Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 21:45:53 GMT
This from trump..
”Where’s the Whistleblower?”
Prompted this from Bill Kristol...
“At Langley, I suppose. Serving the country. A concept @realdonaldtrump is unfamiliar with.”
|
|
|
Post by LavenderLayoutLady on Oct 27, 2019 0:09:09 GMT
I'm pretty sure Trump has an "Illegal Stuff I Want To Do While President" bucketlist, and he's working overtime to check off all the boxes.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 0:27:16 GMT
Molly Jung-Fast..
”Imagine devoting your life to ethics and than having to watch Trumpism”
Walter Shaub. Former Director of the office of Government Ethics.
”I am Walt's untempered rage.”
”I absolutely hate this corruption, the human rights abuses, and the debasement of our highest office. I despise the betrayal of our values, our allies and our republic itself. I hate the frivolity and careless lies of these unqualified hate-mongers and their craven enablers.”
”I hate their war-making on our republic, on government ethics, on decency, and on everything I call America. I hate their literal war-making and the death-dealing they do for financial gain and political advantage and sometimes out of their blundering ineptitude.”
”I hate all their lies and profiteering, the equivocating of their enablers, and all the lies they pile atop their lies. I hate their cynicism, their stoking the fires of bigotry, and the sycophancy that spills sloppily out of their cartoonishly bad replacement appointees.”
“I hate that they claim to love "America" but love only a place bounded by lines on a map and an increasingly militarized network of human guards, instead of the principles, values and aspirations that make this no mere place but an ideal to be pursued even if not always reached.”
”I hate that they hate the America of dreams, principles, ideals, people from all places, freedom, aspirations and values that we once preached to the rest of the world as we called them to join us in pursuit of democracy. I hate that they hate the America I love.”
”I hate their attacks on the norms of this nation's government. I hate their efforts to stamp out what gains had been made toward the goal of freedom and equality. I hate that the West's experiment in democracy is imperiled by a global wave of authoritarianism.”
”I hate that, for the first time in our history, we have to wonder if the President will leave office peacefully if he loses or his term expires. I hate that his Saturday Night Attorney General is using the criminal apparatus of the state to investigate those who investigated him.”
”I hate that they refuse to secure our elections and that they're fine with the President of the United States soliciting foreign attacks on the one thing that makes us a republic—our election. I hate they they don't care that, in at least one case, he backed it up with extortion.”
”I hate all of this, and I am angrier than I have ever been in my life. I hope you are too. Tonight I will fume, tomorrow too. Monday we get back to fighting this attack on America.”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 0:32:45 GMT
Kelly O’Donnell..
”And the White House @presssec Stephanie Grisham responded to former chief of staff John Kelly with a blistering comment. “I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great President.”
What is it with these people. Are they really that dumb?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 0:36:34 GMT
John Cornyn...
”What if, just what if, the Obama administration, including the leadership of the Justice Department and FBI unlawfully coordinated with the DNC and the Clinton campaign to "go after" an opposing presidential campaign? No problemo?”
”Time will tell, but the spinning by the NYT and other media outlets is already in overdrive. A preemptory attack.”
“The opening of a criminal investigation is likely to raise alarms that Mr. Trump is using the Justice Department to go after his perceived enemies. @nytimes”
Really Texas, I think you can do better then this.
Bill Kristol’s reply..
”This from @johncornyn is beyond irresponsible. It's also beyond stupid. Here are two incontrovertible facts: 1. During the campaign, neither the FBI nor DOJ nor the IC "went after" Trump. 2. Due to his intervention ten days out, the Director of the FBI helped ELECT Donald Trump.”
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 27, 2019 0:37:35 GMT
Kelly O’Donnell.. ”And the White House @presssec Stephanie Grisham responded to former chief of staff John Kelly with a blistering comment. “ I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great President.” What is it with these people. Are they really that dumb? Brainwashed, most likely.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 0:54:48 GMT
The Washington Post...
“Americans would rather reduce oil and gas exploration than ‘drill, baby, drill’
“A new poll finds that a clear majority of Americans say oil and natural gas drilling should be curtailed or maintained at current level. But opinions were divided along partisan lines.
A large majority of Americans say drilling for oil and natural gas off the coasts and on public lands should decrease or remain at current levels, a viewpoint at odds with the expansion promoted by President Trump as part of his “energy dominance” agenda.
In a nationwide public opinion poll by The Washington Post and the Kaiser Family Foundation, more than 8 in 10 people said drilling in the United States should “decrease” or “stay as is.”
