|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 14, 2020 0:23:20 GMT
Most anti-abortionists/pro birthers are religious, mostly republican I have found that not to be true. Out of the handful of prolife people I know, Only one is religious. The other are just regular republicans.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Sept 14, 2020 0:24:02 GMT
Also, there's a really great blog post that turns on its head the whole notion of women 'getting themselves pregnant' and women having unprotected sex - the whole if women don't want babies they should keep their legs closed nonsense. Essentially, women can have as much sex and as many orgasms as we want with no babies as a result. Babies only result from men not controlling their bodies and their ejaculations. So if we're serious about stopping abortions, maybe men should have to get vasectomies or some male birth control pill/apparatus in order for them to be allowed to have sex and that is what should be law. I mean if it's really that critical to avoid abortions, don't let men have ejaculations unless there is a desired baby at the other end. OMG!! yes, this!! I have a male friend who's always telling me, you're a democrat who believes in killing babies. Ok, but you're a single male out there, dating, and I know having sex. So he's killing babies by using protection then, right? That's their sort of mind set I feel. I would tell J that you are a Democrat who believes in sex Ed and birth control. With those things readily available, the number of unwanted pregnancies (that end in abortion or not) go down. Also, remind him that not all abortions are due to unwanted pregnancy. Sometimes they are done because of health problems in the baby or mother. That is something that even some women don’t seem to understand unless it has happened to them. All they care about is the points that they think they will get with God by voting for someone who says they are pro-life.
|
|
|
Post by Spongemom Scrappants on Sept 14, 2020 0:26:23 GMT
Birth control is a sin, as it is gods will desire for man and woman to procreate. And that God will bless you with as many children as he sees fit, and it’s your obligation to love them and raise them within the church, upholding the same belief system. That whole "quiverful" movement disturbs me. And I had four children. But I had them because I chose that and was completely prepared for all the responsibilities that came with a larger family. Not because someone else ("god") made the decision for me. Just as I don't think anyone else ("the government") should make the decision for me either. Thank you muggins for sharing your very personal experience with this. It helps illuminate the discussion.
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Sept 14, 2020 0:28:27 GMT
It is not pro-life vs pro-choice. It is anti-abortion vs pro-choice.
I have never heard one anti-abortion advocate give a rat's ass about the children who are already here and who are in need of services like food and education. Once these kids are born the anti-abortionists vote against any and all help for them.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Sept 14, 2020 0:43:40 GMT
I don’t understand those who claim they are for smaller government and religious freedom but also anti abortion. How it OK to impose your moral values or religious beliefs on others?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:03:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2020 1:11:18 GMT
I am not pro abortion. I am pro choice and I don't feel it's my place to judge the decision. This is where I stand. It us not my place to tell another woman what to do with her body. I don't know her situation. I am not her. I am not living her life. I feel that no matter what choice a woman makes, there should be support. Be that abortion and counseling as well as any legal help if due to rape or free day care so she can continue to go to work or school and access to education and resources.
|
|
|
Post by bothmykidsrbrats on Sept 14, 2020 1:11:24 GMT
I am pro choice. I became pro choice at a pretty young age (12-13), when my parents took me to church to learn about the evil of killing babies. It was a presentation by an organization with rose or roses in the title. They showed us a movie where a discarded fetus is tossed into a trash can, after an abortion. The trash can tips over and this bloody "thing" comes crawling out, with a faint cry. It was the most ridiculous D list horror movie I had ever seen, and I knew I would spend the rest of my life with that kind of fiction trying to poison peoples minds about a medical procedure. Roe had been decided in '73, and this was probably '78. I knew all kinds of things my parents would have never approved of thanks to my hippie babysitter turned friend when I no longer needed a sitter.
I had six miscarriages that I know of, before DS was born. After the 4th one, I stopped taking tests until I was 3 months late. I was still a practicing Catholic at the time, and believed if God wanted us to have a child, it would happen, so we did not seek medical intervention. To the best of my knowledge, none of our pro birth family or friends ever questioned if I killed our unborn babies. I know for a fact not a single one ever said they were sorry for the loss of our child. Just the standard it wasn't meant to be, next time will be different, God needed another precious angel, blah blah blah. My personal favorite was it probably had something genetically wrong, so it's a blessing the baby is with Heavenly Father, and not burdened with earthly limitations. WTF? Things that make you go hummmm? for $500 Alex. I've always felt abortion (medical necessity aside) is no different than artificial insemination. Both are science playing God for your own purpose.
|
|
|
Post by padresfan619 on Sept 14, 2020 1:20:01 GMT
After having a very traumatic and invasive trans vaginal ultrasound in the ER for a baby that is very much wanted, I would really love it if every male pro-life legislator who wanted a prescription for Viagra would have to go through an equally invasive and dehumanizing procedure.
