|
Post by peasapie on Apr 11, 2017 12:49:15 GMT
I saw this tweet from Donald Trump today: North Korea is looking for trouble. If China decides to help, that would be great. If not, we will solve the problem without them! U.S.A.
I'm old enough to remember how wars are started and how they are promoted beforehand. He's doing a lot of saber rattling and has now made a first strike in Syria. I'm wondering what happened to his platform of the US minding it's own business. And what is next...and next...
I feel like Trump supporters have tended to minimize each thing he has done and said, saying that this doesn't mean he's going to do that -- until he does. On this very message board, for example, people said it didn't matter his daughter and son-in-law were going to Washington; it was natural for them to be by him. Ivanka would be first lady instead of Melania - and so on. Now both are sitting in on incredibly important meetings essentially representing each of us.
So where does this end? Or is anything he does ok? Is there a point where he will be stopped? Or have people just resigned themselves to WWIII?
|
|
scrappinspidey2
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,511
Location: In the Parlor with the Fly
Mar 18, 2015 19:19:37 GMT
|
Post by scrappinspidey2 on Apr 11, 2017 12:55:03 GMT
I will be the first to admit I know very little about North Korea and why the world lets a crazy man hold it hostage. I wonder why we can't get in there and remove him from his leadership role. It appears (again remember I said I know little) that the entire world doesn't approve of his leadership, so is there really anyone who would come to his aid if action was taken? I don't think a huge show of force with this is the way to go. I think it has to be a sneak assassination, but we need to make sure the next person to lead is not batshit crazy. How do we go about doing that? How do we get rid of him and help the people of North Korea at the same time?
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Apr 11, 2017 12:59:54 GMT
NO! I am really anti-war for most situations.
But war with the North Koreans... sounds like the beginnings of WWIII to me.
|
|
|
Post by monklady123 on Apr 11, 2017 13:00:26 GMT
I will be the first to admit I know very little about North Korea and why the world lets a crazy man hold it hostage. I wonder why we can't get in there and remove him from his leadership role. It appears (again remember I said I know little) that the entire world doesn't approve of his leadership, so is there really anyone who would come to his aid if action was taken? I don't think a huge show of force with this is the way to go. I think it has to be a sneak assassination, but we need to make sure the next person to lead is not batshit crazy. How do we go about doing that? How do we get rid of him and help the people of North Korea at the same time? The problem is that the next person in line probably *is* batshit crazy also. Because that's what they've been taught. No one in North Korea has the slightest idea what it means to lead a democracy or even to live in one. This is one reason so many African countries continue to have coup after coup after coup...it takes education over generations to begin to change the mindset of people who know nothing different. Not picking on African countries, it's just that that was my area of expertise when I worked at State. In my opinion, to really change a country like North Korea we ("we" meaning not just the US but a coalition of countries committed to democracy) would have to go in there and occupy for a long time. And do we really want to do that?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 15:55:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 13:03:40 GMT
Been there lost that. At some point should learn not to repeat.
|
|
maurchclt
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,614
Jul 4, 2014 16:53:27 GMT
|
Post by maurchclt on Apr 11, 2017 13:08:16 GMT
Hell NO!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by gar on Apr 11, 2017 13:09:46 GMT
I will be the first to admit I know very little about North Korea and why the world lets a crazy man hold it hostage. I wonder why we can't get in there and remove him from his leadership role. It appears (again remember I said I know little) that the entire world doesn't approve of his leadership, so is there really anyone who would come to his aid if action was taken? I don't think a huge show of force with this is the way to go. I think it has to be a sneak assassination, but we need to make sure the next person to lead is not batshit crazy. How do we go about doing that? How do we get rid of him and help the people of North Korea at the same time? The problem is that the next person in line probably *is* batshit crazy also. Because that's what they've been taught. No one in North Korea has the slightest idea what it means to lead a democracy or even to live in one. This is one reason so many African countries continue to have coup after coup after coup...it takes education over generations to begin to change the mindset of people who know nothing different. Not picking on African countries, it's just that that was my area of expertise when I worked at State. In my opinion, to really change a country like North Korea we ("we" meaning not just the US but a coalition of countries committed to democracy) would have to go in there and occupy for a long time. And do we really want to do that? Agreed. Going in and removing a leader is just the very beginning obviously. You can't just walk in and install democracy, and who are we (collective we) to say that's what should be done anyway. ETA - I do not, seriously do NOT want a war with Korea happening even if the UK isn't directly involved.
