~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876 
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 4:25:24 GMT
Well if so, then according to "theOtherMeg" you are a whore and it's perfectly ok to call you one. Sorry ladies, you'll just have to take your lumps. She's calling it as it is and you deserve whatever you are called. And because I'm sure she isn't sexist, she must also mean that if you are a married woman who has an affair, you are also a whore.
|
|
Nink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,947
Location: North Idaho
|
Post by Nink on Oct 12, 2016 4:31:42 GMT
If DH had an affair and the other woman knew he was married, I would have some strong names for both parties involved. If I was the "other woman" I don't imagine I'd be the least bit surprised if the mans wife called me that when she found out.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 4:33:54 GMT
Only the wife or are you ok with anyone calling you a "whore" under those circumstances?
We've had people come here admitting to having an affair (as either the married or the unmarried person). It would have been ok to call those people out as "whores"? Somehow, I don't think so. Had anyone done so, they would have been labeled "judgmental", "cruel", a "bully" or any other of a myriad of names.
I never cease to be amused by how people here twist morals to suit their own situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Oct 12, 2016 4:40:08 GMT
I've never had an affair. Never been tempted.
I have no issue with a woman whose husband cheated on her calling the other woman any damn thing she wants
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 4:42:15 GMT
Meanwhile, she stays with the cheater...you know, the one who made the vows to her. The one who broke the vows to her. the one who couldn't keep it in his pants.
But oh yeah, the woman who knew he was married is a whore.
|
|
Nink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,947
Location: North Idaho
|
Post by Nink on Oct 12, 2016 4:42:36 GMT
Since when do morals come into play when discussing an affair?
|
|
Nink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,947
Location: North Idaho
|
Post by Nink on Oct 12, 2016 4:43:38 GMT
Then there's the man who has cheated on multiple wives.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 4:45:31 GMT
Let's say that's true. It would seem then that Hillary lives in a glass house and should not be throwing stones at Trump about what he says in a locker room because she's said far worse things about the women abused by her husband. She is trying to take the moral high ground here when in reality, she's right in the swamp with Trump. Wouldn't you agree?
|
|
|
|
Post by miominmio on Oct 12, 2016 4:52:53 GMT
If I understand this: a woman isn't allowed to be pissed off at cheaters if she decides to work on her marriage?
|
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 12, 2016 4:59:26 GMT
Only the wife or are you ok with anyone calling you a "whore" under those circumstances? We've had people come here admitting to having an affair (as either the married or the unmarried person). It would have been ok to call those people out as "whores"? Somehow, I don't think so. Had anyone done so, they would have been labeled "judgmental", "cruel", a "bully" or any other of a myriad of names. I never cease to be amused by how people here twist morals to suit their own situation. And you have done it on this thread---twisting morals to suit your own agenda. It's okay for Donald to use his star status to sexually assault women, but not okay for a woman whose husband cheated on her to call the other woman a bimbo. He grabs pussy...she says bimbo. Yeah, they're the same. 🙄🙄🙄 |
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 4:59:38 GMT
Yes, if you can forgive the sleezeball you married then you have no business calling the other woman, who never made or broke a vow to you, names. Blame the other woman, forgive the scumbag husband....that is such bullshit. And it plays into the age old nonsense that the harlots lead the poor man astray and that he needs to be forgiven while she needs to be stoned.
|
|
|
|
Post by peatlejuice on Oct 12, 2016 5:00:18 GMT
I hereby give anyone (liberal or conservative but I know the liberals will get more joy out of it) to tell me to "get the hell off this thread" in any political thread between now and the election. These threads are a complete waste of my time and sometimes I forget how ridiculous they are. No one's mind is changed it's just the same-old, same-old "my candidate is great and yours sucks". I get annoyed with myself for getting sucked into them. So, for the next two months, I'm limiting my time here to non-politics related threads and please feel free to set me straight in case I forget or slip. So, what did you make in your IP today?  Per your request dated 9/14/2016, the above is quoted as a reminder to "set you straight" in regards to your self-imposed and desired avoidance of political threads. I'd have put it in the Trump thread that has you so riled up, but I suspect you've already gone tone-deaf on that thread. |
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Oct 12, 2016 5:01:35 GMT
Lauren what happened to your big announcement that you were staying off political threads?
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:02:45 GMT
Thank you Peatlejuice for doing as I requested. I will stay off that thread about Trump's tweets.
However, this thread isn't truly a political thread. It's more along the line of "we claim we're so much less sexist; unless we're talking cheating spouses, in which case it's always the fault of the other woman and not the lying cheating husband".