No one who is pro-choice is pro-abortion. Nobody loves abortion. No one is using abortions as a form of birth control or any other urban legend used to attempt to make them illegal. Unfortunately the people who need to hear and understand that will refuse and dig their heels in even more.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Sept 14, 2020 1:32:15 GMT
When I see the folks who say it's "killing a baby" start voting in favor of making sure every child in the country is fed, housed and educated, and when there are no more kids aging out of foster care, I'll believe it might actually be about concern for the life of a child.
Until then, it's obviously just a desire to control and punish evil women who have sex outside of marriage. And there's also a strong but unspoken feeling that these women have an obligation to birth a child they can't afford so it can be adopted by a deserving family.
|
|
|
Post by lisae on Sept 14, 2020 1:39:12 GMT
I've been pro-choice since high school when a girl I went to elementary school with got pregnant at age 15 and 'had to get married.' I overheard my mother and a friend talk about how they would 'take care of it' if it were their daughter. I never knew whether the girl really wanted to marry or not as we weren't close anymore but I seriously doubt she was given a choice. Years later she ended up in prison for killing an abusive husband. It seemed to me even in my teens that no one really cared about HER life and her choices.
The issue I find today is that many people who are pro life are really pro birth. It only matters to them that a baby is born. Whether the parent can provide for them or society can support the child isn't as important as stopping abortion.
|
|
janeliz
Drama Llama
I'm the Wiz and nobody beats me.
Posts: 5,645
Jun 26, 2014 14:35:07 GMT
|
Post by janeliz on Sept 14, 2020 1:44:46 GMT
I got into a screaming match with one of my brothers around the time of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and I simply repeated again and again that it is a privacy issue. I’m a mother of two daughters and I am terrified about what could happen to their rights to privacy and decision making about their own bodies if Trump is re-elected. You can tell me until you’re blue in the face why you’re pro-life or what Jesus thinks or how so many people would love to adopt the babies and I’ll simply respond that you have no right to interfere in the relationship between a woman and her doctor. It’s as simple as that. At least for now...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:03:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2020 1:49:16 GMT
We give NO HUMAN the right to another person's organs. Another human may not even use the organs of a DEAD PERSON without the dead person's pre-death permission.
NO ONE has the right to use another person's organs or blood or tissue without the tissue/blood/organ owner's continued permission. Not a fetus. Not a toddler. Not a full-grown human. NO ONE.
|
|
Kath
Full Member
Posts: 446
Jun 26, 2014 12:15:31 GMT
|
Post by Kath on Sept 14, 2020 1:57:09 GMT
I am pro-choice all the way. If anyone tries to engage me in a “pro-life” conversation on the subject, I tell them if men could get pregnant, there would be a drive-through abortion clinic on every corner. That usually shuts them up long enough for me to get away.
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Sept 14, 2020 1:57:35 GMT
Here’s what I don’t get.... so many people I know that are staunchly ANTI-ABORTION are also anti-birth control and anti sex-Ed. I would think that if you truly wanted to never see another abortion again, you’d work really hard to help prevent unwanted pregnancies. Seems they have no interest in that—only in acting indignant and judgmental after the fact. Honestly, I think, for men, it’s more about controlling women. For women, it’s about being pious and virtue signaling. I don’t like abortion. But I understand that there are circumstances where it is a necessary choice. I want to make sure that women have the education and resources (including easy access to healthcare and affordable birth control) to take control of their own sex lives. That would be a lot more effective at reducing abortion than harping about it. 🤷🏼♀️ This is where I sit. I am pro birth control. I believe if men carried the babies and had the same consequences or limitations that many women have when carrying a child to birth, birth control would be passed out like candy on every street corner. When you live in a country where six is king and it is in your face at almost every turn, sex is going to be important. I am all about socialism when it comes to free birth control. While it wouldn't help eliminate 100% of abortions, it would certainly limit unwanted pregnancies. Until there is free birth control for anyone who might want or need it, there will be abortions. We just have to decide as a society if we want to kill a living, breathing woman as well as a cells/embryo/fetus.
