huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,990
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Sept 29, 2023 16:52:54 GMT
I firmly believe rote memorization is good for kids.
I believe we need to go back to diagramming sentences.
I believe we need to teach cursive.
It isn't about being able to look up answers on the phone or the computer. It is about being able to recall information and building connections in the brain,
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Sept 29, 2023 16:56:12 GMT
I teach two areas of statutory law, and knowing how to diagram sentences is something pretty fundamental for what I teach -- my students actually do generally seem to know how to do so, however.
I haven't written in cursive since I left high school 30+ years ago, and I write a lot.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,942
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Sept 29, 2023 17:04:57 GMT
I'm a boomer myself, but heck no to the diagraming of sentences. lol My strong skill was math, not language. I know the basic of verbs, nouns, pronouns, prepositions, etc, but what is the point of drawing all these little lines from word to word? I still don't get it. I have never used that in my life.
But memorization is excellent! Go back to the Jack and Jill books where it was repetition. Jack went up the hill, Jill went up the hill, Jill fell down the hill, Janck fell down the hill. lol
I also think cursive wouldn't be good as well. My grandson was one that was not taught and struggles through reading things that are in cursive. He prints his signature, which is okay, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by katiekaty on Sept 29, 2023 17:10:31 GMT
Definitely need to teach cursive and rote memorization and memory tricks. Ned to teach manual library skills, observation of real life nd recall skills, need to visit museums and zoos in person, need to picnic and experience and explore more outdoor science activity, and blend all that with computer experience.And teach the value of meaningful tv-watch purpose movies such as classics and thoughtful, movies with some current and past historical events.
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,990
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Sept 29, 2023 17:11:19 GMT
Lots of our documents are written in cursive. It would be sad if citizens of this country can't read them unless they are printed for them. Cursive is an art.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Sept 29, 2023 17:26:54 GMT
Definitely need to teach cursive and rote memorization and memory tricks. Ned to teach manual library skills, observation of real life nd recall skills, need to visit museums and zoos in person, need to picnic and experience and explore more outdoor science activity, and blend all that with computer experience.And teach the value of meaningful tv-watch purpose movies such as classics and thoughtful, movies with some current and past historical events. I have read this several times and I don't understand what you're trying to say about TV. I consider myself a reasonably intelligent person who survives pretty well in this world without tv. Now maybe I misunderstood and you are trying to argue for intellectual TV. And in that case, again I'd argue that TV is not the preferred way to promote intellectualism either.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Sept 29, 2023 17:32:14 GMT
I think there shouldn't be a one-size fits all approach to education. Students are individuals with different abilities and different styles of learning.
Being able to read cursive is useful. Being able to write cursive -is useful to some but not all. I never learnt and manage just fine. My kids did learn but only one of them uses it regularly - the other two have dysgraphia and prefer typing.
Rote memorisation can be a useful skill but not everyone's brain is able to memorise that way. Understanding the material is most important - formulas can be looked up, so can lines of poetry, and calculators are on everyone's phone.
Diagramming sentences - I actually taught all three of my kids this (I homeschooled them all for part of their education). One loved it because they understood how the words went together in a diagram (but had the hardest time with naming the actual parts of speech), one hated it because they didn't see the point since they wrote well anyway (and then found it useful when learning a foreign language - in that they knew the parts of speech and how they worked and could apply that), and one needed an alternate method of diagramming to grasp any of it but learnt enough to get by. Again two of mine have dysgraphia.
