|
Post by Bridget in MD on Oct 1, 2024 23:43:02 GMT
I'm a little nervous. While I think JDV is a complete moron, he did go to Yale law school, so he can't be all stoopid. LOL. And I am very interested to see how they are supposed to fact check each other during the debate!
Who else is watching?
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 1, 2024 23:55:52 GMT
I just hope Walz stops and thinks before he speaks. Not getting involved in JDV rhetoric..
Just stop, say 'that's a lie...'. 'the Haitians were invited' The new China thing... Easy 'You're right, I made a miscalculation of times. It was 35:years ago!' and move on ..
|
|
|
Post by lisae on Oct 2, 2024 0:11:16 GMT
We will be watching. I'm expecting this one to be more evenly matched in skill than the last debate. The sad thing about Vance is that he is probably intelligent and he has either been brainwashed or sold his soul to the devil.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 2, 2024 0:23:26 GMT
We’ll be watching too. My DD is very interested in seeing it after watching the last one.
|
|
ellen
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,806
Jun 30, 2014 12:52:45 GMT
|
Post by ellen on Oct 2, 2024 0:46:17 GMT
JD Vance has done a lot of tv interviews, so I expect that he’ll hold his own. He’s mean and comes across as very unlikeable, so I expect we’ll see some of that. I don’t think it’s great that Walz will likely have to waste his time fact checking Vance. Walz has said that he is not a great debater, but he’s smart and a good communicator. I think he’ll do a good job.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 2, 2024 0:50:05 GMT
We are watching. And honestly, I hope Vance does bring up Waltz Walz + China. I want to hear how he explains this away.
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Oct 2, 2024 0:52:35 GMT
I hope it goes well snd that Walz does well. I didn’t know he didn’t have experience and wasn’t a good debater. I hope that there isn’t a lot more fallout for Springfield.
I hope he comes across as caring and wanting to do good things for the average person. Fact checking is going to get ugly.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 2, 2024 0:56:58 GMT
I'm a little nervous as well. I'm not sure if I will watch tonight but will be watching for highlights here.
Vance is such a jerk and lies constantly. If I was Walz I would have a hard time keeping my cool. I also think it is irritating that people are equivocating anything that Walz has said about China with all of the lies and chaos that Trump, Vance and 99% of Republicans bring daily.
|
|
|
Post by mom2jnk on Oct 2, 2024 0:58:55 GMT
We are watching. And honestly, I hope Vance does bring up Waltz + China. I want to hear how he explains this away. It's "Walz," not the dance. Pronounced "walls."
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 2, 2024 1:10:05 GMT
We are watching. And honestly, I hope Vance does bring up Waltz + China. I want to hear how he explains this away. It's "Walz," not the dance. Pronounced "walls." I actually knew that but I am guessing my computer auto corrected it. I will go fix it.
|
|
|
Post by Lurkingpea on Oct 2, 2024 1:15:12 GMT
We are watching. And honestly, I hope Vance does bring up Waltz Walz + China. I want to hear how he explains this away. Really? Do you hope Walz brings up every lie Trump or Vance has made? That is what you want explained? Is it going to change how you vote? I don't care if it turns out Walz never left the US. Walz's dog is more qualified to be in office than Trump or Vance.
|
|
|
Post by chaosisapony on Oct 2, 2024 1:31:03 GMT
This is the only debate I've watched so far that isn't giving me anxiety and feelings of doom. From what I've seen so far both of these guys are respectful, articulate, and mostly answering the questions. I'm impressed by both of them. I do think Vance is a pretty slick speaker and that is a very good skill to have when you're trying to deflect and manipulate voters.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 2, 2024 1:32:31 GMT
We are watching. And honestly, I hope Vance does bring up Waltz Walz + China. I want to hear how he explains this away. Really? Do you hope Walz brings up every lie Trump or Vance has made? That is what you want explained? Is it going to change how you vote? I don't care if it turns out Walz never left the US. Walz's dog is more qualified to be in office than Trump or Vance. Eh. I am just curious about what he says about it. Thats all.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Oct 2, 2024 1:33:09 GMT
This is the only debate I've watched so far that isn't giving me anxiety and feelings of doom. From what I've seen so far both of these guys are respectful, articulate, and mostly answering the questions. I'm impressed by both of them. I do think Vance is a pretty slick speaker and that is a very good skill to have when you're trying to deflect and manipulate voters. I agree. I've appreciated (for the most part) of how well this debate has gone so far.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 2, 2024 1:36:00 GMT
We are watching. And honestly, I hope Vance does bring up Waltz Walz + China. I want to hear how he explains this away. Really? Do you hope Walz brings up every lie Trump or Vance has made? That is what you want explained? Is it going to change how you vote? I don't care if it turns out Walz never left the US. Walz's dog is more qualified to be in office than Trump or Vance. I agree. Normally I probably wouldn’t care more but at this point it just seems like another example of democrats being held to a higher standard. Trump lies multiple times a day (about important topics) and they are glossed over because they are so common. But if Harris or Walz said something inconsequential years ago it is the worst offense ever and in the media for who knows how long. It’s maddening.
|
|
|
Post by lisae on Oct 2, 2024 1:39:35 GMT
Walz is sticking to his talking points and he has made some good points. But I keep getting the sense that Walz is trying to keep up rather than leading in this debate.
