Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 3:50:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2017 15:04:10 GMT
There is lots of this going on on both sides and I don't see it stopping any time soon. Its sad......
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 23, 2017 15:06:23 GMT
I find the first lady to be extremely classy. I find her artistic photos to be just that...artistic "Artistic" lol. Yeah so that's what the alternative facts committee have relabelled lesbian soft porn now? So if they are so totally OK, then why did you claim that posting them was disgusting then? No worries though, when you go low, I'll go high First time for everything I guess...but let's not forget who came in here all handslappy and started this, or was that your definition of "going high"...or was that just in reference to some illicit substance consumption?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 3:50:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2017 15:08:15 GMT
Post this one of Michelle in response. or this one or any other of HUNDREDS of google images of the first lady in formal attire. I mean, FFS, can we compare a formal wear shot to a formal wear shot?
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 23, 2017 15:26:07 GMT
I mean, FFS, can we compare a formal wear shot to a formal wear shot? Exactly! But as I already said there is a LOT more to being "classy" then being slim and wearing clothes well. Michelle has proven herself in all the years she has spent in the public eye, everything she has stood for and the example she has set. And she's made some more appropriate life choices too, she married a decent man, obviously for love and there's no "artistic" photos of her popping up online anywhere. Melania will be a nice clothes horse for designers and she will look good at functions, but I doubt she's going to leave any legacy beyond that from her time as first lady.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Jan 23, 2017 15:32:19 GMT
Post this one of Michelle in response. or this one or any other of HUNDREDS of google images of the first lady in formal attire. I mean, FFS, can we compare a formal wear shot to a formal wear shot? I LOVE the blue one on the far right.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Jan 23, 2017 16:34:37 GMT
Post this one of Michelle in response. or this one or any other of HUNDREDS of google images of the first lady in formal attire. I mean, FFS, can we compare a formal wear shot to a formal wear shot? I LOVE the blue one on the far right. I love them all! I also love that Michelle changes up her hair styles. (Said by someone who is not very good at the whole hair thing! haha!) Save
|
|
likescarrots
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,879
Aug 16, 2014 17:52:53 GMT
|
Post by likescarrots on Jan 23, 2017 16:36:11 GMT
Post this one of Michelle in response. or this one or any other of HUNDREDS of google images of the first lady in formal attire. I mean, FFS, can we compare a formal wear shot to a formal wear shot? we all know that op's facebook 'friend' will never think any of these are classy because Michelle Obama doesn't have white skin.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 3:50:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2017 16:50:16 GMT
It is a shame that with all his wealth, it cannot buy him class.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Jan 23, 2017 17:23:08 GMT
It is a shame that with all his wealth, it cannot buy him class. I do believe Countess Luann said it best...
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Jan 23, 2017 17:45:45 GMT
I LOVE the blue one on the far right. I love them all! I also love that Michelle changes up her hair styles. (Said by someone who is not very good at the whole hair thing! haha!) SaveI love the hair too and am also not skilled in that dept . I mostly love how Barack looks at her...she is his world. Sigh...
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Jan 23, 2017 17:50:42 GMT
I love them all! I also love that Michelle changes up her hair styles. (Said by someone who is not very good at the whole hair thing! haha!) SaveI love the hair too and am also not skilled in that dept . I mostly love how Barack looks at her...she is his world. Sigh...Oh, gosh, I know! Save
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jan 23, 2017 18:18:48 GMT
I find the first lady to be extremely classy. I find her artistic photos to be just that...artistic. Michelle Obama, in my opinion, was off limits. So is denigrating the current first lady. No worries though, when you go low, I'll go high. Jonda, is this really you? Or did you lend your identity out to one/some of the peas who recently left? I have to say that most of your posts this past week sound nothing like you used to sound. If it is really you, my apologies. But, geez, the jonda who used to be a regular participant wouldn't have written the above post. The phrasing and the language is all...off.
|
|
flute4peace
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,757
Jul 3, 2014 14:38:35 GMT
|
Post by flute4peace on Jan 23, 2017 18:26:09 GMT
The Obamas look like real people. That's who I want leading my Country, people who understand what it's like to live in the regular world.
