Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:10:30 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2021 21:58:34 GMT
As of today, the police/auxiliary forces can stop you and ask to see your vaccine passport. I had to show it to get into one of the shopping areas. Guess what? I was NOT offended! I was G.L.A.D.! People showed the card and went on their merry freaking way!
I am still at a complete loss why people are arguing about masks and vaccines during a F*&^ing pandemic!!!
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 21, 2021 23:25:03 GMT
I think I found a possible source of pixiechick's insistence that acquired immunity should be an acceptable alternative to the covid vaccine. Almost point for point and even word for word. Without a lot of scientific evidence to back it up. I'm still curious about all of these epidemiologists, scientists and doctors that she keeps referring to but never providing links for. www.wsj.com/articles/some-workers-want-covid-19-recovery-accepted-as-evidence-of-immunity-11634648215The conversation needs to be about immune versus nonimmune instead of vaccinated or non-vaccinated,” said Sen. Roger Marshall (R., Kan.) “If you have the antibodies and natural immunity, there’s no reason to enforce the mandate for those people,” said Mr. Crawford, a cancer survivor who said he’s vaccinated. He said he believed vaccines should be a choice between doctor and patient. “That these policies ignore natural immunity already suggests an unscientific approach to their formation,” Mr. Isaac said in a text message. “When we use vaccination as a hammer and say it’s the only way to be protected, it has bad outcomes.” I can't read your article without paying for it. So not a source for me. I'm sure it was a lovely dismissal of diverse ideas. Please do realize that hundreds of thousands of people see the need for study and discussion of need based vs. one size fits all medicine. I'm still curious about all of these epidemiologists, scientists and doctors that she keeps referring to but never providing links for. You mean the epidemiologists and scientists in the article THAT I LINKED about the importance of discussion on need based vs. one size fits all medicine. The doctors in that Ohio study? The scientists in that study from Isarael, do you really need a link for that?
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 22, 2021 1:06:15 GMT
Here is Sen Dr Roger Marshall... He who made an ad for the Covid vaccines!!! If you click the article you can go to his name and click for his ad! It is many US and state elected officials who are also doctors.. U.S. Sen Roger Marshall on FDA approval of the Pfizer vaccine, Aug. 23: “I encourage you to talk to your doctor about the benefits associated with getting the shot and to determine if getting this fully approved vaccine is right for you." The multi-titled Lord Rev. Sir Sen. Dr. Roger Marshall, Esq., has a medical background. He knows COVID-19 vaccines work and has cut an ad supporting them. But with GOP political winds blowing against common sense, his latest statement falls short. www.rawstory.com/disinformation-caucus-of-kansas-gop-spreads-dangerous-falsehoods-about-19/
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 22, 2021 1:35:17 GMT
However...... Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas.) may be a practicing physician, but some medical experts and doctors argue that his questionable advice on COVID-19 appears to be more politicized than backed by scientific facts.According to The Associated Press, the Republican lawmaker has a history of making questionable statements about vaccines and immunity that do not align with any medical advice or guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Marshall has also been a very vocal critic of President Joe Biden's aggressive vaccine mandates to expedite getting individuals vaccinated. According to Marshall, Biden's initiative may infringe on Americans' civil liberties. During a recent interview, he also expressed concerns about the mandate having a potential impact on the United States' economy. "Without even touching on the constitutionality of a federal mandate, I want people to realize the impact it's going to have on the economy," Marshall said during a recent interview. To make matters worse, he, who happens to be COVID vaccinated, has also acknowledged "experimenting on himself with an unproven treatment for warding off the coronavirus."Now, critics are expressing concern about the dangers of his words and advice. Per The Associated Press: "Critics say the lawmakers' statements are dangerous and unethical, and that Marshall's medical degree confers a perception of expertise that carries weight with constituents and other members of Congress."*** "Vaccination is what we have because the price of getting immunity through natural infection is much too high," Wen said.Arthur Caplan, the founder of New York University's medical ethics division who also heads a vaccination ethics program, also weighed in with his concerns about Marshall's remarks. "He has an enormous role to play here because he's a doctor and a senator," said Caplan. "He bears a very powerful responsibility to get it right." Dr. Beth Oller, a family physician practicing in northwest Kansas, offered a more blatant rebuke of Marshall saying, "He should just be ashamed of himself." www.rawstory.com/gop-2655263705/
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 23, 2021 12:56:04 GMT
