|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 13, 2020 23:17:19 GMT
And keep it civil?
I am pro-choice. I believe in a woman choosing what she should do to her body. I don't believe that abortions are just being done at late term, unless something is majorly wrong. I believe in Planned parenthood. I've seen the statistics where abortions usually go down when a democratic president in is office. I have several relatives where this subject is their hill to do on, and will vote for Trump and republican no.matter.what, because of his pro-life, anti abortion stand, and getting a supreme justice in to overthrow Roe.
What can you even say to these people? I know I sometimes don't even try, because it's their hill, not going to budge. Also because I don't feel prepared, or have full knowledge. I guess I just want to share my frustration, and get more education regarding this subject!
|
|
|
Post by Fairlyoddparent on Sept 13, 2020 23:22:23 GMT
There is very little chance that this can remain civil but...
A person either believes abortion is killing a child or they don't. That's the premise of the argument. If you believe it's killing a child then it's difficult to overlook this issue. If you don't believe it's murder then you can look past it and be prochoice.
|
|
michellegb
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Location: New England and loving it!
Jun 26, 2014 0:04:59 GMT
|
Post by michellegb on Sept 13, 2020 23:28:05 GMT
I feel the same as you.
I also feel that if you're pro birth then you must be pro life and be willing to assist those you are insisting have a child no matter what the circumstances. You can be practicing safe sex and still get pregnant. You can be a virgin, get raped and get pregnant. You can be told your baby is growing in your fallopian tube and you risk serious injury or death if you stay pregnant. You can be told that your fetus will not survive the pregnancy or will not survive birth. Where is the support for these circumstances? Why does a woman become nothing more than a vessel to carry a baby to term and her life lose all it's value to these people? If you want/insist that these children be born, then you MUST care what happens to them after that. To do less than that is disingenuous and quite the opposite of Christian principles that they say they hold dear.
I also strongly believe that there are more than a few who would change their mind if these circumstances befell them or their daughter or wife or sister.
Finally, I firmly believe that abortion is not used as a form of birth control by lazy women and that there are late term abortions happening all the time. These arguments don't hold water and are just words thrown around to scare people who believe what they are told and don't think beyond that. It's reprehensible to lie like that.
I am not pro abortion. I am pro choice and I don't feel it's my place to judge the decision.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,840
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Sept 13, 2020 23:28:05 GMT
I also believe much of it is based in religion.
There is (or should be) a separation of church and state for a reason.
You have freedom of religion and right to follow those beliefs but I don't think that means you get to make others follow those same beliefs.
Also, beliefs tend to change, or made exception of, when the circumstances hit closer to home, to you and/or yours.
Although pro-choice, I've always thought I, personally would have a hard time having an abortion. Although as I've aged, I've become more aware of more "unless", "ifs" and "buts". Which goes back to closer to home mentioned above.
|
|
|
Post by nlwilkins on Sept 13, 2020 23:29:16 GMT
I believe that getting involved in these choices is not something the government should do. Those who feel strongly about it, should join groups and churches that offer education and other choices to women. Sounds simple, but it takes work and it is easier to just turn it over to the government to deal with.
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Sept 13, 2020 23:37:17 GMT
I find that there is no changing some people's minds so I don't even engage in the topic. I am pro-choice. I don't want someone pontificating to me about what I can and cannot do with my body.
|
|
|
Post by AussieMeg on Sept 13, 2020 23:40:12 GMT
I was lying in bed this morning thinking about this very topic. I really don't understand the "one issue voters", and how they are willing to overlook all the disgusting things trump has said and done, things that have harmed real life living breathing people, for this one issue. I keep going back to these two fabulous articles by John Pavlovich. He puts forward a lot of (in my opinion) brilliant arguments, from a Christian viewpoint. I would copy and paste the best bits, but honestly there are too many "best bits" so you may as well read the whole thing! If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryosand The Fraudulence of ‘Pro-life, Christian’ Bullies
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Sept 13, 2020 23:41:46 GMT
Trump is NOT pro-life. He has supported abortions for many years. I just posted leaked notes from a meeting with dt and Theresa May where he said he was not pro-life. www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/trump-in-1999-i-am-very-pro-choice-480297539914m/meet-the-press/video/trump-in-1999-i-am-very-pro-choice-480297539914 Many who claim to be pro-Life are NOT, they are pro-birth. Once a child is born they are on their own. Cut all kinds of assistance, food, medical, housing, schools etc that are needed to make a healthy successful child into adulthood! ** Her face book post....... ""(State)Representative Kelly Townsend(R) on Thursday Our country is sovereign, our State is sovereign, our family is sovereign, our God is sovereign and the most holy and sacred last frontier of sovereignty is our own body. Dearest friends and people of Arizona, it seems we are prepared to give up our liberty, the very sovereignty of our body, because of measles. I read yesterday that the idea is being floated that if not enough people get vaccinated, then we are going to force them to. The idea that we force someone to give up..."" After some online backlash, Townsend wrote another Facebook post later Thursday defending her comments, saying that “maybe [she] meant to say Socialist.” “The point here isn't whether or not we should vaccinate, that's for another post,” she said. “The point is whether or not your body is sovereign or if the government can force you to be injected against your will.” ** thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/432168-arizona-republican-mandatory-vaccines-are-communistRepublican stating your body is SOVEREIGN, thinking that may be useful in time!! As someone posted above, I am pro-choice not pro-abortion. It is a very personal decision that families make, with medical advice, counseling, faith based as they choose!
