|
Post by roxley on Jul 26, 2014 12:01:40 GMT
Should you be able to choose to end your life once you have reached a certain age in life?
Not for the depressed 30 year old, but the 80 year old who feels they have lived a long good life, and just feel "done".
I try try to talk to friends about this, and even though they have just listed off a laundry list of reasons their mother/grandmother is no longer happy, they just can't say to themselves, "It is OK if they want to die".
My DH's grandmother is 97. She must have started telling us 15 years ago that she was ready to die. She was still very mentally there, she could still get around with a walker. But her husband had died 10-15 years ago, she had lost one of her two sons. She had watched all of her friends die. She KNEW what she wanted, but those "dam$" doctors kept keeping her alive". They made her get a pacemaker, they make her keep taking medicine. Now, at 97, she is not mentally there. She spends all day in her chair sleeping or watching TV. She can't gat around. She calls my FIL all the time terrified that someone is out to get her. She is never happy.
Why couldnn't she have made the choice at 80 to "be done". I know there are people who may try to take advantage of family members and convince them to end it when they aren't ready. But if someone is mentally alert, I think a counselor who specialized in this could determine if it was their decision.
Flame away. I think it just depresses me that at one point, I will no longer have any say in my life.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Oct 6, 2024 8:26:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2014 12:15:32 GMT
Anyone can choose to end their life at any age, it's called suicide. Are you asking if it should be a medical decision and carried out by a doctor?
|
|
|
Post by Princess Pea on Jul 26, 2014 12:16:40 GMT
Hmmm...don't you always have a choice? I mean you can take a bunch of pills, shoot yourself, etc. whenever you want; or are you talking about a dr. assisting you? I think someone always has a right to refuse treatment as well.
|
|
|
Post by roxley on Jul 26, 2014 13:13:34 GMT
Hmmm...don't you always have a choice? I mean you can take a bunch of pills, shoot yourself, etc. whenever you want; or are you talking about a dr. assisting you? I think someone always has a right to refuse treatment as well. I think I mean, it being OK in our society without the stigma of suicide. It is considered the wrong choice. Should it be? Maybe. But every now and then you hear about a loving spouse who helped their loved one end their painful life, and they chance getting put in jail to do it. My husband's grandmother tried to refuse treatment, but had many loving relatives who made it impossible for her to do that. They didn't think she knew what she was saying. But nothing she had ever said should have made them believe that. Looking at it from that outside I completely felt like they were looking at how it would affect them, not her. It is easier for me to have this view, not being a blood relative, so I get that it may just may be impossible when you are in this situation to say that it is OK. I had a grandfather slowly die from severe dementia in his late 80s. He never stated that he wanted to die that I am aware of. But if he had, I think I would have wanted him to be able to do so without feeling like he was doing something morally wrong. Also, I personally don't have any religious reasons for believing this is wrong. I know some religions feel it is.
|
|
|
Post by scrapsotime on Jul 26, 2014 13:27:30 GMT
It maybe because of my experience with my mother, but I think there would need to be a whole lot of counseling or something before that step is taken.
At 80 my mother had what has thought to be a very serious health issue. It took awhile to determine, but it wasn't what they thought it was and she is now recovered completely. She also took a fall and lost some mobility. A knee replacement was done and she's back to dancing. She just turned 82, goes out several times a week with her male friend and is back to being as active as before. The difference from how she was a few years ago to now is amazing.
I sit here thinking what if that was an option presented to her when she was at her lowest point.
|
|
|
Post by peasapie on Jul 26, 2014 14:13:01 GMT
I would like to see euthanasia for medical reasons, similar to what we do for our pets. But I don't think that someone should legally be able to terminate their life merely because they feel too old. I believe God has a purpose for us, even if we don't see it or like it.
|
|
georgiapea
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,846
Jun 27, 2014 18:02:10 GMT
|
Post by georgiapea on Jul 26, 2014 14:17:55 GMT
Yes, I absolutly feel we should be allowed to make that decision. I'm 75 and can't imagine wanting my life to be over. I'm driving from Alabama to Wisconsin today to see family. I have several grand invested in a new hobby and I'm still working. But should things change, like my health goes to blazes, I'd like to think I could be able to check out if I so choose.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Jul 26, 2014 14:28:34 GMT
In some countries, assisted suicide is legal in some situations. I really don't have an issue with that.
