Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2019 13:46:34 GMT
linkProPublica... “What Happened to All the Jobs Trump Promised?”From the article.. ”President Donald Trump likes to claim credit for the American job boom. He’s not the only president to celebrate job creation under his watch, but Trump is unusual among his peers for frequently attributing specific jobs at specific companies to his own actions. The U.S. economy has been producing jobs at a healthy clip for years, creating 188,542 jobs a month on average in the first 24 months of Trump’s presidency, compared with 202,417 jobs a month in the last 24 months of the Obama administration. But how much credit does Trump deserve? We tracked the president’s tweets and speeches about job creation to try to figure out how well his claims stacked up. The answer is: Not well.” You need to read the “scrolling” to get the details. But of those employers contacted here is the number of jobs attributed to trump.. 🥁 roll.... “ The bottom line: Only 797 jobs are attributable to Trump, according to the companies that did the hiring. That figure is so small it represents less than even one person in this graphic.“
|
|
PrettyInPeank
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,691
Jun 25, 2014 21:31:58 GMT
|
Post by PrettyInPeank on May 8, 2019 14:21:21 GMT
Admits tax fraud to save face and own the Libs. Brilliant. 👍
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on May 8, 2019 14:24:07 GMT
I read that DT tweet in a whiny middle-school voice: "but everyone did it, Mom!"
...as if everyone breaking the law made it okay...??
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2019 14:42:02 GMT
What one shouldn’t do is watch Rachel Maddow.
Why?
Because it’s so damn depressing to see how trump’s corruption is spreading throughout the Federal Government.
Tonight is how trump has managed to get “his” guys in the top 2 positions at the IRS.
We are screwed. We really are.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2019 14:49:46 GMT
Today.. So far.
New York Times..
”Breaking News: President Trump asserted executive privilege on the unredacted Mueller report in an effort to shield its hidden portions from Congress”
Negar Mortazavi...
“Trump Administration Inflated Iran Intelligence: Sources say the administration blew the threat from Iran out of proportion and characterized it as more significant than it actually was.”
Kyle Griffin..
”House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on executive privilege: "This decision represents a clear escalation in the Trump administration's blanket defiance of Congress' constitutionally mandated duties." Via CSPAN”
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 8, 2019 15:01:02 GMT
One proposal the Office of Management and Budget suggested in the filing is to shift to so-called chained CPI, which regularly shows a slower pace of price gains than traditional measures. Chained CPI shows slower inflation growth because it assumes consumers will substitute less expensive items when prices for specific individual goods increase significantly. Whoever came up with this theory is certainly not paying attention to the real world. Less expensive food equals less food. Less expensive housing equals living in one’s car or on the street. Less expensive health care means no health care.Thank you for posting that... Less expensive food.... let me say that I shop Aldi first for most things, Walmart for others... rarely regular supermarkets .. never Trader Joe's or Whole Foods.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2019 15:21:18 GMT
“Congressional oversight is oversight by the United States Congress over the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies. Congressional oversight includes the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation.[1] Congress exercises this power largely through its congressional committee system. Oversight also occurs in a wide variety of congressional activities and contexts. These include authorization, appropriations, investigative, and legislative hearings by standing committees; specialized investigations by select committees; and reviews and studies by congressional support agencies and staff.
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its “implied” powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.”
The GOP’s response to the discussion about Barr and all of sudden the EP on the redacted part of the Mueller Report..
Aaron Rupar...
”@repdougcollins begins his statement by lamenting that Democrats are spending time trying to conduct oversight of the executive branch instead of funding Trump's wall or talking about how China is bad”
“MINORITY LEADER COLLINS: The economy is good, so what do Dems have to be mad about anyway?”
“.@repstevechabot accuses Hillary Clinton of being the real colluder, rewrites history by saying the FBI tried to help her win, and says Trump "may have been right" about Obama spying on him. #FairyTales”
“Jim Jordan cites Trump firing a bunch of people who were investigating him as evidence of FBI misconduct. It's actually evidence of obstruction of justice by Trump!”
