|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 16:38:16 GMT
Where do you draw the line on what kind of medical treatments businesses are allowed to require? Would you be okay if bussinesses start requiring for example birth control as a condition of employment? After all people could just get another job if they don't like it according to the current rhetoric. You draw the line at public health and safety. The unvaccinated are health threat to others around them since they are more likely to get and spread covid. Pregnancy doesn't affect anyone else. Not according to studies like this... www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00768-4/fulltext
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Feb 10, 2022 16:43:15 GMT
Here in the states the shirtless and shoeless are denied entry to stores. The unvaxxed are not being denied access to health care. In fact, they are clogging up hospitals.I think I read about someone being taken off of a transplant list because they weren't vaxed. And it's not just the unvaxed clogging up hospitals. It's vaxed and unvaxed. Yep, here it is: 2peasrefugees.boards.net/thread/128116/man-denied-heart-transplantThere is a good reason for that. His immune system will be zilch. He will be at a much greater risk of contracting Covid , dying from it, and wasting a donor heart, which has been harvested at great time and expense. A doctor explained: “Dr. Arthur Caplan is Head of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. He says being vaccinated is necessary for this type of procedure. "Post any transplant, kidney, heart whatever, your immune system is shut off," Caplan said. "The flu could kill you, a cold could kill you, COVID could kill you. The organs are scarce, we are not going to distribute them to someone who has a poor chance of living when others who are vaccinated have a better chance post-surgery of surviving." FYI: The patient did get a heart pump, which should last for 5 years, after which he can hopefully try again.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 16:48:21 GMT
There is a good reason for that. His immune system will be zilch. He will be at a much greater risk of contracting Covid , dying from it, and wasting a donor heart, which has been harvested at great time and expense. A doctor explained: “Dr. Arthur Caplan is Head of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. He says being vaccinated is necessary for this type of procedure. "Post any transplant, kidney, heart whatever, your immune system is shut off," Caplan said. "The flu could kill you, a cold could kill you, COVID could kill you. The organs are scarce, we are not going to distribute them to someone who has a poor chance of living when others who are vaccinated have a better chance post-surgery of surviving." FYI: The patient did get a heart pump, which should last for 5 years, after which he can hopefully try again. I didn't follow up on that story so I am glad to hear that. Thank you!
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 10, 2022 16:49:16 GMT
There is a good reason for that. His immune system will be zilch. He will be at a much greater risk of contracting Covid , dying from it, and wasting a donor heart, which has been harvested at great time and expense. A doctor explained: “Dr. Arthur Caplan is Head of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. He says being vaccinated is necessary for this type of procedure. "Post any transplant, kidney, heart whatever, your immune system is shut off," Caplan said. "The flu could kill you, a cold could kill you, COVID could kill you. The organs are scarce, we are not going to distribute them to someone who has a poor chance of living when others who are vaccinated have a better chance post-surgery of surviving." FYI: The patient did get a heart pump, which should last for 5 years, after which he can hopefully try again. Yes, it should be noted that they did not deny him care - at all. They denied his first option of treatment because his decision to not vaccinate could severely compromise the outcomes of it. They gave him a second less ideal long term (but still life prolonging) option of a heart pump.
|
|
|
Post by compeateropeator on Feb 10, 2022 16:51:15 GMT
Did you read the transplant thread? Have you sat through a screening to get onto a transplant list? Because even before Covid, there were many things that would get you taken off a list…including but not limited to not getting vaccinations, risky behaviors, not treating other ailments or having various test and procedures done. I’d stick with using the Truckers and others losing their jobs and stay away from not being treated if unvaccinated for your reasonings because it is not true. At my hospital it is over 75% ( I can’t remember the exact figure so I am being conservative) of Covid patients in the ICU are not vaccinated. That is a pretty big clog.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Feb 10, 2022 16:53:48 GMT
That is part of a letter, not a study. It is his opinion. www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-04/coronacheck-lancet-anti-vaccine-mandate-letter/100802688Dr Franco-Paredes's letter begins by acknowledging that "vaccine effectiveness studies [have] conclusively demonstrated the benefit of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing individual symptomatic and severe disease, resulting in reduced hospitalisations and intensive care unit admissions". And while the letter does argue that there was evidence that vaccines didn't work to lessen the transmission of COVID-19, Dr Franco-Paredes does not argue for the removal of mandates. Rather, that "vaccination status should not replace mitigation practices such as mask wearing, physical distancing, and contact-tracing investigations, even within highly vaccinated populations".
