|
Post by mom on Jun 16, 2018 17:25:29 GMT
I know in many states, the law requires you to be tried within a certain period of time if you are incarcerated, otherwise they must release you pending the trial. Don't know about federal laws. If I am not mistaken, you can be held however long it take to get to trial if you e been harassing witnesses.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 15:03:37 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 15:07:41 GMT
Simple, because the Republicsns in Congress can’t be trusted not to leak classified informagion. Especially if Nunes is involved.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 15:16:37 GMT
Simple, because the Republicsns in Congress can’t be trusted not to leak classified informagion. Especially if Nunes is involved. That's rich, considering all of the leaks from the Dems in control of the FBI.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 15:32:24 GMT
Simple, because the Republicsns in Congress can’t be trusted not to leak classified informagion. Especially if Nunes is involved. That's rich, considering all of the leaks from the Dems in control of the FBI. . Did a quick check and can only find the Republicans leaking information , including the New York FBI agents leaking information to Rudy G about the find of addition emails just before the election. You know the emails about nothing. So you must be confused.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:17:34 GMT
Too funny.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 16:46:09 GMT
That's rich, considering all of the leaks from the Dems in control of the FBI. . Did a quick check and can only find the Republicans leaking information , including the New York FBI agents leaking information to Rudy G about the find of addition emails just before the election. You know the emails about nothing. So you must be confused. No, you clearly don't listen to the news. James Comey admitted leaking info as did his subordinate, Andrew (forget his last name). And, it doesn't matter if the agency doesn't trust Congress. Congress is basically their boss and they don't get to decide whether or not they comply with directives for information.
|
|
|
Post by missmiss on Jun 18, 2018 16:49:11 GMT
. Did a quick check and can only find the Republicans leaking information , including the New York FBI agents leaking information to Rudy G about the find of addition emails just before the election. You know the emails about nothing. So you must be confused. No, you clearly don't listen to the news. James Comey admitted leaking info as did his subordinate, Andrew (forget his last name). And, it doesn't matter if the agency doesn't trust Congress. Congress is basically their boss and they don't get to decide whether or not they comply with directives for information. So are you saying that the GOP didn't leak anything? Without bringing up Democrats can you answer that question?
|
|
|
Post by susancinpa on Jun 18, 2018 16:53:35 GMT
Sorry, when did Comey become a democrat? He was a registered republican. It appears he then became "unaffiliated", but I don't know when that happened.
ETA: Looks like he became "unaffiliated" in 2016.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jun 18, 2018 16:54:12 GMT
DH and I were just talking about it. He HAD to know he would get caught - and the app we hear he used doesn't delete covnersations - so there would be an electronic paper trail. Maybe he didn't. But man, if he did then he isn't as smart as I thought. SaveSaveThe part that is disconcerting to me is that he's been locked up without a trial. www.themarshallproject.org/2015/06/09/no-bail-less-hope-the-death-of-kalief-browder
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jun 18, 2018 16:55:37 GMT
Simple, because the Republicsns in Congress can’t be trusted not to leak classified informagion. Especially if Nunes is involved. That's one of the funniest things I've heard in a long time!
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 18, 2018 16:56:38 GMT
Sorry, when did Comey become a democrat? He was a registered republican. It appears he then became "unaffiliated", but I don't know when that happened. Silly - anyone Trump doesn’t like is now a Democrat, including all the registered Republicans appointed to investigate him.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:57:20 GMT
. Did a quick check and can only find the Republicans leaking information , including the New York FBI agents leaking information to Rudy G about the find of addition emails just before the election. You know the emails about nothing. So you must be confused. No, you clearly don't listen to the news. James Comey admitted leaking info as did his subordinate, Andrew (forget his last name). And, it doesn't matter if the agency doesn't trust Congress. Congress is basically their boss and they don't get to decide whether or not they comply with directives for information. . Last time I checked both of these men were Republicans. In fact the majority of senior folks at the FBI were and are Republicans. Note I said majority and not all. Again you appear to be confused.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 16:58:07 GMT
Simple, because the Republicsns in Congress can’t be trusted not to leak classified informagion. Especially if Nunes is involved. That's one of the funniest things I've heard in a long time! . Another confused person I see.
|
|
|
Post by delilahtwo on Jun 18, 2018 16:58:21 GMT
Manafort was breaking the law while out on bail, which is why he's in jail right now. That's it. Simple reason.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 16:58:54 GMT
No, you clearly don't listen to the news. James Comey admitted leaking info as did his subordinate, Andrew (forget his last name). And, it doesn't matter if the agency doesn't trust Congress. Congress is basically their boss and they don't get to decide whether or not they comply with directives for information. So are you saying that the GOP didn't leak anything? Without bringing up Democrats can you answer that question? I'm not saying that. I'm saying it's rich that the agencies led by Democrats have acknowledged leaking info to the press and Fred claims that another agency doesn't want to hand over info because of Republican leaks. That's exactly what my initial post on this thread said.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 16:59:59 GMT
And fwiw, IMO, the info needs to be turned over and we need to start prosecuting official who leak i nfo.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jun 18, 2018 17:03:54 GMT
You know the emails about nothing. This is going to turn real nasty real fast. Factual, provable negligence. Failure to secure national security information. Access to that information by foreign governments. A conclusion writen before a pitiful excuse for an investigation. - All gets a pass from you as nothing. No facts. Nothing proven. A fabricated dosier paid for by the "nothing-burger" campaign deserves all your respect as the basis to try to unseat a democratically elected President. And it's the Republicans fault. Go away. Take it to another thread. Hell, start 900 other threads, I don't care. Just stop trying to dominate this thread.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jun 18, 2018 17:06:19 GMT
. Did a quick check and can only find the Republicans leaking information , including the New York FBI agents leaking information to Rudy G about the find of addition emails just before the election. You know the emails about nothing. So you must be confused. No, you clearly don't listen to the news. James Comey admitted leaking info as did his subordinate, Andrew (forget his last name). And, it doesn't matter if the agency doesn't trust Congress. Congress is basically their boss and they don't get to decide whether or not they comply with directives for information. Bingo.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 17:09:21 GMT
She can't help it. She can't stand the fact that the Republicans/conservatives have chosen to have a thread for their own point of view. As you previously mentioned, it's pure selfishness.
