people have expressed their views that it was inappropriate for a POTUS to call a reporter an SOB where the public could hear. That has been run with by a number of other people who are now complaining that we are denigrating them and trying to silence them for the opposing view that it was just fine. I havenโt seen anyone try to silence people who are fine with it, nor denigrate them. It is quite frustrating to read, sitting from where I sit. No one who knows me here can doubt that I am a staunch liberal and that I despised the former President with a passion. I am not trying to silence anyone on the left here. I DO think the comment was inappropriate, even after reading the responses. I donโt care that other people feel differently. That is certainly their right. Iโm not trying to argue with them, Iโm not trying to silence them. Simply because my (or Darcyโs) views are different, doesnโt mean that we are trying to stop people from speaking/expressing their views. Perhaps I misunderstood at whom MichyM โs comment was directed, then. It seemed to wish that those of us who donโt agree with her should just go away. Sheโs doubled down on it at this point, so โฆ whatever.
|
|
J u l e e
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,531
Location: Cincinnati
Jun 28, 2014 2:50:47 GMT
|
Post by J u l e e on Jan 26, 2022 17:24:52 GMT
Coming back to post that I am disappointed that President Biden didn't actually apologize, but he still did the right thing and clear the air. The apology would have rung hollow/disingenuous anyway because we all know he really did mean what he said. He wasn't lying, that's for sure. I'm still sitting on the 'good with it' bench. I do think clearing the air is a better description, but I canโt be disappointed because I respect that JB called PD up to chat and they were able to have an amicable conversation. If thatโs good enough for PD (as he said it was) then that should be good enough for the rest of us. Iโm on the โgood with itโ bench with you.
|
|
|
Post by MichyM on Jan 26, 2022 17:28:47 GMT
Yes, but this is also a little different than the norm. Darcy, me and a number of other people have expressed their views that it was inappropriate for a POTUS to call a reporter an SOB where the public could hear. That has been run with by a number of other people who are now complaining that we are denigrating them and trying to silence them for the opposing view that it was just fine. I havenโt seen anyone try to silence people who are fine with it, nor denigrate them. It is quite frustrating to read, sitting from where I sit. No one who knows me here can doubt that I am a staunch liberal and that I despised the former President with a passion. I am not trying to silence anyone on the left here. I DO think the comment was inappropriate, even after reading the responses. I donโt care that other people feel differently. That is certainly their right. Iโm not trying to argue with them, Iโm not trying to silence them. Simply because my (or Darcyโs) views are different, doesnโt mean that we are trying to stop people from speaking/expressing their views. Perhaps I misunderstood at whom MichyM โs comment was directed, then. It seemed to wish that those of us who donโt agree with her should just go away. Sheโs doubled down on it at this point, so โฆ whatever. Would you kindly refrain from putting words in my mouth? What comment that I actually made do you need clarity on?
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jan 26, 2022 17:32:56 GMT
I guess that would depend on the journalist. There are some progressive journalists I feel are not being serious journalists with some questions they ask. I put Peter Doocy in this category, just on the other side. I donโt feel he takes his job seriously, either. I donโt have cable, so I am unable to discern what yโall deem โserious journalistsโ or โnot-seriousโ journalists. Nor do I care. Yโall are qualifying your reactions based on how you view the journalist. If he was a โserious conservative journalistโ I believe the collective response here would have been the same as it is now. That said, I still stand behind what I believe would have been this boards response had the tables been turned. The result certainly would not be a thread with this title and a smiling face. With that, Iโm done defending my remark about hypocrisy and all the whataboutisms. I see it on this board nearly daily. Itโs amazing how the tides have turned and the reactions here on the board have changed in the last year. If one of the Bush Presidents had made a remark like President Biden did to the same dumbass question I would gotten a chuckle out of it as well. IMO they are certain things that happen that fall outside โboth sidesโ & โRepublican vs Democratโ. Today Paul Waldman, the Washington Post columnist I like, pushed a column written by this guy who basically said reporters often ask questions like this and itโs no big deal. But to me it is a big deal in that itโs not honest. The whole point of traditional reporters, separate from talking heads on TV, is to ask questions to obtain information and itโs not to ask โgotchaโ questions. These โgotchaโ questions are a source for spreading misinformation. So yeah, this Democrat would feel the same way regardless the political affiliation if a president was asked a โgotchaโ question and replied the same way as President Biden. Its all about knowing the difference between right and wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 17:36:39 GMT
Perhaps I misunderstood at whom MichyM โs comment was directed, then. It seemed to wish that those of us who donโt agree with her should just go away. Sheโs doubled down on it at this point, so โฆ whatever. Would you kindly refrain from putting words in my mouth? What comment that I actually made do you need clarity on? โIt would be nice to have a conversation without them.โ That was after you called us all hypocrites for making comparisons to previous incidents because of the hypocrisy in how they were met vs now. I still havenโt seen anyone accuse McCain of being inappropriate. It starts to feel like those who try to say weโre being intolerant of their intolerance. You can just call people out, you know. Being passive aggressive and then getting mad when someone notices it is not exactly conducive to discussion. And I stand by my statement that this is mostly a lot of virtue signaling for the benefit of the right. Which is pointless, because theyโre going to say what they say regardless if what anyone on the left actually does. (And with this last post youโve stooped to being insulting, so yeah. Have a nice day.)