|
|
|
Post by princesscubby on Apr 11, 2017 13:11:55 GMT
The fact that the President uses twitter as a foreign policy "tool" is concerning to me. There's no way you can convey an effective message regarding such a nuanced situation in just 140 characters.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Apr 11, 2017 13:12:38 GMT
The fact that the President uses twitter as a foreign policy "tool" is concerning to me. There's no way you can convey an effective message regarding such a nuanced situation in just 140 characters. Nor should you try actually.
|
|
|
Post by annabella on Apr 11, 2017 13:16:51 GMT
Of course I don't want it, but I'm reading a book right now about North Korea and those people need to be free.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 15:55:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 13:21:59 GMT
I think Trump is so desperate to be seen as the saviour of the world that he has no idea of the consequences of pissing off North Korea. Anyone who isn't terrified at the thought of two little man babies with nuclear weapons needs their bumps felt.
|
|
|
Post by seikashaven on Apr 11, 2017 13:26:25 GMT
Trump is exactly what North Koreans have been brainwashed to believe all Americans are.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 15:55:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 13:28:29 GMT
I will be the first to admit I know very little about North Korea and why the world lets a crazy man hold it hostage. I wonder why we can't get in there and remove him from his leadership role. It appears (again remember I said I know little) that the entire world doesn't approve of his leadership, so is there really anyone who would come to his aid if action was taken? I don't think a huge show of force with this is the way to go. I think it has to be a sneak assassination, but we need to make sure the next person to lead is not batshit crazy. How do we go about doing that? How do we get rid of him and help the people of North Korea at the same time? are you serious. What gives any country, however distasteful their leadership is to others, the right to assassinate another country's leader. Good lord countries can't go round the world and assassinate the leaders of countries that don't happen to align with your beliefs. I'm not defending North Korea's leadership for one second I think he's very unstable but he's not holding the whole world hostage. Have the people of North Korea asked for your help?...do you know that they want your help? There's plenty of people in North Korea that are quite happy with his leadership. Yes, there is great concern about Kim's actions in attempting to build nuclear weapons but assassinating a country's leader isn't the answer. This is how world wars start.
And yes, Russia would come to their aid, not just to piss off the US but because they are also a communist country and no doubt see nothing wrong with his form of oppressive government. And Trump needs to reign in his tweets, he's getting to be as unhinged as Kim of North Korea is.
|
|
scrappinspidey2
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,511
Location: In the Parlor with the Fly
Mar 18, 2015 19:19:37 GMT
|
Post by scrappinspidey2 on Apr 11, 2017 13:46:20 GMT
are you serious. What gives any country, however distasteful their leadership is to others, the right to assassinate another countries leader. Good lord countries can't go round the world and assassinate the leaders of countries that don't happen to align with your beliefs. I don't know the level of my seriousness or not, but you can't tell me it hasn't happened before. So it is an option no matter what the ethical/moral issue is. And unfortunately I do think that sometimes it is an option for the greater good. Think of how many people would have lived had someone taken Hitler out before he got the concentration camps started? This isn't just about a crazy leader with his hand on the nuclear power button. His people need help and the world stands by and does nothing. So yeah I weigh the universal good of saving a country vs the life of one man. Luckily I never have to make that decision, so I can sit back in my comfy house and throw out all kinds of ideas. If you feel that my option isn't valid, and you don't agree with what President Trump is doing, then what is the answer to it? I see your arguments against those options, but I don't see an option of your own. And I disagree with your assessment of them being happy. They are told they are happy. Everyone who escapes will tell you a different story that explains just how unhappy and mistreated they are. There is a lot of evidence that points to the fact they are not being treated well in that country. So I don't buy the whole "they are happy with him." argument. I still can't believe they let him on Twitter either
|
|
trollie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,580
Jul 2, 2014 22:14:02 GMT
|
Post by trollie on Apr 11, 2017 13:47:57 GMT
I feel like a war with North Korea is unwinable. Kim Jong Un will go nuclear on us and the surrounding region. No question. He has everything to lose and is batshit crazy. That said, his people are in a precarious situation and need help.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2017 13:49:34 GMT
I think a war with North Korea is inevitable. Trump in office or not, this has been brewing for decades.