|
|
Just T
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,884
Jun 26, 2014 1:20:09 GMT
|
Post by Just T on Sept 14, 2020 2:10:49 GMT
The issue I find today is that many people who are pro life are really pro birth. That is it in a nutshell for me. I can't even count the number of times over the years that people on this very board, who I know are staunch Republicans, have vehemently said they are against food stamps and Medicaid and subsidized day care and mandatory maternity leave etc because "No one told you to have a kid!" Well, if some people have their way, yeah, women will indeed be forced to have a kid. It's mind boggling to me how those who claim to be pro life are against every single program that would actually help a mom in difficult situations be able to raise a happy and stable child who grows into a productive adult. I am a puzzle of a person, and I know this. I was raised Catholic, went to Catholic schools, etc. But I knew from a pretty young age that I was pro choice. As an adult who started to raise her children in the Catholic faith, I was torn. I live in a conservative city/metropolitan area where I had friends with bumpers stickers on their cars that said "You can't be Catholic AND pro choice." But I was. And I am embarrassed to say I never spoke up. I am embarrassed now to say that I mostly voted Republican, too. While I knew that Republicans were pro life, I honestly felt like since abortion was legal, it would stay that way, and I leaned conservative for other reasons that were more financially motivated and states rights motivated. I so very much wish I had paid more attention. Since I was raised in such a conservative family, I just sort of "adopted" those views for myself. Again, I am embarrassed to say that. I have never been a registered Republican, but that is mostly how I have voted. Now, I can't imagine there is a Republican candidate for any office that would make me want to vote R. There is so much more I could write, but I am struggling to put my thoughts into words. Abortion is such a complicated issue. And those who have them late in the pregnancy don't just blissfully decide one day they don't want a baby and go off to find a doctor to kill it. That is so ridiculous. I work for an organization that supports parents who lose a baby during pregnancy or as a newborn, and I have met and talked with so many parents who found out their baby had a profound problem and ended their pregnancy later. It sure as hell was not done gleefully as some politicians like to imply. And like someone else mentioned, it is expensive and insurance doesn't always cover it. Depending on what state you live in, you may have to travel out of state to end a pregnancy of a baby you want and fiercely love. The stories are so heartbreaking. This should not be a political issue. I wish that every politician that rails about the evils of late term abortions should have to sit down across the table from someone who is sobbing about how they couldn't sleep or eat or even function because all they could think about was their baby suffering inside of them. When they are able, these parents are induced, deliver their baby and spend precious hours with him or her. It is absolutely nothing like what it is often described as. I will get off my soapbox now. Sorry for the rant, this is just a topic that is near and dear to me.
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 14, 2020 3:18:16 GMT
Here is the other reply I often get when I bring up taxes and programs to help people out- why should they pay higher taxes because of other people’s problems? Or why arnt they working and supporting themselves? Why should they have to work to pay for others to stay home and get free stuff?
Thanks so much for the great discussion! We’ve all been really civil to each other! Good talk!!
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Sept 14, 2020 10:40:24 GMT
Here is the other reply I often get when I bring up taxes and programs to help people out- why should they pay higher taxes because of other people’s problems? Or why arnt they working and supporting themselves? Why should they have to work to pay for others to stay home and get free stuff? Thanks so much for the great discussion! We’ve all been really civil to each other! Good talk!! Yes, some people can be quite obtuse about the economic realities of the working poor. It’s a shame they won’t look outside their own bubble of reality at how others might be struggling. To answer their questions, I’d reply with, “Why should a woman have to bear a child because of your personal morality?”
