|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 17:37:52 GMT
That's a link to your recent posts. Please send me a link (or more) calling out Biden's mental decline by some reputable source or two.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 17:22:36 GMT
Then you have this from Ted Cruz… He said it wasn't violence. It wasn't. Was it right? No. But it wasn't violence.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 17:10:59 GMT
Disagreeing with you and backing up my statements is frothing? As soon as you bring out the personal attacks, you know you have nothing left to refute what I'm saying. As soon as you’re willing to admit that you couldn’t care less about Trump’s obvious disabilities, while trying to convince us that Biden’s perceived issues are disqualifying, I will lose interest in what you refer to as “personal attacks.” Trump needing two hands to lift a glass of water to his mouth, That's physical, not mental.and a general to hold his arm as they walked slowly down a very slightly sloped ramp, which he later described as “running.” Also physical, not mental.Let’s hear your mockery of the time he got off AF1 and then walked right past the car that was waiting for him with open door at the foot of the stairs and wandered off aimlessly. Secret Service had to go get him and redirect him to the car. Could be mental.How about that time he wouldn’t let go of French President Macron’s hand for pretty much forever? Awkwardly trying to be personable. That's something I wouldn't be surprised to see from him no matter his age.
I've seen nothing from Trump that would compare to what we've seen from Biden in the last year and half. If there is actually anything I wouldn't automatically dismiss it and trash someone for pointing it out. And as for the here and now, it's Biden running the country, not Trump.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 17:03:36 GMT
I've shown enough examples by now for you to realize what a dumb question Please link again. I missed them. link
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 17:01:56 GMT
I've shown enough examples by now for you to realize what a dumb question that is. And noticing that the president may not really be capable of running a country at this point is not indecent in the slightest. That's a national security threat. That’s what we were saying all those years of Trump. You took us seriously, right? Right? When you had a point I did.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 17:01:03 GMT
The difference is I wasn't here dismissing it and bashing anyone who brought any of that up. I'll point out whatever I want to about Biden. And we will continue to not take you seriously. Because honestly, it has nothing to do with his condition and everything to do with your frothing about politics. Disagreeing with you and backing up my statements is frothing? As soon as you bring out the personal attacks, you know you have nothing left to refute what I'm saying.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 16:57:05 GMT
"He's divisive. He's pitting part of the country against the other part." Rich coming from someone who adored the president who has been the most divisive president in my adult lifetime. Thanks for the laugh. I needed that today. Link one single post where I've adored the man. Just one. I'll wait.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 16:56:11 GMT
Yes! That's what people are saying. And he's visibly mentally declining as he does. Which affects his ability to run a country. Biden's policies suck. His execution sucks. His care for Americans suck. He's divisive. He's pitting part of the country against the other part. Nope He may be PHYSICALLY declining. Where do you get "mentally declining"? Oh, right out of your hindquarters.
I'll leave your observations of Biden alone as you're showing your true colors and those w/common decency can see them brightly.
Thanks.
I've shown enough examples by now for you to realize what a dumb question that is. And noticing that the president may not really be capable of running a country at this point is not indecent in the slightest. That's a national security threat.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 16:52:42 GMT
It's not normal for him. Really. Find anything from even 5 years ago that aligns with this type of standing in a trance like that with his arms in such an unnatural position. Anything similar. Please link us to your previous derogatory comments on Trump needing two hands to lift a glass of water to his mouth, and a general to hold his arm as they walked slowly down a very slightly sloped ramp, which he later described as “running.” Let’s hear your mockery of the time he got off AF1 and then walked right past the car that was waiting for him with open door at the foot of the stairs and wandered off aimlessly. Secret Service had to go get him and redirect him to the car. How about that time he wouldn’t let go of French President Macron’s hand for pretty much forever? No? Then please don’t go around cherry-picking Biden’s minor weirdnesses. The difference is I wasn't here dismissing it and bashing anyone who brought any of that up. I'll point out whatever I want to about Biden.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 16:19:15 GMT
It's not normal for him. Really. Find anything from even 5 years ago that aligns with this type of standing in a trance like that with his arms in such an unnatural position. Anything similar. Of course not. He's aging - like all of us. Was TFG's shuffling and two-handed drinking "normal for him"?
