|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 14, 2022 2:57:37 GMT
Maybe you forgot about the time biden fell up the airplane steps THREE TIMES in the same trip. Dude is failing faster. Pence who is 16 years younger seems to go arse up on planes steps too. The new dementia criteria - falling up plane stairs Joe Biden, falling upstairs 3 times in a row. In the same moment. Jill actually physically moved a grown ass man into place. The president of the United States! Even she TREATS him like a man in a diminished mental state. I saw Biden trying to put his jacket on the other day. It was just short of a dog chasing his tail. The press guy talking about when he was recovering from covid the first time, he said that Joe actually held up his plate to show him he ate everything on his plate. Like a 3 year old. Thinking he's running for United States Senate, (twice) when he was running for president, rambling on about a guy named Cornpop while reminiscing about letting kids playing with his leg hair decades ago, repeatedly not understanding not to read the stage directions, standing trance like while holding an imaginary steering wheel? while looking off into the distance instead of looking at the the person asking you the question, saying "We're in the process of deciding what I think." in response to a reporter's question, clapping without getting your hands even close to each other, forgetting words, concepts, people's names and that this is the Biden presidency -not the Harris presidency, admitting that "they" won't let you take questions -saying that "they" are going to be mad at him if he does, repeatedly being guided around with hands on, moving him around like you would a 5 year old. Falling off a bike while standing still. You're free to argue all of that is because of a stutter as much as you like, or however you need to dismiss it, but to the rest of the world all of that TOGETHER, IN ONE PERSON, certainly doesn't look good for cognitive capabilities. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 14, 2022 2:42:37 GMT
After you liked pinklady's post attacking my mental health. I don't think so. Pinklady did not attack your mental health- give me a break, and who cares what people like, because again showing that if folks don't agree with you, they are bullies. What a lame excuse that you can't post any info about what you are claiming. I would like to see what info you are reading/gathering for your evidence? I like to read all sources of information. STOP TRYING TO REASON WITH THE MENTALLY CHALLENGED TROLLS! Samantha, that is not just disagreeing with someone. How do you NOT see that as insulting someone's mental health? I'm really curious to know how that thought process works. That you don't see the words that are actually insulting someone's mental health, as insulting someone's mental health. How does that happen? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 14, 2022 1:33:25 GMT
Samantha, we had the evidence of Hunter's laptop, the media and the FBI were calling it "Russian disinformation" and banning any news source from reporting it on Facebook and Twitter. PEOPLE were put in timeout for saying it. Left leaning news was demonizing anyone who said it. Joe Biden got elected and SINCE THEN it's common knowledge that oh, it wasn't actually "Russian disinformation". Hell, even Hunter himself admitted it. Can you link a source for the "we had the evidence of Hunter's laptop and Russian disinformation"? And where did "Hunter himself admitted it" source come from? I'd like to see this otherwise, a he said she said story.