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Sept 14, 2020 11:35:26 GMT
The issue I find today is that many people who are pro life are really pro birth. That is it in a nutshell for me. I can't even count the number of times over the years that people on this very board, who I know are staunch Republicans, have vehemently said they are against food stamps and Medicaid and subsidized day care and mandatory maternity leave etc because "No one told you to have a kid!" Well, if some people have their way, yeah, women will indeed be forced to have a kid. It's mind boggling to me how those who claim to be pro life are against every single program that would actually help a mom in difficult situations be able to raise a happy and stable child who grows into a productive adult. I am a puzzle of a person, and I know this. I was raised Catholic, went to Catholic schools, etc. But I knew from a pretty young age that I was pro choice. As an adult who started to raise her children in the Catholic faith, I was torn. I live in a conservative city/metropolitan area where I had friends with bumpers stickers on their cars that said "You can't be Catholic AND pro choice." But I was. And I am embarrassed to say I never spoke up. I am embarrassed now to say that I mostly voted Republican, too. While I knew that Republicans were pro life, I honestly felt like since abortion was legal, it would stay that way, and I leaned conservative for other reasons that were more financially motivated and states rights motivated. I so very much wish I had paid more attention. Since I was raised in such a conservative family, I just sort of "adopted" those views for myself. Again, I am embarrassed to say that. I have never been a registered Republican, but that is mostly how I have voted. Now, I can't imagine there is a Republican candidate for any office that would make me want to vote R. There is so much more I could write, but I am struggling to put my thoughts into words. Abortion is such a complicated issue. And those who have them late in the pregnancy don't just blissfully decide one day they don't want a baby and go off to find a doctor to kill it. That is so ridiculous. I work for an organization that supports parents who lose a baby during pregnancy or as a newborn, and I have met and talked with so many parents who found out their baby had a profound problem and ended their pregnancy later. It sure as hell was not done gleefully as some politicians like to imply. And like someone else mentioned, it is expensive and insurance doesn't always cover it. Depending on what state you live in, you may have to travel out of state to end a pregnancy of a baby you want and fiercely love. The stories are so heartbreaking. This should not be a political issue. I wish that every politician that rails about the evils of late term abortions should have to sit down across the table from someone who is sobbing about how they couldn't sleep or eat or even function because all they could think about was their baby suffering inside of them. When they are able, these parents are induced, deliver their baby and spend precious hours with him or her. It is absolutely nothing like what it is often described as. I will get off my soapbox now. Sorry for the rant, this is just a topic that is near and dear to me. The slippery slope of insurance not paying for an ‘abortion’ is that it is the same medical procedure that’s sometimes done after a miscarriage when your doctor deems it necessary due to possible complications like infections etc. A D&C is also sometimes used as a diagnostic tool in other cases having nothing at all to do with pregnancy or miscarriage. So no, law makers with no medical experience should be making that decision for the doctors & patients together
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Sept 14, 2020 11:36:20 GMT
I'll be honest with you, I am pro-life. I do absolutely believe abortion is killing a child. I also believe that Roe vs. Wade is settled law. I see no reason to impose my belief system upon others. I 110% support birth control. And I 110% support policies that help women be able to raise the children that result from unplanned pregnancies. I support Planned Parenthood. And I also support my local Catholic social services that counsel and aid women on abortion. I donated all my baby things back in the day to their organization because their mission is to aid women who want to keep their babies despite being poor. They help women navigate Medicaid and WIC. And that's a mission I can support.
In other words, I want to help women have a true choice because I believe in my heart that that's what I need to do to save babies. I choose not to put my time and effort into overturning the law and taking away the right to choose. In my mind it is a matter akin to behaving in the right way because it's the right thing to do, not just because your mother is watching. In other words, I want women to make the right choice because it is the right choice, not because the government has mandated they raise kids they didn't plan for. I fully believe that even if abortion were illegal that desperate women would find a way and that would be dangerous. And I don't want women harmed. I want abortion to continue to be safe and treated like a medical procedure.
|
|
schizo319
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,030
Jun 28, 2014 0:26:58 GMT
|
Post by schizo319 on Sept 14, 2020 12:29:24 GMT
I haven't read any responses (on purpose - because I want to answer the question asked without feeling the need to respond to anything else) - so if I'm repetitive, please forgive me.
I don't like abortion, I placed my child for adoption 24 years ago because I don't like abortion - it is the hardest thing that I have ever done. I believe that as a country we should do *everything* we can to reduce the number of abortions. To me, that means sex education and universal access to birth control, because the truth is those things are the ONLY things that have ever actually caused the number of abortions to decrease.
