|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 7, 2021 3:09:11 GMT
So I guess someone sent out the peaCON bat signal? đđŒââïžđ Every time you post this stupidity about a damn bat signal, you just show how much some of you despise any diversity of thought whatsoever. Gaslighting again.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 7, 2021 6:30:49 GMT
Yes that is incorrect. They are lying to parents. Indiana teacher and curriculum developer: "Iâm the science coach and admin in the largest public school district in Indiana. Iâm in dozens of classrooms a week, so I see exactly what weâre teaching our students." "When schools tell you that we arenât teaching Critical Race Theory, it means one thing: Go away and look into our affairs no further. It isnât about transparency; it isnât about cultural relevance; itâs race essentialism, painted to look like the district cares about students of color. We call it anti-racism so you feel bad if you disagree with our segregationist pedagogy." "Parents: When we tell you Critical Race Theory isnât being taught in our schools, weâre lying. Keep looking." "Yes, we told principals at the beginning of the year to lie to parents and tell them we werenât using CRT in schools. Yes, we continue to lie."
LINK video tweetHis Bios: Tony Kinnett is a curriculum developer, educator, and STEM coordinator in Indianapolis, Indiana. He is the co-founder of The Chalkboard Review, an education publication seeking to represent all teachers Anthony Kinnett is a curriculum developer in Indiana with a B.S. in Science Education and a M.A. in Curriculum Development and Education Technology. He is a former education policy and legislation advisor to Governor Walker of Wisconsin. Letâs not ignore the fact that they have totally misconstrued and twisted the meaning of CRT. See my posts quite a bit earlier on this thread with the tweets from Chris Rufo and the âexpandedâ definition of CRT. When republicans talks about CRT, they are referring to something totally different than actual CRT, the theory that is taught in law schools. ETA: there is also another CRT (cultural responsive teaching) which I sometimes wonder if people are getting confused with Critical Race Theory. There are going to be teachers that believe what Fox and RW media are telling them, just as there are those people in other professions. I'm not really concerned with what anyone CALLS it. That isn't really the issue. What stands out to me is what the students and teachers are experiencing from whatever you want to call it, that they are employing in schools: "hostile culture of conformity and fear that has taken hold of our school""schoolâs ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood""This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students.""In my classroom, I see up close how this orthodoxy hinders studentsâ ability to read, write, and think."
"Students have internalized the message that this is the way we read and think about the world, and as a result, they fixate on power and group identity. This fixation has stunted their ability to observe and engage with the full fabric of human experience in our literature. In our school, the opportunity to hear competing ideas is practically non-existent.""How can students, who accept a single ideology as fact, learn to practice intellectual curiosity or humility or consider a competing idea theyâve never encountered?"" How can students develop higher order thinking if they are limited to seeing the world only through the lens of group identity and power?" "these students have found comfort in their moral certainty, and so they have become rigid and closed-minded, unable or unwilling to consider alternative perspectives.""Of course, not all students are true believers. Many pretend to agree because of pressure to conform." "Iâve heard from students who want to ask a question but stop for fear of offending someone. I have heard from students who donât participate in discussions for fear of being ostracized."
"One student did not want to develop her personal essay â about an experience she had in another country â for fear that it might mean that she was, without even realizing it, racist. In her fear, she actually stopped herself from thinking. This is the very definition of self-censorship."" the stifling conformity has only intensified. Last fall, two administrators informed faculty that certain viewpoints simply would not be tolerated during our new ârace explicitâ conversations with our new âanti-racistâ work. They said that no one would be allowed to question the orthodoxy regarding âsystemic racism.â The message was clear, and the faculty went silent in response."
" The reality is that fear pervades the faculty. On at least two separate occasions in 2017 and 2018, our Head of School, standing at the front of Hajjar Auditorium, told the entire faculty that he would fire us all if he could so that he could replace us all with people of color.""During a recent faculty meeting, teachers were segregated by skin color. Teachers who had light skin were placed into a âwhite caucusâ group and asked to ârememberâ that we are âWhiteâ and âto take responsibility for [our] power and privilege.â D-Eâs racial segregation of educators, aimed at leading us to rethink of ourselves as oppressors, was regressive and demeaning to us as individuals with our own moral compass and human agency." "DE claims that we teach students how to think, not what to think. But sadly, that is just no longer true." "I hope administrators and board members awaken in time to prevent this misguided and absolutist ideology from hollowing out D-E, as it has already hollowed out so many other institutions."