Yes! That's what people are saying. And he's visibly mentally declining as he does. Which affects his ability to run a country. The key is Biden's policies and his execution and his care for Americans. Biden's policies suck. His execution sucks. His care for Americans suck. He's divisive. He's pitting part of the country against the other part.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 16:01:57 GMT
Find anything from even 5 years ago that aligns with this type of standing in a trance like that with his arms in such an unnatural position. I did not have my condition 5 years ago. You look completely normal there. Joe Biden does not. Would it have been normal if instead of trying to hold my hands open, I had clenched them? I uncomfortable with you judging me too. I think you are completely weird for focusing on how he physically presented himself. I think you ought to have focused on his words and up until now his actions. And before I get criticized, I've never made a comment about Trump's physical appearance either. And we've seen many times him looking angry, upset, or tired. I just don't read too much into that stuff because I cannot imagine the kind of pressure that a president must be under. I did not judge you, in fact I specifically said, I wouldn't think twice about your picture, other than that picture caught your fingers mid fidget or something. I don't think it's weird at all to notice such a completely unnatural stance and seeming trance Biden was in. Trump (or anyone) looking tired, angry or upset is worlds apart from what Biden did there. I did not have my condition 5 years ago. Again your fingers and Biden's truly bizarre stance are not even in the same galaxy.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 15:32:11 GMT
I just want to say something about the fist clenching. Because it hit me hard when some have tried to imply it's not normal. I have a condition called tardive dyskinesia. Right now, it primarily affects my hands. I have involuntary movement in my hands. It's not so bad when my hands are actually moving like when I crochet or type on a keyboard. But when I sit still, I have the worst time with it. And controlling it means that my hands often look clenched or unnaturally posed. I posted this picture of me on my Facebook wall and I actually had a friend joke with me that I was making gang signs with my hands. I knew my friend was just joking with me but he didn't know about my condition. And I stopped to wonder how many other people may have judged me. I even posted the pic on this board. No one said anything to me here but maybe they assumed something nefarious. All because I am trying hard to control my hands. People with Parkinson's do the very same thing. I throw this out there because a lot of people have issues like this. And really our physical state might be affected but our mental States are not. There's a HUGE difference between your bent fingers and Joe Biden's completely unnatural stance and trance like moment. I wouldn't think twice about your picture, other than that picture caught your fingers mid fidget or something. A fleeting thought and then gone. You look completely normal there. Joe Biden does not.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 15:26:55 GMT
And this is NOT normal... It's normal for some people - depending on their physical situation. I'm much more concerned about WHAT HE SAYS and HOW HE MANAGES he executive office than HOW HE STANDS. PS - These weren't "normal" either - the 19 second handshake w/the Japanese PM, the odd 2-handed cup drinking, the shuffling down the ramp - to mention only a few of TFG's weirdities. Did you comment on those too? Of course not. www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/01/trump-cog-decline/548759/The problem w/TFG wasn't his weirdities in moving it was HIS VITRIOL, HIS SCUMMY BEHAVIOR, HIS BRUTISHNESS. Hope that helps. It's not normal for him. Really. Find anything from even 5 years ago that aligns with this type of standing in a trance like that with his arms in such an unnatural position. Anything similar.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 12:56:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 12:25:28 GMT
I wonder what the chances are of a vaccinated person, hacking into their hand and then immediately shaking hands with others, and vaccinated people attending a crowded event, unmasked and cheek to cheek with many others unmasked, contribute to the spread? Well, it could happen, I guess. The vaccinated people that I know are not shaking hands-at all. And they are avoiding crowded venues. But hey, sure; it could happen. Saw the president do exactly that. Then saw him with a crowd of strangers none of them masked, including him. Watched him lean in cheek to cheek with people talking to them. Watched him unintentionally spit on a woman while talking to her. Twice.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 12:24:58 GMT
It has been well documented that at least 90% of covid patients in the hospital are unvaccinated. And that the majority of those testing positive are unvaccinated. Yes vaccinated people can spread it but these numbers show that it is more widespread in unvaccinated people. Unvaccinated people have the right to not be vaccinated. But there may be consequences as far as keeping a job or going to certain stores/events/etc. This. I’m not sure why this is so hard to understand. No, the vaccine is not 100% protective. But the odds of a vaccinated person dying from Covid are significantly lower. Surely one can understand why vaccinated people, most of whom have been extremely careful since March of 2020, would not want to be around unvaccinated people? Especially since many of those vaccinated people are around young children, older people, or people with comorbidities-all of whom have higher risks for Covid. Let's say we reach 100% vaccinated. People will still be getting it and will still be spreading it. You are vaccinated, you will be okay. And that will still be the case even if not another single person gets vaccinated. Either way, you are protected as much as the vaccine will protect you. This: You aren't any more protected by the vaccine when you come in contact with someone who is vaccinated but has covid, than you are coming in contact with someone who has covid but is not vaccinated. You have the same protection either way.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 12:21:25 GMT