|
|
|
Post by jonda1974 on Jan 23, 2017 18:44:10 GMT
I find the first lady to be extremely classy. I find her artistic photos to be just that...artistic. Michelle Obama, in my opinion, was off limits. So is denigrating the current first lady. No worries though, when you go low, I'll go high. Jonda, is this really you? Or did you lend your identity out to one/some of the peas who recently left? I have to say that most of your posts this past week sound nothing like you used to sound. If it is really you, my apologies. But, geez, the jonda who used to be a regular participant wouldn't have written the above post. The phrasing and the language is all...off. It is me. I probably am coming across a lot more defensive than intended. I didn't vote for Trump, but the fact that I didn't vote for Hillary has led to three months of turmoil from a large percentage of my friends, and to some degree members of my family. I had one friend, one of my best friends, spend about a week following the election, calling me every name under the sun other than my name. I have been basically marginalized by many in my community and circle of friends as the gay "Uncle Tom". I have always been fiscally conservative, and more liberal socially than not. I stopped voting party lines after my first election where I voted for Clinton, and he promptly threw the LGBT community under the proverbial bus with DODT then backed it up over us with DOMA. I have never forgiven him for that. Personally I voted for Gary Johnson. I figured, "Hey, he's a pothead...at least we will have a happy president." I personally don't find the photos of Melania vulgar, or pornagraphic, but I have never been what one would consider a prude when it comes to nudity and sexuality. There are many celebrities who have posed for artistic photos. Madonna probably being the most infamous. Melania had these photos taken as the course of her work required. The issue I had with them being posted, and the reason I called the post disgusting, was not the content of the images, but the intent of the poster. There were a lot of things I did not like politically about Michelle Obama, but I have always found her to be gracious and classy. Where she stepped into the political arena, I have commented on my thoughts about her political remarks. However, I have chastised a lot of times over the years, family who have tried to denigrate her personally. I found the comments by many in the political world, such as the so-called Mayor in Va or WVa. who called her a derogatory term to be repulsive. Melania Trump deserves respect, regardless of her husband's policies. I have read that her primary objective is being a mother to Barron. That's her main focus, and she has been thrust into the spotlight where every move she makes will be scrutinized, as it was by many on the right of Michelle Obama. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now. I watched the Inauguration and the Ball. I saw a woman petrified of making a wrong move. She seemed to be concentrating so hard on every gesture, every movement, that yes, she did appear stiff and nervous in some cases. Calling her a gold-digger, someone looking for a sugar daddy, and other such names (not here, but in social media, etc.) is repulsive. She is a competent business woman, a wonderful mother, the 2nd immigrant First lady in this nation's history. She speaks 5 languages if I remember correctly. She is as much a role model for young girls as Michelle was and is.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 3:50:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2017 19:16:39 GMT
I find the first lady to be extremely classy. I find her artistic photos to be just that...artistic. Michelle Obama, in my opinion, was off limits. So is denigrating the current first lady. No worries though, when you go low, I'll go high. Ummm did you see all of the photos? It is one thing to model for nude photos , quite another to do porn.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jan 23, 2017 19:19:13 GMT
Jonda, is this really you? Or did you lend your identity out to one/some of the peas who recently left? I have to say that most of your posts this past week sound nothing like you used to sound. If it is really you, my apologies. But, geez, the jonda who used to be a regular participant wouldn't have written the above post. The phrasing and the language is all...off. It is me. I probably am coming across a lot more defensive than intended. I didn't vote for Trump, but the fact that I didn't vote for Hillary has led to three months of turmoil from a large percentage of my friends, and to some degree members of my family. I had one friend, one of my best friends, spend about a week following the election, calling me every name under the sun other than my name. I have been basically marginalized by many in my community and circle of friends as the gay "Uncle Tom". I have always been fiscally conservative, and more liberal socially than not. I stopped voting party lines after my first election where I voted for Clinton, and he promptly threw the LGBT community under the proverbial bus with DODT then backed it up over us with DOMA. I have never forgiven him for that. Personally I voted for Gary Johnson. I figured, "Hey, he's a pothead...at least we will have a happy president." I personally don't find the photos of Melania vulgar, or pornagraphic, but I have never been what one would consider a prude when it comes to nudity and sexuality. There are many celebrities who have posed for artistic photos. Madonna probably being the most infamous. Melania had