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 7, 2021 14:55:17 GMT
Letâs not ignore the fact that they have totally misconstrued and twisted the meaning of CRT. See my posts quite a bit earlier on this thread with the tweets from Chris Rufo and the âexpandedâ definition of CRT. When republicans talks about CRT, they are referring to something totally different than actual CRT, the theory that is taught in law schools. ETA: there is also another CRT (cultural responsive teaching) which I sometimes wonder if people are getting confused with Critical Race Theory. There are going to be teachers that believe what Fox and RW media are telling them, just as there are those people in other professions. I'm not really concerned with what anyone CALLS it. That isn't really the issue. What stands out to me is what the students and teachers are experiencing from whatever you want to call it, that they are employing in schools: "hostile culture of conformity and fear that has taken hold of our school""schoolâs ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood""This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students.""In my classroom, I see up close how this orthodoxy hinders studentsâ ability to read, write, and think."
"Students have internalized the message that this is the way we read and think about the world, and as a result, they fixate on power and group identity. This fixation has stunted their ability to observe and engage with the full fabric of human experience in our literature. In our school, the opportunity to hear competing ideas is practically non-existent.""How can students, who accept a single ideology as fact, learn to practice intellectual curiosity or humility or consider a competing idea theyâve never encountered?"" How can students develop higher order thinking if they are limited to seeing the world only through the lens of group identity and power?" "these students have found comfort in their moral certainty, and so they have become rigid and closed-minded, unable or unwilling to consider alternative perspectives.""Of course, not all students are true believers. Many pretend to agree because of pressure to conform." "Iâve heard from students who want to ask a question but stop for fear of offending someone. I have heard from students who donât participate in discussions for fear of being ostracized."
"One student did not want to develop her personal essay â about an experience she had in another country â for fear that it might mean that she was, without even realizing it, racist. In her fear, she actually stopped herself from thinking. This is the very definition of self-censorship."" the stifling conformity has only intensified. Last fall, two administrators informed faculty that certain viewpoints simply would not be tolerated during our new ârace explicitâ conversations with our new âanti-racistâ work. They said that no one would be allowed to question the orthodoxy regarding âsystemic racism.â The message was clear, and the faculty went silent in response."
" The reality is that fear pervades the faculty. On at least two separate occasions in 2017 and 2018, our Head of School, standing at the front of Hajjar Auditorium, told the entire faculty that he would fire us all if he could so that he could replace us all with people of color.""During a recent faculty meeting, teachers were segregated by skin color. Teachers who had light skin were placed into a âwhite caucusâ group and asked to ârememberâ that we are âWhiteâ and âto take responsibility for [our] power and privilege.â D-Eâs racial segregation of educators, aimed at leading us to rethink of ourselves as oppressors, was regressive and demeaning to us as individuals with our own moral compass and human agency." "DE claims that we teach students how to think, not what to think. But sadly, that is just no longer true." "I hope administrators and board members awaken in time to prevent this misguided and absolutist ideology from hollowing out D-E, as it has already hollowed out so many other institutions." Once again you put a lot of stuff out there but do not provide any actual proof what is being said is actually happening. People make all kinds of accusations but that doesnât mean what they are saying is actually happening. That is why itâs important that what these folks are claiming is verified by outside sources. Has this happened? In any of the examples you provided above?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 7, 2021 15:23:00 GMT
I'm not really concerned with what anyone CALLS it. That isn't really the issue. What stands out to me is what the students and teachers are experiencing from whatever you want to call it, that they are employing in schools: "hostile culture of conformity and fear that has taken hold of our school""schoolâs ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood""This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students.""In my classroom, I see up close how this orthodoxy hinders studentsâ ability to read, write, and think."