After you liked pinklady's post attacking my mental health. I don't think so. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 14, 2022 1:30:59 GMT
Where did I call anyone names? I didn’t say you did. But you are claiming that merge turned this into a bully fest but you need to take a look at others like Jonathon and cindosha. Unless I guess you are only concerned with the interactions between you and merge. SHE DID. I don't know who Jonathon is, I don't think there's a Jonathon posting to this thread. If you mean sunshine and cindosha, no. MERGE is the one that turned this into a vicious bullying thread. No one else turned it that vicious. SHE is the one that needed to attack my mental health in order to drive home HER point. SHE did this. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 14, 2022 0:33:48 GMT
THIS IS NOT OKAY!!!Recently you called me "A HEARTLESS MONSTER" in response to something I did say, while claiming "I said it in response to something" I never responded to. Something really horrific. I said I didn't see that and couldn't find it even after you said it. You never even bothered to point out where it was and how it could be found in some twitter thread you linked to. In response to my objection to being called "A HEARTLESS MONSTER" for something I did not respond to, you said: Were you lying? Were you just waiting to demonize me again so you could accuse me of making myself out to be a victim when I object? This is not okay. If you have this hard of a time with something you don't agree with that you would stoop to this level of demonizing/bullying, then maybe YOU need to take a break. Or at the very least stick to your own fucking words. I think you really need to take a look at who is calling names on this thread. Where did I call anyone names? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 23:01:01 GMT
THIS IS NOT OKAY!!!Recently you called me "A HEARTLESS MONSTER" in response to something I did say, while claiming "I said it in response to something" I never responded to. Something really horrific. I said I didn't see that and couldn't find it even after you said it. You never even bothered to point out where it was and how it could be found in some twitter thread you linked to. In response to my objection to being called "A HEARTLESS MONSTER" for something I did not respond to, you said: Were you lying? Were you just waiting to demonize me again so you could accuse me of making myself out to be a victim when I object? This is not okay. If you have this hard of a time with something you don't agree with that you would stoop to this level of demonizing/bullying, then maybe YOU need to take a break. Or at the very least stick to your own fucking words. Yeah…the bold, the caps lock, and the enlarged fonts, bringing up a post from eight years ago totally don’t make you look unhinged. Not at all. 😏😂 8 years ago? It was a month ago. Keep bullying. It really proves that the FBI didn't cover up for Joe.  The lengths some of you will go to diminish and bury facts you don't like. And this is Biden's attempt at a cover up? The Biden administration has permitted Trump’s appointee as U.S. attorney for Delaware, David Weiss, to stay on to complete the probe of the president’s son. From the way above link. So not the point being made at all. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 22:48:21 GMT
THIS IS NOT OKAY!!!Recently you called me "A HEARTLESS MONSTER" in response to something I did say, while claiming "I said it in response to something" I never responded to. Something really horrific. I said I didn't see that and couldn't find it even after you said it. You never even bothered to point out where it was and how it could be found in some twitter thread you linked to. In response to my objection to being called "A HEARTLESS MONSTER" for something I did not respond to, you said: You’re absolutely delusional, Gia, making yourself out to be a victim all the time. I initially responded to you at all against my better judgement and now I’m done. Have a nice life as I won’t be wasting a single second of precious time on you again.Were you lying? Were you just waiting to demonize me again so you could accuse me of making myself out to be a victim when I object? This is not okay. If you have this hard of a time with something you don't agree with that you would stoop to this level of demonizing/bullying, then maybe YOU need to take a break. Or at the very least stick to your own fucking words.
|
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 22:16:07 GMT
Yes, they absolutely are facts. With or without the letter, those facts stated above are indisputable facts from way back. We all know that part now. It's out. You can argue the letter, but you can not argue what we all now know. It's been revealed and admitted. - Do you have any other information that I can read about this, besides the letter from Chuck Grassley? I'd like to read up on this "revealed and admitted" information. Samantha, we had the evidence of Hunter's laptop, the media and the FBI were calling it "Russian disinformation" and banning any news source from reporting it on Facebook and Twitter. PEOPLE were put in timeout for saying it. Left leaning news was demonizing anyone who said it. Joe Biden got elected and SINCE THEN it's common knowledge that oh, it wasn't actually "Russian disinformation". Hell, even Hunter himself admitted it. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 22:07:36 GMT
Seriously, talk about projection.  Is that the same Joe Biden you people claim has dementia, can’t put a sentence together on his own, and is being not-so-secretly controlled by Kamala Harris? He’s The Big Guy? Yup, the same joe biden. He also couldn’t find his ass with both hands or zip his pants without jill’s help. One in the same. So the computer repair guy was bullshitting as was Tony Bobulinsky? Please. Jill actually physically moved a grown ass man into place. The president of the United States! Even she TREATS him like a man in a diminished mental state. I saw him trying to put his jacket on the other day. It was just short of a dog chasing his tail. And the press guy talking about when he was recovering from covid the first time, he said that Joe actually held up his plate to show him he ate everything on his plate. Like a 3 year old.  |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 21:55:39 GMT
This thread isn't about what's on the laptop. This thread is about they lied about it and covered it up. They were working in tandem with social media to silence people and news agencies from talking about the facts.
