|
Post by crazy4scraps on Dec 31, 2021 5:37:21 GMT
What about the teenagers sneaking in the house with the girl/boy/they/friend late at night? Shooting at them is OK? Exactly. Teenagers do stupid stuff all the time. Doesn’t mean they deserve to get shot.
|
|
|
Post by chaosisapony on Dec 31, 2021 6:16:31 GMT
@gar and @merge... i really don't think it would ever happen... nobody is ever out here unless they have car problems... then dh sends out a txt n several people meet dh n the person out to get their car going again... unless they hit a deer or hog... then the car will need a tow truck back to town... and someone will give the person a ride... People don't just randomly appear... i don't really have a suspicious nature.... and at 430 am dh would assume an animal over person... I'm going to back you up on this one. It's an inherent risk with rural living. You are on your own, there is no law enforcement that can protect you. I live in an area similar to you. The first year I lived here there was someone going around breaking into houses covered in blood and wielding a machete. The only reason he was stopped was because someone held him at gunpoint waiting the 30 minutes required for the sheriff to arrive. Just last year I had someone creepy try to get into my house. When they discovered my door was locked they stood outside and stared into my window for several long minutes. I called 911 and truly thought I was in danger. The sheriff made it here in 15 minutes, record time really. If that person truly meant me harm I would have been dead in that 15 minutes. It's not paranoia or suspicion, it's just fact. I don't have a gun because they terrify me. I do have a back door and neighbors within running distance. Most everyone I know thinks I am stupid for living here without a gun or at least a dog and I might be. I suppose only time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by katiejane on Dec 31, 2021 7:53:47 GMT
Shocking that he felt it was his right to shoot another human. He heard noises in his garage, and checked the alarm. But no checking on his family. And if someone was in the garage why does that equal death in his head.
I guess being from another country it leaves me dumbfounded that you would feel that an unidentified person in the garage means you are in threat. Why did he not lock the internal door and call the police. Which would be my first option, then grab my family and either leave the property by another door or just make are we were in another part of the house. He had no indication that his daughter was armed or a threat to life. Being in a garage doe not mean you are a killer. We have had attempted break ins before. Scary and unsafe feeling, but not worth killing someone over.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Dec 31, 2021 9:12:11 GMT
She has made it abundantly clear on other threads if it doesn't happen to her, someone in her family or someone she knows it doesn't matter. I would love myshelly to properly consider lesley 's post and respond to it.
|
|
maryannscraps
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,803
Aug 28, 2017 12:51:28 GMT
|
Post by maryannscraps on Dec 31, 2021 10:44:13 GMT
Interesting conversations. It reminds me of the thread from yesterday about the hallmarks of a narcissist.
|
|
teddyw
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,159
Jun 29, 2014 1:56:04 GMT
|
Post by teddyw on Dec 31, 2021 12:10:32 GMT
This isn’t far from me. And I will say I am anti-gun unless you’re hunting for food you are going to eat.
The week before this a 6yo, 9 yo and 22yo were gunned down in a car nearby. The deceased’s 10 yo sister was friends with them. I am not making excuses but I think that area has seen an uptick in crime and shootings that are gang related. So possibly the fear and anxiety there has really gone up.
The neighbor they interviewed said his grandson had been shot & killed a few months ago.
The shootings here are on the increase. They’re just shooting at each all over. Earlier this year they were shooting outside of Carter’s children’s store. It’s like there’s absolutely no regard for life.
I feel awful for that family.
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Dec 31, 2021 13:55:14 GMT
But no one broke into his house… He reasonably believed someone did. That’s all it takes. All it takes to kill his child? Yes, apparently. Let’s not lose sight of that - you’re arguing that he legally killed his child and that you wouldn’t have it any other way.