"Students have internalized the message that this is the way we read and think about the world, and as a result, they fixate on power and group identity. This fixation has stunted their ability to observe and engage with the full fabric of human experience in our literature. In our school, the opportunity to hear competing ideas is practically non-existent.""How can students, who accept a single ideology as fact, learn to practice intellectual curiosity or humility or consider a competing idea theyâve never encountered?"" How can students develop higher order thinking if they are limited to seeing the world only through the lens of group identity and power?" "these students have found comfort in their moral certainty, and so they have become rigid and closed-minded, unable or unwilling to consider alternative perspectives.""Of course, not all students are true believers. Many pretend to agree because of pressure to conform." "Iâve heard from students who want to ask a question but stop for fear of offending someone. I have heard from students who donât participate in discussions for fear of being ostracized."
"One student did not want to develop her personal essay â about an experience she had in another country â for fear that it might mean that she was, without even realizing it, racist. In her fear, she actually stopped herself from thinking. This is the very definition of self-censorship."" the stifling conformity has only intensified. Last fall, two administrators informed faculty that certain viewpoints simply would not be tolerated during our new ârace explicitâ conversations with our new âanti-racistâ work. They said that no one would be allowed to question the orthodoxy regarding âsystemic racism.â The message was clear, and the faculty went silent in response."
" The reality is that fear pervades the faculty. On at least two separate occasions in 2017 and 2018, our Head of School, standing at the front of Hajjar Auditorium, told the entire faculty that he would fire us all if he could so that he could replace us all with people of color.""During a recent faculty meeting, teachers were segregated by skin color. Teachers who had light skin were placed into a âwhite caucusâ group and asked to ârememberâ that we are âWhiteâ and âto take responsibility for [our] power and privilege.â D-Eâs racial segregation of educators, aimed at leading us to rethink of ourselves as oppressors, was regressive and demeaning to us as individuals with our own moral compass and human agency." "DE claims that we teach students how to think, not what to think. But sadly, that is just no longer true." "I hope administrators and board members awaken in time to prevent this misguided and absolutist ideology from hollowing out D-E, as it has already hollowed out so many other institutions." Once again you put a lot of stuff out there but do not provide any actual proof what is being said is actually happening. People make all kinds of accusations but that doesnât mean what they are saying is actually happening. That is why itâs important that what these folks are claiming is verified by outside sources. Has this happened? In any of the examples you provided above? And what of the many thousands of teachers who have spoken up to say that this is not happening in their schools, and that such accusations are ridiculous? Where does that fit in votersâ beliefs that they need to take over the schools?
|
|
purplebee
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,801
Jun 27, 2014 20:37:34 GMT
|
Post by purplebee on Nov 7, 2021 16:39:31 GMT
The current surge of Republican-driven âCRTâ hysteria is mind-boggling to me. CRT Is nothing but a dog whistle for anything being taught about the absolutely true history of the treatment of POC in America. Ban CRT is what the trump cultists WANT to hear, it is what fuels their self-satisfied, and yes, racist outrage, and I blame trump for all of it. This whole movement is yet another symptom of the terrible trump fever that has infected so many formerly sane people.
Yes, Lucy, we ARE doomed.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Nov 7, 2021 16:48:41 GMT
Lol wants to ensure CRT isnât taught. Maybe he should ensure that basic American Government is? đ
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 7, 2021 19:39:22 GMT
Letâs not ignore the fact that they have totally misconstrued and twisted the meaning of CRT. See my posts quite a bit earlier on this thread with the tweets from Chris Rufo and the âexpandedâ definition of CRT. When republicans talks about CRT, they are referring to something totally different than actual CRT, the theory that is taught in law schools. ETA: there is also another CRT (cultural responsive teaching) which I sometimes wonder if people are getting confused with Critical Race Theory. There are going to be teachers that believe what Fox and RW media are telling them, just as there are those people in other professions. I'm not really concerned with what anyone CALLS it. That isn't really the issue. What stands out to me is what the students and teachers are experiencing from whatever you want to call it, that they are employing in schools: "hostile culture of conformity and fear that has taken hold of our school""schoolâs ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood""This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students.""In my classroom, I see up close how this orthodoxy hinders studentsâ ability to read, write, and think."