Just over half, 51 percent, said energy exploration should be reduced on federal lands, and 53 percent said it should be reduced offshore. Thirty-two percent said it should stay as is on federal lands and waters.
Less than 15 percent support an increase in drilling on public lands or at sea.
The poll comes as the Trump administration is issuing hundreds of permits to explore for fossil fuels on taxpayer-owned land, particularly in the West. The administration is also considering a plan that would open 95 percent of the outer continental shelf to leasing and potentially to drilling, making it the largest proposed expansion in U.S. history.
My personal feeling is we do not hold businesses responsible when spills occur and other things happen,” said Brian Nichols, a 51-year-old Republican in New Mexico who said drilling should decrease. “Until businesses [can] stand up and be responsible for things they do to the land, we should not allow them to drill.” Nichols said his view was influenced by the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, when some 168 million gallons poured into the Gulf of Mexico, soiling the seafood fisheries in Louisiana and Mississippi.
The poll also comes amid bids by two leading Democratic presidential candidates to woo voters by targeting drilling as part of their climate change policies. “On my first day as president, I will sign an executive order that puts a total moratorium on all new fossil fuel leases for drilling offshore and on public lands,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted last month. “And I will ban fracking — everywhere.”
A ban on fracking would affect private lands and scale back the power of state governments to issue or refuse to grant permits.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the nation should “leave fossil fuels in the ground.” He has vowed to end drilling on land. In a campaign document released in August titled “The Green New Deal,” Sanders said his administration would not grant new offshore leasing permits to oil companies and he would require companies operating offshore to fix oil and greenhouse gas leaks in pipelines and other infrastructure.
Trump said more energy exploration and drilling will make the United States less reliant on imports from the Middle East and other oil-producing nations. Much of his administration’s ambition to expand drilling is on hold because of court challenges.
A federal judge blocked drilling in Wyoming earlier this year, ruling that the administration failed to show whether the practice would worsen climate change.
The administration’s proposal to expand offshore drilling in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans has come under bipartisan opposition by the governors of nearly every state that would be affected. Federal government approval of several permits to search for oil deposits in the Atlantic using seismic mapping was legally challenged by environmentalists and state attorneys general, and is mired in a federal court in South Carolina.
The Post-KFF poll follows findings of earlier surveys that show support for oil and gas drilling waning over the past decade. In 2008, 75 percent of adults favored an expansion of offshore drilling, according to a survey by Yale and George Mason universities. That was the year that then-vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin rallied the Republican convention with chants of “drill, baby, drill.”
After the BP oil spill, support for offshore drilling started to drop. As oil poured from the site that June, support slid to 62 percent. Six years later, shortly before Trump was elected, 58 percent of registered voters supported expanded drilling. This spring, it sank to 53 percent. While Yale-GMU surveys asked whether adults supported or opposed expanded drilling off the U.S. coast, the Post-KFF survey asked whether drilling should be increased, decreased or left as it is.
I live in the Florida Panhandle. I see what happens to the animals when we mess with the environment like that,” said 44-year-old Bernadette Kyle. “We were directly affected by the BP oil. It was so sad. We had a lot of students volunteer to clean the birds. I don’t think it’s worth the gamble.”
Kyle, a Democrat, lamented that “seafood during that time was ruined” and that “there was a sheen on the ocean” in Gulfport, Miss., when she and her husband visited during the spill. “It wasn’t even safe to go in the water at that time,” she said.
During his first months in office, Trump vowed to expand offshore and onshore drilling to achieve “American energy dominance” to end a reliance on oil imports. His administration stripped regulations that barred drilling on federal land in the West and lowered safety rules on oil platforms operating in the Gulf.
The president sought to expand drilling to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a pristine area in Alaska that had been off-limits. On the Eastern Seaboard, his expansion plan included the coasts of every state, from Maine to Florida.
While the governors of Alaska and Maine supported the offshore plan, governors south of Maine, along with their congressional delegations, mobilized against it. To thwart Trump’s ambitions, lawmakers in New Jersey, New York and Delaware have passed bipartisan legislation banning the construction of pipes and other equipment needed to convey oil to the shore.
The Post-KFF poll, however, reflects a wide partisan divide. Democrats drove support for decreasing drilling on public lands; 69 percent said it should be scaled back. Nearly three-quarters of Democrats favor a decrease in offshore drilling. Among Republicans, just 20 percent favor a drilling rollback onshore and 26 percent offshore.
Republicans are far more likely to favor the current level of drilling without expansion. A narrow 51 percent majority said it should stay as it is onshore, and 45 percent said the same about offshore drilling.