They lied about it. The FBI.
They lied and covered it up, UNTIL Biden got elected. The FBI. The same FBI that FORGED DOCUMENTS in order to get the judge to sign off on spying on the Trump campaign.Those are facts. Those have nothing to do with each other and neither one cancels the other one out. No, they’re not facts. The only evidence is Chuck Grassley’s letter. For various reasons, he is not an objective source. If the whistleblowers come forward, then maybe it will be a fact. All you have right now is Chuck Grassley’s word. His opinion and yours, not facts. Yes, they absolutely are facts. With or without the letter, those facts stated above are indisputable facts from way back. We all know that part now. It's out. You can argue the letter, but you can not argue what we all now know. It's been revealed and admitted. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 21:39:18 GMT
The evidence was there. You said it wasn't. NOW you say... And then you revert back to... And history repeats. Republican claims of what is on the laptop and/or how it got there do not constitute evidence. Please allow the FBI to continue to do its work. This thread isn't about what's on the laptop. This thread is about they lied about it and covered it up. They were working in tandem with social media to silence people and news agencies from talking about the facts. They lied about it. The FBI. They lied and covered it up, UNTIL Biden got elected. The FBI. The same FBI that FORGED DOCUMENTS in order to get the judge to sign off on spying on the Trump campaign. Those are facts. s that the same Joe Biden you people claim has dementia, can’t put a sentence together on his own, and is being not-so-secretly controlled by Kamala Harris? He’s The Big Guy? Those have nothing to do with each other and neither one cancels the other one out. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 21:17:06 GMT
Not a bad idea. But, don't forget that you're the one that started thread to say the laptop was not real. Turns out it was.  I’m not sure what you mean by I “started thread to say laptop was not real.” ETA is this what you were talking about? 2peasrefugees.boards.net/thread/113640/imaginary-hunter-biden-scandalI guess there is a laptop. But the scandal still appears to be imaginary. The laptop story is nothing like that utter nonsense the Republicans started out with. Once again, let’s follow the evidence. The evidence was there. You said it wasn't. NOW you say... I guess there is a laptop. And then you revert back to... But the scandal still appears to be imaginary. And history repeats. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 20:03:56 GMT
pixiechick um. Catherine Herridge is not reporting that it happened. Catherine Herridge is reporting that Chuck Grassley has made an allegation to that effect. Republican politicians are very free with allegations that have no basis in fact. As always … I will wait for the actual evidence. Not a bad idea. But, don't forget that you're the one that started thread to say the laptop was not real. Turns out it was. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 19:28:53 GMT
I didn't say it was for the Biden ADMINISTRATION. What are you basing that on? Of course I have interest in good faith discussion. Okay, so in re-reading your posts, I think what you've been trying to say is that you believe the FBI lied (I assume to the media) about the Hunter investigation having validity, and that there was one specific agent that was actively trying to miscategorize the investigation as disinformation. And separately, you believe the Biden administration has been trying to cover up that there's an active investigation, as well as trying to force the media to not cover it. Is that an accurate assessment of your beliefs? As for why I don't believe you have an interest in good faith discussion. There are multiple posts in here that point out the logical fallacies in the Grassley letter (and thereby, your beliefs, if I understand them correctly). You intentionally cherry-pick around those observations in your responses. I'll specifically point out the response by onelasttime that includes The Hill article as an example of this. You also have a history of doing this act of posting a far-right theory, refusing to discuss counterpoints, and eventually abandoning the thread until you find your next far-right theory to spin. Past performance indicates future behavior. I have no reason to believe you want good faith discussion because your past performances have not been in good faith. Attempting to clarify your positions, for the sake of the people who want to try to discuss this with you, is the most good faith and energy that I care to expend on a debate with you at this time. I'm just one person, whereas how many people am I responding to? I don't have as much time as all of those people combined. To expect that I should is absurd. I've answered and responded to 20 something questions, deflections and allegations. Some that are nothing more than meant to dismiss or silence facts they don't like. I strongly suspect that YOU cherry picked for no other reason than some of the other