How many years did it take to discover that thalidomide produced birth defects? So no, people that don't want to risk subjecting their baby to something like that should NOT be deemed unfit for society. Thalidomide was a medication, not a vaccine. It was given as an example of medical treatment gone wrong. An example of using it for years thinking there was no issue, until they realized it actually had been causing major issues. Point being... it happens and people might not want to take that chance with their baby. They have that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. The vehicle for this vaccine has been in the works for decades. The only new ingredient is the virus. None of that guarantees there won't be major consequences to babies. There probably won't be. And yet, at this point that isn't a given.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 12:19:48 GMT
And you don't give a damn if you kill me or someone else with your Covid? Are you not vaccinated?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 12:18:55 GMT
Being forced to give birth when you have decided it's not what's best for you and/or the baby. Being forced to take a shot of antibodies that you already have in your body naturally, when you have decided it's not what's best for you or your baby. Yep. Valid analogy. is the person who would be harmed by you not giving birth or not getting a shot living inside one of your organs in both cases?
No?
Then not a valid analogy.
Definition of analogy 1a: a comparison of two otherwise unlike things based on resemblance of a particular aspect b: resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike : SIMILARITY Yep, my analogy fits that definition. link
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 27, 2021 3:32:55 GMT
There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice. Agree. And I'll point out to the PP that the Biden admin hasn't imposed universal vaccine mandates and won't. They have made vaccination a condition of certain employment opportunities. You know, like drug tests and other barriers to job entry imposed in the name of safety. Those who object are welcome to seek employment elsewhere. Problem with the anti-vaxxers is that they want to have their cake and eat it, too - they want to remain unvaccinated and force others to be endangered by their choices. But vaccination status is not an immutable characteristic. It's a choice. As such, the unvaccinated are not a protected class, and endangering others in public places and employment sites is not a right. The big, still as of yet, unanswered question is: if you can get vaccinated and still get or pass on covid, why are only the unvaccinated being blamed for getting or passing covid? That is what makes no sense to millions of people.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 27, 2021 3:31:09 GMT
If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice. There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. How many years did it take to discover that thalidomide produced birth defects? So no, people that don't want to risk subjecting their baby to something like that should NOT be deemed unfit for society.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 27, 2021 3:27:44 GMT
If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? Is the person you're going to give Covid to and kill living INSIDE OF YOU!?!?!?!??!
NO? ?
Then not a valid analogy.
Thanks for playing.
Being forced to give birth when you have decided it's not what's best for you and/or the baby. Being forced to take a shot of antibodies that you already have in your body naturally, when you have decided it's not what's best for you or your baby. Yep. Valid analogy.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 26, 2021 13:12:02 GMT
Absolutely vile.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 26, 2021 13:01:24 GMT
Because people want to decide for themselves what medicine to put into their body. That's not unreasonable. For instance, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother would like to be able to decide for herself what she's willing to subject her baby to without being removed from society for not being willing to be forced to inject herself and her baby with a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? She has that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. What happens when it's something YOU don't agree with and you are mandated to do it or be removed from society?Biden said he would not mandate the vaccine and then he did. He's been doing that a lot. I simply point to polio or smallpox as an example. Vaccines ERADICATED these diseases. Covid continues to be a problem in countries because people will not get vaccinated and C-19 is able to mutate and march on. While life isn't back to normal, the push for vaccination here shows that cases are going down. Because.....VACCINES WORK! Funny you should remark that (the bolded above). Is this not EXACTLY what is happening in Texas with abortion? The mental gymnastics to argue over vaccines because "it's MY BODY" yet the very same damn people want to mandate what happens over OTHER PEOPLE'S BODY! If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 26, 2021 12:24:57 GMT