Independents also favored a reduction in onshore drilling, but by a smaller margin, 56 percent, than Democrats. A similar 52 percent preferred an offshore decrease.
In St. Petersburg, Fla., Philip Steers, 70, enthusiastically supports an offshore drilling expansion — even in his state, where government officials are united in opposition.
“It’s just a critical product that you have to have in the United States,” said Steers, a Republican retiree who worked for Saudi Aramco, the Saudi state-owned oil company. “I know people worry about destroying the [beach] view; that’s not true. It creates jobs and provides valuable resources that are needed. It’s a myth some people think oil destroys the environment.”
As far as Steers is concerned, the BP spill was an anomaly. “Oil companies want to make money,” he said. “They don’t want to lose their oil. We would spend a lot on safety. There are too many hazardous things that can happen, so you have to be careful.”
Hazardous things happen far more often than most Americans realize. In the Gulf, the nation’s largest and most productive offshore oil region, an average of 20 uncontrolled releases of oil for every 1,000 wells takes place in state and federal waters each year. A fire erupts offshore every three days, on average, and hundreds of workers are injured annually.
One of those is the Taylor Energy spill, which took place after a hurricane in 2004. The site off Louisiana has released oil for 15 years, and the spill is only beginning to be controlled. A containment system had recovered 63,000 gallons of oil as of July, but some estimates of the amount spilled — as high as 3.5 million barrels, or 147 million gallons — dwarf that number.
Though the poll showed opposition to expanded drilling, other parts of the poll showed that most people are reluctant to pay significantly higher energy costs to rein in climate change.
Gail Adams, spokeswoman for the International Association of Geophysical Contractors, said, “Just as there are Americans who support limiting natural gas and oil development, there are also many Americans who are not willing to pay increased energy costs that will result from this myopic view.”
The Post-KFF survey was conducted online and by telephone from July 9 to Aug. 5, among a national sample of 2,293 adults through AmeriSpeak, a survey panel recruited through a random selection of U.S. households by NORC at the University of Chicago. Questions on fossil fuel extraction were asked of subsamples of 1,104 to 1,189 adults and have a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points.”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 2:46:06 GMT
This from trump..
”Something very big has just happened!”
Prompted this response from Ben Collins...
”Before you get your hopes up and start to think we found life on Mars or something, just know that Judge Jeanine's show is on Fox Business right now, and that's his favorite TV show.”
😀
ETA: I checked and trump has not tweeted since so whatever the “something very big just happened” is, trump isn’t sharing.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 2:55:47 GMT
”And the White House @presssec Stephanie Grisham responded to former chief of staff John Kelly with a blistering comment. “ I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great President.” What is it with these people. Are they really that dumb? Some are dumb, some are not. Wondering, should her taxpayer funded paycheck be stopped? She does no press conferences/briefings or anything for the taxpayers. She goes on FOX for dt!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 2:56:24 GMT
Jennifer Jacobs..
”President of the United States will be making a major statement tomorrow morning at 9 o’clock from the White House,” White House says.”
The Hoarse Whisperer
”US forces have apparently killed or captured al Baghdadi, the founder of ISIS, which is what Trump once called Obama.
Now if those forces could stop by the Whote House, they could capture the Kurds bigger enemy.”
If true that is good news but trump will make it sound like he personally tracked this guy down and either caught or killed him with no help from the military or intelligence guys. Because you know it’s all about trump.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 3:02:15 GMT
MSNBC News...
”DEVELOPING: "Something very big has just happened!" President Trump tweeted at 9:23 p.m. ET.
A White House official tells @nbcnews that the president will be making a statement Sunday at 9 a.m. ET.
”In a formal advisement, the White House declares that the president's Sunday morning announcement will include "a major statement."
It remains unclear what topic or event the president will be speaking on.”
So how many on the West Coast are going to get up at 6 am to listen to trump’s statement?
You think for something very big he would want the entire Nation to hear it at the same time. Guess not.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 3:06:56 GMT
Trump said more energy exploration and drilling will make the United States less reliant on imports from the Middle East and other oil-producing nations. Much of his administration’s ambition to expand drilling is on hold because of court challenges. Related to this .... More US troops are going back into Syria to guard OIL fields but are no longer help to guard the Kurds. dt cares more about OIL than HUMANS. Of course, this is not news!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 3:11:19 GMT
A White House official tells @nbcnews that the president will be making a statement Sunday at 9 a.m. ET. Make an appearance at 9AM? Will he be sitting in bed in his jammies? He normally doesn't show up in the office until close to 11am.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 3:13:18 GMT
trump 10/22/2012..