|
|
|
Post by hookturnian on Dec 31, 2021 14:14:16 GMT
Yes. I do know. And i dont just shoot randomly... i have never shot AT a person.. We have cameras around our gates and house... i can almost always see who is approaching our house.. so if the person looks suspicious and doesn't knock... i can't say that either i or dh wouldn't load the gun... For the record we dont have a loaded gun in the house.... the guns are locked. . The ammo is locked... in separate gun cases... but we do have both... I can't imagine living like that. Sadly this is "normal" middle-class and rich suburban life in South Africa. Houses have burglar bars, external doors have gates, you may have a gate separating living areas from bedrooms, fences are electrified or have razor wire, you have armed response like ADT, and panic buttons in every room. It's why Oscar Pistorius's initial statement sounded so plausible to South Africans. You're allowed to shoot in self defence in South Africa, but you must be able to show that you believed your life to be in danger. If a burglar has a knife but there's a locked gate between you, you cannot legally shoot him. You cannot shoot to defend property.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Dec 31, 2021 14:19:38 GMT
I can't imagine living like that. Sadly this is "normal" middle-class and rich suburban life in South Africa. Houses have burglar bars, external doors have gates, you may have a gate separating living areas from bedrooms, fences are electrified or have razor wire, you have armed response like ADT, and panic buttons in every room. It's why Oscar Pistorius's initial statement sounded so plausible to South Africans. You're allowed to shoot in self defence in South Africa, but you must be able to show that you believed your life to be in danger. If a burglar has a knife but there's a locked gate between you, you cannot legally shoot him. You cannot shoot to defend property. If I may ask, what effect do you think extreme income inequality in SA has on the level of security you feel is necessary?
|
|
hannahruth
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,717
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Aug 29, 2014 18:57:20 GMT
|
Post by hannahruth on Dec 31, 2021 14:21:25 GMT
I absolutely believe with every fiber of my being that if someone breaks into your house you have the legal and moral right to shoot to kill. I don’t understand how anyone could think that’s a bad thing. I think that's a bad thing. I don't think burglary warrants death. It is not excusable to break in to someone's house but killing someone is not an equal retaliation. Of course in the UK the chances of that person breaking into your house being armed is very low so that undoubtedly colours my opinion. I guess yours is based on the probability of them being armed. But suppose they broke in to steal stuff from your garage and were going to leave with their haul. As wrong and bad as that is I don't think it warrants being shot, and potentially, killed. Living in Australia my thoughts are very, very similar. Shootings of this kind has happened but it has been criminals breaking into another criminals house so circumstances were very different.
|
|
|
Post by hookturnian on Dec 31, 2021 14:31:57 GMT
Sadly this is "normal" middle-class and rich suburban life in South Africa. Houses have burglar bars, external doors have gates, you may have a gate separating living areas from bedrooms, fences are electrified or have razor wire, you have armed response like ADT, and panic buttons in every room. It's why Oscar Pistorius's initial statement sounded so plausible to South Africans. You're allowed to shoot in self defence in South Africa, but you must be able to show that you believed your life to be in danger. If a burglar has a knife but there's a locked gate between you, you cannot legally shoot him. You cannot shoot to defend property. If I may ask, what effect do you think extreme income inequality in SA has on the level of security you feel is necessary? South Africa is one of the most unequal societies in terms of wealth distribution. But crime is everywhere, in rich and poor areas, whether it's hijackings, kidnappings, rape, murder, home invasions or just simple theft. The only difference is that people with more money are able to have better security. I refused to live my whole life like that. It's why I left. ETA: When I still lived in SA, crime rates were higher in poor neighbourhoods. And there were plenty of well-off criminals, and I don't mean white collar crime. Crime is a career in South Africa.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Dec 31, 2021 14:38:15 GMT
hookturnian what is the gun culture like in SA? Are guns easily accessed?
|
|
|
Post by whipea on Dec 31, 2021 14:42:39 GMT
In my state you can not just shoot a person for breaking into your house. You need to show a reason why you feared for your life. If he couldn’t see the person well enough to see that it was his daughter then he didn’t see the person well enough to have a cause for self defense. Trespassing, even breaking & entering are not of themselves cause to kill in self defense. If he could not see her to tell if it was his daughter then he could not see her well enough to require killing in self defense. In fact he exhibited indifference to human life. ( manslaughter at the very least ) He should be charged no one in his home is safe if this is how he “responsibly” uses a gun It truly terrifies and repulses me that there is a small majority of states where this is true. I absolutely believe with every fiber of my being that if someone breaks into your house you have the legal and moral right to shoot to kill. I don’t understand how anyone could think that’s a bad thing. You should always have the right to protect your household (and I personally think that should extend to your property and your business). I would not want to live in a state without those protections. And talk about refusing to live in fear.