these photos taken as the course of her work required. The issue I had with them being posted, and the reason I called the post disgusting, was not the content of the images, but the intent of the poster. There were a lot of things I did not like politically about Michelle Obama, but I have always found her to be gracious and classy. Where she stepped into the political arena, I have commented on my thoughts about her political remarks. However, I have chastised a lot of times over the years, family who have tried to denigrate her personally. I found the comments by many in the political world, such as the so-called Mayor in Va or WVa. who called her a derogatory term to be repulsive. Melania Trump deserves respect, regardless of her husband's policies. I have read that her primary objective is being a mother to Barron. That's her main focus, and she has been thrust into the spotlight where every move she makes will be scrutinized, as it was by many on the right of Michelle Obama. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now. I watched the Inauguration and the Ball. I saw a woman petrified of making a wrong move. She seemed to be concentrating so hard on every gesture, every movement, that yes, she did appear stiff and nervous in some cases. Calling her a gold-digger, someone looking for a sugar daddy, and other such names (not here, but in social media, etc.) is repulsive. She is a competent business woman, a wonderful mother, the 2nd immigrant First lady in this nation's history. She speaks 5 languages if I remember correctly. She is as much a role model for young girls as Michelle was and is. This sounds like the you that I've enjoyed talking with over the years. You have been very terse lately - not more defensive, per se - but not explaining yourself as you usually do. The many issues surrounding Melania are a conundrum for me. My biggest issue with her pornographic past is that it would have been an unimaginable shitstorm if she were a Democratic candidate's wife. Heck, we endured threads about Michelle Obama's bare arms. It is frustrating to have the political party that appears to have a perverse interest in legislating what goes on in other people's bedrooms, be a-okay when the atypical behavior is on the part of one of their own. I don't think that Trump's immediate family - meaning Melania and Barron - wanted any part of being in the White House and Trump, it appears to me, made that decision unilaterally. And now we, the taxpayers, have to pay for those two to live in another state. I actually do have an issue with that - I think that the decision to run for and actually BE President of the US is something that the whole family needs to support. Heaven knows it is a very taxing position - or positions - as the family members DO have important roles to play. And, given the number of public sexual comments Trump has made about Ivanka, I find it a little creepy that it is apparently expected for her to fill what is traditionally the FLOTUS role in some situations. For me, Melania is beautiful, and multi-lingual, but isn't who I would use as a role model for girls in my life. There are a number of reasons for that, the soft-porn modeling being just one.
|
|
flute4peace
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,757
Jul 3, 2014 14:38:35 GMT
|
Post by flute4peace on Jan 23, 2017 19:32:21 GMT
It is me. I probably am coming across a lot more defensive than intended. I didn't vote for Trump, but the fact that I didn't vote for Hillary has led to three months of turmoil from a large percentage of my friends, and to some degree members of my family. I had one friend, one of my best friends, spend about a week following the election, calling me every name under the sun other than my name. I have been basically marginalized by many in my community and circle of friends as the gay "Uncle Tom". I have always been fiscally conservative, and more liberal socially than not. I stopped voting party lines after my first election where I voted for Clinton, and he promptly threw the LGBT community under the proverbial bus with DODT then backed it up over us with DOMA. I have never forgiven him for that. Personally I voted for Gary Johnson. I figured, "Hey, he's a pothead...at least we will have a happy president." I personally don't find the photos of Melania vulgar, or pornagraphic, but I have never been what one would consider a prude when it comes to nudity and sexuality. There are many celebrities who have posed for artistic photos. Madonna probably being the most infamous. Melania had these photos taken as the course of her work required. The issue I had with them being posted, and the reason I called the post disgusting, was not the content of the images, but the intent of the poster. There were a lot of things I did not like politically about Michelle Obama, but I have always found her to be gracious and classy. Where she stepped into the political arena, I have commented on my thoughts about her political remarks. However, I have chastised a lot of times over the years, family who have tried to denigrate her personally. I found the comments by many in the political world, such as the so-called Mayor in Va or WVa. who called her a derogatory term to be repulsive. Melania Trump deserves respect, regardless of her husband's policies. I have read that her primary objective is being a mother to Barron. That's her main focus, and she has been thrust into the spotlight where every move she makes will be scrutinized, as it was by many on the right of Michelle Obama. