sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Mar 10, 2022 0:26:29 GMT
I understand why NATO/United States doesn’t want to escalate the conflict by using weapons. But at some point they can’t keep ignoring what is happening. Plus if Putin gets away with this he won’t stop at Ukraine. Then what? I’m starting to wonder if he is doing worse and worse things because he does want to see other countries get involved. He wants a bigger war and/or wants to see what the “line” is where people can’t stand to watch these things happen anymore and not do anything about it. That line has been long crossed. This *is* his MO, unfortunately. He did exactly the same things in Syria. And Chechnya. It’s a pattern with him. People watched it happening then. Both times. 🥺
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:33:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2022 0:44:12 GMT
This takes evil to another level - bombing of a children and maternity hospital No, it's his same level. It's just on more display now.
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Mar 10, 2022 2:15:47 GMT
The thing is what can he possibly get from coming to the table? I don’t see anything that will be a win for him at this point. His country is in shambles not as much as Ukraine but it’s economy is a mess and that isn’t going away any time soon. His oligarchs are hurting and have lost so much so I assume they aren’t happy with him either. The world isn’t going to forget this snd no one thinks favorably towards him. Ukraine feeds a lot of people and with the destruction I don’t see that happening for a while. I don’t see any way this can ever be considered a win for him unless he gets control of the country but there won’t be much left if it. Russians believe what they hear since they are only hearing what he wants them To hear but many have to have heard what’s really going on and that he isn’t saving them from nazis or that he is stopping biological weapons.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Mar 10, 2022 9:13:16 GMT
No one is ignoring anything. My feeling is that it will end around the negotiating table but we will have to find a way of letting putin save face. And how many more innocent people die while waiting around for something to happen at a negotiating table that lets Putin save face? And what makes you think that if the West let’s Putin save face he won’t do something more outrageous? Or that his demands at the negotiating table won’t be outrageous? Then what? Oh yes innocent people including children continue to die. Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. I am fully aware that Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. And I'm fully aware that innocent people are dying...with or without this option. If other answers are as simple as you seem to think why aren't they being put into action? Every action would have massive ramifications unfortunately. I don't think that he won't possibly try something again and of course his demands would probably be outrageous but I am merely stating that I think it's an option that various governments/agencies may be considering. I didn't say that I thought it was a great idea, just that I believe it's a possibility.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:33:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2022 10:46:24 GMT
No one is ignoring anything. My feeling is that it will end around the negotiating table but we will have to find a way of letting putin save face. And how many more innocent people die while waiting around for something to happen at a negotiating table that lets Putin save face? And what makes you think that if the West let’s Putin save face he won’t do something more outrageous? Or that his demands at the negotiating table won’t be outrageous? Then what? Oh yes innocent people including children continue to die. Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. I think everyone is well aware that Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. Unless you want world war 3 then sadly there is no other way except to negotiate - will that work - who knows but the consequences of what he would do the minute a NATO plane/ground troops intervenes in this doesn't bear thinking of. Not only has he nuclear weapons but he also has a pretty good stash of chemical weapons that he would have no hesitation in using. We know full well the consequences of him having already used chemical weapons on the streets of the UK. There is, already, intelligence talk that using chemical weapons could be his next move.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Mar 10, 2022 12:00:47 GMT
The thing is what can he possibly get from coming to the table? I don’t see anything that will be a win for him at this point. His country is in shambles not as much as Ukraine but it’s economy is a mess and that isn’t going away any time soon. His oligarchs are hurting and have lost so much so I assume they aren’t happy with him either. The world isn’t going to forget this snd no one thinks favorably towards him. Ukraine feeds a lot of people and with the destruction I don’t see that happening for a while. I don’t see any way this can ever be considered a win for him unless he gets control of the country but there won’t be much left if it. Russians believe what they hear since they are only hearing what he wants them To hear but many have to have heard what’s really going on and that he isn’t saving them from nazis or that he is stopping biological weapons. Unfortunately, there still ‘people’ ( I use that term loosely ) that think Putin is just fine & dandy, smart, shrewd & a great leader. One of them plans a bid for the US presidency in 2024, some of them are running for re-election this fall.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 10, 2022 15:14:11 GMT