|
|
calgal08
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,519
Jun 27, 2014 15:43:46 GMT
|
Post by calgal08 on Jul 26, 2014 14:40:39 GMT
In some countries, assisted suicide is legal in some situations. I really don't have an issue with that. I wish this were legal in all countries. Personally, I think we're kinder to animals (when they're very old/sick/in pain/etc.). I've heard so many stories where people are very old, sick, infirm, can't take care of themselves, lost all dignity and they just want to die, yet what do we do, we pump them with drugs to keep them alive and miserable. Why is it so wrong if someone truly wants to go to sleep and not wake up if the doctors gave them a shot and let them fall asleep peacefully? It just seems so wrong, we're supposedly a free country, yet it's illegal to ask for help to die a graceful death.
|
|
|
Post by sugarmama on Jul 26, 2014 14:47:19 GMT
I don't think anyone should underestimate the will to live. Many of us say/think we would like to end our life if we were in a certain situation, but you never can know how strong the will to live will be once you get to that point. My grandmother is in her mid 90's and has said at times that she doesn't know why she is still here. Even so, she lives for her children, grand children, etc.
|
|
oldcrow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,828
Location: Ontario,Canada
Jun 26, 2014 12:25:29 GMT
|
Post by oldcrow on Jul 26, 2014 15:02:52 GMT
My, my, what a complicated subject. So many variables.
First, any person may refuse treatment or drugs. So the statement that the doctors kept her alive is not accurate, they simply gave her options . Your follow up post says it was family.
And family is what complicates things. Her family interfered to keep her alive but there are many families that would choose to end an elders life if they had the option.
Many elders who are left to fill their time on their own do indeed find life tedious and boring. There is a way to change that but usually family claims to be too busy for the remedy.
I work in long term care and there is not a day goes by that I don't have bad thoughts about families. Those who would and do put their elder through hell to keep them alive just so that they are not dead. And those who just want a phone call (that does not wake them) notifying them that their elder is gone. And especially those who are too busy to visit - rarely or ever.
Any elder's life can be fulfilling if they have a purpose. And it is up to the family to create that purpose.
|
|
|
Post by scrapqueen01 on Jul 26, 2014 15:18:01 GMT
The issue I have with this is the possible slippery slope that could result. Notice I said possible. If something like this was made legal what rules would be put into place to make sure it wasn't used to deny someone treatment or the right to live. As someone who is disabled I don't want someone to decide my life is worthless and not worth saving just because of my disability. There are people who believe those who are sick or born disabled shouldn't live because in their minds the person will have a miserable or painful life or the cost of health care. I see it as the opposite of Roxley's post where people don't want treatment but are not taken seriously and kind of "forced" into it.
|
|
|
Post by OSUBuckeyeFan on Jul 26, 2014 16:01:14 GMT
. I believe God has a purpose for us, even if we don't see it or like it. So, what is my 91 year old MIL's purpose? To annoy me and my DH(her son) and my son??? Her DH died over 22 years ago. She's got Alzheimers. She does nothing but sit in a chair or lie on the couch all day, stare out the window and sleep. She drives us nuts with the non-stop asking of whether or not the dog was fed. It's the SAME THING EVERY DAY! And I only wish I was kidding. She doesn't want to go anywhere. Most of the time, she can't tell you what day it is. Physically she can move, walk, feed herself and wipe her own butt. Her sons aren't ready to place her in a nursing home and her daughter has little to do with her. She has not ever said she's ready to die....with MY luck though, she'll be the one that will live to be 110
|
|
|
Post by katiekaty on Jul 26, 2014 16:46:52 GMT
You do have choices that can already be put in place now. Living Wills, Advanced Directives, DNR statutes should all be taken care of now so that when you reach a certain point, heroic measure won't be taken. But to outright request euthanasia or deferred suicide at a certain age is not ethical at this point in our society. You can't fairly place the ending of your life just based on your age onto others even if it is your choice.
|
|
|
Post by bluepoprocks on Jul 26, 2014 17:22:28 GMT
I always thought it was a little crazy that when a cat or dog is suffering we can legally end its life but if a person is terminally ill and in constant pain we can't do the same for them if they want it.
|
|
oldcrow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,828
Location: Ontario,Canada
Jun 26, 2014 12:25:29 GMT
|
Post by oldcrow on Jul 26, 2014 18:01:27 GMT
I always thought it was a little crazy that when a cat or dog is suffering we can legally end its life but if a person is terminally ill and in constant pain we can't do the same for them if they want it. I think this is different than wanting to choose death simply because you have reached an advanced age. Would you end the life of your pet who is relatively healthy because it managed to reach say 20 yo.