"Students have internalized the message that this is the way we read and think about the world, and as a result, they fixate on power and group identity. This fixation has stunted their ability to observe and engage with the full fabric of human experience in our literature. In our school, the opportunity to hear competing ideas is practically non-existent.""How can students, who accept a single ideology as fact, learn to practice intellectual curiosity or humility or consider a competing idea theyâve never encountered?"" How can students develop higher order thinking if they are limited to seeing the world only through the lens of group identity and power?" "these students have found comfort in their moral certainty, and so they have become rigid and closed-minded, unable or unwilling to consider alternative perspectives.""Of course, not all students are true believers. Many pretend to agree because of pressure to conform." "Iâve heard from students who want to ask a question but stop for fear of offending someone. I have heard from students who donât participate in discussions for fear of being ostracized."
"One student did not want to develop her personal essay â about an experience she had in another country â for fear that it might mean that she was, without even realizing it, racist. In her fear, she actually stopped herself from thinking. This is the very definition of self-censorship."" the stifling conformity has only intensified. Last fall, two administrators informed faculty that certain viewpoints simply would not be tolerated during our new ârace explicitâ conversations with our new âanti-racistâ work. They said that no one would be allowed to question the orthodoxy regarding âsystemic racism.â The message was clear, and the faculty went silent in response."
" The reality is that fear pervades the faculty. On at least two separate occasions in 2017 and 2018, our Head of School, standing at the front of Hajjar Auditorium, told the entire faculty that he would fire us all if he could so that he could replace us all with people of color.""During a recent faculty meeting, teachers were segregated by skin color. Teachers who had light skin were placed into a âwhite caucusâ group and asked to ârememberâ that we are âWhiteâ and âto take responsibility for [our] power and privilege.â D-Eâs racial segregation of educators, aimed at leading us to rethink of ourselves as oppressors, was regressive and demeaning to us as individuals with our own moral compass and human agency." "DE claims that we teach students how to think, not what to think. But sadly, that is just no longer true." "I hope administrators and board members awaken in time to prevent this misguided and absolutist ideology from hollowing out D-E, as it has already hollowed out so many other institutions." And republicans are the cause of all thisârunning their lies on fear based bullshit. The entire missive youâve posted SCREAMS of segregation and not wanting to teach real, accurate history. It SCREAMS of white privileged individuals not wanting to address any other cultureâ
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 8, 2021 3:03:07 GMT
Is this the sort of alternative viewpoint weâre supposed to allow now? Is this what is being âsuppressedâ in the name of conformity? đ
|
|
|
Post by refugeepea on Nov 8, 2021 4:29:59 GMT
McAuliffe used a racist hoax against his opponent. Was it the the Democrats dressed as neo Nazi white supremacists? Because one of them was black and there was a woman clearly dressed as a man. Seemed obvious they weren't legitimate tiki torch carriers.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 8, 2021 5:56:05 GMT
McAuliffe used a racist hoax against his opponent. Was it the the Democrats dressed as neo Nazi white supremacists? Because one of them was black and there was a woman clearly dressed as a man. Seemed obvious they weren't legitimate tiki torch carriers. So, Terry McAuliffe used an obvious hoax in an attempt to have his political opponent disqualified. That just shows that he's an even bigger scumbag than I first realized. Thanks for pointing that out.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 8, 2021 6:19:55 GMT
Was it the the Democrats dressed as neo Nazi white supremacists? Because one of them was black and there was a woman clearly dressed as a man. Seemed obvious they weren't legitimate tiki torch carriers. So, Terry McAuliffe used an obvious hoax in an attempt to have his political opponent disqualified. That just shows that he's an even bigger scumbag than I first realized. Thanks for pointing that out. Lincoln Project has said they are responsible for that hoax. link
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 8, 2021 6:45:06 GMT
So, Terry McAuliffe used an obvious hoax in an attempt to have his political opponent disqualified. That just shows that he's an even bigger scumbag than I first realized. Thanks for pointing that out. Lincoln Project has said they are responsible for that hoax. link
Yes, they were responsible and Terry McAuliffe used that hoax to attempt to disqualify his political opponent.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 8, 2021 6:46:09 GMT
Lincoln Project has said they are responsible for that hoax. link
Yes, they were responsible and Terry McAuliffe used that hoax to attempt to disqualify his political opponent. Exactly how?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 8, 2021 7:14:48 GMT
Yes, they were responsible and Terry McAuliffe used that hoax to attempt to disqualify his political opponent. Exactly how? He tweeted a picture of the hoax and said this should disqualify Youngkin.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 8, 2021 7:17:39 GMT
He tweeted a picture of the hoax and said this should disqualify Youngkin. Where is the tweet?