Don't forget the millions ^^^^that will vote for them too!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 10, 2022 15:33:34 GMT
Gun toting family Christmas card mailing...Rep Massie is going over the edge... Now spouting Russian propaganda. According to the report, as all of these claims were being made, "Rep. Thomas Massie, who recently voted against a House resolution supporting Ukraine, amplified Russia’s claims Wednesday on Twitter, saying he had not taken 'the concern over Ukrainian biological labs seriously … until now.'" Massie has previously stirred controversy for voting against making lynching a federal hate crime, and for claiming he "didn't see any violence" at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.www.rawstory.com/thomas-massie-2656909000/#cxrecs_s
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:33:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2022 15:40:48 GMT
Gun toting family Christmas card mailing...Rep Massie is going over the edge... Now spouting Russian propaganda. When the voters are largely old, white, superstitious, uninformed people, the representatives look like old, white, superstitious, uninformed people. If the US can't make it easier for more people to vote, people who HOLD PROGRESSIVE VALUES, reason, logic, facts, etc. - but can't take off on a Tuesday from 8 a.m to 8 p.m. to travel who knows how far after working all day, picking up kids, finding time to make dinner, help w/homework or other school issues, etc. Why do you think the old, white, religious majority in the GOP is trying to hard to disenfranchise others from voting? And it impacts EVERYTHING from local laws, school boards, to state-wide, national and even INTERNATIONAL disputes like the war in Ukraine.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Mar 10, 2022 16:21:15 GMT
And how many more innocent people die while waiting around for something to happen at a negotiating table that lets Putin save face? And what makes you think that if the West let’s Putin save face he won’t do something more outrageous? Or that his demands at the negotiating table won’t be outrageous? Then what? Oh yes innocent people including children continue to die. Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. I am fully aware that Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. And I'm fully aware that innocent people are dying...with or without this option. If other answers are as simple as you seem to think why aren't they being put into action? Every action would have massive ramifications unfortunately. I don't think that he won't possibly try something again and of course his demands would probably be outrageous but I am merely stating that I think it's an option that various governments/agencies may be considering. I didn't say that I thought it was a great idea, just that I believe it's a possibility. My feeling is the same. One should not disregard the importance of a compromise agreement to end a war. That’s always a possibility. (Of course, this could end up being a war of attrition in which case casualties won’t just be in the hundreds. It’ll be in the thousands or tens of thousands, and I don’t know what good that will serve.) Zelensky seems to have opened the door to a dialogue. He said he’s open to talking about the future of Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. And (this surprised me) he’s cooled on the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. (NATO had no intention of giving Ukraine membership, anyway, and maybe Zelensky is beginning to accept that.) I’m also speculating he’s come to fully realize that the West is just not going to step foot in his country and its airspace and risk an all-out war with Russia. On the Russia side, of course they would want Ukraine to completely cede the three territories. They also said they want Ukraine’s constitution to include a provision that Ukraine will never join a bloc. So that would eliminate not only membership in NATO but the EU as well. That’s less than what they were demanding earlier which was surrender of the entire country and regime change. So, some ceding and absolute and permanent neutrality might have to be the price. It would be a bitter pill to swallow for Zelensky, but the longer this war drags on the more of his people will die. Putin is thoroughly unhinged. I suspect that if he doesn’t get concessions soon he will level Ukraine completely and it’ll be another Grozny.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Mar 10, 2022 17:12:18 GMT
I am fully aware that Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. And I'm fully aware that innocent people are dying...with or without this option. If other answers are as simple as you seem to think why aren't they being put into action? Every action would have massive ramifications unfortunately. I don't think that he won't possibly try something again and of course his demands would probably be outrageous but I am merely stating that I think it's an option that various governments/agencies may be considering. I didn't say that I thought it was a great idea, just that I believe it's a possibility. My feeling is the same. One should not disregard the importance of a compromise agreement to end a war. That’s always a possibility. (Of course, this could end up being a war of attrition in which case casualties won’t just be in the hundreds. It’ll be in the thousands or tens of thousands, and I don’t know what good that will serve.) Zelensky seems to have opened the door to a dialogue. He said he’s open to talking about the future of Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. And (this surprised me) he’s cooled on the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. (NATO had no intention of giving Ukraine membership, anyway, and maybe