And we the taxpayers paid to fly Obama back and forth to Hawaii. More costly than to Florida. And of course the times he and Michelle chose not to fly together. And it was defended here. So the objections now, ring hollow. Your objections to Biden’s mental acuity ring hollow after your silence and even defense of Trumps stupid, ignorant statements. And you absolutely defended former’s dangerous stupid suggestion to study the injection of bleach. Beyond trying to clarify exactly what he said, you never called out the danger and recklessness of his statement. Even when it was pointed out that the statistics showed more people were poisoned by bleach after his statement, you continued to defend it. Conservatives love whataboutisms except when they’re used on them. Your objections to Biden’s mental acuity ring hollow after your silence and even defense of Trumps stupid, ignorant statements. I never defended a single stupid or ignorant statement. If you seriously think I did, then link it. Don't give some vague summation of what you think I said, link the exact place I did. I did, however correct misinformation being spread here and backed it up with information from Left leaning sites. But aside from that, bringing up Trump doesn't actually hide the issue of Biden's mental decline like you think it does. And you absolutely defended former’s dangerous stupid suggestion to study the injection of bleach. Where? Link it. Even when it was pointed out that the statistics showed more people were poisoned by bleach after his statement, you continued to defend it. I corrected that misinformation being spread here and backed it up with information from Left leaning sites.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 24, 2021 13:59:18 GMT
More of former’s over the top stupid comments. From 2018, but still relevant because he hasn’t become smarter, more intelligent, more knowledgeable or better educated. www.cnn.com/2018/12/20/politics/trump-lines-of-the-year-the-point/index.html “The country is doing well in so many ways. But there’s such divisiveness.” What’s amazing here is that Trump seems entirely unaware of the role he has played in the country’s divisiveness. That’s not to say we weren’t divided before 2016 – we were – but it is to say that Trump exacerbated those divisions for political gain, and continues to do so. 29. “I hold both countries responsible. I think that the United States has been foolish. I think we’ve all been foolish. … And I think we’re all to blame.” This is a line that will live in infamy. Trump, asked directly, “Do you hold Russia at all accountable for anything in particular,” responded, with Russian president Vladimir Putin standing next ton him, with this there’s-plenty-of-blame-to-go-around response. It’s a stunning response to what should be a very straightforward answer: Yes, I believe our intelligence community and the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia actively meddled in the election to help me, hurt Hillary Clinton and sow chaos. It’s hard to properly contextualize what it means when the American President, standing beside the Russian President, says that he can’t say whether Putin or the US intelligence apparatus is to be believed. 41. “And when you’re talking about an atmosphere, oceans are very small. And it blows over and it sails over.” This is not The Onion. This is a real quote. On the “oceans are very small” point: Oceans cover roughly 70% of the Earth’s surface. You can keep listing things about Trump, it won't change the things going on with Biden. If you didn’t call out former’s endless ignorant, stupid, dangerous comments or worse, if you defended them, you don’t get to falsely claim there’s anything wrong with Biden’s mental acuity. That's not really how it works, but never the less, if he said or did something stupid or dangerous I never defended that. And the things I point out about Biden aren't false. Nothing that I've said that Biden has done or said is false.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 24, 2021 13:52:23 GMT
I just saw a major news outlet in Norway release a photo of Alec Baldwin. Supposedly a photo of him taken after he came out of a police station beung interviewed (which I am sure is standard procedure in a case like this). I have two thoughts about it: 1. He is absolutely devestated and crying in the picture. My heart breaks for him, and the trauma he will continue to live with after causing the death of a fellow himan being. 2. Why the fuck am I am seeing this photo? Who the hell is photographing someone in this situation? Who is buying them? Who is making the editorial decision to publish it? This should not be out there! Vultures! It was on the news outlet's front page, so I couldn't opt to not click on it. This is what comes to my mind too, I am devastated for him as well as the victim and her family. How will he ever recover from that? It's so awful for everyone involved.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 24, 2021 13:36:07 GMT