|
|
|
Post by MichyM on Jan 26, 2022 17:52:24 GMT
Would you kindly refrain from putting words in my mouth? What comment that I actually made do you need clarity on? โIt would be nice to have a conversation without them.โ That was after you called us all hypocrites for making comparisons to previous incidents because of the hypocrisy in how they were met vs now. I still havenโt seen anyone accuse McCain of being inappropriate. It starts to feel like those who try to say weโre being intolerant of their intolerance. You can just call people out, you know. Being passive aggressive and then getting mad when someone notices it is not exactly conducive to discussion. And I stand by my statement that this is mostly a lot of virtue signaling for the benefit of the right. Which is pointless, because theyโre going to say what they say regardless if what anyone on the left actually does. (And with this last post youโve stooped to being insulting, so yeah. Have a nice day.) Could you quote the entire remark I made for context please? Iโm on my phone on the go and donโt recall the rest of what i said. Right now youโre quoting an out of context sound bite. Thanks! PS, may be tomorrow before I can get back here.
|
|
|
Post by gardengoddess on Jan 26, 2022 17:53:26 GMT
I'm surprised it took him as long as it did.
When a former POTUS is excused or denied by millions for making fun of a disabled reporter is why I say "FUCK YOU" to trump supporters butt hurt over Joe's comment. #wheresthemiddlefingeremoji
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 18:09:05 GMT
โIt would be nice to have a conversation without them.โ That was after you called us all hypocrites for making comparisons to previous incidents because of the hypocrisy in how they were met vs now. I still havenโt seen anyone accuse McCain of being inappropriate. It starts to feel like those who try to say weโre being intolerant of their intolerance. You can just call people out, you know. Being passive aggressive and then getting mad when someone notices it is not exactly conducive to discussion. And I stand by my statement that this is mostly a lot of virtue signaling for the benefit of the right. Which is pointless, because theyโre going to say what they say regardless if what anyone on the left actually does. (And with this last post youโve stooped to being insulting, so yeah. Have a nice day.) Could you quote the entire remark I made for context please? Iโm on my phone on the go and donโt recall the rest of what i said. Right now youโre quoting an out of context sound bite. Thanks! PS, may be tomorrow before I can get back here. You said: "I have become increasingly disappointed with peas on "my side." The hypocrisy and whataboutisms are out of hand, don't do anyone any good, and I see it here all the time. It would be lovely to have discussions without them." I'm not really sure how those of us who disagreed with you were supposed to take that. What I saw, not unreasonably I think, is that you'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who aren't willing to call him to task for this incident. And then you made the comment that you'd rather have discussions without us. Perhaps you can clarify.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Jan 26, 2022 18:16:34 GMT
Could you quote the entire remark I made for context please? Iโm on my phone on the go and donโt recall the rest of what i said. Right now youโre quoting an out of context sound bite. Thanks! PS, may be tomorrow before I can get back here. You said: "I have become increasingly disappointed with peas on "my side." The hypocrisy and whataboutisms are out of hand, don't do anyone any good, and I see it here all the time. It would be lovely to have discussions without them." I'm not really sure how those of us who disagreed with you were supposed to take that. What I saw, not unreasonably I think, is that you'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who aren't willing to call him to task for this incident. And then you made the comment that you'd rather have discussions without us. Perhaps you can clarify. I don't want to speak for Michy but I read her "them" not as people, but the whataboutisms. I don't want to have discussions without people who disagree with me. But I'd like to have a discussion without comparing everything to Trump. Me, not speaking for Michy. I would like to believe that Trump was an outlier and is not the new standard for behavior. We can all stand to do better. With that said, I was bothered by Biden's comment, but I can understand where it came from and I give him kudos for owning it and apologizing. Everyone gets heated from time to time. And that's my opinion on the matter.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 18:28:45 GMT