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now. I watched the Inauguration and the Ball. I saw a woman petrified of making a wrong move. She seemed to be concentrating so hard on every gesture, every movement, that yes, she did appear stiff and nervous in some cases. Calling her a gold-digger, someone looking for a sugar daddy, and other such names (not here, but in social media, etc.) is repulsive. She is a competent business woman, a wonderful mother, the 2nd immigrant First lady in this nation's history. She speaks 5 languages if I remember correctly. She is as much a role model for young girls as Michelle was and is. This sounds like the you that I've enjoyed talking with over the years. You have been very terse lately - not more defensive, per se - but not explaining yourself as you usually do. The many issues surrounding Melania are a conundrum for me. My biggest issue with her pornographic past is that it would have been an unimaginable shitstorm if she were a Democratic candidate's wife. Heck, we endured threads about Michelle Obama's bare arms. It is frustrating to have the political party that appears to have a perverse interest in legislating what goes on in other people's bedrooms, be a-okay when the atypical behavior is on the part of one of their own. I don't think that Trump's immediate family - meaning Melania and Barron - wanted any part of being in the White House and Trump, it appears to me, made that decision unilaterally. And now we, the taxpayers, have to pay for those two to live in another state. I actually do have an issue with that - I think that the decision to run for and actually BE President of the US is something that the whole family needs to support. Heaven knows it is a very taxing position - or positions - as the family members DO have important roles to play. And, given the number of public sexual comments Trump has made about Ivanka, I find it a little creepy that it is apparently expected for her to fill what is traditionally the FLOTUS role in some situations. For me, Melania is beautiful, and multi-lingual, but isn't who I would use as a role model for girls in my life. There are a number of reasons for that, the soft-porn modeling being just one. I've been trying to figure out why Ivanka's appearance at the ball made me uneasy. After all, she was beautiful, truly looked like a princess! It just now hit me that yeah, she did look like a princess, and when you have a princess you typically have a king. Which, no offence to any current kings/queens/royalty out there who are wonderful people and do a beautiful job of ruling or representing their countries, is a little too much like a dictator.
I agree with your other comments, as well. (well except for Jonda, I don't know you but am happy to have you here.)
|
|
|
Post by jonda1974 on Jan 23, 2017 21:36:35 GMT
This sounds like the you that I've enjoyed talking with over the years. You have been very terse lately - not more defensive, per se - but not explaining yourself as you usually do. The many issues surrounding Melania are a conundrum for me. My biggest issue with her pornographic past is that it would have been an unimaginable shitstorm if she were a Democratic candidate's wife. Heck, we endured threads about Michelle Obama's bare arms. It is frustrating to have the political party that appears to have a perverse interest in legislating what goes on in other people's bedrooms, be a-okay when the atypical behavior is on the part of one of their own. I don't think that Trump's immediate family - meaning Melania and Barron - wanted any part of being in the White House and Trump, it appears to me, made that decision unilaterally. And now we, the taxpayers, have to pay for those two to live in another state. I actually do have an issue with that - I think that the decision to run for and actually BE President of the US is something that the whole family needs to support. Heaven knows it is a very taxing position - or positions - as the family members DO have important roles to play. And, given the number of public sexual comments Trump has made about Ivanka, I find it a little creepy that it is apparently expected for her to fill what is traditionally the FLOTUS role in some situations. For me, Melania is beautiful, and multi-lingual, but isn't who I would use as a role model for girls in my life. There are a number of reasons for that, the soft-porn modeling being just one. Thanks. I can see why you think that. I probably have been much more terse than normal, because I get it from both sides, and have kinda stopped explaining Lol. I understand what you mean about the hypocrisy of the right. I agree. We could also flip it and say that the left who defends the arts is also flipping from the way they would normally defend it. I personally, think she's an excellent role model. I don't find it pornographic in any way. But art throughout time has been considered pornographic regardless of the medium which was used. Mapplethorpe comes to mind. These are all pictures I can see him having taken and framed. I do think that much like Madonna's comments were taken out of context, I believe the Trump/Ivanka comments have been overblown as well. I don't know that it is expected that she will be performing the traditional FLOTUS role, however, even if she was, it wouldn't be unique. It's happened before. Again, my view on nudity is completely different than many. I think there is nothing wrong with the nude form, and being nude, or being photographed nude. I think it shows empowerment, and a determination not to live by anyone's rules of how women should be perceived (in Melania's case).