It would seem that the Republicans in Congress don’t understand their entire job description. This really is a disgrace . #8hearingsonBenghazi
|
|
|
Post by h2ohdog on May 8, 2019 15:25:08 GMT
I read that DT tweet in a whiny middle-school voice: "but everyone did it, Mom!" ...as if everyone breaking the law made it okay...?? Reminds me of my Conservative Dad’s excuse for Nixon—"Every politician does that—Nixon just got caught.” smh
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on May 8, 2019 15:46:49 GMT
One proposal the Office of Management and Budget suggested in the filing is to shift to so-called chained CPI, which regularly shows a slower pace of price gains than traditional measures. Chained CPI shows slower inflation growth because it assumes consumers will substitute less expensive items when prices for specific individual goods increase significantly. Whoever came up with this theory is certainly not paying attention to the real world. Less expensive food equals less food. Less expensive housing equals living in one’s car or on the street. Less expensive health care means no health care.Thank you for posting that... Less expensive food.... let me say that I shop Aldi first for most things, Walmart for others... rarely regular supermarkets .. never Trader Joe's or Whole Foods. Just FYI, Trader Joe’s is often much cheaper than the supermarket for basic items. Check it out. ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/5645536/images/MNrJDkDuSwqIMVw33MdD.jpg)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2019 15:48:13 GMT
Bill Kristol...
”Actual, non-gaslighting fact: The FBI and intelligence agencies did nothing to sabotage the Trump campaign. If anything, they bent over backward not to influence the vote. But Comey’s handling of Clinton’s emails (whatever his intention) may well have cost Clinton the presidency.”
Matthew Chapman...
”If there should be any investigation of the FBI, it should be into whether leaks by agents in the New York field office improperly pushed James Comey to release his October letter on Clinton to damage her campaign — and whether Rudy Giuliani played a role in that.”
“The thing that gets lost in GOP conspiracy theories about the FBI spying on Trump, FISA judges, the dossier etc., is that even if it were true, none of it affected the campaign, because none of it went public until weeks later.
The Comey letter, OTOH, *did* affect the campaign.”
“We should consider the possibility that Trump's allies have pushed the FBI "spying" narrative not just bc they want to taint the Russia investigation, but maybe also bc they want to head off any discussion of the evidence *they* were the ones manipulating the FBI the whole time.”
|
|
suzastampin
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,587
Jun 28, 2014 14:32:59 GMT
|
Post by suzastampin on May 8, 2019 16:33:13 GMT
trump... “The reason for the China pullback & attempted renegotiation of the Trade Deal is the sincere HOPE that they will be able to “negotiate” with Joe Biden or one of the very weak Democrats, and thereby continue to ripoff the United States (($500 Billion a year)) for years to come....” ”Guess what, that’s not going to happen! China has just informed us that they (Vice-Premier) are now coming to the U.S. to make a deal. We’ll see, but I am very happy with over $100 Billion a year in Tariffs filling U.S. coffers...great for U.S., not good for China!” Reuters... ”JUST IN: U.S. raises tariffs on Chinese imports from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports” ”MORE: Tariff increase on Chinese imports will take effect on May 10” And, just how great would it be if China got pissed and called in the debt that the US owes them? $1.17 Trillion as of February.
|
|
pyccku
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,817
Jun 27, 2014 23:12:07 GMT
|
Post by pyccku on May 8, 2019 17:57:39 GMT
And, just how great would it be if China got pissed and called in the debt that the US owes them? $1.17 Trillion as of February. At this point, between Russia and China, they could bring the US to its knees if they wanted to. Russia is able to hack into our electric grid, and they've already shown that they can use social media to divide the US whenever they wish. The Chinese have already shown that they don't need our soybeans - 96% of the market dried up for US farmers after the tariffs went into effect. They could destroy other industries as well by simply not buying from us. And if they call in our debt...well, it will cause an economic collages. If Russia and China wish to become the two superpowers of the world and get rid of US domination, this is the time they could do it. With a president who refuses to recognize actual threats against the US, there will be little to no resistance.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 8, 2019 20:27:19 GMT
Just FYI, Trader Joe’s is often much cheaper than the supermarket for basic items. Check it out. ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/5645536/images/MNrJDkDuSwqIMVw33MdD.jpg) Thanks but I have to drive 15 miles to get there.. Might check it out sometime.......
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 8, 2019 20:32:20 GMT
And, just how great would it be if China got pissed and called in the debt that the US owes them? $1.17 Trillion as of February. At this point, between Russia and China, they could bring the US to its knees if they wanted to. Russia is able to hack into our electric grid, and they've already shown that they can use social media to divide the US whenever they wish. The Chinese have already shown that they don't need our soybeans - 96% of the market dried up for US farmers after the tariffs went into effect. They could destroy other industries as well by simply not buying from us. And if they call in our debt...well, it will cause an economic collages. If Russia and China wish to become the two superpowers of the world and get rid of US domination, this is the time they could do it. With a president who refuses to recognize actual threats against the US, there will be little to no resistance. Unfortunately!