|
|
|
Post by hookturnian on Dec 31, 2021 14:56:27 GMT
hookturnian what is the gun culture like in SA? Are guns easily accessed? Lots of people have guns. You need to take an exam on the gun laws on when you can shoot, responsible gun ownership etc. Once you pass your exam you can apply for a gun licence, and once you have that you can purchase guns, which are registered. You have to renew your licence every few years. There are also a lot of illegal weapons, including AK47s. This is a holdover from apartheid times, when there were weapons caches hidden around the country. A lot of people also received military training of some sort, whether for or against the apartheid regime. South Africa had conscription until the early 90s, so just about every white man over the age of 50 would have served at least 2 years in the army. Many would have combat experience, domestic and abroad.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Dec 31, 2021 15:51:43 GMT
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,840
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Dec 31, 2021 16:35:54 GMT
But no one broke into his house… He reasonably believed someone did. That’s all it takes. So technically, in your line if thinking, if 2 people come upon each other in some scenario and they both, in their individual minds, fear for their life from each other, either one could shoot and kill the other because if what (they say) they believed? Again, fastest trigger finger wins? That's actually what a lot of people felt about the local Rittenhouse case. Many feared for their lives (and of others) because of him and his actions. If only they had shot to kill first... different dead person, same not guilty ending? Again, slippery slope, the "I believed" stuff
|
|
Gennifer
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,241
Jun 26, 2014 8:22:26 GMT
|
Post by Gennifer on Dec 31, 2021 17:03:24 GMT
@gar and @merge... i really don't think it would ever happen... nobody is ever out here unless they have car problems... then dh sends out a txt n several people meet dh n the person out to get their car going again... unless they hit a deer or hog... then the car will need a tow truck back to town... and someone will give the person a ride... People don't just randomly appear... i don't really have a suspicious nature.... and at 430 am dh would assume an animal over person... I'm going to back you up on this one. It's an inherent risk with rural living. You are on your own, there is no law enforcement that can protect you. I live in an area similar to you. The first year I lived here there was someone going around breaking into houses covered in blood and wielding a machete. The only reason he was stopped was because someone held him at gunpoint waiting the 30 minutes required for the sheriff to arrive. Just last year I had someone creepy try to get into my house. When they discovered my door was locked they stood outside and stared into my window for several long minutes. I called 911 and truly thought I was in danger. The sheriff made it here in 15 minutes, record time really. If that person truly meant me harm I would have been dead in that 15 minutes. It's not paranoia or suspicion, it's just fact. I don't have a gun because they terrify me. I do have a back door and neighbors within running distance. Most everyone I know thinks I am stupid for living here without a gun or at least a dog and I might be. I suppose only time will tell. I’m not sure anyone here lives more out of the way than me. For five months of the year my house is only accessible via snowmobile or a specially-equipped atv (and that’s if you have a gate key) or a really long (over a mile) walk through multiple feet of snow. I literally cannot have police or other emergency services respond to a call at my house. And, still… The amount of fear you and anaterra are displaying is… odd.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Dec 31, 2021 17:17:53 GMT
I'm going to back you up on this one. It's an inherent risk with rural living. You are on your own, there is no law enforcement that can protect you. I live in an area similar to you. The first year I lived here there was someone going around breaking into houses covered in blood and wielding a machete. The only reason he was stopped was because someone held him at gunpoint waiting the 30 minutes required for the sheriff to arrive. Just last year I had someone creepy try to get into my house. When they discovered my door was locked they stood outside and stared into my window for several long minutes. I called 911 and truly thought I was in danger. The sheriff made it here in 15 minutes, record time really. If that person truly meant me harm I would have been dead in that 15 minutes. It's not paranoia or suspicion, it's just fact. I don't have a gun because they terrify me. I do have a back door and neighbors within running distance. Most everyone I know thinks I am stupid for living here without a gun or at least a dog and I might be. I suppose only time will tell. I’m not sure anyone here lives more out of the way than me. For five months of the year my house is only accessible via snowmobile or a specially-equipped atv (and that’s if you have a gate key) or a really long (over a mile) walk through multiple feet of snow. I literally cannot have police or other emergency services respond to a call at my house. And, still… The amount of fear you and anaterra are displaying is… odd. I think that to some extent, it depends upon your circumstances and life experiences. I am very cautious; my doors are always locked. I never would leave a downstairs window unlocked at night. But I live alone, and have been burglarized twice in my life. If I lived alone in the country, I wouldn’t have a gun, but I would have a large dog.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 21:52:48 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2021 17:54:32 GMT
If I lived alone in the country, I wouldn’t have a gun, but I would have a large dog. If I lived alone in the country, I would have a gun. I would not however shoot w/o being able to ascertain if someone was a family member/friend first. The shoot-first-ask-questions-later crowd is lined up for these tragedies given their beliefs.
|
|
anaterra
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,134
Location: Texas
Jun 29, 2014 3:04:02 GMT
|
Post by anaterra on Dec 31, 2021 17:56:28 GMT
I guess i will take being called odd... its ok..