Zelensky is beginning to accept that.) I’m also speculating he’s come to fully realize that the West is just not going to step foot in his country and its airspace and risk an all-out war with Russia. On the Russia side, of course they would want Ukraine to completely cede the three territories. They also said they want Ukraine’s constitution to include a provision that Ukraine will never join a bloc. So that would eliminate not only membership in NATO but the EU as well. That’s less than what they were demanding earlier which was surrender of the entire country and regime change. So, some ceding and absolute and permanent neutrality might have to be the price. It would be a bitter pill to swallow for Zelensky, but the longer this war drags on the more of his people will die. Putin is thoroughly unhinged. I suspect that if he doesn’t get concessions soon he will level Ukraine completely and it’ll be another Grozny. Not only Zelenskyy. But it would be a very very bitter pill for the Ukrainian people to swallow. They don’t want ties to Russia. I watched this last night on Netflix. www.netflix.com/title/80031666 It’s from 2015, during and just after Euromaidan in 2014 when they demanded (and got) the resignation of Yanukovych. They protested for 93 days over winter. I’m not sure if he just has horrible intel, isn’t being told the truth, or he just hates the existence of Ukraine and Ukrainians that much (or all three), but I was even more shocked after watching this he thought he could successfully invade and subjugate the people as Russians, like he seems to have thought he could. They’re not Russian, and they don’t want to be.
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on Mar 10, 2022 17:15:00 GMT
Why won't or can't Ukraine join Nato or the EU?
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 10, 2022 17:32:35 GMT
And how many more innocent people die while waiting around for something to happen at a negotiating table that lets Putin save face? And what makes you think that if the West let’s Putin save face he won’t do something more outrageous? Or that his demands at the negotiating table won’t be outrageous? Then what? Oh yes innocent people including children continue to die. Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. I think everyone is well aware that Ukraine did nothing to deserve this. Unless you want world war 3 then sadly there is no other way except to negotiate - will that work - who knows but the consequences of what he would do the minute a NATO plane/ground troops intervenes in this doesn't bear thinking of. Not only has he nuclear weapons but he also has a pretty good stash of chemical weapons that he would have no hesitation in using. We know full well the consequences of him having already used chemical weapons on the streets of the UK. There is, already, intelligence talk that using chemical weapons could be his next move. From my original post.. “ I understand why NATO/United States doesn’t want to escalate the conflict by using weapons. But at some point they can’t keep ignoring what is happening. Plus if Putin gets away with this he won’t stop at Ukraine. Then what?”Now for some American arrogance. As someone who lives in a country that is considered one of the three super powers of the world I’m well aware of the weapons and potential weapons in the US, Russia & China. Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world. But back to my original post above and the bolded part. Got an answer for “then what”? And yes IMO as long as NATO allows women and children to be killed they are ignoring it. And more importantly, what does that say about us as human beings?
|
|
|
Post by gar on Mar 10, 2022 17:37:37 GMT
Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world. There's your answer.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Mar 10, 2022 17:38:40 GMT
Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world. There's your answer. Right? 🤦🏼♀️
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Mar 10, 2022 17:49:14 GMT
Why won't or can't Ukraine join Nato or the EU? NATO doesn’t want Ukraine as a member because that will definitely bring the West in direct conflict with Russia. If one thinks the savagery going on right now is too horrific, just imagine what it would be if Ukraine is part of NATO. If Ukraine was a member, the moment Russia invades, NATO (meaning all member countries) will be obliged under Article 5 to engage in active combat to protect Ukraine. Russia has allies, too, with militaries and nuclear capabilities of their own. That will be WWIII. And it’ll be different this time because both the US and Russia (as well as France and the UK) have amassed an astounding number of nuclear warheads. We would be risking a possible annihilation of an entire continent. EU membership was questionable to begin with. I cannot see Germany and/or The Netherlands agreeing to that. In fact, the Dutch have already raised concerns about it. I suspect there are more than those two.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Mar 10, 2022 17:54:04 GMT
Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world. There's your answer. Jingoism is most pronounced in times of war. Americans should temper this attitude that we’re Wyatt Earp who should shoot down the villains in the OK Corral.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 10, 2022 17:59:56 GMT
Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world. There's your answer. Boy talk about taking something out of context. This was the full response Now for some American arrogance. As someone who lives in a country that is considered one of the three super powers of the world I’m well aware of the weapons and potential weapons in the US, Russia & China. Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world.
