|
Post by putabuttononit on Oct 27, 2022 9:55:53 GMT
My friends little 9 yr old son is on the autism spectrum. He had received a tiny pocketknife for his bday months ago, and it got lost somewhere in his room. He took a bin full of crayons in his backpack to school last week. As he opened the crayons excitedly to be able to share crayons with his friends, somebody saw the pocketknife. The school has a zero tolerance policy. They questioned him without his parents there. He was confused and devastated, then my friend got there and they informed her he was kicked out.
They filed an appeal and were denied so far. Their little boy is inconsolable. It is the only school he ever loved and he has his first friend there.
He is special needs and on an IEP.
WWTPD if you were his parents 😞 Any advice from ASD advocates?
|
|
RedSquirrelUK
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,899
Location: The UK's beautiful West Country
Aug 2, 2014 13:03:45 GMT
|
Post by RedSquirrelUK on Oct 27, 2022 10:10:46 GMT
Apologies, I don't have any experience, but oh my goodness that poor little boy. I think his parents should have been present at the questioning. If he were in the UK, if he doesn't have mental capacity, he has to be allowed a representative.
I also think that parents need to take some responsibility and not allow him to have any knives (or anything forbidden) that might end up in school by accident, because that's what zero-tolerance means. What a sad story.
|
|
artbabe
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,352
Jun 26, 2014 1:59:10 GMT
|
Post by artbabe on Oct 27, 2022 10:21:16 GMT
Is this a public school? Because if it is they cannot kick him out. In a public school they would suspend him for 10 days and then have a manifestation hearing. At that meeting they would have decide if the issue was a manifestation of his disability. If they decide it was (and at my school they almost always do) then they have to let him back.
We had a kid with an IEP get caught smoking pot in the bathroom this week. Because he was already suspended for 2 days he is only suspended for 8 days. Kids with IEPs cannot be suspended more than 10 days a year. At this point he will have a manifestation hearing. As I said, in my district they almost always decide it is a manifestation of their disability, so I suspect he will be back in school in two weeks.
If this is a private school the little boy goes to, then all bets are off. They do not have to follow federal procedures. But a public school definitely does. I think the parents can fight this.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Oct 27, 2022 10:40:48 GMT
I have issues with zero tolerance policies on the whole. I just don't believe anything is ever as black and white as life would have to be in order for that kind of policy to truly work. And because of that, we will continue to hear of instances where it just doesn't work. And in my opinion, this is certainly one of those instances where it is not working. That poor kid. They didn't even realize they had it with them.
|
|
|
Post by christine58 on Oct 27, 2022 10:41:11 GMT
Is this a public school? Because if it is they cannot kick him out. In a public school they would suspend him for 10 days and then have a manifestation hearing. At that meeting they would have decide if the issue was a manifestation of his disability. If they decide it was (and at my school they almost always do) then they have to let him back. We had a kid with an IEP get caught smoking pot in the bathroom this week. Because he was already suspended for 2 days he is only suspended for 8 days. Kids with IEPs cannot be suspended more than 10 days a year. At this point he will have a manifestation hearing. As I said, in my district they almost always decide it is a manifestation of their disability, so I suspect he will be back in school in two weeks. If this is a private school the little boy goes to, then all bets are off. They do not have to follow federal procedures. But a public school definitely does. I think the parents can fight this. artbabe is absolutely correct. I am a retired SPED teacher and attended at least 3 manifestation hearings. putabuttononit Tell your friend to contact her school's special ed committee and ask for a manifestation hearing. If she is denied, tell her to find an advocate. BUT if he is in a special private school---they might not have any recourse
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Oct 27, 2022 15:07:10 GMT
This is a hard one. I'd have your friend contact a lawyer and see how it works in your state.
My friend's husband tried to give my kids pocket knives as a gift and she said absolutely not. She knew that little boys bring that stuff to school and get in trouble/expelled.