I dont feel like i live in fear... i dont watch the camera feed all day on high alert...
I haven't even loaded or shot any of the guns in a couple years... but dh has...
I do have the doors locked when im home alone...
I am not locked and loaded and ready to shoot anyone walking past....
I honestly dont know how fast i could get loaded and ready... it is not really something i worry about.. ever...
I just know that we do have guns... and if something suspicious is going on outside... its better in my opinion to be prepared then not... opinions of course vary so much on this topic...
I still support Beto even if he "came for our guns"
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Dec 31, 2021 18:00:37 GMT
If I lived alone in the country, I wouldn’t have a gun, but I would have a large dog. If I lived alone in the country, I would have a gun. I would not however shoot w/o being able to ascertain if someone was a family member/friend first. The shoot-first-ask-questions-later crowd is lined up for these tragedies given their beliefs. I agree with you. I was responding to being cautious, and why some people might differ in how they handle fear.
|
|
|
Post by chaosisapony on Dec 31, 2021 18:03:37 GMT
I’m not sure anyone here lives more out of the way than me. For five months of the year my house is only accessible via snowmobile or a specially-equipped atv (and that’s if you have a gate key) or a really long (over a mile) walk through multiple feet of snow. I literally cannot have police or other emergency services respond to a call at my house. And, still… The amount of fear you and anaterra are displaying is… odd. I think that to some extent, it depends upon your circumstances and life experiences. I am very cautious; my doors are always locked. I never would leave a downstairs window unlocked at night. But I live alone, and have been burglarized twice in my life. If I lived alone in the country, I wouldn’t have a gun, but I would have a large dog. That's a good point. I live alone. I'm not afraid (if I was I wouldn't be here) but I am cautious.
|
|
anaterra
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,134
Location: Texas
Jun 29, 2014 3:04:02 GMT
|
Post by anaterra on Dec 31, 2021 18:04:17 GMT
I did say in my very 1st post on this thread that the man should've known who he was shooting at before pulling the trigger... blindly shooting whatever is not ok...
I work night shift... sometimes i leave work early... i do send dh a txt letting him know... he is usually asleep so not really hearing his phone...
I do creep in trying to be quiet and not wake him.. i then kinda wake him just to let him know im home... especially if i am not going to bed but staying up to watch or whatever...
He isnt gonna jump out of bed n start getting a gun loaded 1st... like i said his 1st instinct is that it is usually an animal...
|
|
|
Post by Belia on Dec 31, 2021 20:49:06 GMT
In my state you can not just shoot a person for breaking into your house. You need to show a reason why you feared for your life. If he couldn’t see the person well enough to see that it was his daughter then he didn’t see the person well enough to have a cause for self defense. Trespassing, even breaking & entering are not of themselves cause to kill in self defense. If he could not see her to tell if it was his daughter then he could not see her well enough to require killing in self defense. In fact he exhibited indifference to human life. ( manslaughter at the very least ) He should be charged no one in his home is safe if this is how he “responsibly” uses a gun It truly terrifies and repulses me that there is a small majority of states where this is true. I absolutely believe with every fiber of my being that if someone breaks into your house you have the legal and moral right to shoot to kill. I don’t understand how anyone could think that’s a bad thing. You should always have the right to protect your household (and I personally think that should extend to your property and your business). I would not want to live in a state without those protections. Here's the thing- with that attitude, you are declaring yourself as judge, jury, and executioner, all in one fell swoop. And our constitution is supposed to prohibit that. Let's assume the worst- that this was a bad guy with bad intentions. They still have the right to be tried for their crimes in front of a jury of their peers, and they cannot be subject to cruel and unusual punishment. And, sorry, but DEATH would most definitely be a cruel and unusual punishment for the crime of breaking into a house. Which is all that father thought had happened at that point in time. I am not a gun owner and never will be, but I cannot believe that shooting first in the dark before you've even identified your target or accounted for the others in your house is considered responsible gun ownership. No way.
|
|
pilcas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,237
Aug 14, 2015 21:47:17 GMT
|
Post by pilcas on Dec 31, 2021 20:52:59 GMT
Why should charges be filed? The man meets all the requirements of self defense. He genuinely believed someone was breaking into his house. The fact that he was mistaken makes it a tragedy, not a crime. So if If my daughter gets up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom, we can shoot her because I wake up and think there is an intruder in the house?