|
|
|
Post by refugeepea on Nov 8, 2021 12:32:09 GMT
Was it the the Democrats dressed as neo Nazi white supremacists? Because one of them was black and there was a woman clearly dressed as a man. Seemed obvious they weren't legitimate tiki torch carriers. So, Terry McAuliffe used an obvious hoax in an attempt to have his political opponent disqualified. That just shows that he's an even bigger scumbag than I first realized. Thanks for pointing that out. Lincoln Project has said they are responsible for that hoax. link
I knew it was The Lincoln Project. I guess I should have been clearer in my statement. I know a couple of the people were linked to the Virginia Democrat party. I haven't looked into every person that participated.
Seems a dumb thing for McAuliffe to tweet.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 8, 2021 13:11:31 GMT
He tweeted a picture of the hoax and said this should disqualify Youngkin. Now do trump jr.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 8, 2021 13:14:28 GMT
Lincoln Project has said they are responsible for that hoax. link
Yes, they were responsible and Terry McAuliffe used that hoax to attempt to disqualify his political opponent. And what would you call what Margie Greene is doing on a daily basis? Or Jim Jordan? Matt Gaetz? Theyâre all liars, congress people who are lying and spreading more conspiracy theories, racism, hatefulness, and lying out their big fucking pie holes, attempting to disqualify other congress people, politicians, the president. ThemselvesâNot anyone else doing it.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 8, 2021 13:16:35 GMT
Was it the the Democrats dressed as neo Nazi white supremacists? Because one of them was black and there was a woman clearly dressed as a man. Seemed obvious they weren't legitimate tiki torch carriers. So, Terry McAuliffe used an obvious hoax in an attempt to have his political opponent disqualified. That just shows that he's an even bigger scumbag than I first realized. Thanks for pointing that out. Posts like this just show us day in and day out what a hypocrite you are.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 8, 2021 14:13:29 GMT
Where is the tweet? I looked and couldnât find it.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 8, 2021 21:16:47 GMT
It's possible that McAuliffe tweeted before Lincoln Project claimed responsibility and deleted it after he found out. So infuriating that Democrats get held to a higher standard in everything. Just look at all of the stupid tweets from former, junior, Ted Cruz, MTG, Gaetz, Johnson, Jackson, Gosar etc. Republicans never call them out for their stupid tweets.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 8, 2021 22:28:17 GMT
It's possible that McAuliffe tweeted before Lincoln Project claimed responsibility and deleted it after he found out. So infuriating that Democrats get held to a higher standard in everything. Just look at all of the stupid tweets from former, junior, Ted Cruz, MTG, Gaetz, Johnson, Jackson, Gosar etc. Republicans never call them out for their stupid tweets. IOKIYR
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 8, 2021 22:52:33 GMT
He didnât tweet it. One of his staffers made the comment.
On the day in question he was campaigning with VP Harris.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 9, 2021 1:20:16 GMT
He didnât tweet it. One of his staffers made the comment. On the day in question he was campaigning with VP Harris. On his Twitter? Then he should have them check with him before allowing anyone to tweet on his behalf. They made him look like an opportunist jackass, not to mention a dumbass who doesn't know that who supports you is not a disqualifying element. Where did you get your information?
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 9, 2021 1:52:19 GMT
You're trying to criticize McAuliffe for something he had no involvement with and condemned in strong terms. Lincoln Project was trying to draw attention to what happened in Charlottesville. The way they went about it was wrong and they accepted responsibility. In comparison, former said there were good people on both sides and never apologized for those comments. The Republicans have looked the other way and sometimes knowingly embraced white supremacy.