|
|
RosieKat
Drama Llama
PeaJect #12
Posts: 5,538
Jun 25, 2014 19:28:04 GMT
|
Post by RosieKat on Oct 27, 2022 15:21:10 GMT
Whatever comes of this, for the future they should get his IEP to include behavioral consequences as modified by his ASD. I do not know the specific way that is worded, etc. but there is a specific way it can be worded that allows the modification of the "standard" consequences if it is a manifestation of his qualifying disorder. (It's as referenced by others above, but you can specifically codify this in the IEP. Ask me how I know. )
|
|
|
Post by christine58 on Oct 27, 2022 16:57:19 GMT
Whatever comes of this, for the future they should get his IEP to include behavioral consequences as modified by his ASD. I do not know the specific way that is worded, etc. but there is a specific way it can be worded that allows the modification of the "standard" consequences if it is a manifestation of his qualifying disorder. (It's as referenced by others above, but you can specifically codify this in the IEP. Ask me how I know. ) There is what is called a BIP. Behavioral intervention plan. I’ve never seen them written with a modification to standard consequences though, especially in this case where the knife is considered a weapon. The mom needs an advocate if nothing else
|
|
RosieKat
Drama Llama
PeaJect #12
Posts: 5,538
Jun 25, 2014 19:28:04 GMT
|
Post by RosieKat on Oct 27, 2022 18:43:29 GMT
I’ve never seen them written with a modification to standard consequences though, especially in this case where the knife is considered a weapon. The mom needs an advocate if nothing else It can be done (not easily, of course) - though I don't know about this specific set of circumstances. There may be some exceptions to how/when they can be more lenient, and I agree, the weapon issue may go beyond. And I definitely agree with the advocate - I meant to mention that before and forgot, so I'm very glad you did! There still may not be any leeway in this instance, but they need to be 110% sure. I think the other question to ask is if the administrators are doing this reluctantly or if they don't care. In other words, are they doing this simply because it's the rules but they'd otherwise be happy to keep him? Are they completely neutral, checking off boxes and moving on? Or are they considering it good riddance? That won't necessarily change the outcome, but if there is ANY discretion, having them on his side is helpful. It would also affect the approach I'd take.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,922
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Oct 27, 2022 19:17:08 GMT
Is this a public school? Because if it is they cannot kick him out. In a public school they would suspend him for 10 days and then have a manifestation hearing. At that meeting they would have decide if the issue was a manifestation of his disability. If they decide it was (and at my school they almost always do) then they have to let him back. We had a kid with an IEP get caught smoking pot in the bathroom this week. Because he was already suspended for 2 days he is only suspended for 8 days. Kids with IEPs cannot be suspended more than 10 days a year. At this point he will have a manifestation hearing. As I said, in my district they almost always decide it is a manifestation of their disability, so I suspect he will be back in school in two weeks. If this is a private school the little boy goes to, then all bets are off. They do not have to follow federal procedures. But a public school definitely does. I think the parents can fight this. So can a student who doesn't have a disability be expelled permanently? If so, that's some BS.
|
|
|
Post by nine on Oct 27, 2022 19:27:38 GMT
Who gives a ‘little’ pocket knife to a kid? A 9 yo autistic kid? This is on the parents for not confiscating that immediately. What terrible judgment and now the boy has to pay.
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Oct 27, 2022 19:30:45 GMT
Hopefully the parents learned their lesson and took full responsibility for allowing their young child to possess a weapon.
|
|
akkaren
Junior Member
Posts: 75
Jul 16, 2014 5:09:00 GMT
|
Post by akkaren on Oct 27, 2022 19:39:28 GMT
I'm a second grade teacher and have twice had students bring pocket knives to school in their backpacks. We are a reasonable school system and after finding out the reasoning behind them being there the students got a good talking to but no suspension or expulsion. There are mitigating circumstances and some kids are just to young or incapable of understanding the ramifications of their actions.
|
|
|
Post by christine58 on Oct 27, 2022 19:45:57 GMT
Is this a public school? Because if it is they cannot kick him out. In a public school they would suspend him for 10 days and then have a manifestation hearing. At that meeting they would have decide if the issue was a manifestation of his disability. If they decide it was (and at my school they almost always do) then they have to let him back. We had a kid with an IEP get caught smoking pot in the bathroom this week. Because he was already suspended for 2 days he is only suspended for 8 days. Kids with IEPs cannot be suspended more than 10 days a year. At this point he will have a manifestation hearing. As I said, in my district they almost always decide it is a manifestation of their disability, so I suspect he will be back in school in two weeks. If this is a private school the little boy goes to, then all bets are off. They do not have to follow federal procedures. But a public school definitely does. I think the parents can fight this. So can a student who doesn't have a disability be expelled permanently? If so, that's some BS. Yes they can be expelled permanently but it’s rare. I do know of a couple of cases that it happened and it was because the teenager I think either brought drugs to sell at school or had a weapon which I believe was a gun. The other thing is that the school districts are still responsible to educate that child. The case that I know where it was a special ed student who was suspended For I think 15 or 20 school days the school still had to offer tutoring. Some of our districts in the area actually have a specific program for those kids who have been suspended to still receive instruction. Now sometimes parents refuse the instruction but more often than not the child does receive continued education.