”Stop congratulating Obama for killing Bin Laden. The Navy Seals killed Bin Laden. #debate”
If it’s true that guy was captured or killed, let’s see if trump remembers this when he talks about what happened tomorrow.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 3:15:39 GMT
NancyCooper Newsweek...
”The U.S. military has "high confidence" that ISIS leader Baghdadi was killed in Special Ops raid. via @newsweek @shaolintom @jimlaporta @naveedajamali”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 3:47:37 GMT
Paul Waldman...
”If the Baghdadi rumor is true, I guarantee you that at his press conference Trump will:
1) Say "I got him" or "I killed him" 2) Say "Obama couldn't get him, but I did"
I'd also put the odds of "I think I could have gone in with the SEALS, to tell you the truth" at 60%”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 4:08:49 GMT
Brain Stelter...
”The latest from CNN's @rabrowne75: "The US military targeted the leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, in a raid in northwest Syria on Saturday, according to a senior US defense official. The CIA assisted in locating the ISIS leader, the official said."
Nada Bakos...
“The CIA? I thought they were busy deep stating”.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 4:19:19 GMT
Grant Stern..
”With the news cycle totally consumed by Trump's imploding presidency, this massive story slid under the radar.
Steve Bannon is going to testify against Roger Stone at his upcoming trial Nov 4th for lying to Congress & obstructing the Mueller probe. 😂🤣😂”
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,034
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Oct 27, 2019 4:59:25 GMT
Jennifer Jacobs.. ”President of the United States will be making a major statement tomorrow morning at 9 o’clock from the White House,” White House says.” The Hoarse Whisperer ”US forces have apparently killed or captured al Baghdadi, the founder of ISIS, which is what Trump once called Obama. Now if those forces could stop by the Whote House, they could capture the Kurds bigger enemy.” If true that is good news but trump will make it sound like he personally tracked this guy down and either caught or killed him with no help from the military or intelligence guys. Because you know it’s all about trump. Hate to break it to him, but sadly most of the US doesn’t know or care about al Baghdadi.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 5:00:53 GMT
Grant Stern.. ”With the news cycle totally consumed by Trump's imploding presidency, this massive story slid under the radar. Steve Bannon is going to testify against Roger Stone at his upcoming trial Nov 4th for lying to Congress & obstructing the Mueller probe. 😂🤣😂” I don't have the article , but Bannon is setting up a 'war room' in his DC basement to support dt. He will be doing something like podcasts every day from there. He is assembling a team.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 5:03:09 GMT
Hate to break it to him, but sadly most of the US doesn’t know or care about al Baghdadi. What more can he say? It is all over the news already. Paul Waldman... ”If the Baghdadi rumor is true, I guarantee you that at his press conference Trump will: 1) Say "I got him" or "I killed him" 2) Say "Obama couldn't get him, but I did" I'd also put the odds of "I think I could have gone in with the SEALS, to tell you the truth" at 60%” Please, please pat me me me me on the back!! This why he will be giving us the update!!
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Oct 27, 2019 10:05:38 GMT
So how many on the West Coast are going to get up at 6 am to listen to trump’s statement? You think for something very big he would want the entire Nation to hear it at the same time. Guess not.[/quote Any later and wouldn't that interfere with his golfing?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 10:40:31 GMT
Hate to break it to him, but sadly most of the US doesn’t know or care about al Baghdadi. What more can he say? It is all over the news already. Paul Waldman... ”If the Baghdadi rumor is true, I guarantee you that at his press conference Trump will: 1) Say "I got him" or "I killed him" 2) Say "Obama couldn't get him, but I did" I'd also put the odds of "I think I could have gone in with the SEALS, to tell you the truth" at 60%” Please, please pat me me me me on the back!! This why he will be giving us the update!! He can pat himself on the back all he wants but it wasn't HIS doing. The raid on the house was carried out by coalition troops. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Syria war monitor, reported that a squadron of eight helicopters accompanied by a warplane belonging to the international coalition attacked positions of the Hurras al-Deen where Isis operatives were believed to be hiding. Over the past month, the manhunt for Baghdadi had intensified after Iraqi officials identified a Syrian man who had moved his family members and wives from Iraq to Syria. An Iraqi intelligence official said the wives of Baghdadi’s two brothers, Jumah and Ahmad, along with other family members, were monitored as they moved to the region. The information was passed to the CIA earlier this month, the officials said. If it's true, no one has actually confirmed yet that Baghdadi was killed or even there. He's been reported killed on previous occasions and proved to be false, it wasn't any of Trumps doing. No doubt he'll claim the glory though!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 10:47:57 GMT
