|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Sept 4, 2017 17:54:23 GMT
Again, people need to look at the bigger picture. Yes, Trump did denounce hate. But what else did he say before and after that? What types of policies is he putting into place? Comments he makes at his rallies? That tells me more about who he is. Anyone can make a statement but it doesn't mean that is what he truly believes and his actions show that.
|
|
inkedup
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,837
Jun 26, 2014 5:00:26 GMT
|
Post by inkedup on Sept 4, 2017 18:27:54 GMT
I'll be sure to be extremely polite when I speak of Neo-Nazis in the future đ I had no idea it would hurt you so much to hear someone call them "f$%^&*g Neo-Nazis." I won't apologize for interjecting a fact into a discussion on a public message board. At this point, our side argument is as guilty of derailing the conversation as your constant arguments with others here. I've made a liar of myself several times by continuing to engage when I said I wouldn't. You keep proving my point that it's futile to engage you. You twist words. Your mind is made up. I'm not sure why you're butt hurt that I said so. I don't seem to recall you taking any offense when I said the exact same thing about Olan a few weeks ago. inkedup have you noticed how you and a couple other peas are always in the middle of these types of threads? Why continue to bring Olan into this when I am rarely here to defend myself? Or if we've both mutually agreed to not engage? You do know my posting history is just as viewable as yours is right? I'll post what I want, thanks. As you like to say, I am freeborn đ I have no interest in engaging you. You're free to like my posts and to tag me as often as you want. You're just as hostile as a few other peas, and all of you like to play victim when you get called out for it. There has been no mutual agreement not to engage, and if there has, why have you liked several of my old posts and tagged me a few times recently in an effort to engage me? It's only bullying when other people do what you do đ I'm not worried about anyone sifting through my post history or activity on this public message board. Have a great day!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 7:19:05 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 18:30:31 GMT
It's not for me or anyone else to "prove" anything to you. You can't try to be lazy by trying to get me to prove your claim and then claim I'm the lazy one because I won't do it. I read, listen and link back up for my claims all the time. Your definition of intellectually lazy is intellectually lazy. Or full of shit. Or both. In your dreams.You and the other Pea missed the point entirely. The point was NEVER that the Muslim Brotherhood was actually in the Obama White House. Go back and reread it and use that context you love to tout so much. If you are going trying to make a point then you need to be clearer of what your intent is. I wasn't the only one who didn't get it.And water is wet. Here is a perfect example of you not being clear. This means what?I don't know WTH you're talking about, I was specific. And on top of that, at least I gave more consideration than many on the Left give when they just outright say "I'm not even going to bother looking because I don't like your source." Or "nope, I don't agree with you so I'm not even going to bother trying to understand another point of view, I'm right, you're wrong and that's the way it will always be. On any given subject." Or the blanket you're a racist, Nazi, homophobe, xenophobe, brown people hating, less than human, thin skinned, fucking moron. Um, yes he did. Here are some definitions that might help you. Lazy - unwilling to work or use energy. As in intellectually lazy. Curiosity - A strong desire to know or learn something. As in lack of. Specific - Clearly defended or identified. Generality - A statement having general rather than specific validity or force. Closed minded - Not willing to consider different ideas or opinions. And these definitions may help you understand.. Alt - right - A loosely defined group of people with far-right idealogies who reject mainstream conservatism in favor of white nationalism. White Nationalism - is a type of nationalism or pan-nationalism which holds the belief that white people are a race and seek to developed and maintain a white national identity - White separatism and white supremacy are subgroups of white nationalism. What this article does is shows the background of one of trump's senior advisers before Kelly kicked him out of the White House and why he still matters since it's been reported that trump has Bannon on speed dial. From Fair. " How Breitbart Provides a Platform for the alt right. " " Breitbart: âNew American Centuryâ: White Christians Now MinorityStephen Bannon has called his Breitbart website âthe platform for the alt-rightâ (Mother Jones, 8/22/16).
How does one go about providing a platform for a white supremacist movement?
One of Breitbartâs white supremacistâs constant themes is black violence and âAnti-White Racism: The Hate That Dares Not Speak Its Nameâ (4/26/16). Thereâs sometimes an emphasis on presenting white identity, or even white supremacy, as the victim of violence, as with âVideo: Brutal Black-on-White Beating of Man with Confederate Flag Stickerâ (4/11/15) or âWatch: Black Gang Members Attack KKK In South Carolinaâ (7/18/15).
Another Breitbart obsession is demographics and the fear of whites becoming a minority in the US, as expressed in articles like âReport: Minorities in US Will Outnumber Whites in 30 Yearsâ (3/18/16) and âCensus: More Minority Children Than Whites, More Whites Dying Than Being Bornâ (6/25/16). Sometimes the endangered group is not just whites but explicitly Christian whites, as in ââNew American Centuryâ: White Christians Now Minorityâ (11/23/15), which begins:
Four centuries after white Christians landed in Jamestown and settled what would later become America, a report reveals that white Christians are now a minority in the nation their forebearers settled.
Breitbart (1/8/15) highlighted a conspiratorial warning issued by British white nationalist Nigel Farage in âWatch: âFifth Column Out to Destroy Our Whole Civilization,â Says Farageâ: Weâve got to start being a bit more assertive about who we are and what our values areâŠ. We come from countries with Christian culture and Christian constitutions and weâve got to start standing up for that."
Now connect the dots. Agree or don't agree that is your choice. But if you don't agree don't come back general comments and try to pass them off as specific reasons.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Sept 4, 2017 21:12:06 GMT
inkedup have you noticed how you and a couple other peas are always in the middle of these types of threads? Why continue to bring Olan into this when I am rarely here to defend myself? Or if we've both mutually agreed to not engage? You do know my posting history is just as viewable as yours is right? I'll post what I want, thanks. As you like to say, I am freeborn đ I have no interest in engaging you. You're free to like my posts and to tag me as often as you want. You're just as hostile as a few other peas, and all of you like to play victim when you get called out for it. There has been no mutual agreement not to engage, and if there has, why have you liked several of my old posts and tagged me a few times recently in an effort to engage me? It's only bullying when other people do what you do đ I'm not worried about anyone sifting through my post history or activity on this public message board. Have a great day! I didn't say engage. I asked why you feel the need to talk about me and not allow me to defend myself. We all know why. Also I didn't tag you to engage you. I tagged you because you likened me to someone else though I wasn't active in the thread. The tag was for anyone interested in seeing how our posting history measures up. Your opinion about my online activities doesn't touch me and because I think you and Gia were really making progress I will leave you to it.
|
|