insults, deflections and allegations. But that would take it into the tangent that you meant to take it to, so we'll just put that aside and proceed in a "good faith discussion" that you are claiming that you're interested in. Let's look at the one you're miffed about because I "didn't answer" your friend. I actually did answer her. I responded to her statement that she stated as fact, "You’re miffed because not more people are taking this seriously." with a correction of her "fact". For her to say that as fact is, by your standards, "not a good faith argument". Right off the get go. From the very first sentence. So no, I didn't take the rest of her argument in good faith. But you did. So in a "good faith" attempt to understand, what do you think in that article makes it okay that the FBI, despite evidence to the contrary put out the actual disinformation that the laptop was "nothing more than Russian disinformation"? Or what do you think in that article makes it okay that the FBI, despite evidence to the contrary, attempted to close the case very early, in such a way as to go against what was required of them in order to do so and to attempt to mark it in such a way that it wouldn't be able to be opened back up? What in that article makes any of that okay? Okay, so in re-reading your posts, I think what you've been trying to say is that you believe the FBI lied (I assume to the media) about the Hunter investigation having validity, and that there was one specific agent that was actively trying to miscategorize the investigation as disinformation. And separately, you believe the Biden administration has been trying to cover up that there's an active investigation, as well as trying to force the media to not cover it. Is that an accurate assessment of your beliefs? Not just me. Catherine Herridge of CBS news is reporting it, for one. As I said to onelasttime, Because they lied about it and covered it up. They were working in tandem with social media to silence people and news agencies from talking about the facts. Because they lied about it. The FBI. They lied and covered it up, UNTIL Biden got elected. The FBI. The same FBI that FORGED DOCUMENTS in order to get the judge to sign off on spying on the Trump campaign. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 4:21:29 GMT
So I read "the letter in the OP", and every single one of the dates mentioned is prior to the election in November 2020. If the FBI was covering for Hunter, it certainly wasn't on behalf of the Biden administration, because there was no Biden administration at that point. I have a long theory behind why certain actions were taken, but since OP has expressed exactly zero interest in good faith discussion, I'm not going to waste my time writing it out. I didn't say it was for the Biden ADMINISTRATION. but since OP has expressed exactly zero interest in good faith discussion, What are you basing that on? Of course I have interest in good faith discussion. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 3:31:21 GMT
For a group that hates deflection so much, y'all sure do it a lot.  |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 3:06:36 GMT
In the red, Jen Psaki. I may have conflated 2 different instances of government abuse of power though. It would seem, in the Hunter Biden issue, that news outlets and social media got their marching orders from the FBI. Not the White House. That would come later in the Biden White House. I don’t know where you’re getting your news (obviously not anywhere mainstream, with actual journalistic standards) but the FBI does not give marching orders to news media or social media on what they can say or allow to be said on their platforms. Neither does the White House, whether it’s in Democratic or Republican hands. There’s this little thing called the 1st amendment. I’m sure you’ve heard of it. (Government officials may occasionally ASK media to sit on a story for a little while for law enforcement or national security reasons. That is not the same thing as giving “marching orders” to the press.) You're probably right "marching orders" was the wrong phrase. Still doesn't erase the abuse of power, considering the evidence that contradicted their statement of "Russian disinformation". |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 2:34:48 GMT
No. Because they lied about it and covered it up. They were working in tandem with social media to silence people and news agencies from talking about the facts. Because they lied about it. The FBI. The White House was working WITH social media to squash a free press and to keep people from knowing the facts of the case. They lied and covered it up, until Biden got elected. The FBI. The same FBI that FORGED DOCUMENTS in order to get the judge to sign off on spying on the Trump campaign. Where are you getting this? Can you site any credible source? Otherwise, it frankly sounds bonkers-level paranoid. In the red, Jen Psaki. I may have conflated 2 different instances of government abuse of power though. It would seem, in the Hunter Biden issue, that news outlets and social media got their marching orders from the FBI. Not the White House. That would come later in the Biden White House. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 13, 2022 2:32:56 GMT