You said: "I have become increasingly disappointed with peas on "my side." The hypocrisy and whataboutisms are out of hand, don't do anyone any good, and I see it here all the time. It would be lovely to have discussions without them." I'm not really sure how those of us who disagreed with you were supposed to take that. What I saw, not unreasonably I think, is that you'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who aren't willing to call him to task for this incident. And then you made the comment that you'd rather have discussions without us. Perhaps you can clarify. I don't want to speak for Michy but I read her "them" not as people, but the whataboutisms. I don't want to have discussions without people who disagree with me. But I'd like to have a discussion without comparing everything to Trump. Me, not speaking for Michy. I would like to believe that Trump was an outlier and is not the new standard for behavior. We can all stand to do better. With that said, I was bothered by Biden's comment, but I can understand where it came from and I give him kudos for owning it and apologizing. Everyone gets heated from time to time. And that's my opinion on the matter. Maybe. But she started the comment with being disappointed in the peas on "her side" and our supposed hypocrisy. So we'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who disagree with her ... regardless of what she meant by the rest of the comment.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jan 26, 2022 18:31:02 GMT
For swearing? For use of language? I can find absolutely nothing. If there is evidence, I will happily admit I am wrong. I don't know about swearing specifically, but I have heard them disagree with him, say what he should have said/done instead of what he did/said, call him out and such on "all manner of things Trump" through the years. I catch it when they do, because I usually agree with them. Not always, but usually.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jan 26, 2022 18:32:03 GMT
I donโt have cable, so I am unable to discern what yโall deem โserious journalistsโ or โnot-seriousโ journalists. Nor do I care. Yโall are qualifying your reactions based on how you view the journalist. If he was a โserious conservative journalistโ I believe the collective response here would have been the same as it is now. That said, I still stand behind what I believe would have been this boards response had the tables been turned. The result certainly would not be a thread with this title and a smiling face. With that, Iโm done defending my remark about hypocrisy and all the whataboutisms. I see it on this board nearly daily. Itโs amazing how the tides have turned and the reactions here on the board have changed in the last year. If one of the Bush Presidents had made a remark like President Biden did to the same dumbass question I would gotten a chuckle out of it as well. IMO they are certain things that happen that fall outside โboth sidesโ & โRepublican vs Democratโ. Today Paul Waldman, the Washington Post columnist I like, pushed a column written by this guy who basically said reporters often ask questions like this and itโs no big deal. But to me it is a big deal in that itโs not honest. The whole point of traditional reporters, separate from talking heads on TV, is to ask questions to obtain information and itโs not to ask โgotchaโ questions. These โgotchaโ questions are a source for spreading misinformation. So yeah, this Democrat would feel the same way regardless the political affiliation if a president was asked a โgotchaโ question and replied the same way as President Biden. Its all about knowing the difference between right and wrong. I remember W (Bush) made a remark calling a reporter an โassholeโ with the microphone unknowingly being on and was roundly criticized for it. Hereโs a clip: Eta: here is even a snopes article about it: www.snopes.com/fact-check/major-league-remark/youtu.be/Rt86dc6EIoY
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Jan 26, 2022 18:38:34 GMT
You said: "I have become increasingly disappointed with peas on "my side." The hypocrisy and whataboutisms are out of hand, don't do anyone any good, and I see it here all the time. It would be lovely to have discussions without them." I'm not really sure how those of us who disagreed with you were supposed to take that. What I saw, not unreasonably I think, is that you'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who aren't willing to call him to task for this incident. And then you made the comment that you'd rather have discussions without us. Perhaps you can clarify. I don't want to speak for Michy but I read her "them" not as people, but the whataboutisms. I don't want to have discussions without people who disagree with me. But I'd like to have a discussion without comparing everything to Trump. Me, not speaking for Michy. I would like to believe that Trump was an outlier and is not the new standard for behavior. We can all stand to do better. With that said, I was bothered by Biden's comment, but I can understand where it came from and I give him kudos for owning it and apologizing. Everyone gets heated from time to time. And that's my opinion on the matter. I get this. I get where Darcy was coming from with this