As of today, the police/auxiliary forces can stop you and ask to see your vaccine passport. I had to show it to get into one of the shopping areas. Guess what? I was NOT offended! I was G.L.A.D.! People showed the card and went on their merry freaking way! I am still at a complete loss why people are arguing about masks and vaccines during a F*&^ing pandemic!!! Because people want to decide for themselves what medicine to put into their body. That's not unreasonable. For instance, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother would like to be able to decide for herself what she's willing to subject her baby to without being removed from society for not being willing to be forced to inject herself and her baby with a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? She has that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. What happens when it's something YOU don't agree with and you are mandated to do it or be removed from society? Biden said he would not mandate the vaccine and then he did. He's been doing that a lot.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:10:30 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2021 12:12:25 GMT
As of today, the police/auxiliary forces can stop you and ask to see your vaccine passport. I had to show it to get into one of the shopping areas. Guess what? I was NOT offended! I was G.L.A.D.! People showed the card and went on their merry freaking way! I am still at a complete loss why people are arguing about masks and vaccines during a F*&^ing pandemic!!! Because people want to decide for themselves what medicine to put into their body. That's not unreasonable. For instance, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother would like to be able to decide for herself what she's willing to subject her baby to without being removed from society for not being willing to be forced to inject herself and her baby with a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? She has that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. What happens when it's something YOU don't agree with and you are mandated to do it or be removed from society?Biden said he would not mandate the vaccine and then he did. He's been doing that a lot. I simply point to polio or smallpox as an example. Vaccines ERADICATED these diseases. Covid continues to be a problem in countries because people will not get vaccinated and C-19 is able to mutate and march on. While life isn't back to normal, the push for vaccination here shows that cases are going down. Because.....VACCINES WORK! Funny you should remark that (the bolded above). Is this not EXACTLY what is happening in Texas with abortion? The mental gymnastics to argue over vaccines because "it's MY BODY" yet the very same damn people want to mandate what happens over OTHER PEOPLE'S BODY!
|
|
|
Post by monklady123 on Oct 26, 2021 12:18:52 GMT
Because people want to decide for themselves what medicine to put into their body. That's not unreasonable. For instance, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother would like to be able to decide for herself what she's willing to subject her baby to without being removed from society for not being willing to be forced to inject herself and her baby with a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? She has that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. What happens when it's something YOU don't agree with and you are mandated to do it or be removed from society?Biden said he would not mandate the vaccine and then he did. He's been doing that a lot. I simply point to polio or smallpox as an example. Vaccines ERADICATED these diseases. Covid continues to be a problem in countries because people will not get vaccinated and C-19 is able to mutate and march on. While life isn't back to normal, the push for vaccination here shows that cases are going down. Because.....VACCINES WORK! Funny you should remark that (the bolded above). Is this not EXACTLY what is happening in Texas with abortion? The mental gymnastics to argue over vaccines because "it's MY BODY" yet the very same damn people want to mandate what happens over OTHER PEOPLE'S BODY! You should know better than to ask that kind of question at this point, after years of trump-ism. These people are hypocrites through and through, or else they are truly delusional. They say one thing when it affects THEM but say the opposite when they want to impose it on OTHERS. Because you know, it's all about them.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Oct 26, 2021 12:30:11 GMT
As of today, the police/auxiliary forces can stop you and ask to see your vaccine passport. I had to show it to get into one of the shopping areas. Guess what? I was NOT offended! I was G.L.A.D.! People showed the card and went on their merry freaking way! I am still at a complete loss why people are arguing about masks and vaccines during a F*&^ing pandemic!!! Because people want to decide for themselves what medicine to put into their body. That's not unreasonable. For instance, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother would like to be able to decide for herself what she's willing to subject her baby to without being removed from society for not being willing to be forced to inject herself and her baby with a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? She has that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. What happens when it's something YOU don't agree with and you are mandated to do it or be removed from society? Biden said he would not mandate the vaccine and then he did. He's been doing that a lot. She has the right to make that choice, but not the right to demand that vaccinated people include her in any way. Vaccinated people have rights and freedom too.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 26, 2021 13:01:24 GMT