If you could at least acknowledge what’s happening with Trump and classified documents or the millions that Trump and his family made off his presidency, I might take you a little more seriously.  I've done that before and you've already shown that nothing will ever be enough for you. This is just your weird attempt at a bizarre power trip. I’m confused. Who lied about it and covered it up? I follow news pretty closely and I have not seen this. Did you not read the letter on the OP? Wait, isn't Hunter already being investigated? I think he is currently under investigation. "The significant number and consistency of the allegations substantiate their credibility and necessitate this letter." You should read the letter. Among other things, despite all of the "reporting being verified and verifiable via criminal search warrants" it was labeled Russian disinformation and ordered closed almost as soon as they got it. It was also closed without a valid reason as required and "attempted to be marked in such a way that it could not be opened again". |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 12, 2022 21:05:58 GMT
You’re miffed because not more people are taking this seriously. No. Because they lied about it and covered it up. They were working in tandem with social media to silence people and news agencies from talking about the facts. Because they lied about it. The FBI. The White House was working WITH social media to squash a free press and to keep people from knowing the facts of the case. They lied and covered it up, until Biden got elected. The FBI. The same FBI that FORGED DOCUMENTS in order to get the judge to sign off on spying on the Trump campaign. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 12, 2022 20:13:54 GMT
Hmm... still complaining about Hunter but nothing on Trump keeping documents regarding nuclear weapons and under investigation for espionage? Even Fox is talking about the classified documents. Lots of excuses but they’re not just ignoring it. So? I haven't weighed in on it Trump yet. So what? By your own standards, you haven't weighed in on covering for Biden except to deflect and excuse. That's a no no according to you. According to you that's defending. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 12, 2022 19:30:04 GMT
Wait, so the entire "evidence" for this supposed lie and cover-up rests in a grandstanding letter from CHUCK GRASSLEY???  CBS reporting that the letter exists is not the same thing as CBS independently confirming the letter's allegations. Has anyone done that? If not, GTFO. Chuck Grassley is about the furthest thing from a credible source you can imagine, if only because he can't remember what he had for breakfast yesterday. He's probably confusing the Hunter Biden thing with something that happened during the Reagan administration. No, it was right there in front of us all. FFS we discussed it here. The back and forth about the "imaginary laptop" "that didn't actually exist". Turns out, oh, Biden got elected, so NOW they can admit it DOES exist. Something people already knew. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 12, 2022 19:25:20 GMT
And how many people working on former's campaign and in his administration and friends/former friends, did former issue pardons. BTW: prosecuted by his DOJ. They had four years and nothing about Hunter. No, they didn't have 4 years. The laptop only surfaced at the very end of 2019. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 12, 2022 18:43:45 GMT
Because they downplayed it and outright lied about it being Russian disinformation during the campaign. They knew it wasn't at the time, but they pushed that lie until AFTER the election. THEN they admitted that yes, it was real, not Russian disinformation. There's been a poll since then that said a significant amount of Biden voters wouldn't have voted for Biden had they known the truth at the time. Because Hunter's business partner HAS testified that Hunter WAS making money from his dad's position as VP. That's why it's a problem. And vice versa. So why is it a problem for Hunter to make money from his relationship with his dad but it’s ok for the Trump kids to do that and much worse, while also working in the administration (nepotism, anyone?)? The Saudi’s just “invested” 2B with Jared and ivanka, and also paid trump who knows how much to have golf events at his courses. So why is Hunter an issue for you? Because they lied about it and covered it up. They were working in tandem with social media to silence people and news agencies from talking about the facts. Because they lied about it. The FBI. The White House was working WITH social media to squash a free press and to keep people from knowing the facts of the case. They lied and covered it up, until Biden got elected. The FBI. The same FBI that FORGED DOCUMENTS in order to get the judge to sign off on spying on the Trump campaign. If the Trump kids did anything illegal they need to be investigated and face the consequences too. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 12, 2022 7:32:11 GMT