As for learning to read with memorisation of sight words - again, that works well for some kids. Phonics works well for other kids. A mix is probably best for most kids. One of mine learnt to read at school using sight words. One of mine I taught to read using phonics and limited sight words. One of mine was taught using phonics and limited sight words at school, did pull out learning for extra phonics help even into 4th grade, and ended up learning to read silently yet continues to struggle with reading out loud. Phonics and phonemes simply never did click nor did sounding words out. ALL three are strong readers who love to read.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Sept 29, 2023 17:36:10 GMT
Definitely need to teach cursive and rote memorization and memory tricks. Ned to teach manual library skills, observation of real life nd recall skills, need to visit museums and zoos in person, need to picnic and experience and explore more outdoor science activity, and blend all that with computer experience.And teach the value of meaningful tv-watch purpose movies such as classics and thoughtful, movies with some current and past historical events. I have read this several times and I don't understand what you're trying to say about TV. I consider myself a reasonably intelligent person who survives pretty well in this world without tv. Now maybe I misunderstood and you are trying to argue for intellectual TV. And in that case, again I'd argue that TV is not the preferred way to promote intellectualism either. I think she is suggesting meaningful/educational TV as a better option than mindless TV drivel. If so - I do agree that IF children are watching TV, quality programming is better as is discussing what is watched. I used documentaries and historical fiction series/movies when homeschooling as one of my tools. BUT as someone who rarely watches TV or movies myself - I watch the Star Wars shows with my family but would survive just fine with no TV (and have in the past), I certainly don't think TV is required for learning/education.
|
|
|
Post by katlady on Sept 29, 2023 18:13:01 GMT
Lots of our documents are written in cursive. It would be sad if citizens of this country can't read them unless they are printed for them. Cursive is an art. I learned cursive. Even so, have a hard time reading documents written 100 years ago. Cursive has changed. Even when I was a kid, my mom would complain about how we weren’t learning proper penmanship and our cursive was “ugly”. 😂 She has that beautiful flowing cursive. Today, my writing is a combination of cursive and print. It is true, it is an art that is slowly changing/dying. And like my mom, I think my boys handwriting is awful. 😂
|
|
breetheflea
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,894
Location: PNW
Jul 20, 2014 21:57:23 GMT
|
Post by breetheflea on Sept 29, 2023 18:15:03 GMT
I think some memorization is useful. My DS (10) had the worst time learning to read, and his spelling is... interesting. His teacher last year gave spelling tests, but most of the elementary teachers don't do that anymore. I was in the room while DS did online school from the 2nd half of kindergarten-second grade, and I did not understand how learning what a schwa is, helped anything in regard to reading, and more reading rhyming words and such and not circling all the schwas on a page would have been more useful... I can't diagram a sentence (never taught.) On the other hand I can spell (thanks to spelling tests up to 8th grade), and still know my multiplication tables up to 12 times 12 Also, I learned cursive in 3rd grade, and if I scrapbook in cursive 3/4 of my kids can't read it
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Sept 29, 2023 18:18:53 GMT
I have such mixed feelings on some of this stuff. Our elementary curriculum is too advanced these days. No one has time to teach cursive except to accelerated learners.
Kids have to learn technical skills that we never did. We’re expected to make every one of them ready for college. If there isn’t enough time and we start adding more stuff to the curriculum, the first thing that always gets cut is the arts. And you know what we do in music class? A fair amount of rote memorization, and looking for patterns and learning rules for expression (like grammar). That’s in addition to the SEL skills and history/geography embedded in many lessons. Is it worth getting rid of all that to make room for cursive?
|
|
jill8909
Junior Member
Posts: 59
May 17, 2018 11:46:02 GMT
|
Post by jill8909 on Sept 29, 2023 18:30:51 GMT
I'm old and can't think of a single reason to teach cursive.
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Sept 29, 2023 18:48:52 GMT
I think that education should be left to educators!!!
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Sept 29, 2023 18:50:05 GMT
I firmly believe rote memorization is good for kids. I believe we need to go back to diagramming sentences. I believe we need to teach cursive. It isn't about being able to look up answers on the phone or the computer. It is about being able to recall information and building connections in the brain, No disagreement from me. Those multiplication tables that I memorized many years ago come in handy. And that is just one example. Diagramming sentences really taught me to understand sentence structure.
|
|
|
Post by belgravia on Sept 29, 2023 19:05:41 GMT
We sent our daughter to private school partly for these reasons. She learned cursive in Grade 1. Multiplication tables, Latin, French, public speaking, were all taught. She is currently pursuing a bilingual (English & French) degree in Chemical Engineering. She credits her university success and chosen career path to her traditional education.