Because people want to decide for themselves what medicine to put into their body. That's not unreasonable. For instance, a pregnant woman or a breastfeeding mother would like to be able to decide for herself what she's willing to subject her baby to without being removed from society for not being willing to be forced to inject herself and her baby with a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? She has that right to make that decision for herself and her baby, without being essentially removed from society. As do the people that have had Covid, are young, healthy and the risk for them is low. Or any valid reason there is. What happens when it's something YOU don't agree with and you are mandated to do it or be removed from society?Biden said he would not mandate the vaccine and then he did. He's been doing that a lot. I simply point to polio or smallpox as an example. Vaccines ERADICATED these diseases. Covid continues to be a problem in countries because people will not get vaccinated and C-19 is able to mutate and march on. While life isn't back to normal, the push for vaccination here shows that cases are going down. Because.....VACCINES WORK! Funny you should remark that (the bolded above). Is this not EXACTLY what is happening in Texas with abortion? The mental gymnastics to argue over vaccines because "it's MY BODY" yet the very same damn people want to mandate what happens over OTHER PEOPLE'S BODY! If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:10:30 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2021 13:28:15 GMT
I simply point to polio or smallpox as an example. Vaccines ERADICATED these diseases. Covid continues to be a problem in countries because people will not get vaccinated and C-19 is able to mutate and march on. While life isn't back to normal, the push for vaccination here shows that cases are going down. Because.....VACCINES WORK! Funny you should remark that (the bolded above). Is this not EXACTLY what is happening in Texas with abortion? The mental gymnastics to argue over vaccines because "it's MY BODY" yet the very same damn people want to mandate what happens over OTHER PEOPLE'S BODY! If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? Is the person you're going to give Covid to and kill living INSIDE OF YOU!?!?!?!??!
NO? ?
Then not a valid analogy.
Thanks for playing.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:10:30 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2021 13:28:29 GMT
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Oct 26, 2021 13:54:27 GMT
I simply point to polio or smallpox as an example. Vaccines ERADICATED these diseases. Covid continues to be a problem in countries because people will not get vaccinated and C-19 is able to mutate and march on. While life isn't back to normal, the push for vaccination here shows that cases are going down. Because.....VACCINES WORK! Funny you should remark that (the bolded above). Is this not EXACTLY what is happening in Texas with abortion? The mental gymnastics to argue over vaccines because "it's MY BODY" yet the very same damn people want to mandate what happens over OTHER PEOPLE'S BODY! If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Oct 26, 2021 15:37:21 GMT
If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice. Agree. And I'll point out to the PP that the Biden admin hasn't imposed universal vaccine mandates and won't. They have made vaccination a condition of certain employment opportunities. You know, like drug tests and other barriers to job entry imposed in the name of safety. Those who object are welcome to seek employment elsewhere. Problem with the anti-vaxxers is that they want to have their cake and eat it, too - they want to remain unvaccinated and force others to be endangered by their choices. But vaccination status is not an immutable characteristic. It's a choice. As such, the unvaccinated are not a protected class, and endangering others in public places and employment sites is not a right.
|
|
|
Post by hookturnian on Oct 26, 2021 20:54:50 GMT
There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. Slight correction. The vaccines have not been administered to 6.9B people; 6.9B doses have been administered. There's a difference. While about half the world's population has received at least one dose, only 3.1% of people in low income countries have received at least one dose.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 26, 2021 20:59:37 GMT
There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice. Agree. And I'll point out to the PP that the Biden admin hasn't imposed universal vaccine mandates and won't. They have made vaccination a condition of certain employment opportunities. You know, like drug tests and other barriers to job entry imposed in the name of safety. Those who object are welcome to seek employment elsewhere. Problem with the anti-vaxxers is that they want to have their cake and eat it, too - they want to remain unvaccinated and force others to be endangered by their choices. But vaccination status is not an immutable characteristic. It's a choice. As such, the unvaccinated are not a protected class, and endangering others in public places and employment sites is not a right. So perfectly stated!