|
|
|
Post by putabuttononit on Oct 27, 2022 20:00:51 GMT
They did get a lawyer. I’d suggested finding an advocate and she found one yesterday. She’s also talking to a mom whose son went through something similar. Their son is crying everyday. He’s always had trouble making friends and he had one in his new class finally. He’s heartbroken and feels lost in his new school where they had to transfer him. It is a public school btw. The one that expelled him. They are very unsympathetic so far. He’s the sweetest boy, small for his age and very “young” For his age too. It’s very clear that he had no ill intent. Excited little guy showing everyone his broken crayons and THIS happens. I’m not a fan of zero tolerance. Every single situation has to be evaluated and fairness should be the standard.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Oct 27, 2022 20:17:37 GMT
Ugh. Zero tolerance policies suck all the way around. I’m sorry this has happened. Yes, parents should have been aware but the punishment for their lack of awareness should not be on the kid.
I might be turning into a tinfoil hat person but when I hear about this kind of thing I tend to think the principal saw an easy way to to exit a special needs kid from the school. Happens in charter schools and other schools of choice all the time - many of these are nominally public schools.
I hope the lawyer and advocate are able to get this boy back into his school. I also hope his classroom teacher wasn’t part of the decision to expel him. I’d like to think she’ll welcome him back with open arms.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Oct 27, 2022 20:26:52 GMT
Who gives a ‘little’ pocket knife to a kid? A 9 yo autistic kid? This is on the parents for not confiscating that immediately. What terrible judgment and now the boy has to pay. I’m sorry but I have to lol at this. Really? Of course kids have pocket knives. Camping, whittling, hiking, Boy Scouts. Why shouldn’t kids have pocket knives? Now, kids SHOULD be responsible enough to know when and where it’s appropriate to have them and when and where it’s not. They should keep up with them, not lose them, and know basic knife safety. But, yea, I would never bat an eye at a 9 yo owning a pocket knife.
|
|
pantsonfire
Drama Llama
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 5,969
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Oct 27, 2022 20:35:42 GMT
Who gives a ‘little’ pocket knife to a kid? A 9 yo autistic kid? This is on the parents for not confiscating that immediately. What terrible judgment and now the boy has to pay. I’m sorry but I have to lol at this. Really? Of course kids have pocket knives. Camping, whittling, hiking, Boy Scouts. Why shouldn’t kids have pocket knives? Now, kids SHOULD be responsible enough to know when and where it’s appropriate to have them and when and where it’s not. They should keep up with them, not lose them, and know basic knife safety. But, yea, I would never bat an eye at a 9 yo owning a pocket knife. Heck, dh was 6 when he got his first one. Just echoing previous posts. Lawyer Advocate Contact the district AND county special ed services departments. Contact district AND county superintendent. Move up the chain to state if needed. Contact news papers. Contact news stations. Districts HATE bad publicity. If could has services - private, ask them to reach out and advocate too.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Oct 27, 2022 20:39:04 GMT
I’m sorry but I have to lol at this. Really? Of course kids have pocket knives. Camping, whittling, hiking, Boy Scouts. Why shouldn’t kids have pocket knives? Now, kids SHOULD be responsible enough to know when and where it’s appropriate to have them and when and where it’s not. They should keep up with them, not lose them, and know basic knife safety. But, yea, I would never bat an eye at a 9 yo owning a pocket knife. Heck, dh was 6 when he got his first one. Just echoing previous posts. Lawyer Advocate Contact the district AND county special ed services departments. Contact district AND county superintendent. Move up the chain to state if needed. Contact news papers. Contact news stations. Districts HATE bad publicity. If could has services - private, ask them to reach out and advocate too. Yea. I’m guessing nine would clutch her pea pearls at the apparent weapons cache my kids have access to 🤣🤣
|
|
pantsonfire
Drama Llama
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 5,969
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Oct 27, 2022 20:41:01 GMT
Heck, dh was 6 when he got his first one. Just echoing previous posts. Lawyer Advocate Contact the district AND county special ed services departments. Contact district AND county superintendent. Move up the chain to state if needed. Contact news papers. Contact news stations. Districts HATE bad publicity. If could has services - private, ask them to reach out and advocate too. Yea. I’m guessing nine would clutch her pea pearls at the apparent weapons cache my kids have access to 🤣🤣 Dh went camping a lot and did wilderness stuff from a very early age. Would I give a 6 yr old a pocket knife just cuz? No. But with proper training, handling, and rules yes. I've seen 5 yr Olds using knives to cut food.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,922
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Oct 27, 2022 20:54:16 GMT
