The truckers protest in Ottawa is out of hand

That's a pretty broad statement now...and are you suggesting that random people on SM don't have bias, specific angles, agendas etc?

No, my recommendation was to watch events live as they are happening and to form your own opinion. 

I could spend all afternoon pointing out inaccuracies in reporting. What I'm suggesting is that watching live feeds of ongoing events (from a broad spectrum of people if you want to see all "angles") is better than being fed small tidbits with "spin".  These days every second person has their camera out filming things - there are many sources to choose from.

Certainly there's a lot to point out when it comes to certain news channels etc!

Combined with reports of protestors urinating and defecating? Photos showing multiple instances, not just some redneck that let their dog pee on the monument?

I feel like you’re really making a concerted effort to see only what you want to see here.

I think you missed the part where the Emergencies Act was invoked. There is a time limit on the occupation and the police were incredibly patient in educating the crowd as to what would happen next and giving them ample time to leave before arrests started.

The Children's Aid Society of Ottawa (CASO) is not going to make public comments on complaints, tips and/or investigations.

CASO absolutely did make statements urging parents to have a care plan for their children in place as the arrests started. 

CTV coverage

Sorry, but you have that ass backwards.  No, eyewitness accounts are wildly inaccurate.  Just because Trump likes to shout fake news or lame stream media when they report something he doesn’t like, that doesn’t mean the media is wrong or inaccurate.  Washington Post, NYT, mainstream media all have ethics, integrity and standards.  They use actual sources for information, sources that can be verified and multiple sources. Their opinion pieces have a bias, but their news is factual and accurate.  They post retractions and corrections when they get it wrong. There are plenty of sources like NPR, PBS, BBC, Reuters that are mostly neutral and don’t have a spin. Everyone on social media has a bias or spin.   There’s no way to know something on social media hasn’t been edited.  And people on social media do not follow journalism standards.  There is plenty of misinformation and disinformation on social media.  

Look at all if the different sources I linked.  Are you saying all if them are wrong based on your personal experience?  Maybe if that many sources are telling you the same thing, there’s something to what they’re saying.  

I was talking about your eyes. Your eyewitness account. While watching it live. As it's happening.  If you think that's inaccurate, well I'm not sure what to say.

What I'm saying is that watching something live, not selected clips which are edited after the fact and chosen selectively, is my choice. 

The fact that the Children’s Aid society became involved at all should tell you something.  And it’s too soon to declare they took no action.  The Emergencies Act prohibited children from being there.  The police were incredibly patient and gave lots of warnings to allow people to leave peacefully.

ottawa.ctvnews.ca/children-s-aid-society-urges-ottawa-convoy-protesters-to-make-arrangements-for-kids-care-1.5783725

www.ctvnews.ca/politics/emergencies-act-5-notable-new-powers-enacted-by-the-government-1.5783516

Maybe look at the actual science.  Eyewitness accounts are notoriously inaccurate.  10 people watching the same live video and see 10 different things, reach 10 different conclusions.  The other problem with live videos is that you’re only seeing something from one perspective.  What you’re seeing might be misleading if you’re only seeing what’s happening in one specific place on a specific street from a specific perspective.  Missing the forest for the trees.

www.psychologicalscience.org/teaching/myth-eyewitness-testimony-is-the-best-kind-of-evidence.html

www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/

www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/dna/photos/eye/text_06.html

theconversation.com/how-social-media-can-distort-and-misinform-when-communicating-science-59044

www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/557417264/manipulation

You know in their view that’s just government “silencing” the truth. 🙄

So you do understand the EA went into effect immediately, but still call it a peaceful protest that should be allowed to continue. OK, you be you.

The fact that CASO has had any involvement is the problem. Their actions are the reason children weren't removed. 

She posted about the “heads” of this convoy - Pat King and the others. I think I've already mentioned that if you watch a press conference with the "leaders" of the convoy, you won't see Pat King sitting at the table.

And while this convoy may have started by some who believed the mandates were wrong, it morphed into something else. Having a demand to have our elected prime minister step down so they could form a new government with the senate. That is not how our democracy works. If you watched the last press conference given by Tom Marazzo, he said that demanding that Trudeau step down was not one of their requests. The dropping of all mandates was their request.

the people sending her thousands of threats are all convoy supporters. It doesn’t matter that she’s not there walking among them. She spoke her believes and received thousands of threats because of it. Because she’s a person of colour who dared to speak out against the leaders of this convoy. What she did, in fact, was try to paint a picture that portrayed the convoy as being racist and "white nationalist". I'm going to try to explain this to you simply. People who are vehemently racist or "white nationalist" are likely not going to band together with members of all races and skin colours to unite as one, hug in public, take selfies together in public and declare in public that they love one another. Which is exactly what happened all through the protest. Most people after seeing this repeatedly, can deduce that the "racist" moniker doesn't fit. I'm sorry that you can't.

Her view is valid. So are the views of millions of Canadians who have lost their jobs permanently, committed suicide, not been able to deal with the constant stress of being unemployed, had a loved one who died alone in a hospital room, had a loved one who's funeral they couldn't attend etc. Her problem is temporary. Theirs is permanent. Hopefully you can appreciate the difference.