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 16:55:34 GMT
That is part of a letter, not a study. It is his opinion.www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-04/coronacheck-lancet-anti-vaccine-mandate-letter/100802688Dr Franco-Paredes's letter begins by acknowledging that "vaccine effectiveness studies [have] conclusively demonstrated the benefit of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing individual symptomatic and severe disease, resulting in reduced hospitalisations and intensive care unit admissions". And while the letter does argue that there was evidence that vaccines didn't work to lessen the transmission of COVID-19, Dr Franco-Paredes does not argue for the removal of mandates. Rather, that "vaccination status should not replace mitigation practices such as mask wearing, physical distancing, and contact-tracing investigations, even within highly vaccinated populations". it doesn't mean it's wrong...
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Feb 10, 2022 16:57:26 GMT
That is part of a letter, not a study. It is his opinion.www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-04/coronacheck-lancet-anti-vaccine-mandate-letter/100802688Dr Franco-Paredes's letter begins by acknowledging that "vaccine effectiveness studies [have] conclusively demonstrated the benefit of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing individual symptomatic and severe disease, resulting in reduced hospitalisations and intensive care unit admissions". And while the letter does argue that there was evidence that vaccines didn't work to lessen the transmission of COVID-19, Dr Franco-Paredes does not argue for the removal of mandates. Rather, that "vaccination status should not replace mitigation practices such as mask wearing, physical distancing, and contact-tracing investigations, even within highly vaccinated populations". it doesn't mean it's wrong... No, it is just one doctor’s opinion. But very different from a peer-reviewed study. 🤷♀️
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:02:56 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2022 17:00:50 GMT
I am pro-vaccine but disagree with mandatory vaccination.
There are career choices such as the military where vaccinations are required and military applicants are already aware that vaccination goes hand in hand with the job . This is their choice because they would have known about it in advance.
I am guessing that Canadian truck drivers did not sign up to this because it has been applied retrospectively.
I think that mandated vaccines are different to a mask mandate.
I am happy with mask mandates because Covid is an airborne disease. Masks are not medically invasive. Masks protect the wearer as well as others.
Vaccinations on the other hand are medically invasive. There are people who have sadly died or had serious complications. I realise that the risks are likely small but they still exist . I also realise that many people tolerate the vaccine without any problems and that vaccines are helpful in reducing complications . Vaccines have played a part in saving some people’s lives.
There have been punitive measures introduced in some countries where refusing the vaccine has the consequence of people losing their livelihood or being continuously fined , or not allowed on public transport . Amnesty have already got involved in Italy for unvaccinated people not being allowed on trains despite a negative Covid test and wearing a high quality mask to protect themselves and others.
Like I say , I think that vaccines are a good choice for many people but not all.
People in various countries are being punished for exercising their medical choice on something that is medically invasive which also carries a degree of risk of a fatal outcome or long term complications.
Having said that so does catching Covid.
With practicing all the other precautionary measures transmission could still be reduced .
There are Omicron specific vaccines due out in the near future , which shows that even the vaccine manufacturers themselves feel that the current vaccines require improvement to offer better protection.
The spread of the pandemic most likely has multiple causes. Lack of masks Lack of social distancing Lack of ventilation Lack of hand hygiene Lack of isolation Lack of working from home Lack of effective vaccine protection against new variants
|
|
|
Post by sawwhet on Feb 10, 2022 17:12:20 GMT
But the GM workers are not losing their jobs or being denied the right to work because of any mandate though are they?