|
|
scorpeao
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,521
Location: NorCal USA
Jun 25, 2014 21:04:54 GMT
|
Post by scorpeao on Apr 11, 2017 13:52:26 GMT
I don't want a war with anyone, but with North Korea is especially scary because Kim Jong-un is a special kind of crazy. I hate Trump so much. I think it was 2013 he fired off a bunch of tweets to Obama about not starting a war with Syria how the USA can't afford it, it's crazy, USA doesn't need to be in another war, etc, and now not only does he bomb Syria he's threatening Korea? If Trump makes it the entire 4 years, and the USA is still standing...hell, if there's still life on Earth...it will be nothing short of a miracle.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Apr 11, 2017 14:02:11 GMT
The problem with taking out a crazy dictator in another country is that there are no guarantees what will pop up in that person's place. It's kind of like playing Whack-a-Mole. You might be successful in getting rid of one, but another and another will keep coming up behind the one(s) you took out. As someone else said upthread, it doesn't seem like a winning proposal. It seems a little too much like Iraq to ignore the similarities.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 11, 2017 14:08:24 GMT
I will be the first to admit I know very little about North Korea and why the world lets a crazy man hold it hostage. I wonder why we can't get in there and remove him from his leadership role. It appears (again remember I said I know little) that the entire world doesn't approve of his leadership, so is there really anyone who would come to his aid if action was taken? I don't think a huge show of force with this is the way to go. I think it has to be a sneak assassination, but we need to make sure the next person to lead is not batshit crazy. How do we go about doing that? How do we get rid of him and help the people of North Korea at the same time? are you serious. What gives any country, however distasteful their leadership is to others, the right to assassinate another countries leader. Good lord countries can't go round the world and assassinate the leaders of countries that don't happen to align with your beliefs. I'm not defending North Korea's leadership for one second I think he's very unstable but he's not holding the whole world hostage. Have the people of North Korea asked for your help?...do you know that they want your help? There's plenty of people in North Korea that are quite happy with his leadership. Yes, there is great concern about Kim's actions in attempting to build nuclear weapons but assassinating a country's leader isn't the answer. This is how world wars start.
And yes, Russia would come to their aid, not just to piss off the US but because they are also a communist country and no doubt see nothing wrong with his form of oppressive government. And Trump needs to reign in his tweets, he's getting to be as unhinged as Kim of North Korea is. Exactly! Change NK leader to Trump. Would it be okay for them to do it to the US? We have a batshit crazy, unpresidential leader.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 11, 2017 14:10:20 GMT
I feel like a war with North Korea is unwinable. Kim Jong Un will go nuclear on us and the surrounding region. No question. He has everything to lose and is batshit crazy. That said, his people are in a precarious situation and need help. I think this too. NK will be bombing whatever they can for any reason or no reason, they're just looking for a chance to do it. They don't care about living--it's about legacy for them.
|
|
pyccku
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,817
Jun 27, 2014 23:12:07 GMT
|
Post by pyccku on Apr 11, 2017 14:12:54 GMT
Russia isn't communist anymore, and hasn't been for some time. They would not defend NK because of that. They may for other reasons, but not to defend communism.
|
|
scrappinspidey2
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,511
Location: In the Parlor with the Fly
Mar 18, 2015 19:19:37 GMT
|
Post by scrappinspidey2 on Apr 11, 2017 14:13:31 GMT
hange NK leader to Trump. Would it be okay for them to do it to the US? We have a batshit crazy, unpresidential leader. Goodness now you put me in a position to defend our President Thanks He is no where near the level of the leader of NK. Im sorry but he isn't. And we in this country have a wonderful tradition of changing out our leaders when we see fit. Which I have a feeling is going to happen with President Trump sooner rather than later. The people of NK do not have that choice. They cannot stand up for themselves against their leader like we can and do here in this country, without the threat of being tortured or killed, or worse, left alone but family being tortured or killed.. You cannot compare the two at all. And now I have to go take a shower.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 15:55:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 14:17:14 GMT
are you serious. What gives any country, however distasteful their leadership is to others, the right to assassinate another countries leader. Good lord countries can't go round the world and assassinate the leaders of countries that don't happen to align with your beliefs. I don't know the level of my seriousness or not, but you can't tell me it hasn't happened before. So it is an option no matter what the ethical/moral issue is. And unfortunately I do think that sometimes it is an option for the greater good. Think of how many people would have lived had someone taken Hitler out before he got the concentration camps started? This isn't just about a crazy leader with his hand on the nuclear power button. His people need help and the world stands by and does nothing. So yeah I weigh the universal good of saving a country vs the life of one man. Luckily I never have to make that decision, so I can sit back in my comfy house and throw out all kinds of ideas. If you feel that my option isn't valid, and you don't agree with what President Trump is doing, then what is the answer to it? I see your arguments against those options, but I don't see an option of your own. And I disagree with your assessment of them being happy. They are told they are happy. Everyone who escapes will tell you a different story that explains just how unhappy and mistreated they are. There is a lot of evidence that points to the fact they are not being treated well in that country. So I don't buy the whole "they are happy with him." argument. I still can't believe they let him on Twitter either I think other countries, collectively, need to cover the problem and not by assassination of its leader by one country. We didn't fair well in Iraq did we and there's nothing to say that we won't make the same mistake anywhere else. I don't know the answer, I'm not au fait with all the foreign policy,discussions or actions that are going on without our knowledge. What I do know is that dangling the carrot waiting for someone to bite it and if they do, one person will sort it, isn't going to work and neither is the assassination of the leader, without the risk of starting something that most of us as reluctant to see happening.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 15:55:38 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 14:25:43 GMT
Russia isn't communist anymore, and hasn't been for some time. They would not defend NK because of that. They may for other reasons, but not to defend communism. I didn't literally mean that they would defend communist as such, maybe I should have used another word but Putin would side with NK if it came to the crunch. Maybe not as oppressive as the NK leadership and government, but you can hardly compare the freedom allowed to many in Russia to the freedom we have here in the west though.