|
|
scrappinmama
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,909
Jun 26, 2014 12:54:09 GMT
|
Post by scrappinmama on May 8, 2019 21:09:24 GMT
One proposal the Office of Management and Budget suggested in the filing is to shift to so-called chained CPI, which regularly shows a slower pace of price gains than traditional measures. Chained CPI shows slower inflation growth because it assumes consumers will substitute less expensive items when prices for specific individual goods increase significantly. Whoever came up with this theory is certainly not paying attention to the real world. Less expensive food equals less food. Less expensive housing equals living in one’s car or on the street. Less expensive health care means no health care.Thank you for posting that... Less expensive food.... let me say that I shop Aldi first for most things, Walmart for others... rarely regular supermarkets .. never Trader Joe's or Whole Foods. Just wanted to say that Trader Joe's is pretty affordable. Their prices are similar to Aldi for a lot of products. I shop at both. I am finding myself trying not to follow politics too closely right now for my own mental health. I just find it so depressing right now. It seems like no matter how far he sinks, Trump gets away with it and the country pays the price. I'm focusing on the election and hoping that the strongest Democrat finds his/her way to the surface and beats Trump in 2020.
|
|
|
Post by Skellinton on May 8, 2019 22:43:58 GMT
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,015
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on May 8, 2019 22:56:53 GMT
One proposal the Office of Management and Budget suggested in the filing is to shift to so-called chained CPI, which regularly shows a slower pace of price gains than traditional measures. Chained CPI shows slower inflation growth because it assumes consumers will substitute less expensive items when prices for specific individual goods increase significantly. Whoever came up with this theory is certainly not paying attention to the real world. Less expensive food equals less food. Less expensive housing equals living in one’s car or on the street. Less expensive health care means no health care.Thank you for posting that... Less expensive food.... let me say that I shop Aldi first for most things, Walmart for others... rarely regular supermarkets .. never Trader Joe's or Whole Foods. Actually, this isn’t about where you shop so much as it is about what you buy. Remember when there was a big Florida freeze and citrus prices went through the roof? They really didn’t have much of an effect on inflation because people chose to buy other fruits instead. That is normal buyer behavior — when prices go up, demand goes down as consumers seek alternatives to the higher-priced option. Chain CPI takes real-world behavior into account when calculating inflation. Price increases in small segments of the market have a minimal effect on inflation if consumers have other options to choose. Just because there aren’t as many oranges available does mean there is less food, but some of the options will now be canned or frozen. Of course, if prices increase across the board, there won’t be cheaper otions, and chain CPI will show higher rates of inflation based on those numbers.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 8, 2019 23:00:38 GMT
Now we attack the courts!! Vice President Pence on Wednesday announced that the Trump administration will challenge the ability of federal district court judges to issue nation-wide injunctions.Pence argued to supporters at an event hosted by the conservative Federalist Society that the Trump administration has been “unfairly” targeted by injunctions issued by lower courts. The vice president said that in the coming days, administration officials will seek pathways to put the issue before the Supreme Court. “So I say to all those gathered here, for the sake of our liberty, our security, our prosperity and the separation of powers, this era of judicial activism must come to an end,” Pence said. “The Supreme Court of the United States must clarify that district judges can decide no more than the cases before them.”The Trump administration has repeatedly seen some of its most controversial policies, like a travel ban for several Muslim-majority countries and a ban on transgender service members in the military, blocked by national injunctions but then upheld by the Supreme Court. thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/442787-trump-admin-to-challenge-authority-of-district-judges-to-issue
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 8, 2019 23:09:09 GMT
|
|
Just T
Drama Llama
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png)
Posts: 5,587
Jun 26, 2014 1:20:09 GMT
|
Post by Just T on May 8, 2019 23:12:30 GMT
What the ever loving HELL?? You cannot remove a baby from a tube and place it in the uterus. What kind of uneducated circus monkeys write this ridiculous shit???