To this… Unless you want world war 3 then sadly there is no other way except to negotiate - will that work - who knows but the consequences of what he would do the minute a NATO plane/ground troops intervenes in this doesn't bear thinking of. Not only has he nuclear weapons but he also has a pretty good stash of chemical weapons that he would have no hesitation in using. We know full well the consequences of him having already used chemical weapons on the streets of the UK. There is, already, intelligence talk that using chemical weapons could be his next move.”
But then maybe you can answer the bolded part from my original post that started this little discussion. Got an answer for “then what?” From my original post.. “I understand why NATO/United States doesn’t want to escalate the conflict by using weapons. But at some point they can’t keep ignoring what is happening. Plus if Putin gets away with this he won’t stop at Ukraine. Then what?”
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 10, 2022 18:13:22 GMT
I hope he succeeds….
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on Mar 10, 2022 18:19:24 GMT
Why won't or can't Ukraine join Nato or the EU? i would like to know this too, esp since they gave up weapons in 2014 ETA and it was answered above!
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Mar 10, 2022 18:22:52 GMT
Jingoism is most pronounced in times of war. Americans should temper this attitude that we’re Wyatt Earp who should shoot down the villains in the OK Corral. I don't see it that way at all. We are watching people die and a country destroyed because of a senseless decision by an unstable leader. It is hard to watch when it is clear that the US and other countries have the ability to stop it. If someone was being attacked on the street and people stood by and watched because they didn't want to risk themselves, we would all be outraged and say, "Those heartless people. How could they not help?" I am not fully in the camp of getting involved, but there is part of me that believes that we shouldn't just stand by and watch this happen. I also wonder if Ukraine was already in NATO if that would have deterred Putin. I also don't think it is ok that the US and UK (and Russia) have not adhered to the agreement that they made with Ukraine when they gave up their nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on Mar 10, 2022 19:49:47 GMT
Jingoism is most pronounced in times of war. Americans should temper this attitude that we’re Wyatt Earp who should shoot down the villains in the OK Corral. I don't see it that way at all. We are watching people die and a country destroyed because of a senseless decision by an unstable leader. It is hard to watch when it is clear that the US and other countries have the ability to stop it. If someone was being attacked on the street and people stood by and watched because they didn't want to risk themselves, we would all be outraged and say, "Those heartless people. How could they not help?" I am not fully in the camp of getting involved, but there is part of me that believes that we shouldn't just stand by and watch this happen. I also wonder if Ukraine was already in NATO if that would have deterred Putin. I also don't think it is ok that the US and UK (and Russia) have not adhered to the agreement that they made with Ukraine when they gave up their nuclear weapons. It's not a case of failing to retaliate for fear of being attacked ourselves, it's to prevent the entire world from being annihilated. It's not a case of one on one, it's one on millions. People, generally, in the US DO watch people being harmed for fear of being harmed themselves; they might call for law enforcement or other assistance but they will stand by, maybe filming it, rather than actively attack an attacker. It's sadly (and thankfully to avoid mass bloodshed) the same the world over. There was an interesting program on our tv last night with a war expert confirming Putin has lost and the only way forward is to negotiate. We are hearing a lot from warfare experts and they are all seem in agreement for once. The fury and the sheer impotent frustration I feel can be nothing compared to the souls living, and dying in this unnecessary carnage. Sanctions have been taken speedily but they will not cause a quick enough reaction and, tbh, I doubt Putin gives a f*** about them. He will get squeezed by his own turning on him. Like any cornered rat he has to see a way out. Negotiation seems to be the way forward.