It's tempting to believe that outlawing abortions will simply cause them to stop, but that is absolutely not the case (it astounds me that the same people arguing for outlawing abortion say we can't outlaw guns because "criminals will get them anyway"). What repealing Roe will do is outlaw *medically safe* abortions. Abortions have been happening since biblical times. If we outlaw them, it will give rise to underground "midwives", abortionist gardens, and back alley "surgeons" - you know like we had for centuries before abortions were legalized. Even before Roe, wealthy people were still able to send their impure daughters to doctors for a "d&c" (which became so synonymous with abortion that a real legitimate d&c is STILL believed to be an abortion - I had a mandatory d&c before a surgical procedure and my conservative christian childhood friend refused to believe that I did not in fact have an abortion).
I might consider supporting the outlawing of abortion when there are no more children in foster care, when there is a line of people clamoring to adopt profoundly disabled children, when there are no cases of children who are beaten and starved in the care of their "parents", and when we have enough resources to feed/clothe/educate not only the children who are already here, but an additional 600,000+ every year.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Sept 14, 2020 12:40:41 GMT
I just don’t bother discussing it. There is no point. I am pro choice, always have been. I am even more pro birth control. Overturning Roe v Wade will not stop abortions; it will only make them more unsafe.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Sept 14, 2020 13:04:31 GMT
Here is the other reply I often get when I bring up taxes and programs to help people out- why should they pay higher taxes because of other people’s problems? Or why arnt they working and supporting themselves? Why should they have to work to pay for others to stay home and get free stuff? Thanks so much for the great discussion! We’ve all been really civil to each other! Good talk!! I believe that there could be changes to our welfare system, but outlawing abortion is not going to make that better. I work with many families who have every aspect of their lives paid for by "the system" and the parent does not/has never worked. I've had mothers in these situations tell me that they "didn't have kids just to have someone else raise them" so they aren't going to work. All while I am at their home (working) trying to help them with their problems. It can be frustrating. But I also know that not everyone who gets assistance is in this situation. I don't think there is a perfect solution but I suppose that is for another thread.
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,525
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Sept 14, 2020 13:12:34 GMT
I'm a Christ follower. Here's my take on religious freedom: It gives me the freedom to practice my faith, not a mandate to tell you how to live your life.
That said, I don't like abortion(I don't think anyone LOVES it), but I'm not anti-choice. It's not a black and white situation. I don't buy into the BS that evangelicals spout off about it. I've known too many people with absolutely valid reasons for the choices they've made and I don't think I've heard anyone express regrets about that choice.
I could go on and on, but per the usual, most peas say it better than I could.
I do believe Trump has likely paid for his share of abortions. If he's pro life, I'm a super model.
|
|
iowgirl
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,316
Jun 25, 2014 22:52:46 GMT
|
Post by iowgirl on Sept 14, 2020 13:45:26 GMT
I also strongly believe that there are more than a few who would change their mind if these circumstances befell them or their daughter or wife or sister. Oh yes. I have a friend that is staunchly Republican, staunchly Trump. She says that anyone who is a Democrat will murder babies. I asked her if her grand daughter was raped at 12 or younger, and was pregnant she would want her to have that baby? Or to be able to quickly terminate it..... her response to that shocked me. She said "well that is different" ... what? I told her if the choice is gone - it would be gone for that situation too, even though it was "different". I told her she should try to listen to some different news sources once in a while.
|
|
peabay
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,940
Jun 25, 2014 19:50:41 GMT
|
Post by peabay on Sept 14, 2020 13:51:04 GMT
When I see the folks who say it's "killing a baby" start voting in favor of making sure every child in the country is fed, housed and educated, and when there are no more kids aging out of foster care, I'll believe it might actually be about concern for the life of a child. Until then, it's obviously just a desire to control and punish evil women who have sex outside of marriage. And there's also a strong but unspoken feeling that these women have an obligation to birth a child they can't afford so it can be adopted by a deserving family. Unless they are disabled in some way. Or black or brown.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Sept 14, 2020 13:58:18 GMT
In other words, I want to help women have a true choice because I believe in my heart that that's what I need to do to save babies. I choose not to put my time and effort into overturning the law and taking away the right to choose. In my mind it is a matter akin to behaving in the right way because it's the right thing to do, not just because your mother is watching. In other words, I want women to make the right choice because it is the right choice, not because the government has mandated they raise kids they didn't plan for. I fully believe that even if abortion were illegal that desperate women would find a way and that would be dangerous. And I don't want women harmed. I want abortion to continue to be safe and treated like a medical procedure. You amaze again! Thank you! *********** I grew up before Roe v Wade. I know what the system allowed and didn't. If family had funds, there was a flight overseas for a procedure, a trip to the 'aunt' for a year of away schooling, friendly doctor did a medically wanted D&C.. Then there were the back street butchers! Girls/women found dead. Or bled to death at home, because they didn't tell anyone! Beaten to death because boyfriend didn't want it. Deaths at birth, lack of medical care causing injury to mother..