Ugh. Zero tolerance policies suck all the way around. I’m sorry this has happened. Yes, parents should have been aware but the punishment for their lack of awareness should not be on the kid. I might be turning into a tinfoil hat person but when I hear about this kind of thing I tend to think the principal saw an easy way to to exit a special needs kid from the school. Happens in charter schools and other schools of choice all the time - many of these are nominally public schools. I hope the lawyer and advocate are able to get this boy back into his school. I also hope his classroom teacher wasn’t part of the decision to expel him. I’d like to think she’ll welcome him back with open arms. I'm going to go out on a limb and say I think there is WAY more history for this child that the OP didn't disclose and yes, the principal saw a way to get rid of a problem student.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Oct 27, 2022 21:08:26 GMT
I'm a second grade teacher and have twice had students bring pocket knives to school in their backpacks. We are a reasonable school system and after finding out the reasoning behind them being there the students got a good talking to but no suspension or expulsion. There are mitigating circumstances and some kids are just to young or incapable of understanding the ramifications of their actions. I would argue if a child is too young to understand the ramifications of bringing a pocket knife to school they are also way too young to possess one. This is a general response not to the quoted part: I don't understand what kind of parent gives a child a knife. I can understand a parent using a knife with a child in a shared activity but we just are so careless with it we leave it in a crayon box?
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 27, 2022 21:30:08 GMT
I'm a second grade teacher and have twice had students bring pocket knives to school in their backpacks. We are a reasonable school system and after finding out the reasoning behind them being there the students got a good talking to but no suspension or expulsion. There are mitigating circumstances and some kids are just to young or incapable of understanding the ramifications of their actions. I would argue if a child is too young to understand the ramifications of bringing a pocket knife to school they are also way too young to possess one. This is a general response not to the quoted part: I don't understand what kind of parent gives a child a knife. I can understand a parent using a knife with a child in a shared activity but we just are so careless with it we leave it in a crayon box? I agree. I was wondering if I was the only one that thinks it is irresponsible to give the kid a knife in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 27, 2022 21:53:17 GMT
I would argue if a child is too young to understand the ramifications of bringing a pocket knife to school they are also way too young to possess one. This is a general response not to the quoted part: I don't understand what kind of parent gives a child a knife. I can understand a parent using a knife with a child in a shared activity but we just are so careless with it we leave it in a crayon box? I agree. I was wondering if I was the only one that thinks it is irresponsible to give the kid a knife in the first place. Nope, I’m on that bench with you. Just the fact that the kid had the knife and misplaced it says something to me, because in my house that would have been something that I would have put away until we had a project we could use it on together. What if an even younger kid would have discovered it while coloring with those crayons and hurt themselves? I’ve always been unusually sensitive to younger kids using knives without adult assistance. One of my high school friends was blinded in one eye as a child trying to cut an apple with a sharp knife by herself when she was in grade school. Accidents happen. Kids do dumb things. Responsible adults try to prevent them when they can.
|
|
pilcas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,146
Aug 14, 2015 21:47:17 GMT
|
Post by pilcas on Oct 27, 2022 22:12:57 GMT
When the child is described as being young for his age I have to agree that a pocket knife was not an appropriate thing for him to own. Others are referring to other kids who are probably more mature and knew not to take it to school. That is a conversation I had with my kids about scissors and regular knives. They didn’t own pocket knives then as they really had no need. I also understand that living in NYC and Alaska are two very different things.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Oct 27, 2022 22:31:36 GMT
I am opposed to zero-tolerance policies (I've even written about them) and agree with others that it is time to explore legal options if they are otherwise happy with the school.
I also agree with others that if the child is too immature to treat the knife with care, he is too immature to own it or to have unsupervised access to it.
|
|
|
Post by christine58 on Oct 27, 2022 22:43:22 GMT
Instead of pointing fingers at the parents for not knowing the knife was in the crayon box, let’s remember this is a young boy who now has been kicked out of school. He didn’t hurt anyone with it but now he can’t go back into a classroom that he was doing well in. I am glad his parents got a lawyer and advocate. If he had taken it and hurt someone entirely different story. That’s why zero tolerance doesn’t work in some cases.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Oct 27, 2022 22:51:33 GMT
A number of thoughts:
I still wouldn't give my boys with autism pocket knives and they are 21 & 23. They couldn't be safe with them for different reasons. We have no idea how severe the child in the OP is and that is important information.