|
|
|
Post by justcindy on Jul 26, 2014 18:03:46 GMT
. I believe God has a purpose for us, even if we don't see it or like it. So, what is my 91 year old MIL's purpose? To annoy me and my DH(her son) and my son??? Her DH died over 22 years ago. She's got Alzheimers. She does nothing but sit in a chair or lie on the couch all day, stare out the window and sleep. She drives us nuts with the non-stop asking of whether or not the dog was fed. It's the SAME THING EVERY DAY! And I only wish I was kidding. She doesn't want to go anywhere. Most of the time, she can't tell you what day it is. Physically she can move, walk, feed herself and wipe her own butt. Her sons aren't ready to place her in a nursing home and her daughter has little to do with her. She has not ever said she's ready to die....with MY luck though, she'll be the one that will live to be 110 I wanted to say that I am so sorry you are going through this - I've been through some version of it, and it's ugly - stress, guilt, anger, sadness, all of it. it just sucks. I started to reply with the first thing that came to my mind when I read your post, but I by no means am implying YOU need to learn something from this situation, so I hope to present it and you take it in the innocent way it's intended....which was that maybe the reason she's still here isn't for her, it's for someone else's benefit - maybe to teach compassion, or patience, or....that something needs to be done about the greater picture, as stated in the OP. Maybe a nurse, or other caretaker will be touched by this situation and see the light to know that something needs to be done for other patients in similar circumstances and this is the catalyst to get that ball rolling...we don't know who we touch or influence in our lives, or what aspect of it may do the influencing, but I feel that every situation/experience has something to be gleaned from it, something has to be awakened in us, for that situation to have not been in vain. Sometimes we get lucky and can see immediately the reasons why, sometimes we never do. Sometimes it's not about us at all, we just happen to be the witness, bystander, or whatever. I know it's no comfort or consolation to hear that, I just wanted to let you know I feel for you.
|
|
Gennifer
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,168
Jun 26, 2014 8:22:26 GMT
|
Post by Gennifer on Jul 26, 2014 18:22:07 GMT
Should you be able to choose to end your life once you have reached a certain age in life? Yes, undoubtedly. My FIL committed suicide a few years ago after being diagnosed with the early stages of dementia, and as a result I now feel very strongly about it. We should allow people their dignity, and that includes making choices for themselves. The fact that my FIL died alone in a hotel room, crying, instead of surrounded by his loved ones is heartbreaking. I actually think that you should be able to do it at any age, though. Who am I to say that someone else must suffer? I think that a mandatory waiting period (so someone doesn't do it rashly) and proof that you have put your affairs in order should be required, but I think that anyone should be able to choose to die painlessly and humanely if they desire.
|
|
|
Post by justcindy on Jul 26, 2014 18:23:56 GMT
The issue I have with this is the possible slippery slope that could result. Notice I said possible. If something like this was made legal what rules would be put into place to make sure it wasn't used to deny someone treatment or the right to live. As someone who is disabled I don't want someone to decide my life is worthless and not worth saving just because of my disability. There are people who believe those who are sick or born disabled shouldn't live because in their minds the person will have a miserable or painful life or the cost of health care. I see it as the opposite of Roxley's post where people don't want treatment but are not taken seriously and kind of "forced" into it. This brings a thought to my mind - I feel like we've been on that slippery slope for a long time, in the medical world. When my mom was really ill at the end of a long, manageable in the beginning illness, my siblings and I argued and argued about this point - when is enough, enough? Just because there are machines that can keep her breathing, or her blood filtered ( dialysis) does that mean we NEED to use that option? I'm not talking about an otherwise healthy person neededing dialysis, the last weeks of my mom's life had NO meaning - constant pain, in and out of delirium, no physical strength whatsoever, no dignity whatsoever. Keeping her on dialysis kept her heart beating, but it did not keep her ALIVE, ya know? I think the mentality in the US anyway, is KEEP THEM ALIVE AT ALL COSTS. I think that mentality is pushed by money and other motives not beneficial to the individual patient. All the wonderful advances in medicine are truly lifesaving, and I'm not dogging those advancements one bit. But, the snag is, in general, when the procedure/therapy/medication ISN'T helping an otherwise sound, healthy individual continue what THEY feel is a meaningful quality of life, shouldn't that decision be left in the hands of that individual? One of the weirdest things I learned throughout my mom's illness and suffering, is that death isn't the worst thing that can happen to a person. Seeing the ridiculous suffering she endured, for what? There was no "recovery" from her organs shutting down. It came to the point that it felt like all the medications and machines weren't keeping her LIFE, it was keeping her from peace that was coming either way, today or tomorrow, ya know? There comes a point when you know you're going to die. Stage 4 cancer, for instance. My father was diagnosed in April of last year at the age of 83. Healthy as a horse otherwise. Mowed acres of his land on a tractor, even after the diagnosis. He made the decision that he wasn't going to pursue aggressive treatment. He said he had lived 83 years in health, and had lived to see each of his children marry and become healthy and happy with families of their own, and that's all he hoped for from his life. And I have to tell you at the time, it was brutal to hear. But, what a precious gift he gave his family - QUALITY time with him, KNOWING the clock was ticking. Nothing was left unsaid. Precious memories and stories were shared. It was all too soon, but 5 months later, he was gone. No chemo, no illness or side effects to suffer from or us having to see him suffer. He didn't get to choose what caused his death, but he chose how he died. And I didn't know it at the time he told us about his decision, but it was a sacred gift for us to be able to enjoy those last months with him and HE enjoyed his last months. Not like my mom.