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,856
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on May 8, 2019 23:30:40 GMT
I'm actually surprised a Republican-led senate committee would subpoena Don Jr.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2019 23:47:57 GMT
Thank you for posting that... Less expensive food.... let me say that I shop Aldi first for most things, Walmart for others... rarely regular supermarkets .. never Trader Joe's or Whole Foods. Actually, this isn’t about where you shop so much as it is about what you buy. Remember when there was a big Florida freeze and citrus prices went through the roof? They really didn’t have much of an effect on inflation because people chose to buy other fruits instead. That is normal buyer behavior — when prices go up, demand goes down as consumers seek alternatives to the higher-priced option. Chain CPI takes real-world behavior into account when calculating inflation. Price increases in small segments of the market have a minimal effect on inflation if consumers have other options to choose. Just because there aren’t as many oranges available does mean there is less food, but some of the options will now be canned or frozen. Of course, if prices increase across the board, there won’t be cheaper otions, and chain CPI will show higher rates of inflation based on those numbers. Now I’m just guessing here but the folks that would be affected by this plan aren’t buying t-bone stakes for every meal and are already shopping carefully by not buying brand names etc. So if they get less money or thrown off any programs that are on, it means less food, not that have to look for other options. Or to put it another way, their only option is buying less food. I saw a blurb about the number of folks in my county that get Section 8 help with their rent. It’s a lot. When the average 2 bedroom apt rents from $1,700 and up, mostly way up and they lose that Section 8 help, there are very few if any options of housing available to them. So if they have to leave the area, where do they go and how do they get there? And with what? Is this all all figured into the “real-world behavior” I wonder?
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png)
Posts: 5,477
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on May 9, 2019 0:33:55 GMT
I continually grow more impressed with my Congressman Jamie Raskin. Here's a good way to pass a few minutes of your time hearing how Trump has perverted our norms and our presidency.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2019 2:10:39 GMT
Just another member of the well-regulated militia, amirite?
|
|
|
Post by peano on May 9, 2019 2:52:30 GMT
I continually grow more impressed with my Congressman Jamie Raskin. Here's a good way to pass a few minutes of your time hearing how Trump has perverted our norms and our presidency. I admit to having a little bit of a crush on the congressman. I like the way he thinks.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jul 5, 2024 8:36:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2019 2:53:47 GMT
The problem with this little scenario trump lawyers laid out is, as sitting president, there has to be a belief that he or she can’t be blackmailed by an outside party because of their actions before being elected president. It really is that simple.
Washington Post...
“Trump lawyers call Congress’ demands for his tax returns, financial statements ‘unconstitutional’
“Lawyers for President Trump called Congress’s demands for his tax returns unconstitutional Wednesday, urging a federal judge to block a House Oversight Committee subpoena for years of his financial statements.
In a 24-page filing, Trump’s legal team asked the D.C. court to block a committee subpoena to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, saying the panel’s demand “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose.” Even if there were one, Trump’s lawyers argued, the newly elected Democratic-led House overstepped its authority by passing a campaign finance and ethics bill as its first legislation in January that would require, among other things, the president and the vice president to make public 10 years of tax returns.
“H.R. 1 and any similar proposal to regulate the President’s finances would be unconstitutional. Congress cannot interfere with the Executive’s execution of his duties, or add qualifications for President,” wrote Trump’s attorneys, led by William S. Consovoy of Arlington, Va.
Trump’s lawyers argued that the president’s past personal dealings are irrelevant to the legislative branch’s duties.
Trump sues in bid to block congressional subpoena of financial records
Trump is fighting with Congress and others on multiple fronts to prevent his private financial information from being released to the public.
The New York state Senate passed legislation Wednesday that would allow Trump’s state tax returns to be turned over to congressional committees, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) argued that new disclosures by the New York Times about Trump’s tax filings from 1985 to 1994 should compel the administration to withdraw its objections to releasing returns since 2013.
In addition to the House investigations requesting Trump’s banking records, tax returns and statements from his accounting firm, his company faces inquiries from New York state regulators and is defending itself against plaintiffs in two lawsuits alleging that his company violates the Constitution by doing business with foreign governments.
Deutsche Bank and Mazars, which Trump sued after each was issued subpoenas by House committees, were reliable partners of Trump’s as he emerged from his debt-fueled bankruptcies in the 1990s to own golf courses and hotels in New York, Florida, Las Vegas and elsewhere in the United States.
While other investment banks shunned Trump after his failures in Atlantic City, Deutsche Bank issued hundreds of millions of dollars in loans to Trump in the decade leading up to his White House run, allowing him to acquire or develop properties including his luxury hotel in Washington, the Doral golf resort in South Florida, and his hotel and residential tower in Chicago.
Many of the loans were issued by Deutsche’s private banking unit, allowing him to borrow amounts that experts said other banks were not likely to approve.
Mazars, a Long Island accounting firm, for many years helped Trump prepare “Statements of Financial Condition” — documents in which Trump repeatedly inflated the value of his own holdings and often omitted liabilities.
[Trump moves to resist House inquiries, setting up fight over congressional subpoena powers]
House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.) announced plans in April to subpoena Mazars to corroborate testimony by Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, before a congressional hearing that Trump intentionally misreported the value of his assets for personal gain.