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 26, 2021 21:04:04 GMT
U.S. Vaccinations: State by State Roughly half of the U.S. population has been fully vaccinated, and states are flush with supply. The vaccination campaign, however, has slowed. Once the envy of the world for its swift rollout, the U.S. has since been overtaken by dozens of countries. There are still wide gaps between the most and least vaccinated counties in the U.S., leaving many communities vulnerable to continued outbreaks.
Distribution in the U.S. is directed by the federal government. Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine, as well as Moderna’s shot both require two doses taken several weeks apart. J&J’s inoculation requires just a single dose. Additional booster shots may be used to enhance protections over time.
So far, 221 million Americans have received at least one dose of a vaccine—85.5% of the adult population. At least 191 million people have completed a vaccination regimen. The U.S. is sending some of its excess supply to other hard-hit regions of the world.
(Bloomberg)
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Oct 26, 2021 21:26:36 GMT
There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. Slight correction. The vaccines have not been administered to 6.9B people; 6.9B doses have been administered. There's a difference. While about half the world's population has received at least one dose, only 3.1% of people in low income countries have received at least one dose. In the context of how many actual people total, yes it’s important to note the difference. The context of that figure was with regards to safety though, in which case the total amount of doses (to people) is also relevant as a total figure metric, seeing as any one dose of a two dose regimen can generate an adverse reaction. That being said 3.9 billion total people is still a lot of people data, for safety indicator purposes. 🙂
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Oct 26, 2021 22:23:42 GMT
There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. Slight correction. The vaccines have not been administered to 6.9B people; 6.9B doses have been administered. There's a difference. While about half the world's population has received at least one dose, only 3.1% of people in low income countries have received at least one dose. My point stands. I had two doses with two different sets of side effects.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 27, 2021 3:27:44 GMT
If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? Is the person you're going to give Covid to and kill living INSIDE OF YOU!?!?!?!??!
NO? ?
Then not a valid analogy.
Thanks for playing.
Being forced to give birth when you have decided it's not what's best for you and/or the baby. Being forced to take a shot of antibodies that you already have in your body naturally, when you have decided it's not what's best for you or your baby. Yep. Valid analogy.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 27, 2021 3:31:09 GMT
If you can understand the objection to banning abortion, because "my body, my choice", then surely you can understand the objection of a pregnant woman, or a breastfeeding mom not wanting to inject a brand new vaccine that has so many unknowns that we have yet to discover. A vaccine that isn't safe for babies? There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice. There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. How many years did it take to discover that thalidomide produced birth defects? So no, people that don't want to risk subjecting their baby to something like that should NOT be deemed unfit for society.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 27, 2021 3:32:55 GMT
There are no unknowns concerning the safety of these vaccines for the approved populations - it's been administered to 6.9B people, including pregnant and breastfeeding women with minimal adverse events. What does remain unknown are the long-term adverse effects of having Covid. And whether or not vaccinating babies is 'unsafe' (right now, there is no data either way) in no way impacts the safety of vaccinating pregnant or breastfeeding women - medically, the two are unrelated. But, FTR, I don't believe that anyone should be forced to get the vaccine. I also don't believe that those who don't get the vaccine should be granted access to services that put other people at risk. Get the jab, don't get the jab, entirely your choice. Just be prepared to live with everything that goes along with that choice. Agree. And I'll point out to the PP that the Biden admin hasn't imposed universal vaccine mandates and won't. They have made vaccination a condition of certain employment opportunities. You know, like drug tests and other barriers to job entry imposed in the name of safety. Those who object are welcome to seek employment elsewhere. Problem with the anti-vaxxers is that they want to have their cake and eat it, too - they want to remain unvaccinated and force others to be endangered by their choices. But vaccination status is not an immutable characteristic. It's a choice. As such, the unvaccinated are not a protected class, and endangering others in public places and employment sites is not a right. The big, still as of yet, unanswered question is: if you can get vaccinated and still get or pass on covid, why are only the unvaccinated being blamed for getting or passing covid? That is what makes no sense to millions of people.
|
|
|
Post by dizzycheermom on Oct 27, 2021 3:51:10 GMT
Is the person you're going to give Covid to and kill living INSIDE OF YOU!?!?!?!??!