Lincoln Project - âTodayâs demonstration was our way of reminding Virginians what happened in Charlottesville four years ago, the Republican Partyâs embrace of those values, and Glenn Youngkinâs failure to condemn it,â the Lincoln Project said in an unnamed statement. âWe will continue to hold Glenn Youngkin accountable. If he will denounce Trumpâs assertion that the Charlottesville rioters possessed âvery fineâ qualities, weâll withdraw the tiki torches. Until then, weâll be back.â
|
|
|
Post by dizzycheermom on Nov 9, 2021 2:23:12 GMT
He tweeted a picture of the hoax and said this should disqualify Youngkin. Do you have a screenshot of the tweet? BC the one just posted doesn't say that it should disqualify Youngkin. Just says that the McAuliffe camp condemns what happened.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 9, 2021 2:55:45 GMT
He tweeted a picture of the hoax and said this should disqualify Youngkin. Do you have a screenshot of the tweet? BC the one just posted doesn't say that it should disqualify Youngkin. Just says that the McAuliffe camp condemns what happened. Exactly. I did a quick search and might have missed it, but I couldn't find a tweet from one of his staffers saying it should disqualify Youngkin.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 9, 2021 3:01:12 GMT
He didnât tweet it. One of his staffers made the comment. On the day in question he was campaigning with VP Harris. On his Twitter? Then he should have them check with him before allowing anyone to tweet on his behalf. They made him look like an opportunist jackass, not to mention a dumbass who doesn't know that who supports you is not a disqualifying element. Where did you get your information? You are making assumptions again. I tracked the story down that had the tweet from a staffer using her own account. It had a date of 10/29/2021 so I went to Twitter and starting the day before the date & read everyone of Terry McAuliffeâs tweets until the election. What you claimed was there wasnât. I thought of sharing what I found but decided screw it, YOU should have done this work before you made the accusation. And now there is information aj2hall brought that the McAuliffe Campaign condemned the Lincoln Project stunt.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 9, 2021 3:54:41 GMT
You're trying to criticize McAuliffe for something he had no involvement with and condemned in strong terms. Lincoln Project was trying to draw attention to what happened in Charlottesville. The way they went about it was wrong and they accepted responsibility. In comparison, former said there were good people on both sides and never apologized for those comments. The Republicans have looked the other way and sometimes knowingly embraced white supremacy. Lincoln Project - âTodayâs demonstration was our way of reminding Virginians what happened in Charlottesville four years ago, the Republican Partyâs embrace of those values, and Glenn Youngkinâs failure to condemn it,â the Lincoln Project said in an unnamed statement. âWe will continue to hold Glenn Youngkin accountable. If he will denounce Trumpâs assertion that the Charlottesville rioters possessed âvery fineâ qualities, weâll withdraw the tiki torches. Until then, weâll be back.â McAuliffe tweeted the picture and said that "this should disqualify Youngkin." That's his involvement in it. Since he deleted his tweet, I can't link it. They more than likely only came up with their story after they were found out. They sure didn't promote it when they stood up there. They were heard saying "We support Youngkin" as they stood there. This is not a reliable group. The Lincoln Project has been in trouble for covering for one of their founders was sexually harassing underaged boys. I highly doubt anything they say.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 9, 2021 4:06:12 GMT
On his Twitter? Then he should have them check with him before allowing anyone to tweet on his behalf. They made him look like an opportunist jackass, not to mention a dumbass who doesn't know that who supports you is not a disqualifying element. Where did you get your information? You are making assumptions again. I tracked the story down that had the tweet from a staffer using her own account. It had a date of 10/29/2021 so I went to Twitter and starting the day before the date & read everyone of Terry McAuliffeâs tweets until the election. What you claimed was there wasnât. I thought of sharing what I found but decided screw it, YOU should have done this work before you made the accusation. And now there is information aj2hall brought that the McAuliffe Campaign condemned the Lincoln Project stunt. How convenient for you. You ask for verifiable proof from me, I give it. You say, one teacher is not enough. I give other teachers, a students' and a parents' experience and then you move the goal posts that those personal accounts of their own experience need to be verified by "a disinterested third party". Now, when I ask where you got your info, you say "screw it, look for it yourself". That's your standard answer when you really can't back up your claims. That's how I know you aren't being honest in the discussion. It wasn't the aide's account that was tweeted on, it was McAuliffe's account. I saw it. I found information about a spokesperson of McAuliffe taking responsibility for something else entirely. Racists tweets from the spokesperson. Not the tweet about the tiki torch hoax.
|
|