Cummings’s attorneys called the lawsuit a long-shot bid to delay the unearthing of politically damaging information about Trump until after the 2020 election, and to obscure from the public ongoing conflicts of interest by officials charged with executing the nation’s laws.
Trump’s counsel argued that the committee sought “limitless power to subpoena the records of other executive-branch officials, members of Congress, and the federal judiciary.”
If they are wrong, the panel would only have to wait until the case is over to enforce its subpoena, they argued. But if Trump is right, they said, he and his businesses “will forever lose their chance to test the subpoena’s constitutionality because their confidential financial information will be disclosed.”
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,015
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on May 9, 2019 3:06:52 GMT
Actually, this isn’t about where you shop so much as it is about what you buy. Remember when there was a big Florida freeze and citrus prices went through the roof? They really didn’t have much of an effect on inflation because people chose to buy other fruits instead. That is normal buyer behavior — when prices go up, demand goes down as consumers seek alternatives to the higher-priced option. Chain CPI takes real-world behavior into account when calculating inflation. Price increases in small segments of the market have a minimal effect on inflation if consumers have other options to choose. Just because there aren’t as many oranges available does mean there is less food, but some of the options will now be canned or frozen. Of course, if prices increase across the board, there won’t be cheaper otions, and chain CPI will show higher rates of inflation based on those numbers. Now I’m just guessing here but the folks that would be affected by this plan aren’t buying t-bone stakes for every meal and are already shopping carefully by not buying brand names etc. So if they get less money or thrown off any programs that are on, it means less food, not that have to look for other options. Or to put it another way, their only option is buying less food. I saw a blurb about the number of folks in my county that get Section 8 help with their rent. It’s a lot. When the average 2 bedroom apt rents from $1,700 and up, mostly way up and they lose that Section 8 help, there are very few if any options of housing available to them. So if they have to leave the area, where do they go and how do they get there? And with what? Is this all all figured into the “real-world behavior” I wonder? Who said anything about T-bone steak? This type of inflation index takes into account those situations where a small group of products skew the CPI because of a temporary price increase. In reality, they don’t increase the cost for MOST consumers because there are still low cost options available. So if the price of green beans goes up dramatically, someone on a budget is going to choose a different vegetable. You can’t give full weight to that one item’s price because it has a disproportionate effect on the index. If prices are rising across the board, there is less choice, so more of the increased cost is included in the index, and it will show greater inflation. Yes, it does reflect “real world” behavior for MOST people. The previous imethids for calculating inflation inflation of consumer prices was flawed, and the government has been moving to this method for quite some time. This is just one piece of the puzzle for determing cost of living, it really is designed to eliminate the outlier data while capturing a more realistic picture of price changes.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 9, 2019 3:22:21 GMT
I saw a blurb about the number of folks in my county that get Section 8 help with their rent. It’s a lot. When the average 2 bedroom apt rents from $1,700 and up, mostly way up and they lose that Section 8 help, there are very few if any options of housing available to them. So if they have to leave the area, where do they go and how do they get there? And with what? IF they were able to move they might then lose a job for lack of reasonable transportation ... ** Unfortunately low income, moderate income, fixed income, including families and senior citizens are often having to stretch their dollars already limiting choices today with not much room to buy more on less when the prices go up for necessities!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 9, 2019 4:03:30 GMT
Just another member of the well-regulated militia, amirite? Unfortunately a lot more guns!! (Unfortunately they were in the house, but very fortunate they have been found!) (CNN) More than 1,000 guns were found Wednesday in a home in the upscale Los Angeles neighborhood Holmby Hills.
Agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and LA Police Department officers served a search warrant in an investigation of someone suspected of manufacturing and selling illegal firearms, LAPD Officer Jeff Lee said. A man was placed under arrest at the scene for violating Penal Code 30600, California's law regarding assault weapons and .50 BMG (Browning Machine Gun) rifles. It prohibits the manufacture, distribution, transportation, importation and sale of any assault rifle or .50 BMG rifles, except in specific circumstances, according to the California Legislature. Police didn't release any more information about the arrest. ** www.cnn.com/2019/05/08/us/massive-seizure-of-guns-la-trnd/index.html
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on May 9, 2019 12:20:37 GMT
I read that DT tweet in a whiny middle-school voice: "but everyone did it, Mom!" ...as if everyone breaking the law made it okay...?? Reminds me of my Conservative Dad’s excuse for Nixon—"Every politician does that—Nixon just got caught.” smh well, at least getting caught meant something back then. Apparently it means nothing now. There is evidence in the REDACTED report that trump did at least 10x more obstruction than Nixon. Made Nixon look good
|
|