behavior should be an outlier, and not wanting it constantly compared because of that. I get the being beyond tired of even thinking about Trump or having him in every discussion, and wanting to move on from him (although personally I think thatโs a bit dangerous with him being the presumptive 2024 nominee, if he wants it ๐ฃ๐ฅด). I do try to limit that in my own posts. I just think in this specific instance (speaking for me) itโs hard to not at least add him to this conversation, because the reporter at the center of this works for a network that for the last four years, carried on with its agenda, as if Trumps behavior was perfectly normal. For them (as a network) to get upset about this rings rather hollow. I donโt think itโs whatabouting to add that to *this* discussion, or to point that out.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jan 26, 2022 18:46:18 GMT
You said: "I have become increasingly disappointed with peas on "my side." The hypocrisy and whataboutisms are out of hand, don't do anyone any good, and I see it here all the time. It would be lovely to have discussions without them." I'm not really sure how those of us who disagreed with you were supposed to take that. What I saw, not unreasonably I think, is that you'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who aren't willing to call him to task for this incident. And then you made the comment that you'd rather have discussions without us. Perhaps you can clarify. I don't want to speak for Michy but I read her "them" not as people, but the whataboutisms. I don't want to have discussions without people who disagree with me. But I'd like to have a discussion without comparing everything to Trump. Me, not speaking for Michy. I would like to believe that Trump was an outlier and is not the new standard for behavior. We can all stand to do better. With that said, I was bothered by Biden's comment, but I can understand where it came from and I give him kudos for owning it and apologizing. Everyone gets heated from time to time. And that's my opinion on the matter. He did NOT apologize. "it's nothing personal, pal" is not an apology. Would you accept that as a real apology from Trump? And if its honestly a different question would you accept that as a real apology from any republican? The hypocrisy and whataboutisms are out of hand, don't do anyone any good, and I see it here all the time. It would be lovely to have discussions without them." I don't speak for Michy either, but I'm pretty sure this is the point she was making. You quoted 3 sentences. You'd have to completely ignore the sentence in the middle to make the mistake? leap? that you made.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Jan 26, 2022 18:46:24 GMT
If one of the Bush Presidents had made a remark like President Biden did to the same dumbass question I would gotten a chuckle out of it as well. IMO they are certain things that happen that fall outside โboth sidesโ & โRepublican vs Democratโ. Today Paul Waldman, the Washington Post columnist I like, pushed a column written by this guy who basically said reporters often ask questions like this and itโs no big deal. But to me it is a big deal in that itโs not honest. The whole point of traditional reporters, separate from talking heads on TV, is to ask questions to obtain information and itโs not to ask โgotchaโ questions. These โgotchaโ questions are a source for spreading misinformation. So yeah, this Democrat would feel the same way regardless the political affiliation if a president was asked a โgotchaโ question and replied the same way as President Biden. Its all about knowing the difference between right and wrong. I remember W (Bush) made a remark calling a reporter an โassholeโ with the microphone unknowingly being on and was roundly criticized for it. Hereโs a clip: Eta: here is even a snopes article about it: www.snopes.com/fact-check/major-league-remark/youtu.be/Rt86dc6EIoYLol, yeah thatโs how you apologize for a comment that youโre really not sorry for thinking, but also regret it going beyond its intended recipients, unintentionally. โIโm sorry it made the airwavesโ. At least itโs not a disingenuous one. ๐ That Snopes article is interesting on which was more offensive - Bush or Kerry. Almost the same discussion, as we are having here. And it comes to pretty much the same conclusion. ๐ โSo what does all this mean in terms of who was more culpable? We leave that to readers to decide, depending upon which criteria they deem to carry more weight. Such judgments are unique to the individual, after all.โ
|
|
|
Post by MichyM on Jan 26, 2022 19:05:33 GMT
What JeremysGirl said is spot on. That one pea misunderstood what I said and itโs intent is on her. And yes, Iโm well aware that Iโm not โproperly apologizingโ for what I said, because there is no reason to do so. As youโve all seen from my past posts, Iโm one of the first to admit when Iโm wrong. <โโ call that virtue signaling if you will. I call it paying attention to who a person is at their core.