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,990
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Sept 29, 2023 19:06:48 GMT
Lots of our documents are written in cursive. It would be sad if citizens of this country can't read them unless they are printed for them. Cursive is an art. I learned cursive. Even so, have a hard time reading documents written 100 years ago. Cursive has changed. Even when I was a kid, my mom would complain about how we weren’t learning proper penmanship and our cursive was “ugly”. 😂 She has that beautiful flowing cursive. Today, my writing is a combination of cursive and print. It is true, it is an art that is slowly changing/dying. And like my mom, I think my boys handwriting is awful. 😂 I agree. My cursive is hybrid. My dad's handwriting was beautiful. He was a minister and he would fill out certificates for things. They looked professional because they were so well written.
|
|
|
Post by chances on Sept 29, 2023 19:28:19 GMT
I think those can be some of a set of various tools. I think too many people were left behind in school because they weren't able to learn the "right way". There are multiple ways to learn something. I hope that there are more options now. Although with ever more required of teachers and fewer resources, I don't know how they manage.
|
|
|
Post by nine on Sept 29, 2023 19:33:53 GMT
Yep, I agree. Everyone should kmow their times tables by heart. Diagraming sentences?…if it leads to better grammar, then I’m all for it. I crings every time I hear someone say ‘I seen…’ or double negatives…my boomer background says that person is under-educated.
|
|
|
Post by nine on Sept 29, 2023 19:34:08 GMT
Yep, I agree. Everyone should kmow their times tables by heart. Diagraming sentences?…if it leads to better grammar, then I’m all for it. I crings every time I hear someone say ‘I seen…’ or double negatives…my boomer background says that person is under-educated.
|
|
RedSquirrelUK
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,732
Location: The UK's beautiful West Country
Aug 2, 2014 13:03:45 GMT
|
Post by RedSquirrelUK on Sept 29, 2023 19:35:09 GMT
I teach two areas of statutory law, and knowing how to diagram sentences is something pretty fundamental for what I teach -- my students actually do generally seem to know how to do so, however. I haven't written in cursive since I left high school 30+ years ago, and I write a lot. Do you write in print then? Isn't that much slower? I left school 30+ years ago too, and I still write in cursive. I only write in print for little children, and it takes me some concentration. I suppose it's what you get used to.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Sept 29, 2023 19:38:07 GMT
I have such mixed feelings on some of this stuff. Our elementary curriculum is too advanced these days. No one has time to teach cursive except to accelerated learners. Kids have to learn technical skills that we never did. We’re expected to make every one of them ready for college. If there isn’t enough time and we start adding more stuff to the curriculum, the first thing that always gets cut is the arts. And you know what we do in music class? A fair amount of rote memorization, and looking for patterns and learning rules for expression (like grammar). That’s in addition to the SEL skills and history/geography embedded in many lessons. Is it worth getting rid of all that to make room for cursive? I agree with you about having mixed feelings. My kid did have a stint with cursive in 3rd grade so she kind of uses it, kind of not. In spite of being a truly amazing artist, her hybrid handwriting is horrific, LOL. I also agree that they need to know how to function in a computer literate society. The more I think about it, the more I think that kids should be required to be in school longer, either more days in a year or more years in total, simply because there is so much more that they need to know now and there just aren’t enough hours in a day or days in a year to teach it. I think having a strong foundation in the arts helps all students to be more creative and to think in more abstract ways in all their other subjects. Kids really do suffer when those programs are cut. I believe that learning to be able to quickly and accurately memorize things in my early school years helped me a LOT in high school and college, as did learning how to take good notes. I aced so many history classes all the way up through college art history (which was HARD) because I had the capacity to take great notes and memorize critical information from those notes. Manually writing things down really helps to cement information in my brain. As a side point, writing in cursive is much faster which makes it better for taking notes on the fly during lectures in class.
|
|
|
Post by malibou on Sept 29, 2023 20:13:50 GMT
The only time I wished I could better diagram a sentence was when I went to language school for the Army. It was clear who had learned this and who didn't.