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:04:53 GMT
Yes, I give a free pass to the wronged spouse to call any/all participants in an affair in which one or more participants is known to be married any damn thing she/he wants.
On a side note, it appears that if you quote someone from another thread, the person being quoted does NOT get a notification. I almost missed my own party!
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:07:53 GMT
LOL @ staying off political threads by simply C&Ping posts from political threads and starting another thread.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:11:41 GMT
And to be completely clear here, let's C&P my post as the reply it was to your own post. And using your logic, if Bill Clinton wanted your daughter to suck his dick under his desk and his wife called her a bimbo or a whore for doing so, you'd be fine with it. (because that's exactly what's happened with the Clintons). Stellar. And given that Trump only "said" those words whereas Bill actually did them AND Hillary called the women those names, I think your choice is worse. Frankly, a woman who sucks a married man's dick deserves to be called whatever name the wronged wife wants to call her. I have no problem with Hillary Clinton calling the women her husband cheated with whatever names she wants, especially during private conversations. I assume that she called her husband a few choice names, all of them deserved, as well. We're talking about women who screw around with married men. While the men aren't saints by any means, the women are not innocent little angels, either. 1. Bill Clinton isn't running for president. 2. If Hillary Clinton called women who carry on with married men whores and/or bimbos, it's no more than calling it like it is. If a woman doesn't want to be called such names, she shouldn't mess around with married men. 3. Donald Trump not only said vile things, he admitted doing them, and some of them are, by definition, sexual assault. Donald Trump. The one actually running for POTUS. Not Donald's wife. Donald. Admitted to performing acts of sexual assault. |
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:13:16 GMT
Thanks.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:13:27 GMT
Thanks.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:15:45 GMT
Also, next time you want to comment on someone's post, do it OUTSIDE the quote box. I never said this: And because I'm sure she's not sexist, her comments must surely also apply to married women who have affairs.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:16:55 GMT
I'll be sure to run it by you first the next time.  |
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:18:44 GMT
However, I'm still waiting for an answer to my question, are the women who claim they were raped or abused by Hillary's husband bimbos or whores as she claims they are? Do they deserve to be called such by her?
|
|
|
|
Post by peatlejuice on Oct 12, 2016 5:19:06 GMT
Thank you Peatlejuice for doing as I requested. However, this thread isn't truly a political thread. It's more along the line of "we claim we're so much less sexist; unless we're talking cheating spouses, in which case it's always the fault of the other woman and not the lying cheating husband". Yes, I know, but I'm pointing out that had you stayed away from the political threads in the first place, you wouldn't have felt a need to create a call out thread (which is what this is at heart, albeit nicely shrouded under the guise of "sexism and cheating spouses"). This is also my way of nicely suggesting that you let it go; I understand the urge to pop off when you're angry at something/someone, but we (and many other Peas, I'm sure) both know you didn't really want to discuss sexism and cheating. |
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:19:20 GMT
Do that. It's quite misleading, and flat out wrong, to insert your words into a statement that is being attributed, via the quote box, to someone else.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:20:58 GMT
And for the third time (or is it the 4th )
t
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:23:54 GMT
However, I'm still waiting for an answer to my question, are the women who claim they were raped or abused by Hillary's husband bimbos or whores as she claims they are? Do they deserve to be called such by her? Someone claiming rape is quite different than someone having an affair. Your initial comment, and my reply to it, was referring to giving/receiving oral sex, not rape. In quoting my reply and harping on it, you are desperately attempting to equate sex during an affair to the act of rape, and reasonable people cannot and do not make that equation. Save |
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:25:22 GMT
Off topic for a minute: why does it say "Save" under each of your posts?
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:27:27 GMT
It's a board issue. It does it to some people/posts for a while, then stops. It didn't start up on my posts till a couple days ago. It's been happening to others for a long time.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Oct 12, 2016 5:28:09 GMT
And see? No "save" on that one. It's a hit or miss thing, but I notice it more in posts that have a quote.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Oct 12, 2016 5:30:57 GMT
OK, thanks.
Personally, I don't think the woman should be called a "whore" in either event but we have a difference of opinion on that. My point, and it's not being made very clearly obviously is that Hillary has called the women who claim to have been raped by her husband "whores" and "bimbos". No, rape is not the equivalent of an affair but in both instances, the man is being given a "pass". Seems an odd position for people who claim that women need to be shown more respect to take.
I'm off to bed. Have a good night.
|
|
My original pea date was November 1999 and my number was 1803