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Dec 31, 2021 21:32:37 GMT
Shocking that he felt it was his right to shoot another human. He heard noises in his garage, and checked the alarm. But no checking on his family. And if someone was in the garage why does that equal death in his head. I guess being from another country it leaves me dumbfounded that you would feel that an unidentified person in the garage means you are in threat. Why did he not lock the internal door and call the police. Which would be my first option, then grab my family and either leave the property by another door or just make are we were in another part of the house. He had no indication that his daughter was armed or a threat to life. Being in a garage doe not mean you are a killer. We have had attempted break ins before. Scary and unsafe feeling, but not worth killing someone over. Because people with guns are scared of other people having guns. Unfortunately, they don't seem to realize that to others, THEY are the ones that are the threat. And it's a vicious cycle.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Dec 31, 2021 21:39:25 GMT
He reasonably believed someone did. That’s all it takes. So technically, in your line if thinking, if 2 people come upon each other in some scenario and they both, in their individual minds, fear for their life from each other, either one could shoot and kill the other because if what (they say) they believed? Again, fastest trigger finger wins? That's actually what a lot of people felt about the local Rittenhouse case. Many feared for their lives (and of others) because of him and his actions. If only they had shot to kill first... different dead person, same not guilty ending? Again, slippery slope, the "I believed" stuff Exactly. My understanding of the Rittenhouse situation is that the second and third guy he shot were responding to people yelling about someone already being shot (by Rittenhouse). THEY thought they were protecting others, but because of that, Rittenhouse was "justified" in shooting them because *they* were a threat to him. It is all just a big mess. So many situation in society (with police as well as citizens) are a mess because of the number of guns in this country, and the idea that you are justified to shoot based on any type of thread that you perceive is not ok.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Dec 31, 2021 21:48:38 GMT
Shocking that he felt it was his right to shoot another human. He heard noises in his garage, and checked the alarm. But no checking on his family. And if someone was in the garage why does that equal death in his head. I guess being from another country it leaves me dumbfounded that you would feel that an unidentified person in the garage means you are in threat. Why did he not lock the internal door and call the police. Which would be my first option, then grab my family and either leave the property by another door or just make are we were in another part of the house. He had no indication that his daughter was armed or a threat to life. Being in a garage doe not mean you are a killer. We have had attempted break ins before. Scary and unsafe feeling, but not worth killing someone over. Because people with guns are scared of other people having guns. Unfortunately, they don't seem to realize that to others, THEY are the ones that are the threat. And it's a vicious cycle. And people with guns who carry or keep them “for protection” leave their guns improperly secured, and the guns get stolen and used in a crime against someone else. Every gun purchased needs to be registered so it can be traced back to its legal purchaser. Then if it is stolen and used by another in a crime, the purchaser should have charges filed against them as well. If every gun owner secured their weapon properly, there would be many fewer guns on the street to be used by criminals and maybe people wouldn’t feel such a need for protection.
|
|
|
Post by Crack-a-lackin on Dec 31, 2021 23:13:43 GMT
I absolutely think this man was irresponsible and wrong to just shoot, and maybe even more so for not checking on his family when he found the door unlocked and open. But to play devils advocate, how do you know someone breaking in is only intending to rob you and doesn’t mean you harm? He broke into the garage but many people don’t have a lock on the door between the house and garage so this burglar is essentially inside your house (unless it was a detached garage).
I had a prowler recently while I was home and even though he was most likely going to steal from me I can tell you if he had gotten inside I would have done anything I could to hurt and incapacitate him rather than risk getting killed or raped. Especially with family sleeping upstairs.
|
|
|
Post by sabrinae on Jan 1, 2022 1:10:09 GMT
I can't imagine living like that. I don't live in a city... i live 32 miles from the closest town... on a country road leading to another country road... surrounded by cotton and maize fields... nobody is ever just in the neighborhood... because we dont have 1... if someone is suspicious out here... they knock cuz the are probably broke down along the highway.... if they dont knock then they will walkin to an armed house... There is no way to run out the backdoor and call 911... it would take a sheriff deputy alooonngggg time to get out here... . I live in a very similar area. It would take at least 30 minutes for someone to respond. I’m still not going to shoot someone I haven’t seen well enough to identify someone breaking into my house and I identify them — yeah I’ld shoot to protect myself or my kids.
|
|