Yes they are, its a trickle down effect. I know there are internal mandates at the Ford manufacturing facility. They have to fill in a daily attestation, be fully masked in the facility, temperature testing before the enter the facility, socially distancing while working, only so many people per table at lunch etc. I could go on. They have a mandatory vaccine policy but it may have been extended. If you don't comply, you can't work. My neighbour works at Toyota in Woodstock and has similar mandates. There isn't a GM facility near me so I can't comment. ETA: this is in Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Feb 10, 2022 17:18:20 GMT
I am pro-vaccine but disagree with mandatory vaccination. There are career choices such as the military where vaccinations are required and military applicants are already aware that vaccination goes hand in hand with the job . This is their choice because they would have known about it in advance. I am guessing that Canadian truck drivers did not sign up to this because it has been applied retrospectively. I think that mandated vaccines are different to a mask mandate. I am happy with mask mandates because Covid is an airborne disease. Masks are not medically invasive. Masks protect the wearer as well as others. Vaccinations on the other hand are medically invasive. There are people who have sadly died or had serious complications. I realise that the risks are likely small but they still exist . I also realise that many people tolerate the vaccine without any problems and that vaccines are helpful in reducing complications . Vaccines have played a part in saving some people’s lives. There have been punitive measures introduced in some countries where refusing the vaccine has the consequence of people losing their livelihood or being continuously fined , or not allowed on public transport . Amnesty have already got involved in Italy for unvaccinated people not being allowed on trains despite a negative Covid test and wearing a high quality mask to protect themselves and others. Like I say , I think that vaccines are a good choice for many people but not all. People in various countries are being punished for exercising their medical choice on something that is medically invasive which also carries a degree of risk of a fatal outcome or long term complications. Having said that so does catching Covid. With practicing all the other precautionary measures transmission could still be reduced . There are Omicron specific vaccines due out in the near future , which shows that even the vaccine manufacturers themselves feel that the current vaccines require improvement to offer better protection. The spread of the pandemic most likely has multiple causes. Lack of masks Lack of social distancing Lack of ventilation Lack of hand hygiene Lack of isolation Lack of working from home Lack of effective vaccine protection against new variants I'm not sure how effective the current vaccines are in regards to preventing vaccinated people from getting Covid. I haven't seen specific numbers regarding that. However, the data that shows how many vaccinated vs unvaccinated are in the hospital and dying is staggering and shows that the vaccines are helpful. IMO, Covid isn't going away, but we really need to get a handle on the severity of the illness and how many are hospitalized and dying. Getting vaccinated is key to getting us there.
|
|
|
Post by cakediva on Feb 10, 2022 17:37:26 GMT
I am not being snarky here, but could it be that this is bothering you because you have not had to show proof of vaccines for your job before this? Many of us are used to having medical requirements, so this is just one more. It's not bothering me because I don't work in the medical field anymore. I've been out for several years. I am bothered by the fact that this trickled down into folks being harassed for not wearing masks in public places and not being able to go to a store or movie without a mask. And I will never be able to get over parents getting kicked off of airplanes because their 2-3 year old child would not keep a mask on. There is SO MUCH wrong with that. But guess what.....now that the mandates will all be getting dropped, what was it all for in the first place? Harassed for not wearing a mask? That works both ways. Or may be It’s my OPINION, it’s a thought. I never said it was a fact. I still consider it a peaceful protest compared to the riots of 2020/2021!!! As someone who had to pass through the Toronto protests... there was nothing peaceful about it. I had to be in the general area of it for about 10 minutes, because I had to work downtown, and couldn't drive down because of the closures. They were blocking the entrance into transit. Minding my own business, I was no less than 8 times called various versions of "fat fucking bitch" "stupid fat c*nt" "brainwashed fat bitch," had garbage thrown at me and was "accidentally" shoved into a snow pile. I guess because I was walking, and wearing a mask (which is required to get onto transit), and well, apparently my ass is too big for... freedom? Who knows. Deplorable was always the right word.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Feb 10, 2022 17:37:34 GMT