The school district owes the child a free and appropriate education. That does not mean that they owe him an education at the school of his/his parents’ choice. I understand that the boy loves the school, but none of us has the full picture and whether that is the best placement/least restrictive environment that is safe for him and his classmates.
What someone with neuro typical children who homeschools them is not particularly applicable to a child with autism who attends a public school. It is interesting information, but it isn’t necessarily relevant. I eat whole wheat bread. It is safe for me. Another 3rd grade teacher on my team has celiac disease. The fact that it is perfectly fine and safe for me to eat wheat doesn't mean it is for her.
None of us knows the actual child, what his level of functioning is, whether a knife was appropriate at his age, whether there are other issues - behavioral and academic - that might make this placement problematic. That at his young age this is “the first school he has ever loved” means that he has been to multiple schools for some reason(s) that none of us know.
Honestly, there is too much unknown information for me to know if the school behaved inappropriately.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Oct 27, 2022 23:03:23 GMT
A number of thoughts: I still wouldn't give my boys with autism pocket knives and they are 21 & 23. They couldn't be safe with them for different reasons. We have no idea how severe the child in the OP is and that is important information. The school district owes the child a free and appropriate education. That does not mean that they owe him an education at the school of his/his parents’ choice. I understand that the boy loves the school, but none of us has the full picture and whether that is the best placement/least restrictive environment that is safe for him and his classmates. What someone with neuro typical children who homeschools them is not particularly applicable to a child with autism who attends a public school. It is interesting information, but it isn’t necessarily relevant. I eat whole wheat bread. It is safe for me. Another 3rd grade teacher on my team has celiac disease. The fact that it is perfectly fine and safe for me to eat wheat doesn't mean it is for her. None of us knows the actual child, what his level of functioning is, whether a knife was appropriate at his age, whether there are other issues - behavioral and academic - that might make this placement problematic. That at his young age this is “the first school he has ever loved” means that he has been to multiple schools for some reason(s) that none of us know. Honestly, there is too much unknown information for me to know if the school behaved inappropriately. I guess one of those paragraphs was directed at me. I never said I thought my situation was applicable to the situation in the OP. I wasn’t even responding to the OP. I was responding to nine’s statement, which I found ridiculous and laughable. Obviously, the child in the OP isn’t responsible enough to have a knife. Obviously the parents were pretty careless (I don’t have much sympathy for them…this was their fault and now they need to face the consequences, which I’m sure will be perceived as not very nice, but that’s why I didn’t respond about OP in the first place).
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Oct 27, 2022 23:07:07 GMT
A number of thoughts: I still wouldn't give my boys with autism pocket knives and they are 21 & 23. They couldn't be safe with them for different reasons. We have no idea how severe the child in the OP is and that is important information. The school district owes the child a free and appropriate education. That does not mean that they owe him an education at the school of his/his parents’ choice. I understand that the boy loves the school, but none of us has the full picture and whether that is the best placement/least restrictive environment that is safe for him and his classmates. What someone with neuro typical children who homeschools them is not particularly applicable to a child with autism who attends a public school. It is interesting information, but it isn’t necessarily relevant. I eat whole wheat bread. It is safe for me. Another 3rd grade teacher on my team has celiac disease. The fact that it is perfectly fine and safe for me to eat wheat doesn't mean it is for her. None of us knows the actual child, what his level of functioning is, whether a knife was appropriate at his age, whether there are other issues - behavioral and academic - that might make this placement problematic. That at his young age this is “the first school he has ever loved” means that he has been to multiple schools for some reason(s) that none of us know. Honestly, there is too much unknown information for me to know if the school behaved inappropriately. I guess one of those paragraphs was directed at me. I never said I thought my situation was applicable to the situation in the OP. I wasn’t even responding to the OP. I was responding to nine’s statement, which I found ridiculous and laughable. Obviously, the child in the OP isn’t responsible enough to have a knife. Obviously the parents were pretty careless (I don’t have much sympathy for them…this was their fault and now they need to face the consequences, which I’m sure will be perceived as not very nice, but that’s why I didn’t respond about OP in the first place). Fair enough. I misread your intention - my bad and my sincere apology to you.
|
|