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Sept 13, 2020 23:43:42 GMT
I’m pro choice all the way. I do not love late term abortions, but I can understand them when they are medically necessary. It is my understanding that they are not performed unless the situation is dire. Doctors do not want to terminate a viable fetus for parental inconvenience. I actually do not love abortions at all. It’s not a choice that I can see myself making, though depending on the circumstances I might. I also understand that it is not my place to decide what may or may not happen between a woman and her doctor regarding her pregnancy and her body.
The point is is that it is a medical choice that every woman should have the individual right to make for herself and her fetus. It is a medical procedure that should be allowed to happen safely no matter the location and social status of the woman.
It is not the place of politicians to interfere in the doctor/patient relationship.
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,675
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Sept 13, 2020 23:45:25 GMT
I feel the same as you. I also feel that if you're pro birth then you must be pro life and be willing to assist those you are insisting have a child no matter what the circumstances. You can be practicing safe sex and still get pregnant. You can be a virgin, get raped and get pregnant. You can be told your baby is growing in your fallopian tube and you risk serious injury or death if you stay pregnant. You can be told that your fetus will not survive the pregnancy or will not survive birth. Where is the support for these circumstances? Why does a woman become nothing more than a vessel to carry a baby to term and her life lose all it's value to these people? If you want/insist that these children be born, then you MUST care what happens to them after that. To do less than that is disingenuous and quite the opposite of Christian principles that they say they hold dear. I also strongly believe that there are more than a few who would change their mind if these circumstances befell them or their daughter or wife or sister. Finally, I firmly believe that abortion is not used as a form of birth control by lazy women and that there are late term abortions happening all the time. These arguments don't hold water and are just words thrown around to scare people who believe what they are told and don't think beyond that. It's reprehensible to lie like that. I am not pro abortion. I am pro choice and I don't feel it's my place to judge the decision. I don't believe they are pro-life, they are pro-birth Yep. It's not pro-life, it's pro-birth. I'm not pro-abortion, I'm pro- choice. If people were really pro-life, they would work to help make the need for abortion less.
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 13, 2020 23:48:07 GMT
I feel the same as you. I also feel that if you're pro birth then you must be pro life and be willing to assist those you are insisting have a child no matter what the circumstances. You can be practicing safe sex and still get pregnant. You can be a virgin, get raped and get pregnant. You can be told your baby is growing in your fallopian tube and you risk serious injury or death if you stay pregnant. You can be told that your fetus will not survive the pregnancy or will not survive birth. Where is the support for these circumstances? Why does a woman become nothing more than a vessel to carry a baby to term and her life lose all it's value to these people? If you want/insist that these children be born, then you MUST care what happens to them after that. To do less than that is disingenuous and quite the opposite of Christian principles that they say they hold dear. I also strongly believe that there are more than a few who would change their mind if these circumstances befell them or their daughter or wife or sister. Finally, I firmly believe that abortion is not used as a form of birth control by lazy women and that there are late term abortions happening all the time. These arguments don't hold water and are just words thrown around to scare people who believe what they are told and don't think beyond that. It's reprehensible to lie like that. I am not pro abortion. I am pro choice and I don't feel it's my place to judge the decision. That is exactly how I feel. Thanks for sharing that!!
|
|
katybee
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,466
Jun 25, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
|
Post by katybee on Sept 13, 2020 23:48:36 GMT
Here’s what I don’t get.... so many people I know that are staunchly ANTI-ABORTION are also anti-birth control and anti sex-Ed. I would think that if you truly wanted to never see another abortion again, you’d work really hard to help prevent unwanted pregnancies. Seems they have no interest in that—only in acting indignant and judgmental after the fact. Honestly, I think, for men, it’s more about controlling women. For women, it’s about being pious and virtue signaling.