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 23, 2017 23:17:25 GMT
There are many celebrities who have posed for artistic photos. Madonna probably being the most infamous. Melania had these photos taken as the course of her work required. The issue I had with them being posted, and the reason I called the post disgusting, was not the content of the images, but the intent of the poster. OMG you need to seriously shut up about Madonna, you clearly don't have the first idea about feminism. You can't use Madonna's feminist ideals and apply them to Melania, that's just beyond a joke. Two different women posing nude are so NOT the same thing. To start with Madonna isn't the First Lady, if she were then I'm betting her photos would be a big deal, but somehow Trump's wife should get a free pass, and secondly no-one is posting here claiming Madonna is "classy" and ascribing her with false credentials. Madonna built her own career from scratch and turned herself into who she is today, she did her nude photos at the height of her career and she didn't need any old fat man to make it happen and she didn't need the money. She has an actual talent and she has a 30 year career so far and she didn't do any of that by marrying an ugly old man and buying her way in with his money. Love her or hate her she is a strong symbol of female empowerment.
Melania is the exact opposite, she's all about using her body for commerce, she sold herself for the sole purpose of making money and then she sold herself to a disgusting old pervert who talks about just kissing women when they aren't expecting it and grabbing them by the pussy. Young attractive, Slovenian models do not marry men like that for love...they marry them for money and for a lifestyle. Clearly her own career wasn't going well to do that movie and those photos and she saw a way into a lifestyle with Trump and she took it. The gold digger label fits her perfectly and she does NOT just automatically get "respect" because she suddenly finds herself in the same position as the other women who actually did things to deserve it.
She barely says a word and trails after him like some lost puppy, looks miserable 90% of the time. Madonna is about empowerment and Melania is about subservience to a man and not any kind of example or role model to modern women, she acts like she wants to be transported back to the 1950s. Where's her self made career? What's her talent? (apart from what she probably does in the bedroom), where are all the examples of her charity work over the years? Seeing as you insist on comparing the two - Madonna has been raising 4 kids and maintained a career and is building and paediatric hospital in Malawi and did none of that but riding the wealth and coat-tails of some rich old man. Yeah, I'm pretty sure Madonna had "had" a lot more men in her life, but she hasn't needed or used them to get where she is. Michelle Obama married a man who is her equal in life and what they share and the respect they have for each other is clear in every interaction.
Comparing Melania and Madonna shows just how little understanding of the concepts if feminism you have and the two women are far from comparable. She is a gold digger pure and simple or we can tart it up and call him her "sugar daddy" but it is exactly what it looks like and my "intent" of posting that meme was to show that even when Michelle wears an ugly dress, she still has more class on her worst day than Melania has on her best...because it's not about clothes it's about attitude and how you live your life.
|
|
lbrock44
Junior Member
Posts: 73
Jun 29, 2014 2:56:24 GMT
|
Post by lbrock44 on Jan 23, 2017 23:34:40 GMT
I don't care what any of them look like. Trump's hair? His choice. Michelle's bare shoulders? Her choice. Don't care. We have so much to worry about when it comes to the division in our country that these side-by-side "who looks classier" memes are, imho, just stupid. Honestly, I think the Obamas are plenty classy, and I think Melania is a stunning woman. And who the fuck cares what I think about Trump's looks. I'll judge him on his actions. And there's plenty to be worried about there.