I am pro-vaccine but disagree with mandatory vaccination. There are career choices such as the military where vaccinations are required and military applicants are already aware that vaccination goes hand in hand with the job . This is their choice because they would have known about it in advance. I am guessing that Canadian truck drivers did not sign up to this because it has been applied retrospectively. I think that mandated vaccines are different to a mask mandate. I am happy with mask mandates because Covid is an airborne disease. Masks are not medically invasive. Masks protect the wearer as well as others. Vaccinations on the other hand are medically invasive. There are people who have sadly died or had serious complications. I realise that the risks are likely small but they still exist . I also realise that many people tolerate the vaccine without any problems and that vaccines are helpful in reducing complications . Vaccines have played a part in saving some people’s lives. There have been punitive measures introduced in some countries where refusing the vaccine has the consequence of people losing their livelihood or being continuously fined , or not allowed on public transport . Amnesty have already got involved in Italy for unvaccinated people not being allowed on trains despite a negative Covid test and wearing a high quality mask to protect themselves and others. Like I say , I think that vaccines are a good choice for many people but not all. People in various countries are being punished for exercising their medical choice on something that is medically invasive which also carries a degree of risk of a fatal outcome or long term complications. Having said that so does catching Covid. With practicing all the other precautionary measures transmission could still be reduced . There are Omicron specific vaccines due out in the near future , which shows that even the vaccine manufacturers themselves feel that the current vaccines require improvement to offer better protection. The spread of the pandemic most likely has multiple causes. Lack of masks Lack of social distancing Lack of ventilation Lack of hand hygiene Lack of isolation Lack of working from home Lack of effective vaccine protection against new variants Question… After reading the information below do you still think what you posted makes sense? I’ve read in several articles the virus mutants into a variant in unvaccinated host bodies. And this one is from August but this article sort of tells you how. Every time there is a new variant there is a rush to determine if the current group of vaccines work and how well. Restrictions are put in place until it can be determined how serious the new variant is. That being the case then logic dictates that to cut down on new variants then all the people that can be vaccinated get vaccinated so we can all go back to a somewhat normal life. Right now there is a lull and restrictions are being eased. But will that be the case a month from now? Six weeks from now? The problem is the experts don’t know. And again that is why it’s important for people that can get vaccinated, get vaccinated. And to make sure a enough vaccine is sent to the poorer countries who are behind in getting people vaccinated because of the lack of vaccines. I mean seriously people would you want to be the host body for virus to mutate into the latest variant? Ick. “ Unvaccinated People Are Increasing the Chances for More Coronavirus Variants — Here’s How”From the article… linkExperts say the number of unvaccinated people in the United States is a key reason coronavirus variants are emerging. They explain that the virus replicates quicker in unvaccinated people, increasing the chance of mutations. They’re concerned that new COVID-19 cases will continue to rise as variants spread and people still refuse to get vaccinated. How the virus spreads and changesOne of the key characteristics of the coronavirus is the spike protein that allows it to latch onto a host cell, penetrate it, and cause an infection. That spike is what vaccines target to block the virus. In the unvaccinated, however, the virus gets in, hijacks the cell, and turns it into a factory. It then makes thousands of copies of itself. If there’s a copying mistake or error, scientists call that a mutation. Occasionally, a mutation can help the virus get into the body’s cells more easily. When mutations accumulate over time, new variants of a virus strain emerge. The Delta variant has outpaced all its rivals by reproducing itself quicker and in larger numbers. Scientists say that makes it more highly contagious. Another complication has surfaced: Scientists say unvaccinated parents are bringing the virus home to their children. Pediatricians say cases are rising and children’s hospitals are seeing a spike in children needing care. Children under age 12 aren’t currently eligible for a vaccine. And, as schools are opening — some with minimal COVID-19 safety protocols — experts fear it’s only going to get worse.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:02:56 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2022 17:39:30 GMT
There are pros and cons on both sides.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,118
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Feb 10, 2022 17:47:46 GMT
Here in the states the shirtless and shoeless are denied entry to stores. The unvaxxed are not being denied access to health care. In fact, they are clogging up hospitals.I think I read about someone being taken off of a transplant list because they weren't vaxed. And it's not just the unvaxed clogging up hospitals. It's vaxed and unvaxed. Yep, here it is: 2peasrefugees.boards.net/thread/128116/man-denied-heart-transplantYou are being ridiculous! COVID 19 is not the only vaccine that is required. It just happens to be the one that this patient (and another one who was recently in the news) was missing. He would have been rejected without the flu and hepB vaccines as well. From Brigham and Women's Hospital: At Brigham and Women’s Hospital, we are committed to providing the most appropriate care for our patients with advanced heart disease and do everything possible to effectively improve heart function without a heart transplant. The journey to transplantation is often long because of the shortage of available organs compared to recipients in need, but we work with patients and their families to make each step of the transplant process as comfortable as possible. There are currently more than 100,000 candidates on waitlists for organ transplantation and a shortage of available organs — around half of people on waiting lists will not receive an organ within five years. There is no candidate who is “first on the list” since there are varying levels of priority for allocation of organs. Waitlists are