|
|
craftykitten
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,304
Jun 26, 2014 7:39:32 GMT
|
Post by craftykitten on Apr 11, 2017 14:30:50 GMT
I think it would go as well as all the other peaceful, successful regime changes that the western world has carried out. Except this one has actual nukes.
The only, only marginally good thing about Trump was that I thought he was going to stop America fixing the world's problems. Seems like he just cant help himself.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Apr 11, 2017 14:36:07 GMT
Change NK leader to Trump. Would it be okay for them to do it to the US? We have a batshit crazy, unpresidential leader. Exactly what I was thinking. The USA also has a batshit crazy leader now who re-writes the truth and lies to his people. Who is going to step in and remove Trump from power? And just like NK - some people who live in the USA also fail to acknowledge how fucked up their leader is.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 11, 2017 14:37:54 GMT
Change NK leader to Trump. Would it be okay for them to do it to the US? We have a batshit crazy, unpresidential leader. Exactly what I was thinking. The USA also has a batshit crazy leader now who re-writes the truth and lies to his people. Who is going to step in and remove Trump from power? And just like NK - some people who live in the USA also fail to acknowledge how fucked up their leader is. ππ»ππ»ππ»ππ»ππ»ππ»ππ»
|
|
|
Post by HelenaJole on Apr 11, 2017 14:40:25 GMT
*Something* has to happen but I'm not sure how that's going to be accomplished or what it's going to look like. The current system is obviously not sustainable, though they've managed to keep it gong this long--they've also been propped up by China, and I think China is going to be an important key in whatever happens. North Korea has been changing slowly, and people do have more access to information than they have for a long time (black market DVDs are popular). Koreans (both north and south) have a very strong sense of their own national identity and their cultural history, and the North Korean leaders are very good at using that and manipulating it, but I think they might find their own way, μ μ (little by little). Though of course if Kim Jong-Un gets provoked then things may happen a lot quicker and more unpleasantly.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Apr 11, 2017 14:45:34 GMT
hange NK leader to Trump. Would it be okay for them to do it to the US? We have a batshit crazy, unpresidential leader. Goodness now you put me in a position to defend our President Thanks He is no where near the level of the leader of NK. Im sorry but he isn't. And we in this country have a wonderful tradition of changing out our leaders when we see fit. Which I have a feeling is going to happen with President Trump sooner rather than later. The people of NK do not have that choice. They cannot stand up for themselves against their leader like we can and do here in this country, without the threat of being tortured or killed, or worse, left alone but family being tortured or killed.. You cannot compare the two at all. And now I have to go take a shower. It's a matter of perception. What we see may be different as to what NK sees in American and Americans. They may be trained or brainwashed into believing that Trump is worse than KJ and feel the need to remove him. And I beg to differ on you "without the threat of..." while Trump isn't out killing people because their ideals are different than his, ANYONE can see exactly what he says and does about those who disagree. He demonizes them, bitch slaps them on Twitter, smears their reputation and has caused businesses to lose $$ (except for his own) and rewards those who are not qualified but because they've paid (I.e. Betsy DeVos/Erik Prinz just to name one). The scenario is the same with a different "currency". Trump has shown over and over what he does to those who disagree.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Apr 11, 2017 14:57:58 GMT
I think it would go as well as all the other peaceful, successful regime changes that the western world has carried out. Except this one has actual nukes. The only, only marginally good thing about Trump was that I thought he was going to stop America fixing the world's problems. Seems like he just cant help himself. Actually, I think it was just a convenient and easy way to shift attention away from the investigation of the Russian interference with the election. I don't think it has anything whatsoever to do with America fixing anybody's problems but Trump's.
|
|