NO? ?
Then not a valid analogy.
Thanks for playing.
Being forced to give birth when you have decided it's not what's best for you and/or the baby. Being forced to take a shot of antibodies that you already have in your body naturally, when you have decided it's not what's best for you or your baby. Yep. Valid analogy. Sorry I'm coming in late here....who is forcing pregnant women to get the vaccine even if they don't want one? If they have a job that mandates a vaccine, then they may be able to get a note from their doctor for an exemption. Otherwise they are not being held down and forcibly jabbed! They have the option to look for another job. To my knowledge no one has been vaccinated without consent.
|
|
|
Post by dizzycheermom on Oct 27, 2021 3:58:47 GMT
Agree. And I'll point out to the PP that the Biden admin hasn't imposed universal vaccine mandates and won't. They have made vaccination a condition of certain employment opportunities. You know, like drug tests and other barriers to job entry imposed in the name of safety. Those who object are welcome to seek employment elsewhere. Problem with the anti-vaxxers is that they want to have their cake and eat it, too - they want to remain unvaccinated and force others to be endangered by their choices. But vaccination status is not an immutable characteristic. It's a choice. As such, the unvaccinated are not a protected class, and endangering others in public places and employment sites is not a right. The big, still as of yet, unanswered question is: if you can get vaccinated and still get or pass on covid, why are only the unvaccinated being blamed for getting or passing covid? That is what makes no sense to millions of people. It has been well documented that at least 90% of covid patients in the hospital are unvaccinated. And that the majority of those testing positive are unvaccinated. Yes vaccinated people can spread it but these numbers show that it is more widespread in unvaccinated people. Unvaccinated people have the right to not be vaccinated. But there may be consequences as far as keeping a job or going to certain stores/events/etc.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:10:30 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2021 4:25:43 GMT
Is the person you're going to give Covid to and kill living INSIDE OF YOU!?!?!?!??! NO? ? Then not a valid analogy. Thanks for playing.
Being forced to give birth when you have decided it's not what's best for you and/or the baby. Being forced to take a shot of antibodies that you already have in your body naturally, when you have decided it's not what's best for you or your baby. Yep. Valid analogy. is the person who would be harmed by you not giving birth or not getting a shot living inside one of your organs in both cases?
No?
Then not a valid analogy.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2021 4:29:55 GMT
Viable is the operative word!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 27, 2021 4:31:45 GMT
And you don't give a damn if you kill me or someone else with your Covid?
|
|
|
Post by hookturnian on Oct 27, 2021 12:04:50 GMT
Slight correction. The vaccines have not been administered to 6.9B people; 6.9B doses have been administered. There's a difference. While about half the world's population has received at least one dose, only 3.1% of people in low income countries have received at least one dose. My point stands. I had two doses with two different sets of side effects. Your post implied that >85% of people on this planet have been vaccinated. This is patently untrue. Would it be true to say that 415M Americans had been vaccinated?
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Oct 27, 2021 12:09:23 GMT
My point stands. I had two doses with two different sets of side effects. Your post implied that >85% of people on this planet have been vaccinated. This is patently untrue. Would it be true to say that 415M Americans had been vaccinated? My POINT still stands. Did you miss it?
|
|
|
Post by hookturnian on Oct 27, 2021 12:12:12 GMT
Your post implied that >85% of people on this planet have been vaccinated. This is patently untrue. Would it be true to say that 415M Americans had been vaccinated? My POINT still stands. Did you miss it? Did you miss mine?
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Oct 27, 2021 12:21:59 GMT
My POINT still stands. Did you miss it? Did you miss mine? No, I acknowledged it by responding to you. Again, it has no bearing on my point - The sample sizes are enormous. There are no unknowns when it comes to these vaccines and their approved populations.
|
|