everchanging and are based on many patient and donor factors. Patient criteria includes immunologic and blood factors, psychological and social factors, medical and surgical factors, and clinical condition. When an organ does become available, it must be carefully matched among a regional and national pool of candidates based on many factors, including blood type, height, weight, medical factors, distance to the recipient and organ size. Given the shortage of available organs, we do everything we can to ensure that a patient who receives a transplanted organ has the greatest chance of survival. Our Mass General Brigham healthcare system requires several CDC-recommended vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccine, and lifestyle behaviors for transplant candidates to create both the best chance for a successful operation and to optimize the patient’s survival after transplantation, given that their immune system is drastically suppressed. Patients are not active on the waitlist without this. Research has shown that transplant recipients are at a much higher risk of dying from COVID-19 when compared to non-transplant patients. This guidance is in alignment with recommendations from the American Society of Transplantation, American Society of Transplant Surgeons and International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Like most other transplant programs across the country, the COVID-19 vaccine is one of several vaccines and lifestyle behaviors that are required for patients awaiting solid organ transplant. Transplant candidates must also receive the seasonal influenza and hepatitis B vaccines, follow other healthy behaviors, and demonstrate they can commit to taking the required medications following transplant. At the Brigham and across our system, we have transplant guidelines that we follow in alignment with recommendations from the American Society of Transplantation, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. More information is available here. We follow this guidance in order to create both the best chance for a successful operation and also the patient’s disease-free survival, given that their immune system is suppressed after transplant. Research has shown that transplant recipients are at a higher risk of dying from COVID-19 when compared to non-transplant patients. Transplant recipients must take immunosuppressive medications after receiving a transplanted organ. This means that after a transplant, recipients will develop less of an antibody response to a vaccine and are especially vulnerable to severe illness if they contract the virus. For this reason, experts recommend COVID-19 vaccination before organ transplantation to lower the chance of severe disease and death if a recipient becomes infected. Exceptions to these requirements are reviewed by a multidisciplinary group of experts in transplantation.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:02:56 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2022 17:59:04 GMT
There are pros and cons on both sides. There almost always are. The question is which harms, how harmful are they, how likely are they ON EITHER SIDE. Currently, the best peer-reviewed science says the harms are greater if people remain unvaccinated. Those harms are exacerbated in certain fields. If you know better than the current world-wide peer-reviewed science, please publish a study and invite your fellow scientists to peer review your methods, data, analysis and conclusions.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:02:56 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2022 18:05:27 GMT
I know there are internal mandates at the Ford manufacturing facility. They have to fill in a daily attestation, be fully masked in the facility, temperature testing before the enter the facility, socially distancing while working, only so many people per table at lunch etc. I could go on. They have a mandatory vaccine policy but it may have been extended. If you don't comply, you can't work. My neighbour works at Toyota in Woodstock and has similar mandates. There isn't a GM facility near me so I can't comment. ETA: this is in Ontario, Canada Maybe so but I was referring to the GM facility that is being impacted now over the bridge. They are being laid off because of the actions of the truck drivers denying the free flow of goods so they can not continue the assembly lines. For all we know everyone could be vaccinated at the GM plant but they are still being denied the right to work because of the blockade by the truckers. Others shouldn't have the right to impact anyone else's right to work because they have different beliefs and or by their actions.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 18:42:26 GMT
I know there are internal mandates at the Ford manufacturing facility. They have to fill in a daily attestation, be fully masked in the facility, temperature testing before the enter the facility, socially distancing while working, only so many people per table at lunch etc. I could go on. They have a mandatory vaccine policy but it may have been extended. If you don't comply, you can't work. My neighbour works at Toyota in Woodstock and has similar mandates. There isn't a GM facility near me so I can't comment. ETA: this is in Ontario, Canada Maybe so but I was referring to the GM facility that is being impacted now over the bridge. They are being laid off because of the actions of the truck drivers denying the free flow of goods so they can not continue the assembly lines. For all we know everyone could be vaccinated at the GM plant but they are still being denied the right to work because of the blockade by the truckers. Others shouldn't have the right to impact anyone else's right to work because they have different beliefs and or by their actions.The absolute same could be said for the rioters of 2020/2021 who impeded people from getting to their jobs in the cities and who destroyed their businesses because of their different beliefs and actions.