So far Vance has helped himself. Walz really missed the opportunity to point out how much damage Vance did to Springfield Ohio with his cat eating comments. He let Vance claim that Harris had 3 1/2 years to do this and that (when of course she has been VP and had little control over policy) and he isn't pointing out that Trump had 4 years as President to do all these things and failed. He said a little of this during the immigration debate but he could do more.
Walz is on the defensive.
|
|
|
Post by chaosisapony on Oct 2, 2024 1:39:50 GMT
I am getting very tired of hearing Vance talk about his addict mother. Using someone's struggle with addiction to try to sell yourself is distasteful.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,184
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2024 1:41:49 GMT
Vance is not answering the questions. Listen to his response. He always pivots the question, with "first of all" and then just goes off on a tangent. Listen closely.
|
|
uksue
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,546
Location: London
Jun 25, 2014 22:33:20 GMT
|
Post by uksue on Oct 2, 2024 1:44:40 GMT
Urgh I thought Walz handled the 'misspoke' issue horribly.
Vance has admitted he'll make up stories though so why does he gets a pass? It's almost 3am here 😩
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,184
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2024 1:56:19 GMT
Urgh I thought Walz handled the 'misspoke' issue horribly. Vance has admitted he'll make up stories though so why does he gets a pass? It's almost 3am here 😩 Is that the only thing he misspoke? What did you hear that you like? OMG.... you fell into the media trap as to that's all he's done or misspoke?
|
|
pantsonfire
Drama Llama
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 6,273
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Oct 2, 2024 2:02:09 GMT
JD Vance just laughed when he said thoughts and prayers about fun control.
Holy fuck.
Immigrants aren't shooting up schools you dumb ass. Nor are those shootings done with illegally gotten guns.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,184
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2024 2:05:21 GMT
Vance another liar and theatrics.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 2, 2024 2:12:57 GMT
Urgh I thought Walz handled the 'misspoke' issue horribly. Vance has admitted he'll make up stories though so why does he gets a pass? It's almost 3am here 😩 Yes, I think Walz could have said a bit more about China. But he did say he misspoke, he did not deny it. That is far better then TFG and Vance... Yes, unfortunately TFG gets passes ALL the time. Vance also mostly....
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,184
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2024 2:16:32 GMT
liar, liar pants on fire... prescription drugs did not fall under dump.
|
|
|
Post by nightnurse on Oct 2, 2024 2:17:17 GMT
Really liked how Vance said more access to childcare would help prevent abortions when he’s the one who suggested grandparents be the child care. And his party doesn’t support improving access to childcare, that’s a Democrat policy. Hypocrite.
|
|
pantsonfire
Drama Llama
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 6,273
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Oct 2, 2024 2:18:39 GMT
liar, liar pants on fire... prescription drugs fell under dump. Under Trump Albuterol was $35. Under Biden? $15. A strong antibiotic that was $24 is now .97 cents.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,184
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2024 2:25:48 GMT
WTF is he talking about family leave? Did he answer the question? Something about Church and federal money?
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on Oct 2, 2024 2:28:55 GMT
Walz is sticking to his talking points and he has made some good points. But I keep getting the sense that Walz is trying to keep up rather than leading in this debate. So far Vance has helped himself. Walz really missed the opportunity to point out how much damage Vance did to Springfield Ohio with his cat eating comments. He let Vance claim that Harris had 3 1/2 years to do this and that (when of course she has been VP and had little control over policy) and he isn't pointing out that Trump had 4 years as President to do all these things and failed. He said a little of this during the immigration debate but he could do more. Walz is on the defensive. He should have gone for the jugular but he was too civil.
|
|
uksue
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,546
Location: London
Jun 25, 2014 22:33:20 GMT
|
Post by uksue on Oct 2, 2024 2:29:11 GMT
Urgh I thought Walz handled the 'misspoke' issue horribly. Vance has admitted he'll make up stories though so why does he gets a pass? It's almost 3am here 😩 Is that the only thing he misspoke? What did you hear that you like? OMG.... you fell into the media trap as to that's all he's done or misspoke? I'm not sure I can understand your point, it's 3.30 am here and I'm on antibiotics for a tooth abscess. I was making a couple of comments is all.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,184
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2024 2:29:21 GMT
OMG... Vance just asked about Family Leave and Vance went to overseas and more money for overseas, too few people to help out families... stupid.
|
|