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on Mar 10, 2022 20:07:03 GMT
Jingoism is most pronounced in times of war. Americans should temper this attitude that we’re Wyatt Earp who should shoot down the villains in the OK Corral. I don't see it that way at all. We are watching people die and a country destroyed because of a senseless decision by an unstable leader. It is hard to watch when it is clear that the US and other countries have the ability to stop it. If someone was being attacked on the street and people stood by and watched because they didn't want to risk themselves, we would all be outraged and say, "Those heartless people. How could they not help?" I am not fully in the camp of getting involved, but there is part of me that believes that we shouldn't just stand by and watch this happen. I also wonder if Ukraine was already in NATO if that would have deterred Putin. I also don't think it is ok that the US and UK (and Russia) have not adhered to the agreement that they made with Ukraine when they gave up their nuclear weapons. . That is what I wonder too. If Ukraine were part of Nato would Putin have even invaded Ukraine knowing that the ramifications would have been the NATO countries coming in swift and strong?
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 10, 2022 20:11:26 GMT
Jingoism is most pronounced in times of war. Americans should temper this attitude that we’re Wyatt Earp who should shoot down the villains in the OK Corral. I don't see it that way at all. We are watching people die and a country destroyed because of a senseless decision by an unstable leader. It is hard to watch when it is clear that the US and other countries have the ability to stop it. If someone was being attacked on the street and people stood by and watched because they didn't want to risk themselves, we would all be outraged and say, "Those heartless people. How could they not help?" I am not fully in the camp of getting involved, but there is part of me that believes that we shouldn't just stand by and watch this happen. I also wonder if Ukraine was already in NATO if that would have deterred Putin. I also don't think it is ok that the US and UK (and Russia) have not adhered to the agreement that they made with Ukraine when they gave up their nuclear weapons. But we aren’t just sitting around. We are helping by giving them guns and ammo. We are helping by having sanctions against Russia. Just because we aren’t going in, guns blazing, doesn’t mean we aren’t helping. We are looking at the big picture because the moment the USA steps foot in Ukraine to save today, we are forever changing the world. Because what’s happening is bad but it’s not as bad what will happen when Putin is pissed and blows up the entire world.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 10, 2022 21:31:32 GMT
Jingoism interesting word but it doesn’t apply to the comment below which seems to have folks muttering about it.
It was simply a response to @dottyscrapper and her “schooling” me on the weapons Russia has. This came after I had already said I understood why NATO/United States didn’t want to use weapons in the conflict. Maybe a better response should have been “well duh”
Having said that the statement below is fact. It’s something the world has to live with and be mindful of. But the world cannot allow any one of those three countries to go rogue. And that is exactly what Putin has done. His reasons for invading Ukraine sound like something that would come from trump.
I invite you to read the list of demands Putin sent NATO in December. When I read them my first though “ man is he paranoid “ and the second one was “what is he planning”.
There is no question that Putin wants to rebuild the USSR, in fact one of his demands was that no former USSR country can join NATO. Why? Well maybe because it will be easier to invade those countries if they aren’t part of NATO.
So say for giggles sake the world stands by and watches him invade former USSR country after country. And rebuilds the USSR. What makes you think he would stop there? I hear he thinks Finland should be part of the USSR. Must be some truth in that because I read Finland is seriously thinking about joining NATO or the EU can’t remember which. So if he takes Finland, will he stop there or go after Sweden and Denmark?
And then there is China. You can bet your bottom dollar they are watching closely at what the world will let Putin get away with. Because you known China wants Taiwan back. But I did read the great bromance between Putin and Xi may be over because of his actions in Ukraine and the worldwide condemnation it’s received. I mean China is sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine. A paltry amount considering the economic size of China but they are sending something.
Wild musings? Maybe, but what if they aren’t. The question then becomes if Putin gets away with this he won’t stop at Ukraine, then what? How many more countries have to be trashed before the world stops him. Or is the world just going to let the super powers get away with stuff like this?
“Now for some American arrogance. As someone who lives in a country that is considered one of the three super powers of the world I’m well aware of the weapons and potential weapons in the US, Russia & China. Each of these countries has the ability to wipe out a large chunk of the world.”