|
|
Gennifer
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,241
Jun 26, 2014 8:22:26 GMT
|
Post by Gennifer on Jan 23, 2017 23:49:33 GMT
Melania Trump deserves respect, regardless of her husband's policies. Bullshit. I will gladly give respect to people who deserve it. That doesn't include someone who lies about their education, plagiarizes, or marries for money. Also, for the record, this is an artistic nude:
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 24, 2017 0:31:02 GMT
Mapplethorpe comes to mind. These are all pictures I can see him having taken Mapplethorpe? OMG no! Firstly Mapplethorpe hardly took any female nudes, some had bare chests, but many of his female studies are clothed. Secondly his females studies are mostly of women who *do* something, Debbie Harry & Patti Smith come to mind. They are strong independent women. He would have had zero interest in nude shots of some dime a dozen "trying to get a break" unknown foreign model with bad breast implants. Finally for most of his career his photos were considered to be pornographic, offensive and obscene. Libraries burned his books. His exhibitions were cancelled. His focus was on men, and homoerotic & sadomasochistic imagery primarily (and the occasional flower). He also got a lot of criticism about his photos of black men saying that his nudes of them were exploitative, and some of his photos of men...were questionable with regards to the potential that the person was underage. So the only part you get close to being correct is that for the general public Melania's photos and Mapplethorpe's work would both be considered pornographic rather than art. But to claim Mapplethorpe could have taken those crappy, tacky shots of Melania is an insult to everything Mapplethorpe stood for or tried to express, never mind his actual talent as a photographer. That's like comparing a Playboy centrefold to an Annie Leibovitz where the female subject is also semi-clothed...simply laughable.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 3:50:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2017 0:40:29 GMT
Mapplethorpe comes to mind. These are all pictures I can see him having taken Mapplethorpe? OMG no! Firstly Mapplethorpe hardly took any female nudes, some had bare chests, but many of his female studies are clothed. Secondly his females studies are mostly of women who *do* something, Debbie Harry & Patti Smith come to mind. They are strong independent women. He would have had zero interest in nude shots of some dime a dozen "trying to get a break" unknown foreign model with bad breast implants. Finally for most of his career his photos were considered to be pornographic, offensive and obscene. Libraries burned his books. His exhibitions were cancelled. His focus was on men, and homoerotic & sadomasochistic imagery primarily (and the occasional flower). He also got a lot of criticism about his photos of black men saying that his nudes of them were exploitative, and some of his photos of men...were questionable with regards to the potential that the person was underage. So the only part you get close to being correct is that for the general public Melania's photos and Mapplethorpe's work would both be considered pornographic rather than art. But to claim Mapplethorpe could have taken those crappy, tacky shots of Melania is an insult to everything Mapplethorpe stood for or tried to express, never mind his actual talent as a photographer. That's like comparing a Playboy centrefold to an Annie Leibovitz where the female subject is also semi-clothed...simply laughable. This. Mapplethorpe is beyond disturbing, so much so, the first time is saw his crap I almost broke up with the guy I went with. He talked me into going to see it. The second time I was near it I would not let my family into that room.
|
|
|
Post by JBeans on Jan 24, 2017 1:01:28 GMT
I'm honestly sick of the shit slinging on both sides. The left is no fucking better than the right.
"Look at Trump not doing this! How pathetic!"
"Look at Bill Clinton staring at Ivanka! What a pig!"
STFU, everybody.
|
|
|
Post by llinin on Jan 24, 2017 1:29:53 GMT
There are many celebrities who have posed for artistic photos. Madonna probably being the most infamous. Melania had these photos taken as the course of her work required. The issue I had with them being posted, and the reason I called the post disgusting, was not the content of the images, but the intent of the poster. OMG you need to seriously shut up about Madonna, you clearly don't have the first idea about feminism. You can't use Madonna's feminist ideals and apply them to Melania, that's just beyond a joke. Two different women posing nude are so NOT the same thing. To start with Madonna isn't the First Lady, if she were then I'm betting her photos would be a big deal, but somehow Trump's wife should get a free pass, and secondly no-one is posting here claiming Madonna is "classy" and ascribing her with false credentials. Madonna built her own career from scratch and turned herself into who she is today, she did her nude photos at the height of her career and she didn't need any old fat man to make it happen and she didn't need the money. She has an actual talent and she has a 30 year career so far and she didn't do any of that by marrying an ugly old man and buying her way in with his money. Love her or hate her she is a strong symbol of female empowerment.
Melania is the exact opposite, she's all about using her body for commerce, she sold herself for the sole purpose of making money and then she sold herself to a disgusting old pervert who talks about just kissing women when they aren't expecting it and grabbing them by the pussy. Young attractive, Slovenian models do not marry men like that for love...they marry them for money and for a lifestyle. Clearly her own career wasn't going well to do that movie and those photos and she saw a way into a lifestyle with Trump and she took it. The gold digger label fits her perfectly and she does NOT just automatically get "respect" because she suddenly finds herself in the same position as the other women who actually did things to deserve it.