NancyCooper Newsweek... ”The U.S. military has "high confidence" that ISIS leader Baghdadi was killed in Special Ops raid. via @newsweek @shaolintom @jimlaporta @naveedajamali” The Arabic channels are reporting that he blew himself up before he was captured. They are also reporting that they aren’t sure it is in fact him.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 5, 2024 17:25:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 10:53:27 GMT
What more can he say? It is all over the news already. Please, please pat me me me me on the back!! This why he will be giving us the update!! He can pat himself on the back all he wants but it wasn't HIS doing. The raid on the house was carried out by coalition troops. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Syria war monitor, reported that a squadron of eight helicopters accompanied by a warplane belonging to the international coalition attacked positions of the Hurras al-Deen where Isis operatives were believed to be hiding. Over the past month, the manhunt for Baghdadi had intensified after Iraqi officials identified a Syrian man who had moved his family members and wives from Iraq to Syria. An Iraqi intelligence official said the wives of Baghdadi’s two brothers, Jumah and Ahmad, along with other family members, were monitored as they moved to the region. The information was passed to the CIA earlier this month, the officials said. If it's true, no one has actually confirmed yet that Baghdadi was killed or even there. He's been reported killed on previous occasions and proved to be false, it wasn't any of Trumps doing. No doubt he'll claim the glory though!EXACTLY! When my husband saw this...he was like this is the ninth time this guy was supposed to have been killed.
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Oct 27, 2019 11:25:49 GMT
Hate to break it to him, but sadly most of the US doesn’t know or care about al Baghdadi. Isn't this redundant since 'dimwit donnie' already claims to have defeated ISIS? And it really doesn't matter if he/we got him. There are plenty more to take his position in ISIS. And if it was really so vital, why didn't he do the news conference last night. The news stations have already provided most of the facts, anything 'dd' adds will just cloud the story. (except for patting himself on the back for his accomplishments, and criticizing Obama on camera). Nobody else can do what I do....
|
|
DEX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,355
Aug 9, 2014 23:13:22 GMT
|
Post by DEX on Oct 27, 2019 14:07:59 GMT
@dottyscrapper , I just watched part of the live press conference. According to trump we received NO assistance from any other countries other than Russia (they were “great”) and Iraq (who were “terrific “). Sorry. Amazing. It was “we, we, we”. Along with “I, I, I.” He also hinted that no Democrats were informed of the raid because of “leaks in Washington “. The only people informed ahead of time were “his Generals”, VP Pence, CIA director O’Brian, Secretary of State, Pompeo and Head of the Joint Chiefs Of Staff”. At no time, that I heard, did he mention coalition forces.
|
|
DEX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,355
Aug 9, 2014 23:13:22 GMT
|
Post by DEX on Oct 27, 2019 14:11:49 GMT
NancyCooper Newsweek... ”The U.S. military has "high confidence" that ISIS leader Baghdadi was killed in Special Ops raid. via @newsweek @shaolintom @jimlaporta @naveedajamali” The Arabic channels are reporting that he blew himself up before he was captured. They are also reporting that they aren’t sure it is in fact him. trump reported that Baghdadi died a “whimpering, crying coward”. He said that several of his wives had explosive vests on and 11 children were “safely rescued “.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 14:28:30 GMT
He can pat himself on the back all he wants but it wasn't HIS doing. The raid on the house was carried out by coalition troops. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Syria war monitor, reported that a squadron of eight helicopters accompanied by a warplane belonging to the international coalition attacked positions of the Hurras al-Deen where Isis operatives were believed to be hiding. Over the past month, the manhunt for Baghdadi had intensified after Iraqi officials identified a Syrian man who had moved his family members and wives from Iraq to Syria. An Iraqi intelligence official said the wives of Baghdadi’s two brothers, Jumah and Ahmad, along with other family members, were monitored as they moved to the region. The information was passed to the CIA earlier this month, the officials said. If it's true, no one has actually confirmed yet that Baghdadi was killed or even there. He's been reported killed on previous occasions and proved to be false, it wasn't any of Trumps doing. No doubt he'll claim the glory though! My my my......... Thanks for the REAL NEWS !!!!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2019 14:31:16 GMT
At no time, that I heard, did he mention coalition forces. He did in a passing way..
|
|