|
|
|
Post by moveablefeast on Jul 26, 2014 18:26:28 GMT
Well - I think death by overdose or by shooting yourself is imprecise and messy and traumatic to everyone around you. I am qualified to speak on that topic.
So I tend to think that if you are at that point and death is preferable to you, it would be kinder and more humane to do that under the care of a doctor who can give you the right dose of medication and monitor and control the process.
Now that said, I think more often than not, pain management and supportive care for the various physical and emotional maladies we face as we get older is a better answer than suicide. Pain and depression are linked, as are loneliness and depression. I suspect this is a core problem for many older people who consider suicide, and I suspect they usually feel like a personal and financial burden on their families. Maybe there is something that can be done that is less final and drastic.
I am very conflicted about the whole idea of suicide as I am a religious person and believe we are not meant to be the ones to number our own days - but perhaps that is not a moral ideology I should impose on other people.
|
|
|
Post by bluepoprocks on Jul 26, 2014 18:29:10 GMT
I think this is different than wanting to choose death simply because you have reached an advanced age. Would you end the life of your pet who is relatively healthy because it managed to reach say 20 yo.
I agree it is different. I don't think ending your life just because you're old is a good idea I was really thinking of the people who are saying their loved ones have no quality of life left and they are just suffering. I think if they can make that decision on their own they should have that option. It gets a little iffy with other people deciding that maybe their mom is suffering to much so lets just let her go. It should be something they could add to a living will where you say if you're terminally ill this what you want.
I don't know why that posted the quote twice. User error I'm sure.
|
|
|
Post by miominmio on Jul 26, 2014 18:33:55 GMT
It's a very difficult question. It raises a lot of ethical problems, one of which is that there is a possibility that people who are content with their life is pressured by relatives. Western societies are also obsessed by youth, and those who aren't young, healthy, productive, etc etc are by many deemed to have less value. Being infirm or old doesn't mean your life don't have value. Rather than saying their lives are so sad that they need to be given the possibility to end their lived, shouldn't we instead try to make their lives better? Both as relatives and as a society?
In my opinion, society should protect it's weakest members, not kill them. In Europe, the Nazis slaughtered handicapped people, and we shouldn't start on a slippery slope where the norm is that those not being productive or happy or healthy or rich, is faced with death as the only acceptable solution.
|
|
|
Post by katiekaty on Jul 26, 2014 19:07:00 GMT
Soylent Green
|
|
|
Post by lbp on Jul 26, 2014 19:16:43 GMT
My MIL who has dementia, cries and begs every day to die. She will be 80 in November. She is incredibly paranoid and terrified all the time. She can still dress herself and take a shower but we have to make her do it. We take her food 3 times a day. She sits on the couch and cries most of the day. I would not want to live (if you call it that) like that and neither does she. She is diabetic and has congenital heart disease. She begs us daily not to put her in the nursing home and that she will never go to the Dr. because she just wants to die at home. HEART BREAKING!!!
|
|
|
Post by roxley on Jul 26, 2014 19:21:02 GMT
Well - I think death by overdose or by shooting yourself is imprecise and messy and traumatic to everyone around you. I am qualified to speak on that topic. So I tend to think that if you are at that point and death is preferable to you, it would be kinder and more humane to do that under the care of a doctor who can give you the right dose of medication and monitor and control the process. Now that said, I think more often than not, pain management and supportive care for the various physical and emotional maladies we face as we get older is a better answer than suicide. Pain and depression are linked, as are loneliness and depression. I suspect this is a core problem for many older people who consider suicide, and I suspect they usually feel like a personal and financial burden on their families. Maybe there is something that can be done that is less final and drastic. I am very conflicted about the whole idea of suicide as I am a religious person and believe we are not meant to be the ones to number our own days - but perhaps that is not a moral ideology I should impose on other people. I actually agree with most of this. But I think my DH's grandmother did believe that she was leaving it up to God by not wanting the pacemaker and other things that have prolonged her life. I don't know that she would have chosen suicide. But would have chosen no more doctors, just let me live in peace.