She barely says a word and trails after him like some lost puppy, looks miserable 90% of the time. Madonna is about empowerment and Melania is about subservience to a man and not any kind of example or role model to modern women, she acts like she wants to be transported back to the 1950s. Where's her self made career? What's her talent? (apart from what she probably does in the bedroom), where are all the examples of her charity work over the years? Seeing as you insist on comparing the two - Madonna has been raising 4 kids and maintained a career and is building and paediatric hospital in Malawi and did none of that but riding the wealth and coat-tails of some rich old man. Yeah, I'm pretty sure Madonna had "had" a lot more men in her life, but she hasn't needed or used them to get where she is. Michelle Obama married a man who is her equal in life and what they share and the respect they have for each other is clear in every interaction.
Comparing Melania and Madonna shows just how little understanding of the concepts if feminism you have and the two women are far from comparable. She is a gold digger pure and simple or we can tart it up and call him her "sugar daddy" but it is exactly what it looks like and my "intent" of posting that meme was to show that even when Michelle wears an ugly dress, she still has more class on her worst day than Melania has on her best...because it's not about clothes it's about attitude and how you live your life.
I am pretty sure your feminism handbook is seriously fucking outdated because you are spewing shit that may support your agenda but is absolutely contradictory to modern feminism ideals. Convenient but incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 24, 2017 1:48:34 GMT
I am pretty sure your feminism handbook is seriously fucking outdated because you are spewing shit that may support your agenda but is absolutely contradictory to modern feminism ideals. Convenient but incorrect. *Snort* Well as someone who voted for Trump, I expect you wouldn't recognise a feminist handbook if someone hit you over the head with it. So I'll take your concept of feminism with a large grain of salt because if you had the first clue about it you couldn't have/wouldn't have voted for that misogynistic pig. Having voted for Trump gives you no credibility to discuss feminism in any form.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 24, 2017 1:51:23 GMT
The many issues surrounding Melania are a conundrum for me. My biggest issue with her pornographic past is that it would have been an unimaginable shitstorm if she were a Democratic candidate's wife. Heck, we endured threads about Michelle Obama's bare arms. It is frustrating to have the political party that appears to have a perverse interest in legislating what goes on in other people's bedrooms, be a-okay when the atypical behavior is on the part of one of their own. I don't think that Trump's immediate family - meaning Melania and Barron - wanted any part of being in the White House and Trump, it appears to me, made that decision unilaterally. And now we, the taxpayers, have to pay for those two to live in another state. I actually do have an issue with that - I think that the decision to run for and actually BE President of the US is something that the whole family needs to support. Heaven knows it is a very taxing position - or positions - as the family members DO have important roles to play. And, given the number of public sexual comments Trump has made about Ivanka, I find it a little creepy that it is apparently expected for her to fill what is traditionally the FLOTUS role in some situations. For me, Melania is beautiful, and multi-lingual, but isn't who I would use as a role model for girls in my life. There are a number of reasons for that, the soft-porn modeling being just one. Thanks. I can see why you think that. I probably have been much more terse than normal, because I get it from both sides, and have kinda stopped explaining Lol. I understand what you mean about the hypocrisy of the right. I agree. We could also flip it and say that the left who defends the arts is also flipping from the way they would normally defend it. I personally, think she's an excellent role model. I don't find it pornographic in any way. But art throughout time has been considered pornographic regardless of the medium which was used. Mapplethorpe comes to mind. These are all pictures I can see him having taken and framed. I do think that much like Madonna's comments were taken out of context, I believe the Trump/Ivanka comments have been overblown as well. I don't know that it is expected that she will be performing the traditional FLOTUS role, however, even if she was, it wouldn't be unique. It's happened before. Again, my view on nudity is completely different than many. I think there is nothing wrong with the nude form, and being nude, or being photographed nude. I think it shows empowerment, and a determination not to live by anyone's rules of how women should be perceived (in Melania's case). 1. I think you're ascribing an awfully high motive to a young, relatively unknown model who took her clothes off for cash. 2. Art is certainly in the eye of the beholder, but I think it's a pretty big stretch to call Melania's photos "art." I'm not going to slut-shame her for them, but the problem is that they are the most memorable part of her body of work. She has had no career apart from modeling, led no charitable work, championed no causes. She has been a mother (laudable, but of course I'm sure there were a bevy of nannies to help with the heavy lifting) and a trophy wife, and that's it. And while there's nothing wrong with any of that - it is her life to live as she chooses - there is nothing in that, that makes her a role model for young women who aspire to use their brains and not just their bodies to further their careers. Now in Melania's defense, I'm quite certain that she only signed up to be a trophy wife and a mom and an NYC socialite, and never aspired to be first lady. And it's not her fault that she's been put in that position now. But we don't need to falsely ascribe virtues to her that don't exist to make her look better in comparison with previous, more accomplished first ladies. And we should absolutely speak up when anyone describes her relatively uneducated, relatively unaccomplished self as "more classy" than Michelle Obama just because she has a model's body and white skin.