What is the obsession with Hunter Biden about? He isn’t in the administration or working for the administration or making money while they are working in their dad’s administration. If I was doing something wrong, I would do everything I could to avoid talking about it, including talking about other people doing what I was doing. For example, if I knew that my dear leader’s kids did all of the above, The last thing I would be doing is whining about Hunter Biden’s laptop. Or, if I had ranted and raved about the protection of classified information on a private email server, I wouldn’t have used burner phones, ripped up, flushed, and otherwise destroyed classified documents. And I sure wouldn’t be saying “defund the FBI” after tearing down the idea of defunding the police. Or I wouldn’t be contradicting everything that I said over the last five years to spin my party in a different way. But republicans are allergic to irony and immune to hypocrisy. There is a special kind of personality flaw with them. Eta that if he did something wrong, I am fine with him being investigated. But I don’t think that what he may or may not have done is as consequential as what the Trumps did during his presidency. And I think they should have had some consequences. And again, I think it is hypocritical for people to constantly bring up Hunter Biden while ignoring the rest. What is the obsession with Hunter Biden about? He isn’t in the administration or working for the administration or making money while they are working in their dad’s administration. Because they downplayed it and outright lied about it being Russian disinformation during the campaign. They knew it wasn't at the time, but they pushed that lie until AFTER the election. THEN they admitted that yes, it was real, not Russian disinformation. There's been a poll since then that said a significant amount of Biden voters wouldn't have voted for Biden had they known the truth at the time. Because Hunter's business partner HAS testified that Hunter WAS making money from his dad's position as VP. That's why it's a problem. And again, I think it is hypocritical for people to constantly bring up Hunter Biden while ignoring the rest. And vice versa. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 11, 2022 4:06:56 GMT
Have at it. Given all of the other breaking news this week (Trump pleading the 5th today after saying only guilty people plead the 5th, Republican leaders stoking violence, Republican lawmakers in PA served with subpoenas, the FBI taking Scott Perry’s phone etc) I don’t think anyone is really interested in talking about Hunter Biden. I already said that. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 11, 2022 3:36:55 GMT
When I posted, I don’t think we had the full details of the search warrant. I was referring to other bad news for Trump lately (pictures of him flushing documents, judge ordered him to turn over taxes, scheduled to give a deposition in the civil case etc, more information about his relationship with his generals, he didn’t want injured soldiers marching in his parade, he wanted his generals to be like the Nazi generals etc) and good news for Biden and the Democrats. Did CBS report anything other than Chuck Grassley’s letters? His letters were dated at the end of May and July. The FBI director was interviewed, but there’s nothing new here. It's never been discussed here, so anything discussed about it is new here. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 11, 2022 1:41:14 GMT
And since it was said that it wasn't covered by any major news outlets, I think CBS still counts as a major news outlet...
|
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 11, 2022 1:17:18 GMT
FFS I didn't post this to take eyes away from Trump. I had no idea about Trump when I hit post. And with such a bombshell on Trump I don't think anything short of UFO's and alien invasion would have taken the focus off Trump. Certainly not here anyway.
I also don't think someone being questioned 4 days ago regarding this qualifies as old news, but you do you.
I had just found out about this. I never would have posted it if I knew about the raid because I would have known that would be the accusation.
|
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Aug 9, 2022 0:28:49 GMT
I've definitely noticed a lot of stores and restaurants closed early and some places not open at all because they're short staffed. One day my husband went through the drive through and Arby's was out of meat! Isn't the tagline on their commercials Arby's, we have THE MEAT! Not part of the poll, but do you think this is the new normal? We are moving away from expanded hours to limited hours of operation for most places? As a night owl, I love stuff that I can do at night and will miss it if it goes away. Could be. On a similar note, I went back to my home town and the mall was basically empty. It was open but not many stores or food court counters at all, then I saw a reel online with someone else showing their mall in the same condition. I wonder how much covid and online shopping is going to impact the brick and mortar stores in the long run? |
|