|
|
|
Post by roxley on Jul 26, 2014 19:23:44 GMT
My MIL who has dementia, cries and begs every day to die. She will be 80 in November. She is incredibly paranoid and terrified all the time. She can still dress herself and take a shower but we have to make her do it. We take her food 3 times a day. She sits on the couch and cries most of the day. I would not want to live (if you call it that) like that and neither does she. She is diabetic and has congenital heart disease. She begs us daily not to put her in the nursing home and that she will never go to the Dr. because she just wants to die at home. HEART BREAKING!!! Yes, exactly! That is how I do not think I will want to live. This should not be anyone's choice but that person, but there lies the slippery slop.
|
|
|
Post by katiekaty on Jul 26, 2014 19:41:21 GMT
My MIL who has dementia, cries and begs every day to die. She will be 80 in November. She is incredibly paranoid and terrified all the time. She can still dress herself and take a shower but we have to make her do it. We take her food 3 times a day. She sits on the couch and cries most of the day. I would not want to live (if you call it that) like that and neither does she. She is diabetic and has congenital heart disease. She begs us daily not to put her in the nursing home and that she will never go to the Dr. because she just wants to die at home. HEART BREAKING!!! Yes, exactly! That is how I do not think I will want to live. This should not be anyone's choice but that person, but there lies the slippery slop. And this is why I am such an advocate of Living Wills and advance directives and DNRs. Had her wishes been in place prior to the dementia and paranoia, the next serious illness (heart issues, pneumonia, etc.), treatment can be withheld per her wishes and she can pass easily enough. As it stands, she cannot make those decisions and full treatment will be done. Family needs to step in and get a POA and move forward on some things, so that whatever wishes she has can occur if possible.
I don't think the government needs any input in anything dealing with death by choice, option, etc. I don't think we need any laws to allow obtaining prescriptions of drugs to assist, etc. We go that route and it is a slippery slope as someone said to there being definitions of when someone can be euthanized to when someone should be to when someone will be (the whole for the betterment of society thing/soylent green).
|
|
|
Post by AN on Jul 26, 2014 19:54:27 GMT
I absolutely believe assisted suicide for medical reasons should be allowed, the fact that it isn't in most states borders on unethical and immoral in my mind.
I'll even go one (giant) step further and say - why shouldn't anyone who wants to be allowed to end their life peacefully? While I recognize lots of logistical and practical issues that would have to be addressed here, and I do think there should probably be some protections in place so someone can't decide extremely rashly, if someone is unhappy and doesn't want to be alive anymore, why do we force them to?
I believe in "my body, my choice" and bodily autonomy. That doesn't just extend to when someone is in a difficult predicament like unwanted pregnancy or terminal illness. I believe people should have the choice at all points. And in reality, they do - no law can stop someone. The only question is how difficult and traumatic do we make it for that person and the family left behind.
Kind of an extreme viewpoint, I suppose. I don't believe that there is a God saying that killing yourself is a sin though, so I don't see why someone should be forced to live if they don't want to. And to be frank, even if I did believe in God, it doesn't really make any sense to me that he would be against killing yourself. Let's see... basic tenet is that life on Earth is full of wicked people, we're all sinful, life here is misery compared to the afterlife. Once you're dead, life is gonna be awesome, so hang in there with this God thing. BUT, make sure you don't try to do anything to speed up getting to the afterlife, even though I've told you how awesome it is. God has a purpose for everyone. Hope you figure yours out before you kick the bucket. If you're young and die in a war, everyone is sure you're going to heaven. But if you're young and just don't want to be alive anymore - nope, that is awful. But who WOULDN'T want to get to the afterlife faster if you believe it is going to be awesome? That doesn't work out for religion though if all their followers are offing themselves. Better make it a sin.
Alright, that's a crazy rant. Fully recognize it. Not super logical and could be picked apart. BUT, bottom line - I don't consider suicide a sin and think if people want to do it, they should be able to (with reasonable protections in place).
|
|
|
Post by ~KellyAnn~ on Jul 26, 2014 20:16:54 GMT
Wow AN, there must have been some interesting conversations when you and mapchic lived together!!
|
|
|
Post by sugarmama on Jul 26, 2014 20:46:46 GMT
This thread is difficult to read and keep a dry eye.
|
|