|
|
|
Post by peano on Jun 18, 2018 17:14:39 GMT
You know the emails about nothing. This is going to turn real nasty real fast. Factual, provable negligence. Failure to secure national security information. Access to that information by foreign governments. A conclusion writen before a pitiful excuse for an investigation. - All gets a pass from you as nothing. No facts. Nothing proven. A fabricated dosier paid for by the "nothing-burger" campaign deserves all your respect as the basis to try to unseat a democratically elected President. And it's the Republicans fault. Go away. Take it to another thread. Hell, start 900 other threads, I don't care. Just stop trying to dominate this thread. Virtually everything in that "fabricated dosier (sic)" has turned out to be fact. Factual proven interference by a foreign country into our election. Guilty pleas and indictments. And you're acting like this is a "nothing burger". Your powers of denial are astounding. And what is with the demand for proven facts from an investigation that is still ongoing?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 8:56:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 17:16:43 GMT
You know the emails about nothing. This is going to turn real nasty real fast. Factual, provable negligence. Failure to secure national security information. Access to that information by foreign governments. A conclusion writen before a pitiful excuse for an investigation. - All gets a pass from you as nothing. No facts. Nothing proven. A fabricated dosier paid for by the "nothing-burger" campaign deserves all your respect as the basis to try to unseat a democratically elected President. And it's the Republicans fault. Go away. Take it to another thread. Hell, start 900 other threads, I don't care. Just stop trying to dominate this thread. Not really. After reading all of you guy’s comments I am convinced you all are not only confused but misguided. There is nothing more to say.
|
|
|
Post by missmiss on Jun 18, 2018 17:17:27 GMT
So are you saying that the GOP didn't leak anything? Without bringing up Democrats can you answer that question? I'm not saying that. I'm saying it's rich that the agencies led by Democrats have acknowledged leaking info to the press and Fred claims that another agency doesn't want to hand over info because of Republican leaks. That's exactly what my initial post on this thread said. So next question. Do you think some Republicans have leaked information?
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 17:26:42 GMT
I'm not saying that. I'm saying it's rich that the agencies led by Democrats have acknowledged leaking info to the press and Fred claims that another agency doesn't want to hand over info because of Republican leaks. That's exactly what my initial post on this thread said. So next question. Do you think some Republicans have leaked information? I wouldn't be surprised. However, as I said, the issue is whether an agency under the control of and answerable to Congress can decide it doesn't trust one party or the other and refuse to turn over information requested by Congress. Would you care to address that rather than trying to start a debate about who leaks info more?
|
|
|
Post by missmiss on Jun 18, 2018 18:18:24 GMT
So next question. Do you think some Republicans have leaked information? I wouldn't be surprised. However, as I said, the issue is whether an agency under the control of and answerable to Congress can decide it doesn't trust one party or the other and refuse to turn over information requested by Congress. Would you care to address that rather than trying to start a debate about who leaks info more? No where did I say who leaks more. I was trying to see if you think Republicans have leaked information. What if certain people in Congress are doing the leaking? Then what? We have leaks all throughout our government. If certain information shouldn't be leaked then what?
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 18:45:12 GMT
Again, you're focusing on who leaks rather than the issue of whether a government agency who operates under the control of Congress has the right to refuse oversight by Congress.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jun 18, 2018 18:52:18 GMT
Again, you're focusing on who leaks rather than the issue of whether a government agency who operates under the control of Congress has the right to refuse oversight by Congress. Translation - Let's dominate the conservative thread. Again. ETA - not you, #notLauren. It's the asking questions but refusing to answer them that I refer to.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 19:08:35 GMT
Again, you're focusing on who leaks rather than the issue of whether a government agency who operates under the control of Congress has the right to refuse oversight by Congress. Translation - Let's dominate the conservative thread. Again. ETA - not you, #notLauren. It's the asking questions but refusing to answer them that I refer to. I think it's time to just block these people.
|
|
|
Post by mom26 on Jun 18, 2018 19:32:55 GMT
From the OP:
Anyone can post here, obviously, but this is not the place for those with opposing views to grill conservatives and demand that they defend every word of every post ad naseum. If you see that as us not wanting to be challenged on our views, it’s probably best not to contribute, and you can complain about that in every other thread you like.
As for those who do post here, remember you can ignore any of the above should it occur. Put people on ignore, scroll, whatever.
I think it's time to consider the above advice going forward. Let's face it - many on the far left are so rabid in their blind hatred of Trump and Republicans (which many of us are not) that they simply cannot control themselves.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 18, 2018 19:35:26 GMT
good point,
|
|