I don’t like abortion. But I understand that there are circumstances where it is a necessary choice. I want to make sure that women have the education and resources (including easy access to healthcare and affordable birth control) to take control of their own sex lives. That would be a lot more effective at reducing abortion than harping about it. 🤷🏼♀️
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 13, 2020 23:51:25 GMT
The point is is that it is a medical choice that every woman should have the individual right to make for herself and her fetus. It is a medical procedure that should be allowed to happen safely no matter the location and social status of the woman. It is not the place of politicians to interfere in the doctor/patient relationship. I really like what you said there!!
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Sept 13, 2020 23:52:40 GMT
Here’s what I don’t get.... so many people I know that are staunchly ANTI-ABORTION are also anti-birth control and anti sex-Ed. I would think that if you truly wanted to never see another abortion again, you’d work really hard to help prevent unwanted pregnancies. Seems they have no interest in that—only in acting indignant and judgmental after the fact. Honestly, I think, for men, it’s more about controlling women. For women, it’s about being pious and virtue signaling. I don’t like abortion. But I understand that there are circumstances where it is a necessary choice. I want to make sure that women have the education and resources (including easy access to healthcare and affordable birth control) to take control of their own sex lives. That would be a lot more effective at reducing abortion than harping about it. 🤷🏼♀️ In my experience these people are very religious. They firmly believe that sex should not be taking place outside of marriage. Birth control is a sin, as it is gods will desire for man and woman to procreate. And that God will bless you with as many children as he sees fit, and it’s your obligation to love them and raise them within the church, upholding the same belief system. It is very black and white for them.
|
|
|
Post by catmom on Sept 13, 2020 23:54:22 GMT
So I'm both pro-choice and pro-life, but in terms of my abortion stance I'm pro-choice. What I mean by saying I'm both is that I believe (and I'm pretty confident there is data that backs this up) that the most effective way to avoid abortions is to provide excellent sex education and encourage frank conversations on sex and birth control from childhood, by making all manner of birth control widely available and affordable, by having excellent and affordable (i.e. medicare) health care for mom and children, by having a generous maternity leave (in Canada it's 12-18 months) and subsidized daycare. In other words, create conditions that support and encourage women being able to have children. I can't speak to the US numbers, but in Canada abortion rates have dropped in the last decade and only 15% or so of abortions are done after 12 weeks, so late term abortions are exceedingly rare.
Which is a very long way of saying, rather than debate whether someone is pro choice or not, try and change the conversation to what can be done to help women be able to carry babies to term to either keep or adopt them. And if they are against these things, I think its very fair to question if they are truly pro-life or if they are just anti a woman controlling her body. Rights come with responsibilities, and to say I (general I) should have the 'right' to tell a woman that she must carry a baby to term, but that I don't have responsibility to make those conditions favourable is just silly in the extreme.
Also, there's a really great blog post that turns on its head the whole notion of women 'getting themselves pregnant' and women having unprotected sex - the whole if women don't want babies they should keep their legs closed nonsense. Essentially, women can have as much sex and as many orgasms as we want with no babies as a result. Babies only result from men not controlling their bodies and their ejaculations. So if we're serious about stopping abortions, maybe men should have to get vasectomies or some male birth control pill/apparatus in order for them to be allowed to have sex and that is what should be law. I mean if it's really that critical to avoid abortions, don't let men have ejaculations unless there is a desired baby at the other end.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,069
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Sept 13, 2020 23:55:59 GMT
Many who claim to be pro-Life are NOT, they are pro-birth. Once a child is born they are on their own. Cut all kinds of assistance, food, medical, housing, schools etc that are needed to make a healthy successful child into adulthood! A million trillion time this!!!! Protect them in the womb but fuck them when they are born especially if they are black or brown. You cannot truly be “pro life” and be one iota ok with how republicans are “handling” the coronavirus. A life is a life, right? You cannot truly be “pro life” and be unable to say black lives matter. You cannot truly be “pro life” and separate children from their parents and lock them in cages. You cannot truly be “pro life” and only support republican run states.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Sept 13, 2020 23:56:17 GMT