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama
La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Feb 10, 2022 18:44:48 GMT
Especially when the protest has nothing to do with your (general you) job or yourself. The workers at the GM plant are being laid off because the components they need for the production lines are not being allowed through so they have to halt production. cindosha do you think it's fair and reasonable for these workers to lose their jobs when the protest has nothing whatsoever to do with them but they are prevented from working by others? Do you think the impact of the protest is fair when somewhere in the region of $320 million of goods cross that bridge daily worth $1.7 BILLION of trade daily. Ask yourself what impact that will have on your ( US) economy if it is allowed to continue? And for the record I think Canada has every right to mandate vaccinations for anyone crossing their border into their country. For the ones that think it's very unfair, I hope non of you are thinking of taking an out of country vacation or a cruise in the coming months because you will find that the same conditions apply - no vaccine = no cruise/ no vacation, to very many countries. But the protest has now morphed into something totally different to why it started. Others, with a very different agenda have taken over and it has got out of hand not only in US/Canada but also in parts of Europe, This no longer about vaccine mandates it's anarchy. I don't agree with you there. It has always been about freedom from mandates. Mandates that fire workers from their jobs if they are not vaccinated and require vax cards to get into a lot of stores, venues and restaurants. I would agree with you but then we'd both be wrong. The trucker convoy started because of the end of the moratorium that exempted long-haul truckers from requiring vaccines to pass back and forth over our southern border. But 90% of truckers were already vaccinated and, given that they would be required to show a pass to get into the US in the first place, the organizers weren't getting the support they wanted. Rather than facing the prospect of giving back the millions of dollars they had already raised, they changed the focus of the protest. And, FTR, since you seem to have missed others who have posted the same thing - there has NEVER been a requirement in Canada to show vaccine cards to get into stores - restaurants and venues, yes, but never stores. And we are, after all, talking about Canada here, yeah?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 10, 2022 18:46:35 GMT
Nah, I wouldn't say that about my mentions of it. Looking at my post history, I've never said the word until it was brought up by someone else. Then just like right now, all of my mentions have been in response to someone else bringing up the word as you did here. You have a point. It was a brief discussion, and you were responding to someone else. You did not appear to be a fan. Apologies for my lack of quoting skills. Jun 25, 2014 at 4:22pm huskergal said: For the peas who don't like the "Whataboutism", it is a forever fact of life. Obama got brought up constantly during the Trump presidency. It is what it is. You: It was NEVER acceptable when it came from conservatives. It was labeled as deflection, trolling, crazy, derailing the thread and all around demonized as nothing but a tactic. Interesting how it's now acceptable when it suits your deflection and tactics. And here: Jan 28, 2022 at 9:54am pixiechick said: I wasn't here then. If you all don't like it when conservatives did it and "you" tried to put a stop to it then, why is it suddenly acceptable now? Huskergal: I never said it was acceptable. I said it is what it is. It isn't going to change. As long as people are going to call out the sitting President for a behavior that the previous President did, and they didn't call out the previous President, whataboutism isn't going to change. Crap, Hillary got brought up by Trumpers and she wasn't even the President. You: You don't have to say it. When it was always called out with major piles-ons whenever a conservative did it and most aren't calling it out now, it IS acceptance. As has been stated just recently, silence is acceptance. So, hardly a tear. I misspoke. Certainly disapproval comes through. I will concede that whataboutisms have become part of the political discourse.Only since the Left wants to use it. When anyone on the Right did, the overwhelming majority (Left) would not allow it to be. So yeah, that's where the disapproval you're picking up comes from.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 10, 2022 18:50:18 GMT