|
|
|
Post by llinin on Jan 24, 2017 1:52:39 GMT
Phaye, you would be incorrect. Seriously, you may want to brush up on modern feminism because you are pretty far off on a few things. It is amusing, so disregard if you like as I can use the laughs.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 24, 2017 2:13:17 GMT
Phaye, you would be incorrect. Seriously, you may want to brush up on modern feminism because you are pretty far off on a few things. It is amusing, so disregard if you like as I can use the laughs Not buying into your wishy washy claims about "modern feminism" like Jonda, you can toss out the words but I have yet to see anything you post that backs up your claims on the subject....or any other subject for that matter. You never post anything of any significance or insight on any topic, so until you show me otherwise, your vague claims of your superior knowledge will continue to go unheeded. Thank-you for your permission to disregard your comments, but I already said I was doing that on this thread, and quite frankly in all other threads where I've seen you post, so that was kind of redundant. But go right on "giving permission" for stuff that you have no control over if it makes you feel better about yourself.
|
|
|
Post by jonda1974 on Jan 24, 2017 14:42:02 GMT
Thanks. I can see why you think that. I probably have been much more terse than normal, because I get it from both sides, and have kinda stopped explaining Lol. I understand what you mean about the hypocrisy of the right. I agree. We could also flip it and say that the left who defends the arts is also flipping from the way they would normally defend it. I personally, think she's an excellent role model. I don't find it pornographic in any way. But art throughout time has been considered pornographic regardless of the medium which was used. Mapplethorpe comes to mind. These are all pictures I can see him having taken and framed. I do think that much like Madonna's comments were taken out of context, I believe the Trump/Ivanka comments have been overblown as well. I don't know that it is expected that she will be performing the traditional FLOTUS role, however, even if she was, it wouldn't be unique. It's happened before. Again, my view on nudity is completely different than many. I think there is nothing wrong with the nude form, and being nude, or being photographed nude. I think it shows empowerment, and a determination not to live by anyone's rules of how women should be perceived (in Melania's case). 1. I think you're ascribing an awfully high motive to a young, relatively unknown model who took her clothes off for cash. 2. Art is certainly in the eye of the beholder, but I think it's a pretty big stretch to call Melania's photos "art." I'm not going to slut-shame her for them, but the problem is that they are the most memorable part of her body of work. She has had no career apart from modeling, led no charitable work, championed no causes. She has been a mother (laudable, but of course I'm sure there were a bevy of nannies to help with the heavy lifting) and a trophy wife, and that's it. And while there's nothing wrong with any of that - it is her life to live as she chooses - there is nothing in that, that makes her a role model for young women who aspire to use their brains and not just their bodies to further their careers. Now in Melania's defense, I'm quite certain that she only signed up to be a trophy wife and a mom and an NYC socialite, and never aspired to be first lady. And it's not her fault that she's been put in that position now. But we don't need to falsely ascribe virtues to her that don't exist to make her look better in comparison with previous, more accomplished first ladies. And we should absolutely speak up when anyone describes her relatively uneducated, relatively unaccomplished self as "more classy" than Michelle Obama just because she has a model's body and white skin. I always find it very interesting how women are more derogatory and tear down other women more than anyone else in the world. This goes for both sides. "Trophy Wife" Prove it. Not opinion. Proof. Just because she happened to marry a wealthy man, doesn't mean she did it solely for the money, or the fame, or the NYC social life. That's the same in my opinion as slut shaming. Which is another thing feminist women do very well. If a woman wants to take off her clothes, to me, that's an example of empowerment. Whatever the reason. I thought it was interesting that the Women's march broke ties with a pro-life group that was intending to be a sponsor of the women's movement, or how about the racial division with white women being told to "check their privilege". 42% of women voted for Trump. Their opinion matters as much as the women marching. But I see them being talked down to consistently if they don't 100% ascribe to the so-called "modern feminist ideals". I personally said that Melania was "JUST AS" class as Michelle Obama, not more than.
|
|