Interesting breakdown of (some) religious groups: Maybe some should rethink they positions... Leaked notes between Trump and British leaders prove he’s not really ‘pro-life’Published 2 days ago on September 7, 2020By Sarah K. Burris President Donald Trump has long been accused of saying whatever he needs to for the religious-right to support him. But a new report claims that Trump talked about not supporting the abortion ban that anti-choice advocates espouse.In an exclusive report from The Telegraph, notes from a meeting between the U.S. and British leaders cites Trump being honest about where he really stands. “He wanted to know where Mrs. May stood. Pro-choice or pro-life?” the article says about Trump’s meeting with former Prime Minister Theresa May. “‘Imagine some animal with tattoos raping your daughter and then she gets pregnant,’ the president said, according to the notes, graphically outlining the case for allowing abortion,” The Telegraph reported. “Mr. Trump then pointed at Mike Pence, the U.S. vice president known for being deeply religious. ‘He’s a really tough one on abortion,’ he is quoting saying, before again [asking] Mrs. May for her view. The then-prime minister offered a careful response ‘diplomatically threading the needle’ according to one source familiar with the conversation — before shifting the discussion back to safer ground,” the report said. It was just four days ago that Trump’s campaign released a letter to anti-choice leaders falsely accusing former Vice President Joe Biden of wanting taxpayer-funded abortions. “As I seek re-election this November, I need your help in contrasting my bold pro-life leadership with Joe Biden’s abortion extremism,” Trump said in the release. ** www.rawstory.com/2020/09/leaked-notes-between-trump-and-british-leaders-prove-hes-not-really-pro-life/
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Sept 13, 2020 23:57:35 GMT
Here’s what I don’t get.... so many people I know that are staunchly ANTI-ABORTION are also anti-birth control and anti sex-Ed. I would think that if you truly wanted to never see another abortion again, you’d work really hard to help prevent unwanted pregnancies. Seems they have no interest in that—only in acting indignant and judgmental after the fact. Agreed. I am trying to insert a map showing teen pregnancies and religious and how they meet.
|
|
muggins
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,861
Jul 30, 2017 3:38:57 GMT
|
Post by muggins on Sept 13, 2020 23:57:37 GMT
I had an abortion when I was a 20 year old university student in the U.K. My boyfriend and I weren’t financially or mentally ready for parenthood. We also did not want to give up our studies or place the burden of childcare on our parents. I simply did not want it.
However the decision was mine, and remains one of the best I have ever made about my body, my life, my family, and my future.
The procedure was fine. No trauma, no pain, no regret, nothing but relief and gratitude that I lived in a country that respects a woman’s right to choose.
Unfortunately the stigma of abortion and label of ‘baby murderer’ by religious zealots stopped me from sharing my very positive experience with others. That is my only regret. That I didn’t help others navigate the process.
I’ll be 52 this week with 2 kids that were planned and very much loved. I simply cannot imagine being forced to have a child I did not want.
Most anti-abortionists/pro birthers are religious, mostly republican, and look down on single women who couldn’t keep their legs closed and are ‘looking for handouts’. Once the child is born they generally vote against any of their precious tax dollars going towards any programs to help these children.
ETA - you cannot be pro-choice and pro-life. They are opposing views. If you believe a pregnant person should have the choice to terminate a pregnancy, you are pro-choice. If not, you are pro-life.
|
|
katybee
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,466
Jun 25, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
|
Post by katybee on Sept 14, 2020 0:01:13 GMT
Here’s what I don’t get.... so many people I know that are staunchly ANTI-ABORTION are also anti-birth control and anti sex-Ed. I would think that if you truly wanted to never see another abortion again, you’d work really hard to help prevent unwanted pregnancies. Seems they have no interest in that—only in acting indignant and judgmental after the fact. Honestly, I think, for men, it’s more about controlling women. For women, it’s about being pious and virtue signaling. I don’t like abortion. But I understand that there are circumstances where it is a necessary choice. I want to make sure that women have the education and resources (including easy access to healthcare and affordable birth control) to take control of their own sex lives. That would be a lot more effective at reducing abortion than harping about it. 🤷🏼♀️ In my experience these people are very religious. They firmly believe that sex should not be taking place outside of marriage. Birth control is a sin, as it is gods will desire for man and woman to procreate. And that God will bless you with as many children as he sees fit, and it’s your obligation to love them and raise them within the church, upholding the same belief system. It is very black and white for them. Yeah....except for the ones diddling the pool boy. Or molesting their sisters. Or frequenting sex sites to arrange kinky hookups. Or having same sex affairs with their interns. I mean Utah is the #1 state for porn consumption. They’re all PRAISE GOD on the outside, but dirty, dirty (hypocritical) dogs deep down...
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Sept 14, 2020 0:03:17 GMT
There is very little chance that this can remain civil but... A person either believes abortion is killing a child or they don't. That's the premise of the argument. If you believe it's killing a child then it's difficult to overlook this issue. If you don't believe it's murder then you can look past it and be prochoice. Then there is the question of whether or not abortion is the only issue that matters (even if there is little chance that it would actually be overturned)? Why does an unborn child mean more than people who are already born (in regards to policies that hurt people)?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 1:48:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2020 0:07:57 GMT
I dislike saying anti-abortionist are “pro life.” That’s not a correct identification of anti-abortionists.