And yes, the West is doing something with sanctions and they are affecting Russia’s economy in a big way but Putin doesn’t care.
And that is why I get frustrated when I see what’s happening in Ukraine because the response by the West is not enough to force Putin out of Ukraine.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Mar 10, 2022 21:31:43 GMT
I don't see it that way at all. We are watching people die and a country destroyed because of a senseless decision by an unstable leader. It is hard to watch when it is clear that the US and other countries have the ability to stop it. If someone was being attacked on the street and people stood by and watched because they didn't want to risk themselves, we would all be outraged and say, "Those heartless people. How could they not help?" I am not fully in the camp of getting involved, but there is part of me that believes that we shouldn't just stand by and watch this happen. I also wonder if Ukraine was already in NATO if that would have deterred Putin. I also don't think it is ok that the US and UK (and Russia) have not adhered to the agreement that they made with Ukraine when they gave up their nuclear weapons. . That is what I wonder too. If Ukraine were part of Nato would Putin have even invaded Ukraine knowing that the ramifications would have been the NATO countries coming in swift and strong? But Ukraine isn’t a member of NATO for a very specific reason, due to its proximity to and relationship with Russia. Ukraine joining NATO would have precipitated WWIII all on its own.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 10, 2022 21:45:47 GMT
Ok…. But I wonder what it called when one country bombs another and sends in troops into that country?
.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on Mar 10, 2022 22:04:39 GMT
And that is why I get frustrated when I see what’s happening in Ukraine because the response by the West is not enough to force Putin out of Ukraine. I get that and at the moment the response does not seem to be enough. What you said in the rest of your post is not "wild musings" either. Much of it has been said in our press and TV broadcasts, many of us are thinking the same. As for Lavrov - he was lying again today about the strike on the maternity hospital. He wouldn't know the truth if it hit him in the face.
|
|
|
Post by LiLi on Mar 10, 2022 22:22:27 GMT
Are you going to stand in line for a charge station if your electric car dies during your commute? How long does it take to charge your car? Are there going to be electric airplanes, helicopters or aircraft carriers, tanks or other military vehicles? Do you really think people are going to never travel from state to state or across country ever again? Are we just going to stop using boats, ocean liners/cruise ships? I’m sure there are circumstances where EV’s are practical. Plain common sense dictates that EV’s are NOT practical for everyone or everything or every situation. It sounds like some of your ideas are based on outdated information on the very first EV stats. The science behind them has come so far since then and will continue to progress. I would encourage you to read more about where EVs are now and how fast the technology is progressing. 🙂 (For example there already is an electric cruise ship that can hold 1300 passengers. )
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Mar 10, 2022 22:34:20 GMT
I don't see it that way at all. We are watching people die and a country destroyed because of a senseless decision by an unstable leader. It is hard to watch when it is clear that the US and other countries have the ability to stop it. If someone was being attacked on the street and people stood by and watched because they didn't want to risk themselves, we would all be outraged and say, "Those heartless people. How could they not help?" I am not fully in the camp of getting involved, but there is part of me that believes that we shouldn't just stand by and watch this happen. I also wonder if Ukraine was already in NATO if that would have deterred Putin. I also don't think it is ok that the US and UK (and Russia) have not adhered to the agreement that they made with Ukraine when they gave up their nuclear weapons. But we aren’t just sitting around. We are helping by giving them guns and ammo. We are helping by having sanctions against Russia. Just because we aren’t going in, guns blazing, doesn’t mean we aren’t helping. We are looking at the big picture because the moment the USA steps foot in Ukraine to save today, we are forever changing the world. Because what’s happening is bad but it’s not as bad what will happen when Putin is pissed and blows up the entire world. I hope that giving them guns and ammo really is helping them. The news hasn’t covered as much of the military aspect of the war (as opposed to how it is affecting civilians) but most of what I have heard is that unless they have the no fly zone, there is little hope that Ukraine will hold the country in the end. If that is the case, and it is just prolonging the inevitable and causing more deaths, how helpful was that?
|
|