The list of former’s stupid, ignorant comments is a mile long. Here’s just a sampling. The strategy of Fox hosts and Republican supporters of former who remained silent for the last 4 years and are now falsely accusing President Biden of mental decline is unbelievable. Here’s just a sampling of former’s stupid, ignorant comments. www.politico.eu/article/peak-stupidity-donald-trump-ben-shapiro-edward-cocking/During his four chaotic years in power, barely a day went by without Trump saying something witless. In 2018, he declared Hurricane Florence, “One of the wettest we’ve ever seen, from the standpoint of water.” In 2019, he suggested that during the American Revolutionary War, Washington’s army had “taken over airports” — a full 128 years before the Wright brothers’ first flight. In a speech to the National Republican Congressional Committee that same year, he argued that “the noise [from windmills] gives you cancer.” Let’s not forget some of his stupid and even dangerous ideas His solution for forest fires in California was to rake the forests. He suggested that we should study injecting bleach and using UV rays to kill covid. How does any of that explain or fix or what? the current problem with Biden?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 24, 2021 13:24:14 GMT
There is nothing wrong with Biden’s mind. He spoke clearly and intelligently at the UN recently as well as at the CNN town hall meeting last week. The mental acuity of President Biden is something that Fox hosts and Republican supporters of former like to attack because he’s older and they’re looking for weaknesses to attack. If we’re going to disqualify people because of their age, there are many older sitting Republicans like Grassley. Unlike former who surrounded himself with his idiot children and other inexperienced people who’s only qualification was their loyalty to him, Biden selected a cabinet and White House staff full of intelligent, experienced qualified people. Here’s what Blinken had to say recently www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/09/22/republicans-attack-joe-biden-over-age-insult-boomer-voters/5802798001/All I can tell you is … the president very much speaks for himself.” Risch: “He does speak for himself but what happens when somebody doesn’t want him speaking?” Blinken: “Senator, I’m telling you based on my own experience with the president over the last 20 years, heh, anyone who tried to stop him from saying what he wanted to say, speaking his mind, would probably not be long for their job.” Even Republicans who met with Biden over the summer agree there’s nothing wrong with Biden’s mind. www.politico.com/news/2021/03/26/biden-health-republican-senators-477813“In the two meetings I was in with the president, he was as sharp as a tack,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) said in an interview. Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.), who joined Capito at a February meeting with Biden on Covid relief, said he didn’t see anything amiss: “I visited with him in the Oval Office, and he seemed well-prepared and well-briefed for the meeting.” From the first article The age-related conservative offensive reprises the blatant psychological projection of the Trump era: attributing his worst traits to someone else and weaponizing them. Trump set many hours aside to tweet and watch TV in the residence ("executive time”) and made nearly 300 trips to his own golf clubs and resorts. So Trump and his defenders claim Biden shirks his job and takes long vacations. Likewise, the attacks on Biden's capacities are rooted in the many questions about Trump's. The former president's disordered speech drew attention from experts who said it reflected cognitive decline. He himself has never stopped marveling at his “amazing” performance on a cognitive test in 2018 (best captured by comedian Sarah Cooper). Trump bragged about the test on the 2020 campaign trail and was still bragging in Texas this summer: “I aced it. And I’d like to see Biden ace it. He won’t ace it.” It’s a fact that Biden is the oldest newly inaugurated president we’ve ever had. But it’s also a fact that everyone has memory lapses, more often as they age, and that’s not the same as dementia. It's true as well that Biden occasionally goes awkwardly off script, or gets testy, or mangles sentences, but he has been doing all that for decades. And if you want to talk about mental acuity, let’s talk about former. General Miley was so concerned about former becoming unhinged that he had a conversation with Nancy Pelosi. Former was the threat to national security. His ignorance, stupidity, narcissism and temper were all threats to national security. He didn’t know that Great Britain was a nuclear power. Recently, he thought Thomas Jefferson helped write the US Constitution. Yes, he can speak clearly and intelligently for a while, but it's usually interspersed with rambling and things like forgetting words, concepts, people's names and that this is the Biden presidency, not the Harris presidency. And WTH was this during the town hall the other day? It's like he just froze and shut down for about 20 seconds with his arms bent at the elbow straight out and clenched fists while Anderson was asking him a question? You can keep denying it, but something is SO MAJORLY OFF with him, you won't be able to for much longer. Even those on his side and his supporters are noticing and commenting.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 24, 2021 12:49:19 GMT
Why yes it really is time to move on from all those insisting Trump really win or the elections were fraudulent. Since that’s not happening though, the dangers of what happened Jan 6th haven't passed, and shouldn’t be overlooked. Disappointing Sec Rice. You're right, the whole idea that Trump really won is rancid and anyone who really thinks that needs to move on. Condoleezza Rice wasn't saying that January 6th needs to be overlooked or forgotten. She said that it's needs to be investigated, but while that is happening we need to be dealing with issues that are pressing down on our country.
|
|