I am pro-life. I care about the unborn, the challenged child, the abused child, the child hung up in a closet for weeks until he dies literally from neglect and starvation, the child who mother lets her boyfriend beat him/her up, the 2 year old beaten to death for crying, the child who doesn’t have enough to eat, the child who never knows that your parent is not someone who burns you, slaps you for pooping in your pants, who is denied food day after day after day because he ate your last peanut.
Being opposed to abortion doesn’t mean pro-life. Nosiree!
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 14, 2020 0:11:36 GMT
I don't get pro-birth. So what's the purpose? just to make another human being? that sounds cold and heartless, but it sort of is. What about quality of life? possible birth defects, and most often a bad family or non family life? sooo, why? And yes, I know all these things can be rose above, and made better, but there are many many that arn't. and how do these families naviagate that? and that's in a family that's even involved.
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Sept 14, 2020 0:14:41 GMT
There is very little chance that this can remain civil but... A person either believes abortion is killing a child or they don't. That's the premise of the argument. If you believe it's killing a child then it's difficult to overlook this issue. If you don't believe it's murder then you can look past it and be prochoice. I disagree that there isn’t grey area on the issue. There has to be. Otherwise you wouldn’t have pro-life people who are amenable to abortion when it comes to rape and incest or when the mother’s life is in danger. If they see it as killing a child, there would be no wiggle-room.
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 14, 2020 0:15:47 GMT
Here’s what I don’t get.... so many people I know that are staunchly ANTI-ABORTION are also anti-birth control and anti sex-Ed. I would think that if you truly wanted to never see another abortion again, you’d work really hard to help prevent unwanted pregnancies. Seems they have no interest in that—only in acting indignant and judgmental after the fact. Honestly, I think, for men, it’s more about controlling women. For women, it’s about being pious and virtue signaling. Yes! my aunt told me that women should not be having sex to begin with. I'm like ok, but it takes 2? don't just blame the woman.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Sept 14, 2020 0:16:25 GMT
There is very little chance that this can remain civil but... A person either believes abortion is killing a child or they don't. That's the premise of the argument. If you believe it's killing a child then it's difficult to overlook this issue. If you don't believe it's murder then you can look past it and be prochoice. I can assure you that murder/killing a child or not is NOT all that a person thinks of when they are deciding if they are for pro-choice (abortion).
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Sept 14, 2020 0:17:29 GMT
The point is is that it is a medical choice that every woman should have the individual right to make for herself and her fetus. It is a medical procedure that should be allowed to happen safely no matter the location and social status of the woman. It is not the place of politicians to interfere in the doctor/patient relationship. I really like what you said there!! That was the basis of the Roe v Wade decision, wasn’t it?
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 14, 2020 0:17:52 GMT
Also, there's a really great blog post that turns on its head the whole notion of women 'getting themselves pregnant' and women having unprotected sex - the whole if women don't want babies they should keep their legs closed nonsense. Essentially, women can have as much sex and as many orgasms as we want with no babies as a result. Babies only result from men not controlling their bodies and their ejaculations. So if we're serious about stopping abortions, maybe men should have to get vasectomies or some male birth control pill/apparatus in order for them to be allowed to have sex and that is what should be law. I mean if it's really that critical to avoid abortions, don't let men have ejaculations unless there is a desired baby at the other end. OMG!! yes, this!! I have a male friend who's always telling me, you're a democrat who believes in killing babies. Ok, but you're a single male out there, dating, and I know having sex. So he's killing babies by using protection then, right? That's their sort of mind set I feel.
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Sept 14, 2020 0:21:04 GMT
I don't think you can say anything to change their minds. They believe that abortion is killing a child and nobody is okay with killing a child.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Sept 14, 2020 0:22:12 GMT
Pro choice for me.
I’m a practicing Catholic too.
Religion is not going to dictate my healthcare and well being.
If a bunch of people think that government should deciding for women to not allow them reproductive health care, (and birth control) then men as well should be ordered to have vasectomies and ban Viagra.
No one, other than my doctors and myself should be deciding my body health. It should never be illegal for a woman to seek healthcare based on her own needs.
And with the current administration, they are actively working to criminalize it for both the women and their medical professionals, but the men who rape/get them pregnant and don’t want it get off scot free.
And furthermore, if the administration goes as far as to criminalize abortion, they must hold the “Sperm donors” accountable.
|
|