I also didn't learn cursive because I moved from a school where we had just started to one where it had been completed the year before. I did worksheets for cursive when ds was in 3rd grade. I turned them in and they were graded. I got a B! The teacher teased me about being ridiculously slow and she didn't see where I would get enough practise to speed up unless I pushed myself, which I did not.
Memorization is my jam, but can't say I did it much in school, or perhaps I don't remember, but it has always come easy for me.
|
|
|
Post by busy on Sept 29, 2023 20:23:36 GMT
Agree to disagree.
I don’t think any of the things you listed are an essential part of a modern education.
We had to memorize a lot of stuff when I was in school. I don’t remember any of that anymore. I do remember the things I *learned* and understood on a deeper level.
Cursive - whatever. I learned it. My handwriting is a hybrid mishmash now. I don’t think it’s a great value.
Diagramming sentences - understanding grammar and parts of speech is important. I think there are multiple routes to learning them. Most people I know actually learned English grammar the best when they took foreign languages.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Sept 29, 2023 20:40:02 GMT
My written words are mixed cursive and printed. I can write very neatly, but notes, shopping lists are sloppy.
My mother's writing was good. Her parents not so good. We're talking long ago for them. My grandmother's writing was so distinctive the banks cashed her checks even unsigned, 1930-1950s when everything was done by hand.
To this day when I receive something written from my cousins I know immediately who wrote which one, their mother was a teacher.
I enjoy looking at the old birth/death records and census records.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,521
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Sept 29, 2023 21:16:18 GMT
If kids are not taught cursive, how do they/will they sign their names on legal documents?
|
|
pantsonfire
Pearl Clutcher
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 4,761
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Sept 29, 2023 21:19:07 GMT
Lots of our documents are written in cursive. It would be sad if citizens of this country can't read them unless they are printed for them. Cursive is an art. My oldest never learned cursive. She can read it perfectly fine. Old documents, my moms, other person's cursive. She never has to write except a note in a cars. All college assignment are on the PC
|
|
pantsonfire
Pearl Clutcher
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 4,761
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Sept 29, 2023 21:19:55 GMT
If kids are not taught cursive, how do they/will they sign their names on legal documents? Print. Dd was never taught due to her disabilities and prints her name. Ds is allowed to put an X and he cant even write his name.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Sept 29, 2023 21:20:03 GMT
If kids are not taught cursive, how do they/will they sign their names on legal documents? probably the same way I do -in manuscript (print)...a signature is not required to be in cursive
|
|
|
Post by quietlycrafted on Sept 29, 2023 22:00:22 GMT
DD needed her passport renewed, but had to go in person since her first one was when she was a minor, and she’s 19 now. The post office employee handed back her printed signature and said it had to be in cursive. I thought he was joking, but he was serious. She only took a week or two of cursive in third grade, and hadn’t used it since. I had to write her name out on a scrap piece of paper, and then she tried her best to copy it on the document. Seemed silly to me since she never signs her name that way, but she needed her passport.
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on Sept 29, 2023 22:06:12 GMT
cursive.. even if you learn it, doesn't mean you can read old documents. we were transcribing my father in law's letters from ww2.. and even my husband.. at 73, had a hard time occasionally figuring out what was written.
my kids don't write cursive and I haven't used it since high school 50 yrs ago and we don't ever need it. I write faster printing and always have.. even my dad, who was born in 1926, never used cursive... used engineering printing. you could read anything he wrote.
memorization.. again not really needed.. keyboarding would be a better skill to be taught.
my kids excel in languages.. one kid took 8 yrs of russian, one kid took 4 yrs of mandarin, and one kid has completed a minor in classics (latin) and is majoring in japanese and none of them ever diagrammed a sentence. I didn't either.. I got out of going to one high school to go another because they taught a different kid of grammar.. no diagramming.
education has changed since 1900, since 2000 and thank goodness. there are many ways to learn.
|
|