Characterization of vaccines as ‘medically invasive procedures’ has been a goal of the anti-vaxx movement for quite a while. 🤷🏼♀️
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 18:50:25 GMT
There are pros and cons on both sides. There almost always are. The question is which harms, how harmful are they, how likely are they ON EITHER SIDE. Currently, the best peer-reviewed science says the harms are greater if people remain unvaccinated. Those harms are exacerbated in certain fields. If you know better than the current world-wide peer-reviewed science, please publish a study and invite your fellow scientists to peer review your methods, data, analysis and conclusions.Except, now the mandates and regulations/restrictions regarding covid and all that goes with it will all be dropped and/or lifted. Is that because the medical science has changed? No. It will be because the political science will change when the administration says it will change. Nothing will be different on the medical side of it. So it really doesn't matter, does it?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 10, 2022 18:52:58 GMT
Let’s all remember that you recently had to admit that you brought an article to this board in an attempt at a “gotcha” but had actually been taken in by a partisan writer who was just confirming your own biases. Yes, I posted an article from a Left leaning source and after some discussion of the issue and discussing the subjects non-existent reputation for speaking like that, not to mention the article was shown to be written by someone who used to write for the Blaze, I conceded that it wasn't as the writer presented it. It happens. It's what you do when it does, that shows who you are. You're making sure we see you. It was NOT a gotcha, and I never said it was. It’s not the first time that has happened, btw, though it was the first time you conceded it. You're right, in that it wasn't the first time I got it wrong. You're so very, very wrong that it was the first time I conceded that I was wrong. So far off. There was at least one other instance where you copied and pasted false and misleading words from a propaganda site article and used them as your own. NO, that did not happen. Where? Link it. And of course there’s the whole matter of you continuing to insist that you are not the pea we all know you are, who has been here for years. That’s very dishonest. No, I've NEVER said who I was and I've NEVER said who I wasn't. On any of the guesses/accusations. So no, I've never been dishonest about who I was. If you TRULY think I did and aren't just throwing out baseless accusations to see what sticks again, then link it. Does being caught out in instances like that ever cause you to reflect about whether many of your other cherished beliefs come from a place of misinformation and bias? If not, you’ve got no business telling anyone else about honesty. You’re not even capable of being honest with yourself. I haven't been caught out in anything. Back up your accusations with facts, not your written VERSION of them. Link them. I at least admit when I'm wrong. You on the other hand do nothing but try to deflect and make accusations when you make mistakes and then have the glaring lack of self awareness and character to ask ME if *I* reflect on MY mistakes. But thanks for confirming that what they’re really protesting is a politician and not a real infringement on their rights. I did no such thing. WTH are you even talking about here. The rest of your post is your typical grievance bullshit and matters not at all to me. I stand by what I said about the babies in Ottawa protesting something that shouldn’t even be a blip on their radar. My entire post is spot on and given your lack of character explains why you have turned around every instance YOU fucked up and deflected it back on me by throwing baseless accusations at me. Like YOU bringing the comparison of the 2 protests here to this thread and then having absolutely no self awareness, try to say I'm divorced from reality for comparing the two. That is the ultimate display of YOU being so blatantly dishonest. Either that, or YOU are divorced from reality. You choose.
|
|
|
Post by bunnyhug on Feb 10, 2022 18:53:08 GMT
I've waded through all 14 pages of this thread, and now I'm just mad at myself for wasting half an hour of my life reading all the tangential, ridiculous crap that has pulled the thread away from talking about the protest in Ottawa ... maybe I'll go have a tea and step away from the board before I start posting the cranky comments that will not result in anything positive ... I'm trying to keep my long held belief in myself as a 'polite Canadian' but the world is making that harder some days ...