Merge, I hope youโre able to come back to this thread without anger and realize that I was not asking/suggesting/or declaring that Iโd like anyone to leave.
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,441
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Jan 26, 2022 19:27:24 GMT
For the peas who don't like the "Whataboutism", it is a forever fact of life. Obama got brought up constantly during the Trump presidency. It is what it is. At this point in time I don't give a rat's ass about what Biden does or says. I am tired of trying to go higher. The GOP let Trump run amok for 4 years. He could do or say whatever he wanted. They didn't care. His demented minions are going around with the "Let's go Brandon" slogan on everything. So give me a break if Biden called a dumbass reporter a "stupid SOB". I don't care. I don't care if he apologizes.
The bar has been set very low.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Jan 26, 2022 20:31:26 GMT
I don't want to speak for Michy but I read her "them" not as people, but the whataboutisms. I don't want to have discussions without people who disagree with me. But I'd like to have a discussion without comparing everything to Trump. Me, not speaking for Michy. I would like to believe that Trump was an outlier and is not the new standard for behavior. We can all stand to do better. With that said, I was bothered by Biden's comment, but I can understand where it came from and I give him kudos for owning it and apologizing. Everyone gets heated from time to time. And that's my opinion on the matter. Maybe. But she started the comment with being disappointed in the peas on "her side" and our supposed hypocrisy. So we'd gone from censuring Biden to censuring those who disagree with her ... regardless of what she meant by the rest of the comment. MichyM would have to clarify and now reading ahead I see she did. I just wanted to speak up and say, my interpretation of her comment was quite different than yours and that's where my like came from. I, too, am fatigued by the whataboutisms.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Jan 26, 2022 20:40:16 GMT
itโs hard to not at least add him to this conversation, because the reporter at the center of this works for a network that for the last four years, carried on with its agenda, as if Trumps behavior was perfectly normal. For them (as a network) to get upset about this rings rather hollow. I donโt think itโs whatabouting to add that to *this* discussion, or to point that out. I see your point. And I agree that Peter Doocy is a jackass. He did NOT apologize. "it's nothing personal, pal" is not an apology. Would you accept that as a real apology from Trump? And if its honestly a different question would you accept that as a real apology from any republican? I'm not splitting hairs with you or dissecting what Peter Doocy claims Joe Biden did or did not say on a personal phone call. He said outloud what many of us think of Peter Doocy. It's the truth. It wasn't kind to say it outloud but anyone who watches Doocy's behavior knows that what Biden said wasn't wrong. It takes guts to call someone up on the phone and even attempt to apologize after saying something like that outloud about them. And hey, I'm totally willing to believe that Joe Biden truly feels that way about Peter Doocy and he recognizes it was bad form to say it outloud. And that's the limit of his apology. I'm cool with that too. I'm not sitting here and going round and round with you on this comment. Before you decide to criticize Biden's apology, recognize that the guy took the step to even do so.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 20:41:21 GMT
For the peas who don't like the "Whataboutism", it is a forever fact of life. Obama got brought up constantly during the Trump presidency. It is what it is. At this point in time I don't give a rat's ass about what Biden does or says. I am tired of trying to go higher. The GOP let Trump run amok for 4 years. He could do or say whatever he wanted. They didn't care. His demented minions are going around with the "Let's go Brandon" slogan on everything. So give me a break if Biden called a dumbass reporter a "stupid SOB". I don't care. I don't care if he apologizes. The bar has been set very low. Yep. I'm not going to be chastised by people who think that playing nice with those folks will do any good.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 20:42:35 GMT
What JeremysGirl said is spot on. That one pea misunderstood what I said and itโs intent is on her. And yes, Iโm well aware that Iโm not โproperly apologizingโ for what I said, because there is no reason to do so. As youโve all seen from my past posts, Iโm one of the first to admit when Iโm wrong. <โโ call that virtue signaling if you will. I call it paying attention to who a person is at their core. Merge, I hope youโre able to come back to this thread without anger and realize that I was not asking/suggesting/or declaring that Iโd like anyone to leave. OK. I'm not angry. And I know exactly what you meant and why you wrote it. It doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 26, 2022 21:05:42 GMT