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Sept 14, 2020 14:01:29 GMT
I had an abortion when I was a 20 year old university student in the U.K. My boyfriend and I weren’t financially or mentally ready for parenthood. We also did not want to give up our studies or place the burden of childcare on our parents. I simply did not want it. However the decision was mine, and remains one of the best I have ever made about my body, my life, my family, and my future. The procedure was fine. No trauma, no pain, no regret, nothing but relief and gratitude that I lived in a country that respects a woman’s right to choose. Unfortunately the stigma of abortion and label of ‘baby murderer’ by religious zealots stopped me from sharing my very positive experience with others. That is my only regret. That I didn’t help others navigate the process. I’ll be 52 this week with 2 kids that were planned and very much loved. I simply cannot imagine being forced to have a child I did not want. Most anti-abortionists/pro birthers are religious, mostly republican, and look down on single women who couldn’t keep their legs closed and are ‘looking for handouts’. Once the child is born they generally vote against any of their precious tax dollars going towards any programs to help these children. ETA - you cannot be pro-choice and pro-life. They are opposing views. If you believe a pregnant person should have the choice to terminate a pregnancy, you are pro-choice. If not, you are pro-life. I appreciate you sharing your story. The pro-choice movement needs to help remove the stigma. That said, I will never call the forced birth faction, pro-life. There is nothing pro-life about their movement at all. They are in fact trying to force women to give birth. We need to label them what they are!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:03:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2020 14:33:15 GMT
I'm pro choice but not pro abortion. I want women to have safe and legal choices. I don't want those clauses thrown in. Just leave it at "abortion is legal and is a medical decision that is made between a woman and her doctor." No but this or if that.
What I really want to see are programs that are federally and state funded that are aimed at lowering abortions. It's been proven time and time again that when you start with protection, education, and birth control, the number of unwanted pregnancies go down. Those programs need more funding and support. We need to stop being so anti birth control and make it affordable. Want less people on assistance? Then give the working poor access to free or very cheap birth control.
Unfortunately the far right and religious idiots don't or won't see that. They simply don't want to pay for any social programs that will have a positive effect on our society. It's very "I have mine, fuck the rest of you."
|
|
|
Post by kmcginn on Sept 14, 2020 14:36:33 GMT
This is me to a T. I think it's really most pro-choice people.
My issue with many people who claim to be pro-life is that they are really pro-birth. They don't care about immigrants trying to make a better life/ They don't care about DACA recipients. They don't care about BLM. they don't care about peaceful protesters. They don't care about athletes trying to make a statement.
I am a Catholic and I am against abortion but I don't think it's my right to judge anyone about the issue. It is a decision that must be made between her, her donctor, and her god. And the government and I don't have a right to judge.
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Sept 14, 2020 14:42:54 GMT
I believe that there could be changes to our welfare system, but outlawing abortion is not going to make that better. I work with many families who have every aspect of their lives paid for by "the system" and the parent does not/has never worked. I've had mothers in these situations tell me that they "didn't have kids just to have someone else raise them" so they aren't going to work. All while I am at their home (working) trying to help them with their problems. It can be frustrating. But I also know that not everyone who gets assistance is in this situation. I don't think there is a perfect solution but I suppose that is for another thread. Kristin, how messed up is that? you,a working mom are there trying to help someone, who won't work, because they want to raise their own children. For one, where do they think your children are? and yea, sure I would love to be home more, but we can't afford it. So I work. I also never felt like my at home daycare was raising my children. Yes, that's a whole other thread, but I hear people say something to the effect, of, why should I have to work full time, and pay taxes, so YOU can stay home with your children? while I work and can't?
|
|