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 19:04:29 GMT
I've waded through all 14 pages of this thread, and now I'm just mad at myself for wasting half an hour of my life reading all the tangential, ridiculous crap that has pulled the thread away from talking about the protest in Ottawa ... maybe I'll go have a tea and step away from the board before I start posting the cranky comments that will not result in anything positive ... I'm trying to keep my long held belief in myself as a 'polite Canadian' but the world is making that harder some days ... You can thank the deep left on this board for that!!!
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 10, 2022 19:08:21 GMT
I think there are some assumptions and misinformation in your post. If the truckers were having a peaceful protest that wasn’t disruptive, they might have more support. The Democrats are not coming down on them because of their jobs, we value and appreciate the work they do. We are opposed to their actions - blocking downtown streets, harassing pedestrians, blaring horns all day, blocking a border crossing etc. The blocked border crossing led to Ford and GM cancelling shifts at their factories. We support the auto workers who lost wages and the people in downtown Ottawa who have had to contend with the noisy, disruptive truckers for 2 solid weeks. Vaccine mandates are strictly that - requiring a vaccine, nothing more. They do not give governments greater powers for other medical treatments. Vaccine mandates have been in place for the small pox and other vaccines since the Revolutionary war and they have not lead to broader powers. Protests that don't cause any disruption at all are very easily ignored by the powers that be and highly unlikely to lead to any meaningful change imo. That doesnt mean they have to be violent but they do have to have some sort of an impact (which can include noise). Furthermore vaccine mandates to access non health care related jobs in your own country are not remotely the same thing as the vaccine mandates that were in place before the pandemic. It's not much of a reach to see how the enthustiac acceptance of 'no jab no job' could easily be extended to other forms of medical treatment. Protests that don't cause any disruption at all are very easily ignored by the powers that be and highly unlikely to lead to any meaningful change imo. That doesnt mean they have to be violent but they do have to have some sort of an impact (which can include noise). Which is exactly what those objecting NOW said to those objecting to the major disruptions and aggressive intimidation in 2020.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 10, 2022 19:20:45 GMT
Vaccine mandates have been in place for the small pox and other vaccines since the Revolutionary war and they have not lead to broader powers.
People never lost their jobs and healthcare because they weren't vaxed against small pox, or mumps or measles or hepatitis or pertussis or diphtheria. This is simply not true. Many jobs, including military service, require vaccines. Equating military requirements with civilian jobs is not a true comparison.
|
|
quiltz
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,850
Location: CANADA
Jun 29, 2014 16:13:28 GMT
|
Post by quiltz on Feb 10, 2022 19:27:46 GMT
I've waded through all 14 pages of this thread, and now I'm just mad at myself for wasting half an hour of my life reading all the tangential, ridiculous crap that has pulled the thread away from talking about the protest in Ottawa ... maybe I'll go have a tea and step away from the board before I start posting the cranky comments that will not result in anything positive ... I'm trying to keep my long held belief in myself as a 'polite Canadian' but the world is making that harder some days ... You can thank the deep left on this board for that!!!NO, it is the American's that are bringing in stuff from their country (USA) into the CANADIAN protest. Don't need to read/hear stuff that has happened in your country. This is (was?) a thread about the situation in CANADA.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 0:02:56 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2022 19:29:24 GMT
There almost always are. The question is which harms, how harmful are they, how likely are they ON EITHER SIDE. Currently, the best peer-reviewed science says the harms are greater if people remain unvaccinated. Those harms are exacerbated in certain fields. If you know better than the current world-wide peer-reviewed science, please publish a study and invite your fellow scientists to peer review your methods, data, analysis and conclusions.Except, now the mandates and regulations/restrictions regarding covid and all that goes with it will all be dropped and/or lifted. Is that because the medical science has changed? No. It will be because the political science will change when the administration says it will change. Nothing will be different on the medical side of it. So it really doesn't matter, does it? You are so ill-informed. It’s really a tragedy how ill-informed so many people are. The rules will change when the conditions change. Do you follow the science or the medical news at all?
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 10, 2022 19:39:53 GMT
You can thank the deep left on this board for that!!! NO, it is the American's that are bringing in stuff from their country (USA) into the CANADIAN protest. Don't need to read/hear stuff that has happened in your country. This is (was?) a thread about the situation in CANADA. Then don't go on an international message board.
|
|