I don't think its hypocrisy if you're making a false comparison. You can be outraged at what Trump said about women or directly to reporters and not be concerned about what Biden said. The difference - Trump did it deliberately to a room full of reporters. What Biden said wasn't presidential or gentlemanly, but he said it when reporters were leaving the room and he thought the microphone was off. He made a mistake, took responsibility and called to apologize. I'm not using what Trump did or said to justify what Biden did, I just don't think it's a fair comparison or hypocrisy. My thought on hypocrisy is that if a (not trump) Republican president called a journalist for a progressive institution a stupid SOB, I believe the democrats on this board would be outraged, not applauding. I'm not sure what would happen. I don't think anyone was outraged when John McCain was caught using a curse word. I know that's different, he was only a Senator. Maybe there are higher standards for a president. I don't remember the reaction but George W called a NYT reporter a major league as*hole over a hot mic. I think the context- when and how it was said - is really important. Directly to a reporter in a room full of reporters, absolutely not OK. Over a hot mic when they thought it was off and reporters were leaving the room? I'm not too concerned and willing to give him a pass. Personally, I wasn't worked up when George W did it either. George W did other things I disagree with, a curse word over a hot mic didn't seem too significant.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 21:20:53 GMT
My thought on hypocrisy is that if a (not trump) Republican president called a journalist for a progressive institution a stupid SOB, I believe the democrats on this board would be outraged, not applauding. I'm not sure what would happen. I don't think anyone was outraged when John McCain was caught using a curse word. I know that's different, he was only a Senator. Maybe there are higher standards for a president. I don't remember the reaction but George W called a NYT reporter a major league as*hole over a hot mic. I think the context- when and how it was said - is really important. Directly to a reporter in a room full of reporters, absolutely not OK. Over a hot mic when they thought it was off and reporters were leaving the room? I'm not too concerned and willing to give him a pass. Personally, I wasn't worked up when George W did it either. George W did other things I disagree with, a curse word over a hot mic didn't seem too significant. This. But I disagree with the "only a Senator" part. He had been a presidential candidate. He was a high-profile Senator, and he meant what he said. It wasn't just an open mic. Zero people were outraged as I recall. (And I agree - no outrage necessary.) Trump didn't just call names, he frequently referred to the press as "the enemy of the people" and, consistently, "fake news." He put journalists' lives in danger with his constant targeting of them.I think Trump's actions merited outrage but Biden's do not because they are not remotely in the same class of behavior. That's not hypocrisy. That's not whataboutism. To me, it's just common sense and perspective. These are not equivalent behaviors. Pretending they are just helps to whitewash the things that Trump did and continues to do.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 26, 2022 21:21:03 GMT
I can't decide if Peter Doocy is genuinely stupid. It's entertaining to watch him interact with Jen Psaki. She gets the upper hand every time. I gib=ve him credit, he seems genuinely good natured about it. Peter does ask dumb questions like does the President think a tweet #StandwithUkraine will stop an authoritarian regime? My major objection to his questions is that he starts with false assumptions and false premises. Here are some of his dumb and not so dumb questions from the last year. slate.com/business/2022/01/peter-doocy-joe-biden-stupid-son-bitch-fact-checked.html
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2022 21:22:52 GMT
I can't decide if Peter Doocy is genuinely stupid. It's entertaining to watch him interact with Jen Psaki. She gets the upper hand every time. Peter does ask dumb questions like does the President think a tweet #StandwithUkraine will stop an authoritarian regime? My objection to his questions is that he starts with false assumptions and false premises. Here are some of his dumb and not so dumb questions from the last year. slate.com/business/2022/01/peter-doocy-joe-biden-stupid-son-bitch-fact-checked.htmlHe's all about getting the soundbite. You know they post those video clips with titles like "Doocy DESTROYS Jen Psaki with question about Ukraine" without any context at all. That's literally his job. Creating those clips for right-wing propagandists to distribute.
|
|